臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

近年來為了提升汽車駕駛的安全與舒適度，世界上已有許多國家開始投入車內資訊系統與智慧車的研發，將整合多項功能的資訊系統搭載於車輛中，以滿足駕駛愈來愈多元的使用需求。雖然車內資訊系統的發展帶來許多的便利性，但若系統的介面設計不良，不但更容易耗用駕駛人注意力資源，同時也會增加潛在的行車風險。因此在進行車內資訊系統的介面開發與設計時，必須將可用性的議題納入考量，以增加行車安全。
本研究主要目的在於結合「使用情境」與「可用性評估」等兩大部分發展出車內資訊系統的情境資料庫。以資料庫的類型而言，由於車內資訊系統的各項功能中皆包含輸入操作、輸出呈現以及使用選單等共通性介面，因此可將這些共通性的部分整合為「通則性(General)資料庫」來進行整體性評估；而針對車內資訊系統中的特定功能，本研究則以使用者的活動為基礎(Activity-Based)進行情境資料庫的分類，發展出「系統功能(System-Specific)資料庫」，對特定的系統功能進行更深入的可用性評估。
以情境資料庫的內容架構而言，本研究使用三層資料結構來描述「使用情境」部分，分別為使用目標(S1)、活動行為(S2)與細部動作(S3)；另在「可用性評估」部分亦包含三層資料結構，分別為量測項目(L1)、量測概念(L2)與量測規格(L3)。將情境資料庫分層呈現，主要目的在於讓未來產品設計開發人員應用資料庫進行新產品開發或改善現有產品時，可依照實際需求自行調整資料庫的階層架構，來增加其適用的評估目標與內容。根據情境資料庫中的各種情境分類與可用性規格描述，可對車內資訊系統逐一進行介面上的檢核、評估與測試，確認是否符合人因工程設計準則，以增加未來產品的友善性與可靠度。

In order to improve driving safety and comfort, more and more countries around the world start to engage in research and development of in-vehicle information systems (IVIS) and intelligent cars in recent years. Automobile manufacturers integrate diverse IVIS functions into vehicle to satisfy drivers’ multiple demands. The development of IVIS offers a great deal of convenience for drivers: however, a poorly designed interface not only takes more drivers’ attention resource but also increases potential driving risks simultaneously. Consequently, vehicle interface design engineers ought to consider interface usability issues in the design process to improve driving safety.
The main purpose of this study is to combine “User Scenario” and “Usability Evaluation” to develop scenario database of IVIS. Since all human-computer interfaces have input and output devices, the current study integrates them as “General Scenario Database” to identify the usability issues in interface design. In addition, this study also takes activity-based perspective to develop “System-Specific Scenario Database” for the evaluation of usability on different IVIS functions.
The scenario database uses three layers to decompose each user scenario, termed user goals (S1), activity behaviors (S2) and body actions (S3) respectively. Similarly, three layers are also used to describe interface usability evaluation, called measuring items (L1), measuring concepts (L2), and measuring specifications (L3) severally. Using hierarchical layers in scenario database will make interface design engineers easily adjust the layers to fit their practical needs. According to each scenario and usability specification, design engineers can inspect, evaluate and test the interface usability of IVIS to enhance product friendliness and reliability in the future.

摘要.....I
Abstract.....II
致謝.....III
圖目錄.....V
表目錄.....VI
第一章 緒論.....1
第一節 研究動機與目的.....1
第二節 研究內容與流程.....3
第二章 文獻探討.....5
第一節 車內資訊系統與相關研究.....5
第二節 駕駛行為、心智負荷與人機介面.....15
第三節 可用性工程與評估方法.....20
第四節 情境資料庫與產品開發.....23
第三章 研究方法.....26
第一節 資料庫建構方法.....26
第四章 研究結果.....30
第一節 發展情境資料庫架構.....30
第二節 情境資料庫.....52
第五章 情境資料庫未來應用與討論.....77
第一節 情境資料庫的階層架構發展.....78
第二節 情境資料庫的推廣應用.....79
第六章 結論與建議.....81
參考文獻.....84

中文部分：
1.方裕民(2003)，人與物的對話-互動式介面的理論與實務，田園城市出版社，臺北市。
2.朱維禮(2010)，結合指引回顧法與情境資料庫應用於車用電腦可用性分析，國立臺灣科技大學工業管理系碩士論文。
3.李青蓉(1997)，人機介面設計，空中大學，臺北。
4.財團法人資訊工業策進會(2007)，經濟部工業局96年度專案計畫執行成果報告：「推動外商來台擴大產銷合作計畫」。
5.裕隆汽車製造股份有限公司 (2009)，納智捷車用電腦THINK+使用者手冊。
6.黃禎頤(2009)，不同駕駛路況之車用導航介面設計最佳化研究，大同大學工業設計研究所碩士論文。
英文部分：
1.Adams, S. K. (2001). “Input Devices and Controls: Mannual Controls”, International Encyclopaedia of Ergonomics and Human Factors.
2.Bellet T., Tattegrain-Veste H. (1989). “A Framework for Representing Driving Knowledge”, International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 3(1), 37-49.
3.Benyon, D., Turner, P. and Turner, S. (2005). “Designing Interactive Systems: People, Activities, Contexts and Technologies”, Boston, MA: Addison Wesley.
4.Bevan, N., Kirakowski, J. and Maissel J. (1991). “What is Usability?”, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction.
5.Bevan, N., and Curson, I. (1997). “Methods for Measuring Usability”, Proceedings of the IFIP TC13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 672-673, Sydney, Australia: Chapman and Hall.
6.British Standards Institution (1980). “Safety Signs and Colours Parts 1: Colour and Design”, British Standards 5378 Part 1, London, British Standards Institution.
7.Brown, J. R. and Cunningham, S.(1989). “Programming the User Interface”, John Wiley & Sons.
8.Burnett, G.E. and Porter J.M. (2001). “Ubiquitous Computing within Cars: Designing Controls for Non-Visual Use”, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55, 521-531.
9.Carroll, J. M. (2000). “Making Use: Scenario-Based Design”, New York, NY: Wiley.
10.Campbell, J.L., Carney, C. and Kantowitz, B. H. (1998). “Huamn Factors Design Guidelines for Advanced Traveller Information Systems (ATIS) and Commerical Vehicle Operations (CVO)”, FHWA-RD-98-057, Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
11.Dingus, T. A., Antin J. F., Hulse M. C., and Wierwille W. W. (1989). “Attention Demand Requirements of an Automobile Moving-Map Navigation System”, Transportation Research Part A, 23(4), 301-315.
12.Dumas, J. S. (1988). “Designing User Interfaces for Software”, Prentice-Hall.
13.Elias M. Awad and Hassan Ghaziri (2004). “Knowledge Management”, Upper Saddle River, N. J., Prentice Hall.
14.European Commission (1998). “HMI TF. European Statement of Principles on Human Machine Interface for In-Vehicle Information and Communication Systems- Expansion of the Principles”.
15.French, R.L. (1990). “In-Vehicle Navigation-status and Safety Impacts”. Technical Papers from ITE’s, 226-235.
16.Galitz, W. O. (1996). “The Essential Guide to User Interface Design”, John Wiley & Sons.
17.Green, P. (1993). “Human Factors of In-Vehicle Driver Information Systems: An Executive Summary” (Technical Report UMTRI-93-18), Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
18.Green P., William L., Gretchen P., and Colleen S. (1994). “Suggested Human Factors Design Guidelines for Driver Information Systems”, Technical Report UMTRI-93-21, FHWA-RD-94-087.
19.Helander, M. G. (1987). “Design of Visual Displays”. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of Human Factors, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
20.Hewett, T. T. and Adelson, B. (1998). “Psychological Science and Analogical Reminding in The Design of Artifacts”, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 30, 314-319.
21.Hewett, Thomas T., Ronald B., Stuart C., Tom C., Jean G., Marilyn M., Gary P., Gary S., and William V. (2002). “ACM SIGCHI Curricula for Human-Computer Interaction”, ACM.
22.ISO 4040 (2001). “Road Vehicles - Location of Hand Controls, Indicators and Tell-Tales in Motor Vehicles”, ISO 4040.
23.ISO 9241 (1998). “Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDT)s-Part 11 Guidance on Usability”, ISO 9241-11.
24.ISO 15005 (2002). “Road Vehicles - Ergonomic Aspects of Transport Information and Control Systems - Dialogue Management Principles and Compliance Procedures”, ISO 15005.
25.ISO 15008 (2009). “Road Vehicles - Ergonomic Aspects of In-Vehicle Presentation for Transport Information and Control Systems” , ISO 15008.
26.Martin, G.L., (1988). “Configuring a Numeric Keypad for a Touch Screen”, Ergonomics, 31, 945–953.
27.McAnulty, Robert (1995). “The Politics of Contemporary Architectural Discourse, a Special Issue of Assemblage”, Critical Journal of Architecture and Design Culture, 27.
28.McDougall, S. J. P. and Osborne, D. J. (2001). “Design and Use of Displays”, International Encyclopaedia of Ergonomics and Human Factors.
29.Michael Trentacoste (2006). “Task Analysis of Intersection Driving Scenarios: Information Processing Bottlenecks”, Technical Report No. FHWA-HRT-06-033, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration.
30.Michon, J. A. (1989). “Explanatory Pitfalls and Rule-Based Driver Models”, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 21(4), 341-353.
31.MIL-STD 1472F. (1999). “Human Engineering”, American Department of Defence Design Criteria Standard.
32.Nardi, B. A. (1992). “The Use of Scenarios in Design”, ACM SIGSHI Bulletin, 24(4), 13-14.
33.Nielsen, J. and Mack, R. L. (1994). “Usability Inspection Methods”, Wiley, New York.
34.O’Hara, J.M, Brown, W.S., Lewis, P.M. and Persensky, J.J. (2002). “Human-System Interface Design Review Guidelines”, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research.
35.Paelke, G., Green, P., and Wen, C. (1992). “Development and Testing of a Traffic Information System Driver Interface” (Technical Report UMTRI 93-20), Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
36.Plannerer, B. (2005). “An Introduction to Speech Recognition”, IEEE.
37.Robert, S. G., Brian, P. and Olan, W.(2001). “Design Requirements for Automotive Entertainment Displays”, SID 2001, Vehicle Displays Conference.
38.Rumar, K. (1982). “The Human Factor in Road Safety”, Invited Paper at the 11th ARRB Conference, University of Melbourne, 23-27.
39.Rumar, K. (1990). “The Basic Driver Error: Late Detection”, Ergonomics, 33, 1281-1290.
40.Sanders, M.S. & McCormick, E.J. (1992). “Human Factors in Engineering and Design”, 7th ed., McGraw-Hill Books, New York.
41.Schank, R.C., Fano, A., Bell, B., and Jona, M. (1993). “The Design of Goal-Based Scenarios”, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(4), 305-346.
42.Shang Hwa Hsu and Jen Wei Chang (2009). “Developing a Scenario Database for Product Innovation”, M. Kurosu (Ed.): Human Centered Design, HCII 2009, LNCS 5619, 585–593.
43.Shneiderman, B. (1992). “Designing the User Interface”, Addison-Wesley.
44.Simpson, C.A.; McCauley, M.E.; Ronald, E.F.; Ruth, J.C. and Williges, B.H. (1987). “Speech Controls and Displays”, Handbook of Human Factors, New York: J. Wiley and Sons, 1490-1525.
45.Sorkin, R. D. (1987). “Design of Auditory and Tactile Displays”, Handbook of Human Factors, New York: Wiley, 549-576.
46.Stevens, A., Quimby, A., Board, A., Kersloot, T. and Burns, P. (2002). “Design Guidelines for Safety of In-Vehicle Information Systems”, PA3721-01, Transport Research Laboratory.
47.Tijerina, L., Kiger, S., Wierwille, W., Rockwell, T., Kantowitz, B., Bittner, A., Nygren, T., Myers L., Tolbert, C., and McCallum M. (1996). “Heavy Vehicle Driver Workload Assement Task 1: Task Analysis Data and Protocols Review”, DOT-HS-808-467, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
48.Verplank, B., Fulton, J., Black, A. and Moggridge, B. (1993). “Observation and Invention- Use of Scenarios in Interaction Design”, Tutorial Notes.
49.Walker, J.T. (1978). "Mobile Telephone Control Unit Design Guidelines for the Advanced Mobile Phone Service," IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, VT 27(4), 276-281.
50.Weidenhaupt, K., Pohl K., Jarke, M., Haumer P. and Aachen, T.H. (1998). “Scenarios in System Development: Current Practice”, Software, IEEE, 15, 34-45.
51.Whiteside, J. and Wixon, D., (1987). “The Dialectic of Usability Engineering”, 2nd IFIP International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction.
52.Wierwille, W. W. (1995). “Development of An Initial Model Relating Driver In-vehicle Visual Demands to Accident Rate”, Third Annual Mid-Atlantic Human Factors Conference Proceedings, Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
53.Zhang Hua and Wei Lieh Ng (2010). “Speech Recognition Interface Design for In-Vehicle System”, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications(AutomotiveUI 2010), November 11-12, 2010, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
網頁部分：
1.中華民國交通部官方網站( http://www.motc.gov.tw/ )。
2.裕隆汽車製造股份有限公司-納智捷汽車(Luxgen 7)官方網站(http://www.luxgen-motor.com.tw/)。
3.Better Place (http://www.betterplace.com/).
4.National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( http://www.nhtsa.gov/ ).