跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.87) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/05 21:56
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:陳俊達
研究生(外文):CHUN-TA CHEN
論文名稱:高績效人力資源實務與組織公平對離職意向之影響研究
指導教授:陳惠芳陳惠芳引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:東吳大學
系所名稱:國際經營與貿易學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:貿易學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2011
畢業學年度:99
語文別:中文
論文頁數:100
中文關鍵詞:高績效人力資源實務組織公平離職意向
外文關鍵詞:high-performance human resource practicesorganizational justiceturnover intention
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:225
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
在全球化的時代下,企業所要面對的是一個更加競爭激烈的商業環境,如何保留和發展有能力的員工,對高科技產業來說將是一個主要的挑戰。本研究主要是探討台灣高科技產業中,高績效人力資源實務、組織公平及離職意向之間的關係,以組成本文之研究架構。

本研究共回收有效問卷 203 份,實證分析結果發現高績效人力資源實務及組織公平對離職意向有負向影響,而高績效人力資源實務對組織公平有正向影響。除了各變項間直接關係之探討外,更進一步討論組織公平在高績效人力資源實務與離職意向關係中所扮演之角色。

本研究之主要貢獻在於提出高績效人力資源實務、組織公平及離職意向在理論與實務上的意涵,並指出企業在實務上之作法,且給予後續研究方向及建議。
The research was designed to explore how the high-performance human resource practices influence organizational justice and turnover intention. The main purpose is to examine the relationship between high-performance human resource practices, organizational justice, and turnover intention, in high-tech industry.

The research data were collected from 203 Taiwanese employees in high-tech industry. The empirical results show that high-performance human resource practices are positively related to organizational justice and is negatively related to turnover intention. Organizational justice is also negatively related to turnover intention. However, organizational justice doesn’t interfere the relationship between high-performance human resource practices and turnover intention.

The contributions of this study include two sides. Academically, it provides evidences to support the relationships between high-performance human resource practices, organizational justice, and turnover intention. Practically, it provided implications for Taiwanese high-tech industry to establish appropriate high-performance HR mechanism to help their employees, and then reduce the turnover intention. Lastly, future research directions are recommended.
第一章 緒論....................................................................................................1
第一節 研究動機..............................................................................................1
第二節 研究目的..............................................................................................4
第二章 文獻探討..............................................................................................5
第一節 高績效人力資源實務..............................................................................5
第二節 組織公平............................................................................................11
第三節 離職意向............................................................................................16
第三章 研究方法............................................................................................19
第一節 研究架構............................................................................................19
第二節 研究假設............................................................................................21
第三節 操作性定義及衡量方式.........................................................................26
第四節 研究設計............................................................................................31
第五節 樣本資料收集與分析............................................................................33
第六節 信度與效度分析..................................................................................36
第四章 研究結果............................................................................................48
第一節 相關分析............................................................................................48
第二節 假設驗證............................................................................................50
第三節 研究結果與討論...................................................................................67
第五章 結論與建議.........................................................................................70
第一節 研究結論............................................................................................70
第二節 研究貢獻與意涵...................................................................................71
第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議......................................................................73
參考文獻........................................................................................................75
附錄一 研究問卷............................................................................................92
附錄二 受訪人員資料......................................................................................97
ㄧ、中文部份:

1. 朱建平 (2003),組織成員的政治知覺對離職傾向之影響:工作滿足的中介效果,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。

2. 江育君 (2008),高績效工作系統與組織績效之關係探討 - 智慧資本之中介效果,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。

3. 呂奇樺 (2007),組織公平、企業聲望認知與組織承諾之關係探討,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。

4. 吳至英 (2007),組織公平、心理契約與派外調適對組織承諾之影響研究,東吳大學國際貿易學系碩士班國際企業組碩士論文。

5. 金珮縈 (2006),真實工作預覽對新進員工離職傾向之影響 - 以工作期望相符程度為中介變數,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。

6. 柯龍光 (2004),組織定位與工作滿意度離職傾向之關聯性研究,中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。

7. 翁麒翔 (2007),心理契約與外向性對派外調適與離職意向之影響研究,東吳大學國際貿易學系碩士班國際企業組碩士論文。

8. 郭倍宏 (2009),工作 - 家庭衝突、工作壓力、知覺主管支持與離職傾向關係研究:以輔導會所屬員工為例,國立中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。

9. 張珮琦 (2008),個人背景及幸福感與工作滿意、組織承諾、離職意向之關聯,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。

10. 張舒涵 (2004),大學院校約聘人員人格特質、工作滿意度及離職傾向之研究,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。


二、英文部份:

1. Adams, J.S. 1965. Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 2, pp. 267-299. New York: Academic Press.

2. Aryee, S., Budhwar, P. S., & Chen, Z. X., 2002. Trust as a Mediator of the Relationship between Organizational Justice and Work Outcomes: Test of a Social Exchange Model, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 23, pp. 267-285.

3. Allen, N.J. & Meyer, J.P. 2000. Construct validation in organisational behaviour research: The case of organisational commitment. In R.D. Goffin & E. Helmes (Eds.), Problems and solution in human assessment: Honoring Douglas N. Jackson at seventy pp. 285-314. Norwell, A: Kluwer.

4. Aryee, Pawan & Chen 2002. Trust as a Mediator of the Relationship between Organizational Justice and Work Outcomes: Test of a Social Exchange Model. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 23 (3), 267–285.

5. Agarwal, R. & Ferratt, T.W. 1999. Coping With Labor Scarcity in IT: Strategies and Practices for Effective Recruitment and Retention. Pinnaflex, Cincinnati, OH.

6. Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P. & Kalleberg, A. 2000. Manufacturing Advantage: Why High-Performance Work Systems Pay Off, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

7. Arthur, W. B. 1994. Inductive Reasoning and Bounded Rationality. The American Economic Review. 84 (2), 406-411.

8. Arthur, J. B. 1992. The link between business Strategy and Industrial Relations Systems in American Steel minimills, Industrial and Labor Review, pp. 488-506

9. Abelson, M. A. 1986. Strategic management of turnover :A model for the health service administrator. Health care Management Review, 11 (2), 61-71.

10. Barney J.B., 1991. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, Journal of Management, 17 (1), pp. 99-120

11. Belanger, J., A. Giles & G. Murray. 2002. Towards a New Production Model: Potentialities, Tensions and Contradictions, in Work and Employment Relations in the High Performance Workplace, ed. G. Murray et al. London and New York: Continuum.

12. Bailey T. N. 1993. The African Leopard. Ecology and behavior of a solitary felid. Columbia University Press, New York: 1-429.

13. Boxall, P., & Macky, K. 2009. Research and Theory on High-performance Work Systems: Progressing the High-Involvement Stream, Human Resource Management Journal, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 3-23.

14. Becker, B. E., Huselid, M. A., & Ulrich, D., 2001. The HR SCORECARD: linking people, strategy, and performance, Boston:Harvard Business School Press.

15. Brockner, J., Grover, S., Reed, T., DeWitt, R., O’Malley, M. 1987. Survivors’ reactions to layoffs: We get by with a little help for our friends. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32 (4), 526-541.

16. Berrin Erdogan, Robert C. Liden, Maria L. Kraimer 2006. Justice and Leader - member Exchange: The Moderating Role of Organizational Culture. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 49, No. 2, 395-406.

17. Bamberger, P., & Meshoulam, I., 2000. Human Resource Strategy, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

18. Bies, R .J. & Moag, J. S., 1986. Interactional justice:communication criteria of fairness, Research on Negotiation in Organization, Vol. 1, pp. 43-55.

19. Boretsky, M., 1982. The Threat to U.S. High-Technology Industries: Economic And National Security Implication, International administrations, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington D.C.

20. Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. 2004. Understanding HRM-Firm Performance Linkages: The Role of the "Strength" of the HRM System. Academy of Management Review, 29 (2), 203-221.

21. Becker, B.E. & Huselid, M.A. 1998. High-performance work system and firm performance: a synthesis of research and managerial implications. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, Vol. 16, pp. 53-101. G.R. Ferris (ed). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

22. Blau, P. M., 1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

23. Bedeian, A.G & Armenakies 1981. A path-analytic Study of the Consequences of Role Conflict and Ambiguity. Journal of Applied Psychology, vol 24, No 24, pp. 417-424.

24. Baltes, B. B., Briggs, T. E., Huff, J. W., & Wright, J. A. 1999. Flexible and compressed workweek schedules: Ameta-analysis of their effects on work-related criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 496–513.

25. Boshoff, C., & Mels, G. 2000. The impact of multiple commitments on intentions to resign: An empirical assessment. British Journal of Management, 11, 255-273.

26. Boxall, P. & Purcell, J. 2000. Strategic human resource management: where have we come from and where should we be going? International Journal of Management Reviews, 2: 2, 183-203.

27. Becker, B., & Gerhart, B. 1996. The impact of human resource management on organisational performance: progress and prospects. Academy of Management, 39 (4), 779‐ 801.

28. Blancero, D., Boroski, J., & Dyer, L., 1996. Key competencies for a transformed human resource organization: Results of a field study, Human Resource Management, 35(3), pp. 383-403.

29. Bies, R. J. 1987. The Predicament of Injustice: The Management of Moral Outrage. In Research in Organizational Behavior . Edited by L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. pp. 289-319.

30. Batt, Rosemary. 2002. Managing Customer Services: Human Resource Practices, Quit Rates, and Sales Growth. Academy of Management Journal. 45(3), 587-597.

31. Callas, E., 1998. Getting at the Heart of the Turnover Puzzle, Health Management Technology, (19:13), pp. 41-44.

32. Cappelli, P. & Neumark, D. 2001. Do High-Performance Work Practices Improve Establishment-Level Outcomes?, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 54, No. 4, pp. 737-775.

33. Chang, P. L. & Chen, W. L. 2002. The effect of human resource management practices on firm performance: Empirical evidence from high-tech firms in Taiwan. International Journal of Management, Vol.19 (4), pp. 622-631.

34. Cropanzano, R. & Greenberg, J., 1997. Progress in Organizational Justice: Tunneling through the Maze, in C. L. Cooper and I.T. Robertson (eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New York : Wiley, Vol. 12, pp. 317-372.

35. Cowherd, D. M., & D. I. Levine. 1992. Product quality and pay equity between lower-level employees and top management: An investigation of distributive justice theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37 (2): 302-320.

36. Chan, M., 2000. Organizational Justice Theories and Landmark Cases, The International Journal of Organizational Analysis. 8, pp. 68-88.

37. Cropanzano, R., Prehar, C. A., & Chen, P. Y. 2002. Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional justice. Group & Organization Management, 27 (3), 324-351.

38. Cropanzano, R., Byrne, Z. S., Bobocel, D. R., & Rupp, D. E. 2001. Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 164-209.


39. Delery, J., & Shaw, J. 2001. The strategic management of people in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and extension. In G. Ferris (Ed.), Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 20. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.

40. Dalton, D.R., Mesch, D.J., 1990. The impact of flexible scheduling on employee attendance and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 370–387.
Deutsch, D. 1985. Quantum theory, the church-turing principle and the universal quantum computer. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 400: 97-117.

41. De Cremer, D. 2005. Procedural and Distributive Justice Effects moderated by Organizational Identification. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20 (1), 4-13.

42. Deutsch, D. 1975. Two-channel listening to musical scales, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 57, 1156-1160.

43. Dailey, R., & D. Kirk. 1992. Distributive and procedural justice as antecedents of job satisfaction and intend to turnover. Human Relations 45 (3), 305-317.

44. Evans, W.R., W.D. Davis. 2005. High-performance work systems and organizational performance: The mediating role of internal social structure. J. Mgt. 31: 758-775.

45. Eisenberger, R., Fasalo, P. & Davis-LaMastro, V. 1990. Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 51-59.

46. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. 1986. Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500-507.

47. Folger, R., 1977. Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of “voice” and improvement on experienced inequity, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.35, pp. 108-119.

48. Folger, R. & R. Cropanzano, 1998. Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management, SAGE Publication, Inc., Thousand Oaks.

49. Guthrie, J. P., Flodd, P. C., Liu, W., & MacCurtain, S. 2009. High Performance Work System in Ireland: Human Resource and Organizational Outcomes. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(1), 112-125.

50. Guy Pare, Michel Tremblay, Patrick Lalonde 2001. The Role of Organizational Commitment and Citizenship Behaviors in Understanding Relations between Human Resources Practices and Turnover Intentions of IT Personnel. Serie Scientifique Scientific Series.

51. Greenberg, J. 1990. Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16 (2), 399-432.

52. Greenberg, J. 1986. The distributive justice of organizational performance evaluations. In H. W. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen, & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Justice in social relations pp. 337-351. New York: Plenum Press.

53. Godard, J. 2004. A critical assessment of the high-performance paradigm. British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 42 (2), pp.349–378.

54. Guthrie, J. 2001. “High-involvement work practices, turnover and productivity: evidence from New Zealand”. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44, pp. 180-192.

55. Guthrie, J.P. & Datta, D.K. 2004. HRM and firm performance: peeling back the onion. Academy of Management 2004 – Human Resources Conference Paper Abstracts, p.37.

56. Greenberg, B., 1988. Chrysomya megacephala (F.) (Diptera: Calliphoridae) collected in North America and notes on Chrysomya species present in the New World. J. Med. Entomol. 25, 199–200.

57. Gulink, D. B. 1971. The Webster’s new world dictionary of the American language. NJ: Prentice Hall.
Horgan J & P. Muhlau 2003. The adoption of High Performance Human Resource Practices in Ireland: An Integration of Contingency and Institutional Theory, Irish Journal of Management, forthcoming.

58. Huselid, M. A. 1995. The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 38 (3), 635-672.

59. Huselid, M., Jackson, S. E., & Schuler, R. S. 1997. Technical and strategic human resource management effectiveness as determinants of form performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40 (1), 171-189.

60. Haiyan Zhang & Naresh C. Agarwal 2009. The mediating roles of organizational justice on the relationships between HR practices and workplace outcomes: an investigation in China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 20, No. 3, 676–693.

61. Jarrod M. Haar & Chester S. Spell 2009. How does distributive justice affect work attitudes? The moderating effects of autonomy. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 20, No. 8, 1827–1842.

62. Johnson, R. E., Selenta, C., & Lord, R. G. 2006. When organizational justice and the self-concept meet: Consequences for the organization and its members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 99. 175-201.

63. Kochan, T.A. & Osterman P. 1994. The mutual gains enterprise: Forging a winning partnership among labor, management, and government, Harford Business School Press

64. Kidwell & Bennett 1994. Electronic Surveillance as Employee Control: A Procedural Justice Interpretation. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, Volume 5, Number 1, 39-57.

65. Kretiner, R. & Kinicki, A. 2004. Organizational Behavior, 6/e. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

66. Lawler, E. E., 1986. High-involvement Management, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

67. Leventhal, G. S., Karuza, J., & Fry, W. R. 1980. Beyond fairness : A theory of allocation preferences. In G. Mikula (Eds.), justice and social interaction, 167-218. New York: Springer-Verlag.

68. Lawler, E. E. 1992. The ultimate advantage: creating the high-involvement organization. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

69. Levine, L. J. 1995. Young children's understanding of the causes of anger and sadness. Child Development, 66, 697-709.

70. Lind, E., & Tyler, T. 1988. The social psychology of procedural justice, Plenum, New York.

71. McNee, B. Morello T. Zidar, E. & C. Smith 1998. IT Staff Retention and Recruit- ment: Addressing a Critical Problem for the IS Organization. Gartner Group Strategic Analysis Report, September 28.

72. Meyer, J.P. & Smith, C.A. 2000. HRM practices and organizational commitment: Test of a mediation model. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 17 (4), 319-331.

73. Masterson, Bartol, K. M., & Moye, N. 2000. Interactional and procedural justice: Type versus source of fairness. The 15th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, SIOP , New Orleans, LA. Academic National.

74. McFarlin, D. B., & Sweeney, P. D. 1992. Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35 (3), 626-637.

75. Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B. M., & Taylor, M. S. 2000. Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (4), 738-748.

76. MacDuffie, J. P., 1995. Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48, 197-221.

77. McCaughey, D., Bruning, N.S. 2005. Enhancing opportunities for expatriate job satisfaction: HR strategies for foreign assignment success. HR. Human Resource Planning, 28 (4), 21-29.

78. Miller, H. E., Katerberg, R., & Hulin, C. L. 1979. Evaluation of the Mobley, Horner and Hollingsworth model of employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64 (5), 509-517.

79. Mar, B. W., Newell, W. T., & Saxberg, B. O. 1985. Managing High Technology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. North-Holland, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishing.

80. Mobley, W. H., 1982. Employee Turnover: Causes, Consequences, and Control, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

81. Moorman, R. H., 1991. Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.76, pp. 845-855.

82. Mobley, W. H. 1977. Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62 (2), 237-240.

83. Mobley, W. H., Horner, S. O., & Hollingsworth, A. T. 1978. An evaluation of precursors of hospital employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(4), 408-414.

84. Michaels, C. E., & Spector, D. E. 1982. Causes of employee turnover: A test of the mobley, Griffeth, Hand and Meglino model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67 (1), 53-59.

85. Malecki, E. J., 1991, Technology and Economic Development, New York, John Wiley.

86. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Paine, J.B., & Bachrach, D.G. 2000. Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26 (3), 513-563.


87. Pare, G., Tremblay, M., 2004. The impact of human resource management practices on IT personnel commitment, citizenship behaviors, and turnover intentions. International Conference on Information System, Brisbane, Australie, p. 461-466.

88. Porter, Lyman W., Steers, Richard M., & Mowday, Richard T. 1974. “Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction, and Turnover among Psychiatric Technicians.” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 59, pp. 603-609.

89. Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. 1973. Organizational, work, and personal factors in employee turnover and absenteeism. Psychological Bulletin, 80 (2), 151-176.

90. Pare, G., Tremblay, M., & Lalonde, P. 2001. Workforce retention: What do IT employees really want?. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCPR conference on Computer personnel research, San Diego.

91. Pfeffer, J., & Langton, N. 1993. The effects of wage dispersion of satisfaction, productivity, and working collaboratively: Evidence from college and university faculty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38 (3), 382-407.

92. Paterson, J. M., Green, A., & Cary, J. 2002. The measurement of organizational justice in organizational change programmes: A reliability, validity and context-sensitivity assessment. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75: 393-408.

93. Paauwe, J. & Boselie, P. 2003. Challenging (strategic) human resource management and the relevance of the institutional setting. Human Resource Management Journal,  13/3: 56-70.

94. Pfeffer, J. 1994. Competitive Advantage through People: Unleashing the Power of the Workforce, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

95. Pfeffer, J. 1998. The Human Equation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

96. Price, J. L., & Muller, C.W. 1981. Professional turnover: The case for nurses, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.

97. Price, J. L. 1977. The study of Turnover. Ames: Iowa State University Press.

98. Roepke, R., Agarwal, R., & Ferratt, T. W., 2000. Aligning the IT Human Resource With Business Vision: The Leadership Initiative at 3M. MIS Quarterly, 24 (2), 327-353.

99. Riggs, E. K., 1983. Managing High-Technology Companies, Robert M. Hall & Donald D. Goodal, Personnel Management, Boston, Houghtom Mifflin Company, pp. 490.

100. Rappaport, A, Bancroft, E & Okum, L 2003. The Ageing Workforce Raises New Talent Management Issues for Employers, Journal of Organisational Excellence, 23, 55-67.

101. Sun, L. Y., Aryee, S., & Law, K. 2007. High-Performance Human Resource Practices, Citizenship Behavior, and Organizational Performance : A Relational Perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (3), 558-577.

102. Smith, M., & Brough, P. 2003. Personnel recruitment and selection. In O'Driscoll, M., Taylor, P., & Kalliath, T. (Eds), Organizational psychology in Australia and New Zealand pp. 31-55. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

103. Snell, S.A. & Dean, J.W., Jr. 1992. Integrated manufacturing and human resource management: a human capital perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 3, 467-504.

104. Schuler, Heinz 1993. Social validity of selection situations: A concept and some empirical results. In Schuler, H., Farr, J.L., & Smith, M. (Eds.) Personnel selection and assessment. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

105. Sousa-Poza, A. & Henneberger, F. 2004. Analyzing job mobility with job turnover intentions: An international comparative study. Journal of Economic Issues, 38 (1), 113-137.

106. Sweeney, P. D. & McFarlin, D. B. 1997. Process and Outcome: Gender Differences in the Assessment of Justice, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol.18, pp. 83-98.

107. Schein, E. H. 1990. Organizational culture. American Psychologist, 45 (2), 109-119.

108. Samuel, Pawan, & Chen 2002. Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: Test of a social exchange model. Journal of Organizational Behavior.Vol. 23, Iss.3; pg.267.

109. Tett, R. P., & Meyer, J. P. 1993. Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytic findings. Personnel Psychology, 46 (2), 259-293.

110. Thomas, S. L., & Bretz, R. D., Jr. 1994. Research and practice in performance appraisal: Evaluating performance in America’s largest companies. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 22 (2), 28-37.

111. Tepper, B. J. 2000. Consequence of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178-190.

112. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. 1975. Procedural justice: A psychology logical analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: erlbaum.

113. Tyler, T. R., & Caine, A. 1981. The influence of outcomes and procedures on satisfaction with formal leaders. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 41: 642–655.

114. Vandenberg, R. J., Richarson, H. A., & Eastman, L. J. 1999. The impact of high-involvement work process on organizational effectiveness. Group & Organization Management, 24 (3), 300-339.

115. Whitener, E. M. 2001. Do ‘high commitment’ human resource practices affect employee commitment? A cross-level analysis using hierarchical linear modeling. Journal of Management. 27 (5), 515-535.

116. Way, S. A. 2002. High performance work systems and intermediate indicators of firm performance within the US small business sector. Journal of Management, 28: 765-785.

117. Whitfield, K. & Poole, M. 1997. Organizing Employment for High Performance: Theories, Evidence and Policy, Organization Studies, Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 745-764.

118. White, M., Hill, S., McGovern, P., Mills, C. & Smeaton, D. 2003. High- Performance Management Practices, Working Hhours and Work-Life Balance. British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 175-195.

119. Welbourne, T., D. Balkin, & L. Gomez-Mejia 1995. Gainsharing and mutual mon- itoring: A combined agency-organizational justice interpretation. Academy of Man- agement Journal, 38, 881—899.

120. Williams, L. J., & Hazer, J. T. 1986. Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction and commitment in turnover models: A reanalysis using latent variable structural equation methods, Journal of Applied Psychology, 71 (2), 219-231.

121. Youndt, M.A. & Snell, S.A., 2004. Human resource configurations, intellectual capital, and organizational performance, Journal of Managerial Issues, 16 (37), 337-360.

122. Yochi & Spector, P.E. 2001. The Role of justice in organizational a meta-analysis. Organizational behavior and human decision process, 86 (2), pp. 278-321.

123. Zachoratos, A., Barling, J., & Iverson, R.D. 2005. High-performance work systems and occupational safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 90, pp. 77-84.

124. Zohar, D., 1995. The Justice Perspective of Job Stress, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 487-495.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊