跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.86) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/02/09 02:48
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:闕伶倫
研究生(外文):CHUEH,Linglun
論文名稱:企業國際化程度與創新能力對創新績效及公司價值之影響:以台灣電子資訊業為例
論文名稱(外文):The Impact of Internationalization and Innovation Capability on Innovation Performance and Firm Value: The Evidence of Taiwan’s Electronics Industry
指導教授:黃政仁黃政仁引用關係
指導教授(外文):Huang, Chengjen
口試委員:尤隨樺劉俊儒
口試委員(外文):Yu, SuihuaLiu, Chunju
口試日期:2011-06-27
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:東海大學
系所名稱:會計學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:會計學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2011
畢業學年度:99
語文別:中文
論文頁數:56
中文關鍵詞:國際化程度創新能力創新績效公司價值
外文關鍵詞:InternationalizationInnovation capabilityInnovation performanceFirm value
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:454
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:49
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
面臨全球化競爭的趨勢,企業經營已不能再是本位主義,國際化儼然成為了企業的必要課題,另外,持續不斷的創新也是企業得以永續經營的條件之一,然而在資源有限的環境下,企業應該要如何妥善配置所擁有的資源,才能創造公司永續的競爭優勢,乃企業經營者所關心的議題。本研究以2001年至2009年擁有美國專利暨商標局專利權的台灣上市櫃之電子資訊業為研究對象,探討企業創新能力與創新績效之關係,再進一步探討企業國際化程度與創新能力兩者對創新績效及公司價值之交互效果為何。實證結果發現,公司創新能力越強,則創新績效越佳,但是,國際化程度的提升對創新績效並無助益,反而會因為資源分散而使得創新績效有下降的現象,亦即國際化程度與創新能力對於創新績效存在互斥效果。另外,當公司國際化達到一定程度,若同時具有較強的創新能力,則對公司價值之創造具有正面幫助,相反的,若公司國際化程度較低,則徒具創新能力仍無法為公司創造更高的價值。
Under the trends of global competition, enterprise management should no longer be operated towards egoism. Internationalization has primarily become a dominant factor in managing an enterprise. In addition, continuing innovation is one of the criteria to sustain management. However, with the relatively scarce resource, entrepreneur has a main concern on how to properly allocate resources in order to create a sustainable competitive advantage. This paper seeks to address the relationship between enterprise innovation capability and innovation performance . Additionally, I will focus on their interaction effects towards innovation performance and firm values. The main investigated target was aimed at the firm that lists under Taiwan’s electrical information industry, goes public, and holds the patent that was issued from U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) within the period from 2001 to 2009. Based on the research results, the stronger the innovation capability, the higher the innovation performance. However, raising the degree of internationalization doesn’t seem to improve the innovation performance. The scattered resources make the innovation performance decline instead. The findings indicate the degree of internationalization and innovation capability are mutually exclusive. Despite the fact, the further research proved when the degree of internationalization reaches a certain level, stronger innovation capability tends to enhance the firm values. Contrarily, if a firm has a relatively lower perspective in internationalization, then no higher value would be made for the firm, even with existed innovation capability.
謝辭 I
摘要 II
Abstract III
目錄 IV
圖目錄 V
表目錄 VI
第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景及動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究架構 4
第貳章 文獻探討 6
第一節 創新活動與公司績效之關係 6
第二節 國際化程度與公司績效之關係 13
第三節 國際化程度與創新活動之關係 17
第四節 研究延伸 21
第參章 研究設計 23
第一節 觀念性架構 23
第二節 假說發展 24
第三節 變數衡量 27
第四節 研究模型 35
第五節 研究樣本、期間與資料來源 36
第肆章 研究結果分析 37
第一節 基本資料分析 37
第二節 研究結果 40
第三節 敏感性分析 46
第伍章 結論與建議 49
參考文獻 51

李文福與蔡秋田,2004,新產品研發技術效率及其影響因素之研究,中山管理評論,第12卷第3期︰573-593。
何信彰,2010,十大創新公司 微軟排第一,經濟日報(12月),網址:http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/jw!3n8nLS6BERqCEOjr84RJ_7.oyw--/article?mid=1367。
林宏達,2011,智慧手機股》宏達電,商業週刊,第1210期(1月),網址:http://www.businessweekly.com.tw/article.php?id=42520。
林彩梅與李嫻柔,2007,國際化程度、代理成本對經營績效關係之影響-以台灣上市電子業為例,中華管理學報,第8卷第1期:71-85。
孫梅瑞與蕭瑞子,2007,國際多角化與企業績效、企業風險的關連性及其影響因素之研究,管理與系統,第15卷第4期:617-643。
徐佳豪,2007,台灣高科技製造業附加價值影響因素實證︰以上市電子業為例,台灣經濟研究月刊,第30卷第11期:59-68。
曹壽民、紀信義與劉正良,2007,股市對創新活動的評價是否具有效率性?從研發效率與內部人交易論析,會計評論,第45期:27-45。
曹壽民與陳光政,2010,創新活動、國際化與公司績效:以台灣上市公司支國外直接投資檢測,管理學報,第27卷第3期:205-224。
喬友慶、于卓民與林月雲,2002,國際化程度與產品差異化能力對廠商績效之影響-台灣大型製造廠商之實證研究,管理學報,第19卷第5期:811-842。
黃政仁與詹佳樺,2010,創新能力、創新效率及公司價值:以台灣電子資訊業為例,2010年會計理論與實務研討會,台北。
楊朝旭、蔡柳卿與吳幸蓁,2008,最終控制股東與公司創新之績效與市場評價:台灣電子業之證據,管理評論,第27 卷第4 期:29-56。
劉正田、林修葳與金成隆,2005,創新價值鏈之路徑分析︰企業研發投資成效之實證研究,管理評論,第24卷第4期︰29-56。
蔡宜臻與邱俊榮,2007,對外直接投資與研究發展,經濟論文,第35卷第1期:53-82。
謝蕙如,2009,智慧資本轉換能力與企業績效之關聯性研究,國立政治大學碩士論文。
鐘惠玲,2011,宏達電 擠身全美第2大手機,中國時報(5月),網址:
http://times.hinet.net/times/article.do?newsid=5278145&option=infotech。
Anderson, R. C., T. W. Bates, J. M. Bizjak, and M. L. Lemmon. 2000. Corporate governance and firm diversification. Financial Management (spring): 5-22.
Autio, E., H. J. Sapienza, and J. G. Almeida. 2000. Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity and imitability on international growth. Academy of Management Journal 43(5): 909-924.
Banker, R. D., A. Charnes, and W. W. Cooper. 1984. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 30: 1078-1092.
Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantages. Journal of management 17: 99-120.
Bartlett, C. A., and S. Ghoshal. 1989. Managing across borders: The translational solution. Boston, Harvard Business School Press.
Baumol, W. J. 2002. The free-market innovation machine: Analyzing the growth miracle of capitalism, NY: Princeton University Press.
Bharadwaj, A. S., S. G. Bharadwaj, and B. R. Konsynski. 1999. Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin's q. Management Science 45(7): 1008-1024.
Bloom, N., and J. V. Reenen. 2002. Patents, real options and firm performance. The Economic Journal 112(3): C97-C116.
Blundell, R., R. Griffith, and J. V. Reenen. 1999, Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms. Review of Economic studies 66: 529-554.
Burgelman, R. 1986. Management corporate entrepreneurship:New structures forImplementing technological innovation. In Horwitch, M.(Ed.). Technology in theModern Corporation. New York:Pergaman Press.
Bushee, B. J. 1998. The influence of institutional investors in myopic R&D investment behavior. Accounting Review 73: 305.
Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operations Research 2: 429-444.
Chung, K. H., and S. W. Pruitt. 1994. A simple approximation of tobin’s q. Financial management 23: 70-93.
Cohen, W., and D. Levinthal. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128-52.
Conner, K. 1991. Theory of the firm: firm resources and other economic theories. Journal of Management 17: 121-154.
Coombs, J. E., and P.E. Bierly. 2006. Measuring technological capability and performance. R&D Management 36 (4): 421-438.
Delios, A., and P. W. Beamish. 1999. Geographic scope, product diversification, and the corporate performance of Japanese firms. Strategic Management Journal 20(8): 711-727.
Diaz-Balteiro, L., A. C. Herruzo, M. Martinez, and J. Gonzalez-Pachon. 2006. An analysis of productive efficiency and innovation activity using DEA: An application to Spain's wood-based industry. Forest Policy and Economics 8: 762-773.
Edvinsson, L., and M. S. Malone. 1997. Intellectual capital: Realizing your company’s true value by finding its hidden roots. Harper Collins Publishers,Inc.. New York.
Ettlie, J. E. 1998. R&D and global manufacturing performance. Management Science 44(1): 1-11.
Farrell, M. J. 1957. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the royal statistical society. A CXX, part 3: 253-290.
Fayermeather, J. 1969. Canadian foreign investment policy. Califonia Management Review 17(3): 74-83.
Fu, X. 2007, Foreign direct investment, absorptive capacity and regional innovation capabilities: Evidence from China. Oxford Development Studies.
Ghoshal, S. 1987. Global strategy: An organizing framework. Strategic Management Journal 8(5): 425-440.
Grant, R. M. 1987. Multinationality and performance among British manufacturing companies. Journal of International Business Studies 18(3): 79-89.
Grant, R. M., A. P. Jammine, and H. Thomas. 1988. Diversity, diversification, and profitability among British manufacturing companies. Academy of Management Journal 31(4): 771-801.
Grant, R. M. 1991. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review 33(3): 114-135.
Griliches, Z. 1990. Patent statistics as economic indicator: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature 4: 1661-1707.
Hall, B., A. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg. 2005. Market value and patent citation. The Rand Journal of Economics 36(Spring): 16-38.
Hashimoto, A., and S. Haneda. 2008. Measuring the change in R&D efficiency of the Japanese pharmaceutical industry. Research Policy 37: 1829-1836.
Hill, Charles and Scott Snell. 1988. External control, corporate strategy and firm performance in research intensive industries. Strategic Management Journal 9:577-590.
Hitt, M. A., R. E. Hoskisson, and R. D. Ireland. 1994. A mid-range theory of the interactive effects of international and product diversification on innovation and performance. Journal of Management 20(2): 297-326.
Hitt, M. A., R. E. Hoskisson, and H. Kim. 1997. International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified Firms. Academy of Management Journal 40(4): 767-798.
Kanter, R. 1988. When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior 10: 169-211.
Kim, W. C., P. Hwang, and W.P. Burgers. 1993. Multinationals' diversification and the risk-return trade-off. Strategic Management Journal 14: 275-286.
Kogut, B. 1985. Designing global strategies: Profiting from operation flexibility. Sloan Management Review. 27(1): 27-38.
Kumar, N., and A. Aggarwal. 2005. Liberalization, outward orientation and in-house R&D activity of multinational and local firms: A quantitative exploration for indian manufacturing. Research Policy. 34(4): 441-460.
Lall, S. 1992. Technological capabilities and industrialisation. World Development 20(2): 165-186.
Lanjouw, J. O., and M. Schankerman. 2004. Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators. The Economic Journal 114(4): 441-465.
Legge, J. M. 2000. The economics of industrial innovation. Review of Political Economy 12(2): 249-256.
Lev, B., and P. Sougiannis. 1996. The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R&D. Journal of Accounting and Economics 21(1): 107-138.
Lin, T., E. Ping, and W. Chiu. 2005. International diversification and performance: Evidence from singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 22(1): 65-88.
Mahrt-Smith, Jan. 2006. Organizational structure, R&D intensity and firm value. Working paper. University of Toronto.
Mansi, S. A., and D. M. Reeb. 2003. Corporate diversification: What gets discounted? Jounal of Financial 57: 2167-2183.
Narin, F. 1999. Tech-Line background paper. CHI Research: Haddon Heights.
Nagaoka, S. 2007. Assessing the R&D management of a firm in terms of speed and science linkage: Evidence from the US patents. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 16: 129-156.
Nerkar, A., and S. Paruchuri. 2005. Evolution of R&D capabilities: the role of knowledge networks within a firm. Management Science 51(5): 771-785.
O'Brien, J. P. 2003. The capital structure implications of pursuing a strategy of innovation. Strategic Management Journal 24: 415-431.
Oriani, R., and M. Sobrero. 2008. Uncertainty and the market valuation of R&D within a real option logic. Strategic Management Journal 29: 343-361.
Porter, M. E. 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.
Qian, G., L. Li, J. Li and Z. Qian, 2008. Regional diversification and firm performance. Journal of International Business Studies 39(2): 197-214.
Ramaswamy, K., K. G. Kroeck, and W. Renforth. 1996. Measuring the degree of internationslization of a firm: A comment. Journal of International Business Studies 27(1): 167-177.
Sharma, S., and V.J. Thomas. 2008. Inter-country R&D efficiency analysis: An application of data envelopment analysis. Scientometrics 76(3): 483-501.
Schoenecker T., and L. Swanson. 2002. Indicators of firm technological capability: Validity and performance implications. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 49(1): 36-44.
Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The theory of economic development. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press (first edition in German: 1912).
Sher, P. J., and P. Y. Yang. 2005. The effects of innovative capabilities and R&D clustering on firm performance: The evidence of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry. Technovation 25:33-43.
Sullivan, D. 1994. Measuring the degree of internationalization of a firm. Journal of International Business Studies 25(2): 325-342.
Tihanyi, L., D. Griffith, and C. Russell. 2005. The effect of cultural distance on entry mode choice, international diversification, and MNE performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of International Business Studies 36(3): 270-283.
Tsai, K. H. 2005. R&D productivity and firm size: A nonlinear examination. Technovation 25: 795-803.
Tsai, W. 2001. Knowledge transfer in intraorgainzational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of management Journal 44(5): 996-1004.
Teece, D.J. 1980. Economies of scope and the scope of the enterprise. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1: 223-247.
Vernon, R. 1966. International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics 80: 190-207.
Vernon, R. 1971. Sovereignty at bay: The multinational spread of U.S. enterprises. New York: Basic Books.
Wang, E. C. 2007. R&D efficiency and economic performance: A cross-country analysis using the stochastic frontier approach. Journal of Policy Modeling 29: 345-360.
Wang, E. C., and W. Huang. 2007. Relative efficiency of R&D activities: A cross-country study accounting for environmental factors in the DEA approach. Research Policy 36: 260-273.
Wang, C. H., I. Y. Lu, and C. B. Chen. 2008. Evaluating firm technological innovation capability under uncertainty. Technovation 28: 349-363
Welch, L. S., and R. Luostarinen. 1988. Internationalization: Evolution of a concept. Journal of General Management 14(2): 36-64.
Wolff, J. A., and L. T. Pett. 2006. Small-firm performance: Modeling the role of product and process improvements. Journal of Small Business Management 44 (2): 268-284 .
Yang, C.H., Y.Y. Wu and H.L. Lin. 2009. Outward investment to China and local innovation of Taiwanese manufacturing firms. Japanese Economic Review. forthcoming.
Yeoh, P. L. 2004. International learning: Antecedents and performance implications among newly internationalizing companies in an exporting context. International Marketing Review 21(4/5): 511-535.
Yuriy, G., S. Jan and T. Katherine. 2009. Globalization and innovation in emerging markets. Policy Research Working Paper 4808.
Zahra, S. A., R. D. Ireland, and M. A. Hitt. 2000. International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning and performance. Academy of Management Journal 43(5): 925-950.
Zhang, A., Y. Zhang, and R. Zhao. 2003. A study of the R&D efficiency and productivity of Chinese firms. Journal of Comparative Economics 31: 444-464.

連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top