臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

研究發展是全球各國經濟持續成長的驅動力，持續研發競爭力是關鍵，本研究以 1999 年至 2009 年625家台灣上市上櫃之電子公司為樣本，探討機構法人持股與研發活動對財務績效之影響。
本研究之機構法人持股構面變數採用外資持股比例、投信持股比例、自營商持股比例；研發活動構面變數採用研發強度、研發密度；財務績效構面變數採用毛利率、營業利益率、資產報酬率、股東權益報酬率、Tobin’s Q 值，加上控制變數有資本額、成立年數、產業別、上市櫃，並利用SPSS 14.0版執行複迴歸之統計分析工作。
結果發現，在研發活動構面變數為研發強度下，其對所有財務績效均無顯著影響，而研發活動構面變數為研發密度時，其對資產報酬率、股東權益報酬率、毛利率、營業利益率有顯著影響，僅對Tobin’s Q 值無顯著影響；在機構法人持股方面，外資持股比例對資產報酬率具有顯著影響，投信持股比例對資產報酬率、股東權益報酬率、毛利率有顯著影響，特別的是就上市電子公司而言，自營商持股比例對其資產報酬率、股東權益報酬率有顯著影響。以上結果顯示上市櫃電子公司可多進行研發密度之研發行為以及吸引外資與投信的持股，以提升資產報酬率。
關鍵字：研發強度、研發密度、財務績效、機構法人持股

Research and development is driving worldwide for the sustainable economic growth. The investigation in this study utilizes 625 respondents’ data among electronic companies in Taiwan Stock Market for measuring institution’s financial performance effect over the eleven years period of 1999 to 2009.
The constituent variables for the research on institution’s ownership include: Foreign ownership ratio, Investment trust shares ratio, Dealers stake ratio. The constituent variables for the R&D activities include: R&D strength, and R&D intensity. The constituent variables for measuring institution’s financial performance, such as, “Gross marginal profit rate, Business operation profit rate, Asset benefit return rate, and Stockholder’s benefit return rate. Tobin's Q values, as well as Gathered capital volumes, Set up years, Industry/business classifications, Business listed operations”, are implemented in the multiple regression statistical analysis by using software package SPSS 14.0 version.
The major findings consist that the R&D strength variable may not be an overall significant factor on institution’s financial performance. However, except on the values of Tobin’s Q, the R&D intensity variable may create significant impacts on Asset benefit return rate, Stockholder’s benefit return rate, Gross marginal profit rate, Business profit return rate.
In the aspect of institution’s ownership, the foreign ownership ratios may cause significant impacts on Asset benefit return rates. For the Investment trust ownership rate, it can be a significant factor on Assets benefit return rate, Stockholder’s benefit return rate, Gross marginal profit rate. With respect to business listed electronic companies, Dealer’s stake ratio may have significant impacts on Asset benefit return rate, Stockholder’s benefit return rate. Finally, these overall indicators have revealed that the business listed electronic companies will be encouraged to conduct more intensity of R & D activities and therefore mostly likely to be able to attract foreign capital & investment trust holdings, and finally to enhance institution’s financial performance on returns and assets.
Keywords：R&D strength, R&D intensity, Institution’s investors’ holding rate, Financial performance

書名頁……………………………………………………………………………………….i
論文口試委員會審定書………………………………………………………….…..iii
中文摘要……………………………………………………………………………...iv
英文摘要……………………………………………………………………………...v
謝誌…………………………………………………………………………………..vi
目錄…………………………………………………………………………………. vii
表目錄………………………………………………………………………………viii
圖目錄……………………………………………………………………………….. ix
第一章　緒論…………………………………………………………………………1
第一節　前言………………………………………………………………………1
第二節　論文章節架構流程………………………………………………………3
第三節　研究目的.............................................4
第二章　文獻探討……………………………………………………………………5
第一節　機構投資人持股…………………………………………………………5
第二節　研究發展活動…………………………………………………………..9
第三節　財務績效………………………………………………………………..16
第四節　機構投資人持股與財務績效之關係…………………………………..19
第五節　研究發展與財務績效之關係…………………………………………..22
第六節　機構投資人持股與研發活動之關係…………………………………..25
第七節　機構投資人持股與研發活動對財務績效之影響……………………..27
第三章　研究設計…………………………………………………………………..30
第一節　研究架構……….……………………………………………..………..30
第二節　研究假設………………………………………………………….…….31
第三節　研究變數及操作型定義………………………………………………..31
第四節　研究方法………………………………………………………………..38
第四章　研究結果…………………………………………………………………..45
第一節　描述性敘述統計分析…………………………………………………..45
第二節　迴歸分析結果…………………………………………………………..48
第五章　結論與建議………………………………………………..………………69
第一節　研究結論………………………………………………………………..69
第二節　研究限制………………………………………………………………..73
第三節　建議……..………………………………………………………………73
參考文獻……………………………………………………………………………..76
一、中文文獻………………………………………………………………………76
二、英文文獻..……………………………………………………………………..78

一、中文文獻
1.朱建州（1999），機構投資人與月營收資訊內涵之關聯性研究－以台灣股市為例，國立中正大學會計研究所碩士論文。
2.李雅惠（1996），企業發展研究之支出與股價報酬關係研究，東吳大學會計研究所碩士論文。
3.李馨蘋、黃啟倫（2009），股權結構、關係人交易與公司績效，中華管理評論國際學報，第12卷，第2期，1-31。
4.林淑棻 (2003），公司股權結構、董事會組成結構以及財務政策與公司經營績效關係之研究，政治大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。
5.林蕙真（2001），高等會計學新編，臺北:証業。
6.周行一、陳錦村與陳坤宏（1996），家族企業、聯屬持股與公司價值之研究，中國財務學刊，第4卷，第1期，115-139頁。
7.施其佑（2006），股權結構資本結構與公司結構價值關聯性之研究。大同大學事業經營學系研究所碩士論文。
8.黃開義、駱景堯、連世銘（2001），ISO品保系統對服務業經營績效之影響模式，中國工業工程學會九十年度年會論文集。
9.陳忠民（1996），本國產業研究發展經費與利潤、營業額之關連性，交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
10.陳鎮宇（1997），研發對台灣電子業獲利能力影響之分析，東吳大學經濟研究所碩士論文。
11.陳威廷（2001），研究發展支出與市場價值關聯性之實證研究，中國文化大學會計研究所碩士論文。
12.陳志強（2005），研究發展與權力支出對台灣光電產業長短期績效之影響，私立東海大學管理碩士在職專班（EMBA）碩士論文。
13.郭敏華（2001），財務報表分析，台北：智勝。
14.郭俊男（2004），研發專案投入對技術產出及財務績效影響之研究－以主導性新產品開發計劃為例，國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。
15.張旭玲（1998），我國股票上市公司股權結構暨經營績效之研究，國立成功大學會計學系研究所碩士論文。
16.梁玲菁（1998），我國資訊電子業研究與發展決定因素之研究，國立中興大學經濟研究所碩士論文。
17.黃麗芬（2003），景氣循環、研究發展對財務績效影響之研究－以我國上市上櫃資訊電子業為例，中原大學會計學系研究所碩士論文。
18.黃雅苓（1999），研究發展支出與經營績效關係及其費用化之探討－以台灣上市公司與非電子業為例，國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。
19.黃明潔（2002），多期損益平穩化行為之決定因素，國立政治大學會計研究所之論文。
20.許受昌（2002），資訊電子產業研究發展支出與股東報酬關聯性之研究，東吳大學會計研究所碩士論文。
21.葉銀華、柯承恩與蘇裕惠（2000），中小企業財務結構與經營績效關係之研
究，中山管理評論，第8卷，第2期，303-323頁。
22.歐進士（1998），我國企業研究發展與經營績效關聯之實證研究，中山管理評論，第6卷，第2期，357-386頁。
23.劉文平（1993），經營分析與企業診斷－企業經營系統觀，台北：華泰。
24.劉碧珍、陸雲（2004）：從廠商外銷接單、出口行為與國內外投資看台灣產業之發展，經濟部研究報告。
25.鄭嘉珮、劉錦添（1995），台灣廠商研究發展支出的分析，台灣銀行季刊，第45卷，第2期，138-152頁。
26.鄭丁旺（2001），中級會計學，台北：鄭丁旺。
27.謝淑娟（1994），觀點探討股權與公司經營績效之關係－以台灣上市公司為實證。交通大學事業管理科學研究所碩士論文。






二、英文文獻
1.Bange, M. M. and Debondt, W.（1998）, R&D Budgets and Corporate Earnings Targets. Journal of Corporate Finance, 4, No. 2, 153-84.
2.Branch, B.（1974）, Research and Development Activity and Profitability：A Distributed Lag Analysis. Journal of Political Economy, Vol.82, No.5, 999-1011.
3.Bushee, B. J.（1998）, The Influence of Institutional Investors on Myopic R&D Investment Behavior. Accounting Review 73, No.3, 305-33.
4.Bushee, B. J.（2001）, Do institutional investors prefers near-term earnings over long-run value？Contemporary Accounting Research, 18 (Summer)：207-46.
5.Brancato, C. K.（1997）, Institutional Investors and Corporate Governance：Best Practices for Increasing Corporate Value, Chicago, IL：Irwin Professional Publishing.
6.Bushee, B. J. (2001), Do institutional investors prefers near-term earnings over long-run value？Contemporary Accounting Research, 18 (Summer)：207-46.
7.Cooper, R. G.（1985）, industrial Firm’s New Product Strategies？Journal of Business Research, Vol.13, Issue：2, 107-121.
8.Chung, K. W. and S.W. Pruitt,（1994）, A Simple Approximation of Tobin Q. Financial Management,Vol.3, 70-74.
9.Dobrzynski, J.（1993）, Relationship investing. Business Week 3309 (March 15) ：68-75.
10.Eng, L., and Shackell M.（2001）, The implications of long-term Performance plans and Institutional Ownership for Firms, research and Development Investments. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 16：117-139.
11.Ferris, S. P. and Park, K.（2005）, Foreign Ownership and Firm Value：Evidence From Japan, Advances in Financial Economics, Vol.11, 1-29
12.Graves, S. B.（1988）, Institutional ownership and corporate R＆D in the computer industry. Academy of Management Journal 31：417-427.
13.Graves, S. A, and Waddock S.（1990）, Institutional Ownership and Control： Implication for long-term Corporate Strategy. Academy of Management Executive 4, 75-83.
14.Griliches（1990）, Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey, Journal of Economic Literature, 237, 31-35. Management 31, 67-84.
15.Grossman, S., Hart, O.（1980）, Takeover, Bird, the Free Rider Problem and the Theory of the Corporation. Bell Journal of Economics, 11, 42-64.
16.Hand, J.（1990）, A test of extended functional fixation hypothesis. The Accounting Review 65 (October)：740-763.
17.Hansen, G. C. and Hill, C. W. （1991）, Institutional Investor Myopia A Time-Series Study of Four Technology Driven Industry. Strategic Management Journal, 12, No.1, 1-16.
18.Hill, C. W.（1991）, CEO Tenure as a Determinant of CEO Pay. Academy of Management Journal, 34, No.3, 707-17.
19.Hirschey, M. and Weygandt, J.（1995）, Amortization Policy for Advertising and R&D Expenditures, Journal of Accounting Research, 326-335.
20.Hultink, E. J. and H. S. J. Robben（1995）, Measuring New Product Success:The different That Time Perspective Makes.Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.12, Issue：2, 99-122.
21.Jarrell, G. A., Ken, L. and Wayne, M.（1985）, Institutional Ownership, Tender Offer and long-term Investments. Working Paper. Office of the Chief Economist, Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, D. C.
22.Jacobs, M.（1991）, Short-Term America：The Causes and Cures of Our Business Myopia. Boston, MA：Harvard Business School Press.
23.Lin, B. W., Lee, Y. and Hung, S. C.（2006）, R&D Intensity and Commercialization Orientation Effects on Financial Performance Journal of Business Research, Vol.59, Issue：6, 679-685.
24.Lev, B. and T. Sougiannis.（1996）, The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R＆D. Journal of Accounting and Economics 21：107-138.
25.Morbey G. K. （1988）, “R＆D：Its Relationship to Company Performance”, Journal to Product Innovation Management, Vol.5, Issue：3, 191-200, Sep.
26.Morbey, G. K and R. M. Reithner (1990), “How R&D Affects Sales Growth, Productivity and Profitability.”Research Technology Management, 33(3),11-14.
27.Morbey, G. K. and S. S. Dugal（1992）, “Corporate R&D Spending During a Recession.” Research Technology Management, 35(4), 42-46.
28.McConnell, J. J, and Servases, H.（1990）, Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value. Journal of Financial Economics 27：595-612.
29.McConnell, J. J., and Servases, H.（1995）, “Equity Ownership and Two Factors of Debt”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.37, 131-157.
30.Monks, R., and N. Minow.（1995）, Corporate Governance. Cambridge, MA：28. Blackwell. Myers, S.（1984）, The capital structure puzzle. Journal of Finance 39(July)：575-592.
31.Opler, T., and J. Sokobin.（1997）, Does coordinated institutional shareholder activism work？An analysis of the Council of Institutional Investors. Working paper .Ohio State University.
32.Porter, M.（1992）, Capital Choices：Changing the Way America Invests in Industry Boston, MA：Council on Competitiveness/Harvard Business School.
33.Pound, J.（1988）, Proxy Contests and the Efficiency of Shareholder Oversight. Journal of Financial Economics 20：237-265.
34.Rajgopal et al,（1998）, The Role of Institutional Investor in Corporate Governance：An Empirical Investigation, Working Paper. University of Washington.
35.Sougiannis, T.（1994）, The Accounting Based Valuation of Corporate R&D. The Accounting Review, Vol.69, No.1, 44-68.
36.Taffler, R. J. and P. Sudarsanam（1980）, editing The Board: A New Approach To Measurement of Company Performance Managerial Finance, Vol.5, Issue：2, 125-47.
37.Tobin, J.（1969）, A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol.1, No.1, 15-29.
38.Venkatraman, N. and V. Ramanujam（1986）, Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research：A Comparison of Approaches The Academy of Management Review, Vol.11, Issue：4, 801-814.
39.Wahal, S. and McConnell. J. J.（2000）, and Bange, Institutional Investors Exacerbate Managerial Myopia Journal of Corporate Finance, 6, No.3, 307-329.
40.Wang J. C. and Tsai（2002）, Productivity Growth and R&D Expenditure in Taiwan Manufacturing Firms .Working Papers.
41.Zhao, H. and H. Li （1997）, “R&D and Export：An Empirical Analysis of Chinese Manufacturing Firms.” The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 8(2), 89-105.