跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.192.48.196) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/06/14 17:45
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:黃凱榛
研究生(外文):Kai-Chen Huang
論文名稱:領導風格、知識分享意願與組織承諾之關連性研究
論文名稱(外文):The Relationships among Leadership Style, Knowledge Sharing and Organizational Commitment
指導教授:李弘暉李弘暉引用關係
指導教授(外文):Hung-Hui Li
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:元智大學
系所名稱:經營管理碩士在職專班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2011
畢業學年度:99
語文別:中文
論文頁數:65
中文關鍵詞:領導風格;知識分享意願;組織承諾
外文關鍵詞:Leadership StyleKnowledge SharingOrganizational Commitment
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:209
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
在時代的不斷變化下,企業競爭優勢的來源就是知識,組織運用知識來提高其價值性及不易模仿性,成為企業的核心競爭能力。任何組織的成功在於它能夠利用知識分享創造、 散播及使用新的知識,以維持長久的競爭力。知識分享的關鍵不在技術而是在人,根據以往一些研究結果顯示:主管與部屬的關係是決定員工如何善用智慧與經驗的最大因素。此外,員工需要透過一股強烈的信仰,願意接受組織的目標與價值,而為組織的利益來努力,並期望透過組織成員對組織的這種承諾能夠超越自身的利益而提高知識分享的意願。因此希望透過本研究全面探討領導風格、知識分享意願與組織承諾的關聯性,並透過土木建築業、資訊科技業、醫療相關行業、軍公教業、服務業、金融業等不同產業之實證,比較不同產業在各變項間是否有差異存在。
本研究採用問卷調查法,共發出212份問卷,回收193份,有效問卷為191份。利用SPSS統計軟體,進行描述性統計分析、相關分析、變異數分析與迴歸分析來驗證本研究之假設。
本研究結果顯示:
一、領導風格對知識分享意願無顯著的影響。
二、領導風格對組織承諾無顯著的影響。
三、知識分享意願對組織承諾無顯著的影響。

關鍵字:領導風格、知識分享意願、組織承諾



In current times of continual change, the competitive advantage comes from knowledge. Organizations using knowledge to add value and difficult to imitate, enhance the core competitiveness of enterprises. The success of any organization lies in its ability to utilize knowledge-sharing practices and procedures to create, disseminate and use new knowledge in order to outlive or outlast the competition. The key point is not about using advanced technology, but people sharing knowledge. According to previous researches, a major factor for how the employee uses his or her knowledge and experience depends on the relationship between employers and employees. Besides, the employees need to have a strong belief for accepting the values and goals of the organization. Arousing employees'' organizational commitment, willing to go beyond their own benefit is most likely to increase willingness to share knowledge. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to discuss the relationships among leadership style, employees’ knowledge sharing and organizational commitment.
This survey used the questionnaire as a research method. The samples were people in construction industry, information technology, medical service industry, military, civil, and teaching personnel, servicing industries and financial industry, in order to find out if there is any difference in the variables.
This study adopts the method of investigation through questionnaires. 212 questionnaires had been sent; there were 191 valid questionnaires among them. After collecting all questionnaires, I used SPSS statistical software to conduct Descriptive Statistical Analysis, Correlation Analysis, Variance Analysis and Regression Analysis for testing the hypothesis in this research.
The results of this study are shown as follows:
1.There was no significant difference effect on leadership style over the knowledge-sharing willingness.
2.There was no significant difference effect on leadership style over the organizational commitment.
3.There was no significant difference effect on knowledge-sharing willingness over the organizational commitment.

Keywords: Leadership Style, Knowledge Sharing, Organizational Commitment

書名頁.....................................................i
論文口試委員審定書 .......................................ii
授權書...................................................iii
中文摘要..................................................iv
英文摘要...................................................v
誌謝.....................................................vii
目錄....................................................viii
表目錄....................................................ix
圖目錄.....................................................x
第一章 緒論................................................1
第一節 研究背景與動機......................................1
第二節 研究目的............................................3
第三節 研究流程............................................3
第二章 文獻探討............................................5
第一節 領導風格............................................5
第二節 知識分享...........................................11
第三節 組織承諾...........................................16
第四節 領導風格、知識分享意願與組織承諾之關連.............19
第三章 研究方法...........................................21
第一節 研究架構...........................................21
第二節 研究假設...........................................22
第三節 研究變相之操作性定義...............................22
第四節 研究對象...........................................25
第五節 資料分析方法.......................................25
第四章 研究結果與分析.....................................27
第一節 描述性統計分析.....................................27
第二節 相關分析...........................................34
第三節 變異數分析.........................................36
第四節 迴歸分析...........................................45
第五章 結論與建議.........................................48
第一節 研究結論...........................................48
第二節 研究建議...........................................53
第三節 研究限制與檢討.....................................54
參考文獻..................................................56
附錄一 領導風格問卷.......................................60



中文書目參考:
1. 林孟彥(譯)(2003)。Stephen P. Robbins, Mary Coulter著。管理學(Management)(第七版)。台北市:華泰。
2. 林秋慧:組織承諾與工作滿意對員工知覺服務品質影響之研究—以休閒健身俱樂部為例。南亞學報第二十六期,pp.309
3. 林坤燕(2006)。國小級任教師如何運用領導理論提昇班級經營效能。網路社會學通訊期刊,第58期。2006年11月15日
4. 邱吉鶴(2008),行政領導與績效管理,台北市:秀威資訊科技,pp.35-36
5. 吳百祿(2006):知識經濟時代的領導理論。學校行政雙月刊,第43期,pp.22-35
6. 胡瑋珊(譯)(1999)。Thomas H. Davenport& Laurence Prusak著。知識管理(Working Knowledge)。台北:聯經,pp.32.。
7. 胡蘭沁、黃建皓(2008.4):從校長領導卓越獎探討轉型領導之內涵及其對校長領導之啟示。研習資訊雙月刊,第25卷第2期,pp.101-106。
8. 許月娥(2006),領導行為、知識分享意願只組織公民行為意向關係之研究,元智大學管理研究所碩士論文。
9. 許熾榮(2001),組織核心技術能力辨識研究,國立交通大學科技管理所碩士論文。
10. 黃銘廷(2002),公務人員之事分享意願、組織信任與組織文化之關係研究,台灣科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文。
11. 簡建忠:員工工作知識分享意願及影響因素—台灣省自來水公司個案研究。國立中正大學勞工研究所碩士論文,2005,pp.20
12. 顏忠漢(2009),員工組織承諾、工作滿意度與離職傾向之關聯性研究-以臺北市健康服務中心為例,國立臺灣大學公共衛生學院醫療機構管理研究所碩士論文。
13. 羅虞村(1995),領導理論研究,台北:文景,pp.58.

英文參考文獻:
1. Arthur Andersen and The American Productivity and Quality Center. 1996. The Knowledge Management Assessment Tool: External Benchrnarking Version.
2. Arthur Andersen Business Consulting (1999),Zukai Knowledge management, Tokyo: Toyo Keizai
3. Avolio, B. J. (1999). Full leadership development: Building the vital forces in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Bart H., Jan A. (2004). Knowledge sharing in context: the influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing, Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(6), 117–130.
5. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectation. N.Y.: The Free Press.
6. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J.(1990). Transformational leadership development:Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA:Consulting Psychologists Press.
7. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Becker, H.S. 1960. Notes on the content of commitment. American Journal of Sociology. 66. pp.32-42.
9. Bennis, W. & Nanus, B (1985). Leaders: The Strategies for Taking Charge. New York: Harper & Row,pp.244.
10. Bock, G.-W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y.-G., & Lee, J.-N. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(No.1), 87-111.
11. Bryman, A.(1993). Charisma and Leadership in Organizations. London Newbury, CA:Sage.
12. Buchanan, B. Ⅲ., (1974). Government manager, business executive and organizational commitment. Public Administration Review, 34, 339-347.
13. Burns, J. M.(1978).Leadership .New York:Harper and Row.
14. Bycio, P., Hackett, R., & Allen, J. (1995). Further assessment''s of Bass''s (1985) conceptualization of transactional and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.80, No.4,pp.468-478.
15. Conger, J. A. & Kanungo, R. N. (1998). Charismatic leadership in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Davenport, Thomas H., and Lawrence Prusak. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, P.34
17. Dixon, Nancy M. (2000), Common knowledge. How companies thrive by sharing what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
18. Donald, H. (2003). Linking human resource management and knowledge management via commitment: A review and research agenda. Employee Relations, 25(2), 182–202.
19. Downton, J.V., Rebel Leadership: Commitment and Charisma in the Revolutionary Process. The Free Press, New York, 1973.
20. Drath, W. H., & Palus, C. J. (1994). Making common sense: Leadership as meaning-making in a community of practice. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.
21. Drucker, P. 1998. Peter Drucker on the profession of management. The President and Fellows of Harvard College.
22. Drucker, P. F. (1993). Post-Capitalist Society. New York: Harvard Business.
23. Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., and Davis-LaMastro, V., 1990. Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation, Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1): 51-59.
24. Etzioni, A. (1961), Modern Organizations, Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall Hall, D., Schneider, B., & Nygren, H. (1970). Personal factors in organizational identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, pp.176-89.
25. Hemphill, J. K. and Coons, A. E. (1957). "Development of the Leader behavior Description Questionnaire." In Leader Behavior, Columbus: Ohio State University, pp 1-18
26. Hendriks, P. (1999) “Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing”. Knowledge and Process Management, Vol. 6. No. 2 pp. 91-100
27. Hersey, P. and Blanchard, K. H. (1969), “Life Cycle Theory of Leadership,”Training and Development Journal, Vol. 23, PP. 26-34.
28. Hickins, M. 1999. Xerox shares its knowledge. Management Review, 88(8): 40-45.
29. Hoof, B. V., & Ridder, J. A. (2004). Knowledge sharing in context: The influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8 (6), pp117-130.House, R. J. (1971), A path goal theory of leader effectiveness, Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, pp. 321-339.
30. House, R., & Baetz, M. L. (1979). Leadership: Some empirical generalizations and new research directions. Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 1, pp.341-423.
31. House, R. J. (1977). A 1976 theory of charismatic leadership. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.). Leadership: The cutting edge. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
32. House, R. J. & Aditya, R. N. (1997). The social scientific study of leadership: Quo Vadis? Journal of Management. 23: 409 - 473.
33. Hrebiniak, L.G and Alutto J.A. (1972). Personal and role-related factors in the development of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, pp.555-572.
34. Huysman, M., & Dirk de Wit (2002). Knowledge Sharing in Practice. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
35. Janda, K. F.(1960).”Towards the explication of the concept of leadership in terms of the concept of power”. Human Relations (HR), 13, pp.345-363.
36. Kanter, R.M. (1968), Commitment and Social Organization: A study of Commitment Mechanisms in Utopian Communities, American Sociological Review, 33, pp.499-517.
37. Koontz, J. L.(1990). Taking a Lesson from McDonald’s Production. 29-31.
38. Kuan-Tsae Huang, Yang W. Lee, Richard Y. Wang. 1999,Quality Information and Knowledge, Prentice Hall PTR, pp.115.
39. McKenzie, J., Truch, A., & Winkelen, C. (2001). Winning commitment for knowledge management initiatives. Journal of Change Management, 2 (2), 115-127.
40. Meyer, J. P. & Allen , N. J. 1990. Affective and continuance commitment to the organization: Evaluation of measures and analysis of concurrent and time lagged relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: pp.710-720.
41. Mowday, R.T., L.W. Porten & R.W. Steens (1982), Employee-Organization Linkage. New York: Academic Press.
42. Musen, A. M. (1992), Dimensions of knowledge sharing and reuse, Computers and Bio-Medical Research, Vol.25, pp.435-467.
43. Nonaka, I. & H.Takeuchi, (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press.
44. Porter LW, RM. Steers , R.T. Mowday & P.V. Boulian (1974), Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction, and Turnover among Psychiatric Technicians, Journal Apply Psychology, 59(5), pp.603-609.
45. Quinn, J.B., Anderson, P., and Finkelstein, S. (1996). Managing Professional Intellect: Making the Most of the Best. Harvard Business Review, March-April.
46. Robbins, Stephen P. and Mary Coulter (2002),Management,7TH international ed., Upper Saddle ,NJ; Prentice Hall.
47. Stephen P. Robbins & Mary Coulter(2005),Management, 8 th ed.
48. Robertson, M., & Hammersely, G. O. (2000). Knowledge management practices within a knowledge-intensive firm: The significance of the people management dimension. Journal of European Industrial Training, 24 (2-4), 241-253.
49. Ruggles, R. (1998). The State of Notion: Knowledge Management in Practice. California Management Review, 40(1), 80-89.
50. Salancik, G.R. (1977). Commitment and the control of organizational behavior and belief. In B. W. Staw & G. R. Salancik (Eds.),
New directions in organizational behavior .Chicago: St Clair. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 40-64.
51. Scarbrough, H., & Carter, C. (2000). Investigating knowledge management. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel Development.
52. Seviby, K.,1997, The new Organizational Wealth, San Francisco:Berrett Koehler.
53. Sheldon,M. (1971) Investments and involvements as mechanisms producing commitment to the organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, pp.142-150.
54. Steven, J.M., J.M. Beyer & H.M. Trice(1978),Assessing Personal, Role and Organization Predictors of Managerial Commitment, Academy of Management Journal, 21(1), p.382.
55. Stogdill, R.M.(1948). Personal factors associated with leadership:A survey of the literature. Journal of Psycology,25, pp 35-71
56. Teece, D., G. Pisano and A. Shuen, 1997. “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management,” Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509.
57. Thompson, M., & Heron, P. (2005). The difference a manager can make: organizational justice and knowledge worker commitment. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16 (3), 383-404.
58. Wiener, Y. 1982. Commitment in organizations. A normative view. Academy of Management Review. 7(3). Pp.418-428
59. Yammarino, F. J., Spangler, W. D., & Bass, B. M. (1993). Transformational leadership and performance: a longitudinal investigation. Leadership Quarterly, 4, 81–102.
60. Yukl, G. A.(1994). Leadership in Organizations, 3rdEdition, Englewood Cliffs New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.


QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 領導風格對組織承諾及組織公民行為影響之研究--以桃園縣政府為例
2. 醫院員工領導型態、工作滿意度、組織承諾及離職傾向之研究
3. 企業主管領導型態與員工溝通滿足及組織承諾之關係研究:以臺灣石化業為例
4. 托兒所所長領導型式、托兒所組織氣氛、保育人員組織承諾與服務機構組織績效關係之研究--以台北市為例
5. 軍事組織領導型態與組織承諾、組織公民行為之關係研究--以陸軍單位為例
6. 企業領導者更迭下的員工協助策略研究--以金融服務業為例
7. 台南地區幼稚園園長領導風格、教師工作價值觀與教師組織承諾關係之研究
8. 文化中心主任領導型態與成員組織承諾之關係
9. 領導型態對工作投入、工作滿足、組織承諾與組織公民行為之影響關係研究-以台電公司為例
10. 工作特性、組織社會化對組織承諾之關係研究─以主管領導風格與員工工作動機為干擾變數
11. 領導型態、激勵制度、人格特質與組織承諾關係之研究─以台灣地區民營銀行為例
12. 領導行為、組織公平、信任、組織承諾與組織公民行為關係之研究-以國際觀光旅館員工為例
13. 領導風格與工作滿意度對情感性承諾影響之研究
14. 政府機關人員組織承諾影響因素之研究--以嘉義縣政府為例
15. 領導型態、組織承諾對工作績效影響之研究─以高雄市區公所里幹事為例