英文部分:
1.Alaszewski, A. (2003). Risk, trust and health. Health, Risk & Society, 5(3).
2.Anon (2004). Consumer food handling practices indicate need for food safety education: a summary of research, Wisconsin Nutrition Education Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, available at: www.uwex.edu/ces/wnep/files/05resfdsaf.pdf
3.Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51:1173–1182.
4.Bauer, R. A. (1960). Consumer behavior as risk taking, dynamic marketing for a changing world. Chicago: American Marketing Association.
5.Berry, D., Raynor, T., Knapp, P., & Bersellini, E. (2004). Over the counter medicines and the need for immediate action: A further evaluation of European Commission recommended wordings for communicating risks. Patient Education and Counseling, 53:129–134.
6.Bier, V. M. (2001). On the state of the art: risk communication to the public. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 71(2):139–50.
7.Bier, V. M. (2001). On the state of the art: risk communication to decision–makers. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 71(2):151–7.
8.Bloom, D. L., Byrne, D. M., & Andresen, J. M. (1993). Communicating risk to senior EPA policy makers: a focus group study. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.
9.Borgida, E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1977). The differential impact of abstract vs. concrete information on decisions. Appl Soc Psychol, 7:258–71.
10.Brun, W., & Teigen, K. H. (1988). Verbal probabilities: Ambiguous, context–dependent, or both? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41:390–404.
11.Boulding, W., & Kirmani, A. (1993). A consumer–side experimental examination of signaling theory:Do consumers perceive warranties as signals of quality? Journal of Consumer Research, 20(1):111–123.
12.Brown R., & Ulvila, J. W. (1987). Communicating uncertainty for regulatory decisions. In: Covello VT, Lave LB, Moghissi A, Uppuluri VRR, editors. Uncertainty in risk assessment, risk management, and decision making. New York: Plenum Press.
13.Bruhn, C. (1997). Consumer concerns: motivating to action. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 3(4):511–515.
14.Budescu, D. V., & Wallsten, T. S. (1990). Dyadic decisions with numerical and verbal probabilities. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46:240–263
15.Chandran, S., & Menon, G. (2004). When a day means more than a year: Effects of temporal framing on judgments of health risk. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2):375–389.
16.Churchill, G. A. Jr. (1995), Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations, 6th Edition, New York: The Dryden Press.
17.Cameron, L. D., & Diefenbach, M. A. (2001). Responses to information about psychosocial consequences of genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: Influences of cancer worry and risk perceptions. Journal of Health Psychology, 6:47–59.
18.Chapman, G. B., & Coups, E. J. (1999). Predictors of influenza vaccine acceptance among healthy adults. Preventive Medicine, 29:249–262.
19.Chapman, G. B., & Coups, E. J. (2006). Emotions and preventive health behavior: Worry, regret, and Influenza vaccination. Health Psychology, 25(1):82–90
20.Constans, J. I. (2001). Worry propensity and the perception of risk. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 39:721–729.
21.Chess, C., Hance, B. J. & Sandman, P. M. (1989). Planning Dialogue with Communities: A Risk Communication Workbook, Environmental Communication Research Programme (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press).
22.Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. (2004). The risk–based view of trust: a conceptual framework, Journal of Business and Psychology, 19(1).
23.DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development theory and applications. Sage Publications, Newbury, CA.
24.Diefenbach, M. A., Miller, S. M., & Daly, M. B. (1999). Specific worry about breast cancer predicts mammography use in women at risk for breast and ovarian cancer. Health Psychology, 18:532–536.
25.Easterling, D. V., & Leventhal, H. (1989). Contribution of concrete cognition to emotion: Neutral symptoms as elicitors of worry about cancer. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74:787–796.
26.Eckela, C. C., & Wilsonb, R. K. (2004). Is trust a risky decision? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55: 447–465.
27.Erev, I., & Cohen, B. L. (1990). Verbal versus numerical probabilities: Efficiency, biases, and the preference paradox. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 45:1–18.
28.Finucane, M., & Holup, J. (2005).Psychosocial and culture factors affecting the perceived risk of genetically modified food: an overview of the literature. Social Science & Medicine, 60:1603–1612.
29.Fisher, A., King, R., Hewitt, W., Epp, D. J., Finley, K., Brown, J. L., & Maretzki, A. N. (1992). Understanding food safety policy issuesÐreport on model materials, University Park, PA: Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Pennsylvania State University.
30.Fisher, A., King, R., Epp, D. J., Brown, J. L., & Maretzki, A. N. (1994). Evaluating alternatives for communicating about food risk. Journal of Applied Communications, 78(2):1–11.
31.Flynn, J., Slovic, P., & Merta, C. K. (1994). Gender, Race, and perception of environmental health risks. Risk Analysis, 14:1101–1108.
32.Flin, R., Mearns, K., Fleming, M., & Gordon, R. (1996). Risk perception and safety in offshore workers. Safety Science, 22:131–145.
33.Fox, C. R., & Irwin, J. R. (1998). The role of context in the communication of uncertain beliefs. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 20:57–70.
34.Frewer, L. (1999). Public risk perceptions and risk communication. Risk communication and public health. New York: Oxford university press.
35.Gay, L. R. (1992). Educational research competencies for analysis and application, Florida International University, New York.
36.Garretson, J. A., & Clow, K. E. (1999). The influence of coupon fair value on service quality expectation, risk perception and purchase intention in the dental industry. Journal of Service Marketing. 13(1):59–72.
37.Gefen, D. (2000). E–commerce: the role of familiarity and trust. Omega, 28(6): 725–737.
38.Gigerenzer, G., & Hoffrage, U. (1995). How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review, 102:684–704.
39.Greening, L., Chandler, C. C., Stoppelbein, L., & Robison, L. J. (2005). Risk perception: Using conditional versus general base rates for risk communication. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35:2094–2122.
40.Gurmankin, A. D., Baron, J., & Armstrong, K. (2004). The effect of numerical statements of risk on trust and comfort with hypothetical physician risk communication. Medical Decision Making, 24:265–271.
41.Gurmankin, A. D., Baron, J., & Armstrong, K. (2004). Intended message versus message received in hypothetical physician risk communications: Exploring the gap. Risk Analysis, 24:1337–1347.
42.Hendrickx, L., Vlek, C., & Oppewal, H. (1989). Relative importance of scenario information and frequency information in the judgment of risk. Acta Psychologica, 72:41–63.
43.Hoffrage, U., & Gigerenzer, G. (1998). Using natural frequencies to improve diagnostic inferences. Acad Med, 73:538–40.
44.IRGC (2005) White paper on risk governance. towards an integrative approach., Author O. Renn with an annex by P. Graham (Geneva: International Risk Governance Council).
45.Joslyn, S. L., Limor, N., Taing, M. U., & Nichols, R. M. (2009). The effects of wording on the understanding and use of uncertainty information in a threshold forecasting decision. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23:55–72.
46.Koehler, J. J. (2001). When are people persuaded by DNA match statistics? Law and Human Behavior, 25:493–513.
47.Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). Variants of uncertainty. Cognition, 11:143–157.
48.Gigerenzer, G. (2002). Reckoning with risk. Learning to live with uncertainty. London: Penguin Books.
49.Kaplan, S. (1983). On a `two–stage'' Bayesian procedure for determining failure rates from experiential data. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS–102:195–202.
50.Kasperson, R. E., Golding, D., & Tuler, S. (1992). Social distrust as a factor in siting hazardous facilities and communicating risks. Journal of Social Issues, 48(4):161–78.
51.Kennedy, J., Worosz, M., Todd, E. C., & Lapinski, M. K. (2008). Segmentation of US consumers based on food safety attitudes. British Food Journal, 110(7):691–705
52.Keller, P. A., Lipkus, I. M., & Rimer, B. K. (2002). Depressive realism and health risk accuracy: The negative consequences of positive mood. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(1):57–69.
53.Kimery, K. M., & McCord, M. (2002), Third–party assurances: mapping the road to trust in e–retailing. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 4 (2):63–82.
54.Kim, K., & Prabhakar, B. (2004), Initial trust and the adoption of B2C e–commerce: The case of Internet banking. ACM SIGMIS Database, 35(2):50–64.
55.Klinke, A., & Renn, O. (2002). A new approach to risk evaluation and management: risk–based, precaution–based and discourse–based management. Risk Analysis, 22(6):1071–1994.
56.Krishnamurthy, P., Carter, P., & Blair, E. (2001). Attribute framing and goal framing effects in health decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85(2):382–399.
57.Kuhberger, A. (1998). The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta–analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75:23–55
58.Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(2):149–188.
59.Levin, I. P., Gaeth, G. J., Schreiber, J., & Lauriola, M. (2002). A new look at framing effects: distribution of effect sizes, individual differences, and independence of types of effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88:411–429.
60.Levin, I. P., Johnson, R. D., Russo, C. P., & Deldin, P. J. (1985). Framing effects in judgment tasks with varying amounts of information. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36:362–377.
61.Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76:149–188.
62.Leventhal, H., Diefenbach, M. A., & Leventhal, E. A. (1992). Illness cognition: Using common sense to understand treatment adherence and affect cognition interactions. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 16:142–163.
63.Lin, Y. C., Lin, C. H., & Raghubir, P. (2003). Avoiding anxiety, being in denial, or simply stroking self–esteem: Why self–positivity? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(4):464–477.
64.Lindsey, S., Hertwig, R., & Gigerenzer, G. (2003). Communicating statistical DNA evidence. Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science, and Technology, 43:147–163.
65.Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127:267–286.
66.Lundgren, R., & McMakin, A. (1998). Risk communication: a handbook for communicating environmental, safety, and health risks. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.
67.Lundgren, R. E. (1994). Risk Communication: A Handbook for Communicating Environmental, Safety, and Health Risks (Columbus: Battelle Press).
68.Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3):709–734.
69.Mazur, D. J., Hickam, D. H., & Mazur, M. D. (1999). How patients’ preferences for risk information influence treatment choice in a case of high risk and high therapeutic uncertainty: Asymptomatic localized prostate cancer. Medical Decision Making, 19:394–398.
70.Marteau, T. M., Saidi, G., Goodburn, S., Lawton, J., Michie, S., & Bobrow, M. (2000). Numbers or words? A randomized controlled trial of presenting screen negative results to pregnant women. Prenatal Diagnosis, 20:714–718.
71.McCaul, K. D., Branstetter, A. D., O’Donnell, S. M., Jacobson, K., & Quinlan, K. B. (1998). A descriptive study of breast cancer worry. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 21:565–579.
72.McCaul, K. D., Canevello, A. B., Mathwig, J. L., & Klein, W. M. P. (2003). Risk communication and worry about breast cancer. Psychology, Health and Medicine, 8:379–389.
73.McCaul, K. D., Branstetter, A. D., Schroeder, D. M., & Glasgow, R. E. (1996). What is the relationship between breast cancer risk and mammography screening? A meta–analytic review. Health Psychology, 15:423–429.
74.McCaul, K. D., Schroeder, D. M., & Reid, P. A. (1996). Breast cancer worry and screening: Some prospective data. Health Psychology, 15:430–433.
75.McLain, D. L. & Hackman, K. (1999), Trust, risk, and decision making in organizational change, Public Administration Quarterly, 152–176.
76.Mellers, B., & McGraw, A. P. (2001). Anticipated emotions as guides to choice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10:210–214.
77.Mellers, B., Schwartz, A., & Ritov, I. (1999). Emotion–based choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128:332–345.
78.Meyerowitz, B. E., & Chaiken, S. (1987). The effect of message framing on breast self–examination: attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52:500–510.
79.Mishra, A. K. (1996). Organizational responses to drisis: The centrality of trust, in R. M. Kramer & T. R.
80.Miller, S. M., Shoda, Y., & Hurley, K. (1996). Applying cognitive–social theory to health–protective behavior: Breast self–examination in cancer screening. Psychological Bulletin, 119:70–94.
81.National Research Council (1989). Improving risk communication. National Academy Press, Washington, D. C.
82.National Research Council (1994). Science and Judgment in Risk Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
83.National Research Council (1989). Improving risk communication .Washington、D. C.:National Academy Press.
84.Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed., McGraw Hill, New York, NY.
85.Renn, O. (2006). Risk communication– Consumers Between Information and Irritation. Journal of Risk Research, 9(8):833–849.
86.Olson, M. J., & Budescu, D. V. (1997). Patterns of preferences for numerical and verbal probabilities. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 10:17–131.
87.Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2003). Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation. Risk Analysis, 23(5):961–972.
88.Peters, R. G., Covello, V. T., & McCallum, D. B. (1997). The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: an empirical study. Risk Analysis, 17:43–54.
89.Rowan, K. E. (1991). Goals, obstacles, and strategies in risk communication: a problem–solving approach to improving communication about risks. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 19:300–29.
90.Rosati, S. & Saba, A. (2004).The perception of risks associated with food–related hazards and the perceived reliability of sources of information. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 39:491–500.
91.Roselius, T. (1971). Consumer rankings of risk reduction methods. Journal of Marketing, 35:56–61.
92.Russo, J. E., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1989). Decision traps: The ten barriers to decision–making and how to overcome them. New York: Simon & Schuster.
93.Shapira, M. M., Nattinger, A. B., & McHorney, C. A. (2001). Frequency or probability? A qualitative study of risk communication formats used in health care. Medical Decision Making, 21:459–467.
94.Shaw, N. J., & Dear, P. R. F. (1990). How do parents of babies interpret qualitative expressions of probability? Archives of Disease in Childhood, 65:520–523.
95.Simon, H. A. (1986). Rationality in Psychology and Economics. The Journal of Business, 59(4): S209–S224.
96.Siegrist, M., Cvetkovich, G., & Roth, C. (2000). Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/benefit perception, Risk Analysis, 20(3):353–362.
97.Sjöberg, L. (1998). Worry and risk perception. Risk Analysis, 18, 85–93.
98.Slovic, P. (1999). Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science: Surveying the Risk-Assessment Battlefield. Risk Analysis, 19(4):689–701.
99.Slovic, P. (2000). Gender race and perceived risk: the ‘white male ’effect. Health. Risk & Society, 2(2):159–172.
100.Slovic, P., Peters, E., Finucane, M. L., & Macgregor, D. G. (2005). Affect, risk, and decision making. Health Psychol, 24:S35–40.
101.Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236:280–285.
102.Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002). The affect heuristic. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases, New York: Cambridge University Press, 397–410.
103.Slovic, P. (1997). Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: surveying the risk–assessment battlefield. In: Bazerman MH, Messick DM, Tenbrunsel AE, Wade–Benzoni KA, editors. Environment, ethics, and behavior: the psychology of environmental valuation and degradation. San Francisco, CA: The New Lexington Press.
104.Smed, S., & Jensen, J. D. (2005). Food safety information and food demand. British Food Journal, 107(3):173–186.
105.Smith, D., & Riethmuller, P. (2000). Consumer concerns about food safety in Australia and Japan. British Food Journal, 102 (11): 838–855.
106.Stone, R. N., & Gronhaug, K. (1993). Perceived risk: Further consideration for the marketing discipline. European Journal of Marketing, 27(3):39–50.
107.Teigen, K. H., & Brun, W. (1999). The directionality of verbal probability expressions: Effects on decisions, predictions, and probabilistic reasoning. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 80:155–190.
108.Teigen, K. H. (1988). The language of uncertainty. Acta Psychologica, 68:27–38.
109.Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211:453–458.
110.Thompson, K. M., & Bloom, D. L. (2000). Communication of risk assessment information to risk managers. Journal of Risk Research, 3:333–352.
111.Timmermans, D., Ockhuysen–Vermey, C., & Henneman, L. (2008). Presenting health risk information in different formats: The effect on participants’ cognitive and emotional evaluation and decisions. Patient Education and Counseling, 73: 443–447.
112.Visschers, V. H. M., Meertens, R. M., Passchier, W. W. F., & Vries, N. N. K. (2009). Probability Information in Risk Communication: A Review of the Research Literature. Risk Analysis, 29(2):267–287.
113.Walker, B. A., & Olson, J. C. (1991). Means–End Chains: Connecting Products with Self. Journal of Business Research, 22:111–118.
114.Wallsten, T., Budescu, D. V., Zwick, R., & Kemp, S. M. (1993). Preference and reasons for communicating probabilistic information in numerical or verbal terms. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31:135–138
115.Weber, E. U., & Hilton, D. J. (1990). Contextual effects in the interpretations of probability words: Perceived base rate and severity of events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16:781–789.
116.Weber, E. U. (1994). From subjective probabilities to decision weights: The effect of asymmetric loss function. Psychological Bulletin, 115:228–242.
117.Windschitl, P. D., & Weber, E. (1999). The interpretation of ‘‘likely’’ depends on the context, but ‘‘70%’’ is 70%—right? The influence of associative processes on perceived certainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 25: 1514–1533.
118.Williams, D. E., & Olaniran, B. A. (1998). Expanding the Crisis Planning Function: Introducing Elements of Risk Communication to Crisis Communication Practice. Public Relations Review, 24,(3): 387–400.
119.Wogalter, M. S., Young, S. L., Brelsford, J. W., & Barlow, T. (1999). The relative contributions of injury severity and likelihood information on hazard–risk judgments and warning compliance. Journal of Safety Research, 30:151–162.
120.Yosie, T. F., & Herbst, T. D. (1998) Managing and communicating stakeholder–based decision making. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 4:643–646.
121.Yamagishi, K. (1997). When a 12.86% mortality is more dangerous than 24.14%: Implications for risk communication. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11:495–506.
中文部分:
1.王文科，王智弘（2006）。教育研究法（10版)。台北市:五南圖書。
2.吳明隆 （2007）。SPSS統計應用學習實務－問卷分析與應用統計。經緯國際股份有限公司，臺北市。
3.黃懿慧（1994）。科技風險的認知與溝通問題，民意研究季刊，188:95–129。4.陳景堂 （2005）。統計分析SPSS FOR WINDOWS入門與應用。儒林圖書出版社，臺北市。
5.張春興（2002）。實驗觀察研究。載於楊國樞，文崇一，吳聰賢，李亦園（主編），社會及行為科學研究法（13 版，183–216 頁）。台北市:東華書局。
6.楊國樞等著（1989）。實驗設計，社會及行為科學研究法上冊，台北:東華書局
7.邱皓政（2006），「量化研究與統計分析」，台北市：五南圖書出版股份有限
公司。