跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(2600:1f28:365:80b0:8e11:74e4:2207:41a8) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/01/15 17:30
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:曾怡雯
研究生(外文):Tseng-Yi-Wen
論文名稱:遊樂園體驗價值、滿意、承諾與忠誠度之關聯性研究-以台灣主題遊樂園為例
論文名稱(外文):The Correlation Among Experiential Value, Satisfaction, Commitment &; Loyalty for Theme Park in Taiwan
指導教授:林麗嬌林麗嬌引用關係侯國隆侯國隆引用關係
指導教授(外文):Li-Chiao LinKuo-Lung Hou
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立勤益科技大學
系所名稱:企業管理系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2012
畢業學年度:100
語文別:中文
論文頁數:77
中文關鍵詞:體驗價值滿意度承諾主題遊樂園
外文關鍵詞:ExperienceValueSatisfactionCommitmentTheme Park
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:2653
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:528
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
隨著政府實施週休二日,民眾增加了休閒時間,主題樂園開始蓬勃發展,遊樂園業者藉由打造具有特色的主題跟環境,讓遊客感受到滿意進而吸引遊客。綜上所述,引發本研究進一步以主題遊樂園做為主題,本研究目的如下:(1)不同遊客背景屬性之間是否影響、體驗價值、滿意度、承諾、忠誠度。(2)體驗價值跟遊客滿意關係。(3)體驗價值與遊客承諾關係。(4)體驗價值與遊客忠誠度關係。(5)遊客滿意與承諾為體驗價值與遊客忠誠度之仲介變項。
本研究針對有主題遊樂園的顧客為主要研究對象,藉由蒐集文獻資料加以探討,以體驗價值、滿意度、承諾、忠誠度等衡量構面,採用網路問卷方式和實地發放進行問卷發放調查,再以統計方法SPSS12.0和AMOS17.0進行分析遊樂園體驗價值、滿意、承諾與忠誠度之關聯性研究,並驗證各衡量構面之間之關係,以作為遊樂園業者經營方向與參考建議。
本研究總共回收401份,有效問卷有329份,回收率達82%。經實證分析結果發現:(1) 不同遊客背景變項、消費經驗對體驗價值、滿意、承諾與忠誠度存在顯著差異。(2)主題遊樂園體驗價值與顧客忠誠度具正向關係。(3)主題遊樂園體驗價值與顧客滿意度具正向關係。(4)主題遊樂園體驗價值與遊客承諾具正向關係。(5)主題遊樂園遊客滿意與遊客忠誠度具正向之關係。(6)主題遊樂園遊客承諾與遊客忠誠度具正向之關係。(7)主題遊樂園遊客滿意與遊客承諾為體驗價值與遊客忠誠度之中介變項。
After the government implemented the two-day weekend policy in Taiwan, people had more leisure time, which stimulated the construction of an increasing number of theme parks. These theme parks attracted visitors by offering recreational facilities &; environments with distinctive themes that satisfy customers’ dem&;s. This phenomenon inspired us to conduct a study examining theme parks. The purpose of this study was to explore: (1) Whether differences in visitor background &; consumer experience attribute an influence to a theme park experience value, level of visitor satisfaction, visitor commitment &; visitor loyalty. (2) The relationship between theme park experience value &; level of visitor satisfaction. (3) The relationship between theme park experience value &; visitor commitment. (4) The relationship between theme park experience value &; visitor loyalty. (5) Level of visitor satisfaction &; visitor commitment are the mediating variables between theme park experience value &; visitor loyalty.
Theme park visitors are chosen as the objects of this study, and through literature reviews, constructs including theme park experience value, level of visitor satisfaction, visitor commitment &; visitor loyalty are identified. Questionnaires are conducted by both online &; the study objects, and the collected questionnaires are compiled by utilizing SPSS12.0 &; AMOS17.0 to analyze the relationship between theme park experience value, level of visitor satisfaction, visitor commitment &; visitor loyalty &; verify the relationships among the above constructs are verified to pinpoint business direction &; provide recommendations for theme park operators.
401 questionnaires are collected. 329 of them are effective questionnaires, &; the return ratio is 82%. After empirical analyses, the following results are verified: (1) Significant discrepancies are observed among influences that different visitor background attribute has on theme park experience value, level of visitor satisfaction, visitor commitment &; visitor loyalty. (2) Theme park experience value is positively correlated with visitor loyalty. (3) Theme park experience value is positively correlated with level of visitor satisfaction. (4) Theme park experience value is positively correlated with visitor commitment. (5) Level of visitor satisfaction is positively correlated with visitor loyalty. (6) Visitor commitment is positively correlated with visitor loyalty. (7) Level of visitor satisfaction &; visitor commitment are mediating variables between theme park experience value &; visitor loyalty.
中文摘要 i
英文摘要 iii
誌謝 v
目錄 vi
表目錄 viii
圖目錄 x
一、 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的 3
1.3 研究範圍及對象 3
1.4 研究流程 3
1.5 研究大綱 4
二、 文獻探討 6
2.1 主題遊樂園 6
2.2 體驗價值 10
2.3 滿意 14
2.4 忠誠度 16
2.5 承諾 19
2.6 研究假說與推論 21
三、 研究方法 27
3.1 研究架構 27
3.2 問卷設計 28
3.3 抽樣設計 32
3.4 資料分析方法 36
四、 研究分析與結果 40
4.1 描述性統計分析 40
4.2 遊樂園產業分析 42
4.3 T檢定 43
4.4 單因數變異數分析 44
4.5 信度與效度分析 56
4.6 結構模型之適配度檢定 58
4.7 研究假設驗證 60
4.8 模型仲介效果檢定 61
4.9 研究假說檢定結果 63
五、 結論與建議 64
5.1 研究結論 64
5.2 管理意涵 65
5.3 研究限制 66
5.4 後續研究建議 67
參考文獻 68
附錄-正式問卷 74
作者簡歷 77
1. 王世澤(2004)。體驗行銷:模型發展與實務驗證。國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
2. 王惠芬(2002)。主題樂園遊客行為之研究-以劍湖山世界、六福村及九族文化村為例。朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理系碩士論文,未出版,台中市。
3. 李思玉(2011)。原住民餐廳消費者體驗價值、滿意度與忠誠度相關之研究。國立臺灣師範大學運動與休閒管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
4. 交通部觀光局(2011)。國內主要觀光遊憩據點遊客人數統計,臺北:交通部觀光局。
5. 交通部觀光局 (2011)。兩岸觀光人數統計表,臺北:交通部觀光局。
6. 林紋年(2010)。遊樂園之促銷感知、服務品質、遊客滿意度與重遊意願關係之研究-北部某遊樂園為例。私立大葉大學休閒事業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台中市。
7. 何秉燦(2004),觀光衝擊認知與觀光衝擊管理策略之研究-以奮起湖地區為例。國立嘉義大學休閒事業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
8. 吳萬益(2011)。企業研究方法四版。臺北:華泰書局。
9. 邱媞(2003)。體驗行銷模式與其遊客行之為實證研究,私立中國文化大學觀光研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
10. 胡儷偉(2010)。真誠領導對員工意見表達之影響-內在動機、個人正向心情與情感承諾之仲介效果驗證。國立東華大學企業管理所碩士論文,未出版,花蓮縣。
11. 徐堅白(2001)。主題樂園與其管理實務。臺北:碁泰管理顧問。
12. 殷嘉良(2009)。體驗行銷、體驗價值、顧客滿意度與顧客忠誠度影響之研究—以宜蘭香格里拉休閒農場為例。國立政治大學商管專業碩士學位學程論文,未出版,臺北市。
13. 高儀文(1999)。主題遊樂園服務品質與旅客購後行為關係之研究。私立中國文化大學觀光事業研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
14. 曹勝雄(2010)。觀光行銷學,臺北:揚智出版社。
15. 陳碩偉(2003)。遊客選擇主題樂園之考慮因素與滿意度之研究-以劍湖山世界為個案。國立臺北大學企業管理學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
16. 黃映瑀(2005)。體驗行銷、體驗價值、顧客滿意、品牌形象與行為意象關係之研究。大葉大學事業經營研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化縣。
17. 黃振翔(2003)。刺激性遊具之刺激程度與遊憩滿意度關係之研究。私立中國文化大學觀光事業研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
18. 劉連茂(2000)。21 世紀主題樂園之夢幻與實現。臺北市:詹氏書局。
19. 鄭明松、王世澤(2004)。體驗行銷─創造體驗與體驗價值的時代。卓越雜誌,236,168-170。
20. 蕭柏勳(1997)。以資源基礎觀點探討民營遊樂園業之競爭策略。國立雲林科技大學企業管理所碩士論文,未出版,雲林縣。
21. 謝其淼(1998)。主題遊樂園,臺北:詹氏書局。
22. 鍾志強、林淑美、黃三翁(2009)。主題遊樂園促銷知覺、知覺價值與購後行為之研究-以劍湖山世界為例。休閒運動期刊,8,93-103。
23. 顏鎮榮(2001)。娛樂空間的規劃設計與構成形式之探討-以遊樂園為主。嶺東學報,12,361-370。
24. 蘇子忻(2006)。醫學美容消費者體驗層級效果模式。國立中正大學企業管理學系博士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
25. Articlesbase directory Mar 10, 2011, http://www.articlesbase.com/what-is-the-difference-between-a-theme-park-and-an-amusement-park-4381743.html.
26. Baron, R. M. &; Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator - mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
27. Bhote, K. R. (1996). Beyond customer satisfaction to customer loyalty - The key to greater profitability, New York: American Management Association.
28. Browne, M.W., &; Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit. In Testing Structural Equation Models, K. A. bollen and J. S. Long (eds.). Newbury Park, CA, Sage.
29. Anderson, E. W., Fornell C. &; Lehmann, D. R. (1994). Customer Satisfaction, Market Share, &; Profitability: Finding from Sweden. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 53-66.
30. Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R. &; Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 644-656.
31. Bagozzi, R. P. &; Yi, Y. (1988). On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models.Academic of Marketing Science, 16(1),76-94.
32. Bearden, William O. &; Jesse E. T. (1983). Selected Determinants of Consumer Satisfaction and Complaints Reports. Journal of Marketing Research, 20(2), 21-28.
33. Berry, L. L. &; Parasuraman A. (1991). Marketing Service Competing through Quality. New York: A Division of Macmillan Inc.
34. Bhote, K. R. (1996). Beyond Customer Satisfaction to Customer Loyalty: The Key to Greater Profitability. New York: American Management Association.
35. Binter, M.J. (1990). Evaluating Service Encounters: The Effect of Physical 59 Surroundings and Employee Responses. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 69-82.
36. Bolton, R. N. &; Drew J. H. (1991). A Longitudinal Analysis of the Impact of Service Changes on Customer Attitude. Journal of Marketing, 55(1), 1-19.
37. Bowen, J. T. &; Shoemaker, S. (1998). Loyalty: A Strategic Commitment. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 39(1), 12-25.
38. Cardozo, R. N. (1965). An Experience Study of Customer Effort, Expectation and Satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 2(8), 244-249.
39. Craft, S. H. (1999). Marketers Gain by Measuring True Loyalty. Marketing News, 33, 18.
40. Crosby, L. A., Evans, K. R. &; Cowles, D. (1990). Relationship Quality in Services Selling: An Interpersonal Influence Perspective. Journal of Marketing, 54(3), 68-81.
41. Griffin, J. (1995).Customer Loyalty: How to Earn It, How to Keep It.Simmon and Schuster Inc.
42. Gurney, P. (1999). Influence Is The Better Part of Loyalty. Marketing News, 33(5), 18.
43. Hazra, S. G. &; Srivastave K. B. L. (2009).Impact of service Quality on customer Loyalty, Commitment and trust in the Indian Banking. Sector. IUP. Journal of Marketing Management, 8(3), 74-95.
44. Hair, Jr. R., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., and Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th Edition. Macmillan, New York.
45. Heskett, J. L., Jones, T. O. Loveman, G. W., Sasser, W. E. and Schlesinger, L. A.(1994). Putting the Service-profit chain to work. Harvard Business Review March-April, 164-174.
46. Holbrook, M. B. (1994). The Nature of Customer Value: An Axiology of Services in the Consumption Experience. In Service Quality: New Directions in Theory and Practices, edited by R. Rust and R. L. Oliver, Sage, CA: Newbury Park, 21-71.
47. Holbrook, M. B. (1996). Customer Value: A Framework for Analysis and Research. Advances in Consumer Research, 23(1), 138-142.
48. Holbrook, Morris B., (1999). Introduction to Consumer Value in Morris B. Holbrook. Consumer Value: A Framework for Analysis and Research, Routledge, New York, 1-28.
49. Hosany, S., &; Witham, M. (2010). Dimensions of Cruisers’ Experiences, Satisfaction, and Intention to Recommend. Journal of Travel Research, 49 (3), 351-64.
50. Jones, T. O., and Sasser, W. E., Jr. (1995). Why Satisfied Customers Defect. Harvard Business Review, 73(6), 88-99.
51. Jöreskog, K. G. and Sörbom, D. (2001). LISREL 8. User’s reference guide. Lincolnwood: Scien-tific Software International.
52. Katarzyna Szczepanska, Patryk Pawel Gawron (2011). Changes in Approach to customer Loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 5(1), 60-69.
53. Kotler P., (1991), Marketing Management:Analysis, Planning, Implemention and Control, 7th edition, Prentice-Hall.
54. Mathwick, C., Malhotra, N. K., &; Rigdon, E. (2001). Experiential value: Conceptualization, measurement and application in the catalog and internet shopping environment. Journal of Retailing, 77(1), 39-56.
55. Max Beaudry (2011). What Is the Difference Between a Theme Park and an Amusement Park? http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Max_Beaudry.
56. Norris, R. T. (1941) .The Theory of Consumer’s Demand. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
57. Ndubisi, N. O. (2006). Factors of online learning adoption: a comparative juxtaposition of the theory of planned behavior and the technology acceptance model. International Journal on eLearning, 5(4), 571-591.
58. Oliver, Richard L. (1996). Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective On The Consumer, McGraw-Hill Companies.
59. Ornell, C. (1992). A National Customer Satisfaction Barometer: The Swedish Experience. Journal of Marketing, 56(1), 6-21.
60. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml Valarie A. and Berry Leonard L. (1985). A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and its ImpliCation for Future Research. Journal of Marketing, 49(3), 41-50.
61. Reichheld, F. F. &; Sasser, W. E. (1990). Zero Defection: Quality Comes to Services. Harvard Business Review, 68(4), 105-111.
62. Rigdon, E. (1995). A necessary and sufficient identification rule for structural models estimated in practice. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30(3), 359-383.
63. Ryan, M. J. (1999). Diagnosing Customer Loyalty Drivers. Marketing Research, 11(2), 18-27.
64. Sheth, Bruce I. Newman, and Barbara L. Gross, (1991).Consumption Values and Market Choices: Theory and Applications.Cincinnati, OH: South western Publishing.
65. Simonin, B. L. (1999). Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 20(7), 595-623.
66. Sit, J. and Morgan, M. J. (2009). Defining the experiential value of auxiliary special events in shopping centres: a shopper’s perspective. 15th Annual Conference of European Association for Education and Research in Commercial Distribution (EAERCD). UK: Guildford, Surrey.
67. Smith, J. B. (1998). Buyer–seller relationships: similarity, relationship management, and quality. Psychology and Marketing, 15(1), 3-21.
68. Storbacka, K., Strandvik, T., &; Gronroos, C. (1994). Managing customer relationships for profit: The dynamics of relationship quality. International. Journal of Service Industry Management, 5(5), 21-38.
69. Stratigos, A. (1999). Measuring End-user Loyalty Matter, Online, 23(6), 74-78.
70. Westbrook, R. A. (1981). Sources of satisfaction with retail outlets. Journal of Retailing, 57(3), 68-85.
71. Woodruff, R., Cadotte, E.R., and Jenkins, R. L. (1983). Modeling Consumer Satisfaction Process Using Experience-Based Norms. Journal of Marketing Research, 20(3), 296-304.
72. Wylson, A. and Wylson, P. (1994).Theme Parks, Leisure Centres, Zoos and Aquaria. Textbook, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York.
73. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 遊樂園之促銷感知、服務品質、遊客滿意度與重遊意願關係之研究-以北部某遊樂園為例
2. 遊樂園基層員工人格特質、工作表現及工作滿意度間的關係-以六福村主題遊樂園為例
3. 品牌知名度、品牌形象、服務品質與滿意度之相關性研究─以主題遊樂園為例
4. 主題遊樂園之企業形象、服務品質、關係品質與顧客忠誠度之關聯性研究
5. 主題遊樂園體驗行銷與行為意圖關係之研究-以小人國為例
6. 主題遊樂園服務品質、顧客滿意、知覺價值與行為意向關係之研究─以月眉育樂世界探索樂園為例
7. 消費者對於遊樂園價格知覺、服務品質的態度與行為意圖之關係-以鈴鹿賽道樂園為例
8. 顧客關係聯結與創新行銷策略對消費者知覺感受之影響—以主題遊樂園為例
9. 智慧型遊樂園服務系統之設計與開發
10. 服務品質、參與動機及顧客滿意度對活動效益間關係影響之研究─以義大遊樂園區2015年跨年煙火活動為例
11. 觀光遊樂園員工之工作價值觀、工作環境與情緒勞務對 工作滿意影響之研究
12. 消費者體驗與購後行為關係之研究-以六福村主題遊樂園為例
13. 向新加坡學習-臺灣主題遊樂園攝影人力資源發展個案研究
14. 主題遊樂園促銷知覺、知覺價值與購後行為之研究-以劍湖山世界為例
15. 智慧穿戴裝置APP在遊樂園區產業之應用–以CH公司為例