跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.81) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/01/15 04:21
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:廖蕙琴
研究生(外文):Liao, Hui-Chin
論文名稱:金融自由化和經濟成長之研究
論文名稱(外文):Three Essays On Financial Liberalization And Economic Growth
指導教授:黃柏農黃柏農引用關係
指導教授(外文):Huang, Bwo-Nung
口試委員:邱魏頌正王瑜琳劉文獻王冠閔
口試日期:2012-01-16
學位類別:博士
校院名稱:國立中正大學
系所名稱:國際經濟研究所
學門:社會及行為科學學門
學類:經濟學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2012
畢業學年度:100
語文別:英文
論文頁數:110
外文關鍵詞:financial liberalizationfinancial opennesseconomic freedomeconomic growth
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:608
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:22
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本論文由三篇文章組成。第一篇文章重估金融開放和經濟成長間關係。由於資本邊際報酬的遞減,我們的實證結果發現金融開放對經濟成長是否有顯著的影響,取決於金融開放的程度。採用1985-2008年跨國81個國家資料,發現經濟體要從金融開放得到收益,FDI必須滿足特定的「門檻」水準。實證結果顯示,只有當FDI占GDP比率不超過2.65%時,對成長的效果才會出現。政策隱含當一個國家的FDI比例尚未很高時,政府應允許更多的國外資金流入國內市場以促進經濟成長,特別是對發展中的國家。
第二篇文章提出投資的角色並指出它在金融自由化與經濟成長關連中扮演一個決定性角色,金融自由化對經濟成長的效果取決於金融自由化能否提升國內資本投資。運用多元治療效果架構來處理潛在的選擇性偏誤問題,實證結果顯示,對工業國家,較高程度的金融自由化會減少其投資,但對成長是沒有效果的。新興市場經濟則發現自由化對成長的收益僅出現在自由化程度相對較低時。相反的,對於其他發展中國家,卻只有最高程度的金融自由化能為經濟成長與投資帶來幫助。
第三篇文章我們使用分量迴歸估計關於政策改革路徑對經濟成長影響的議題。證據顯示波動的政策改革路徑會抑制長期經濟成長的效果,尤其是對高成長國家,隱含高成長的國家更應採行更平穩的自由化改革,以避免失去信譽而不利成長。

This dissertation is composed of three essays. The first article re-examines the relationship between financial openness and economic growth. Because of the diminishing the marginal returns of capital, our empirical evidence show that the impact of financial openness on growth depends on different levels of financial openness itself. Using panel data from 81 countries over 1985-2008, we find that FDI seems to be have a certain “threshold” level related to growth that an economy needs to satisfy before it can gain benefit from financial openness. That is, only when the ratio of FDI to GDP does not surpass the level of financial openness, which is about 2.65%, growth effects will appear. The policy implications suggest that when a country with the proportion of FDI is not high enough, the government should adopt a policy which allows more international capital inflow into their domestic market to promote growth, especially for developing countries.
The second subject provides an investment perspective and indicates that investment play a determined role to link between financial liberalization and economic growth. The effect of financial liberalization on growth depends on whether the financial liberalization could foster the accumulation of domestic investment. We implement this analysis through a multiple-treatment framework to deal with the potential selection problem. As the results, for industrial countries, a higher degree of liberalization reduces investment, but has no effect on economic growth, relative to a lower degree of liberalization. Evidence from emerging market economies suggests that the beneficial effect of liberalization emerges only in countries having relatively a lower degree of liberalization. In contrast, for other developing countries, only the highest degree of liberalization has significantly higher economic growth and investment.
In the third subject, using a quantile regression estimator, we examine the issue of policy reform path on economic growth. Our evidence show that the volatile policy reform path will depresses the long-run growth effect, especially for high-growth countries. This implies that higher growth countries should take a smoother path of their policy reform to avoid losing their credibility, which is unfavorable to economic growth.

Contents

中文摘要 I
Abstract II
1 Introduction 1
2 Does Financial Openness Spur Economic Growth? A Panel Threshold Regression Approach 4
2.1 Introduction 4
2.2 Literature Review 7
2.2.1 Financial Transmission Mechanism 7
2.2.2 Financial Openness and Economic Growth 9
2.3 Data Definition and Description 10
2.3.1 Measurement and Data 11
2.3.2 Basic Stylized Facts 13
2.4 Methodology 14
2.4.1 Panel Threshold Regression Model 14
2.4.2 Model Specification 17
2.5 Empirical Results 18
2.5.1 Panel Threshold Regression Analysis 18
2.5.2 Robustness Test 21
2.6 Conclusion 24
Tables and Figures 26
3 Financial Liberalization and Economic Growth: The Role of Investment 43
3.1 Introduction 43
3.2 Data and Preliminary Evidence 46
3.2.1 Data Sources and Definitions 46
3.2.2 Basic Stylized Facts 47
3.3 Empirical Methodology 49
3.3.1 Notation and Definition of Causal Effect 50
3.3.2 Identification 52
3.3.3 Propensity Score Estimate 53
3.3.4 A Matching Estimator 55
3.3.5 Summary the Matching Protocol for the Estimation of 56
3.4 Empirical Results 57
3.4.1 Basic Descriptive Statistics and Pairwise Comparison 57
3.4.2 Multiple-Treatment Effect 59
3.5 Conclusion 63
Tables and Figures 65
4 The Path of Economic Freedom on the Distributional Heterogeneity of the Growth Effect 79
4.1 Introduction 79
4.2 Model and Methodology 82
4.2.1 Model Specification 82
4.2.2 Quantile Regression 84
4.3 Data Sources and Definitions 86
4.4 Empirical Results 88
4.5 Conclusion 90
Tables and Figures 92
Reference 103


Tables

Table 2.1 Summary of Variables, Descriptions, and Data Sources 26
Table 2.2 Summary Statistics 27
Table 2.3 Summary Statistics of Sample Countries 28
Table 2.4 Tests for Threshold Effects ─ All Countries 30
Table 2.5 Regression Estimates: Single Threshold Model ─All Countries 31
Table 2.6 Tests for Threshold Effects ─ Developed Countries 32
Table 2.7 Regression Estimates: Single Threshold Model ─ Developed Countries 33
Table 2.8 Tests for Threshold Effects ─ Developing Countries 34
Table 2.9 Regression Estimates: Single Threshold Model ─ Developing Countries 35
Table 2.10 Financial Openness and Economic Growth 36
Table 2.11 Marginal Effects of FDI on Economic Growth 37
Table 3.1 Descriptive Statistics of Real GDP Growth and the KAOPEN Index 65
Table 3.2 Descriptive Statistics of Real GDP Growth and Pairwise Comparison 66
Table 3.3 Average Treatment Effects on the Treated 67
Table 4.1 Summary Statistics and Correlation Matrix 92
Table 4.2 OLS and Quantile Regression Estimates, 1980-2005 93
Table 4.3 OLS and Quantile Regression Estimates with Additional Control Variables, 1980-2005 94
Table 4.4 OLS and Quantile Regression Estimates, 1980-1990 95
Table 4.5 OLS and Quantile Regression Estimates with Additional Control Variables, 1980-1990 96
Table 4.6 OLS and Quantile Regression Estimates, 1995-2005 97
Table 4.7 OLS and Quantile Regression Estimates with Additional Control Variables, 1995-2005 98



Figures

Figure 2.1 Confidence Interval Construction in Single and Double Threshold Model for All Countries 38
Figure 2.2 Confidence Interval Construction in Single and Double Threshold Model for Developed Countries 39
Figure2.3 Confidence Interval Construction in Single Threshold Model for Developing Countries 40
Figure 2.4 Marginal Effect of FDI on Economic Growth by Using Instrumental Variables 41
Figure 2.5 Marginal Effects of FDI on Economic Growth by Using System-GMM 42
Figure 3.1 KAOPEN Index, 1985-2008 73
Figure 3.2 Histogram of KAOPEN Index 74
Figure 3.3 Histogram of Normalized KAOPEN Index 75
Figure 3.4 Propensity Scores (Frequencies of Probability Intervals by Treatments and Models) for Industrial Countries 76
Figure 3.5 Propensity Scores (Frequencies of Probability Intervals by Treatments and Models) for Emerging Markets 77
Figure 3.6 Propensity Scores (Frequencies of Probability Intervals by Treatments and Models) for Other Developing Countries 78
Figure 4.1 Simple Correlation of Growth and Policy Volatility 99


Aghion, P., P. Bacchetta, R. Rancière, and K. Rogoff (2009), “Exchange Rate Volatility and Productivity Growth: The Role of Financial Development,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 56, 494-513.
Alfaro, L., A. Chanda, S. Kalemli-Ozcan, and S. Sayek (2004), “FDI and Economic Growth: The Role of Local Financial Markets,” Journal of International Economics, 64(1), 113–134.
Ang, J. B. (2008), “A Survey of Recent Developments in The Literature of Finance and Growth,” Journal of Economic Surveys, 21(3), 536-576.
Barreto, R. A. and A. W. Hughes (2004), “Under Performers and Overachievers: A Quantile Regression Analysis of Growth,” Economic Record, 80, 17-35.
Barro, R. J. and J-W. Lee (2010), “A New Data Set of Educational Attainment in The World, 1950-2010,” NBER Working Paper, No. 15902.
Bekaert, G., C. R. Harvey, and C. Lundblad (2005), “Does Financial Liberalization Spur Growth?” Journal of Financial Economics, 77, 3-55.
Bencivenga, V. R. and B. D. Smith (1991), “Financial Intermediation and Endogenous Growth,” Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 195-209.
Bengoa, M. and B. Sanchez-Robles (2003), “Foreign Direct Investment, Economic Freedom and Growth: New Evidence from Latin America,” European Journal of Political Economy, 19, 529-545.
Berggren, N. (2003), “The Benefits of Economic Freedom: A Survey,” The Independent Review, VIII, 193-211.
Bhagwati, J. (1998), “The Capital Myth: The Difference between Trade in Widgets and Dollars,” Foreign Affairs, 77, 7-12.
Blonigen, B. A. and M. Wang (2005), “Inappropriate Pooling of Wealthy and Poor Countries in Empirical FDI Studies,” Chapter 9 in: T. Moran, E. Graham and M.
Blundell, R. and S. Bond (1998), “Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models,” Journal of Econometrics, 87, 115–43.
Bonfiglioi, A. (2008), “Financial Integration, Productivity and Capital Accumulation,” Journal of International Economics, 76(2), 337-355.
Borensztein, E., J. De Gregorio, and J. W. Lee (1998), “How Does Foreign Investment Affect Growth?” Journal of International Economics, 45(1), 115–135.
Buchinsky, M. (1995), “Estimating The Asymptotic Covariance Matrix for Quantile Regression Models: A Monte Carlo Study.” Journal of Econometrics, 68, 303-38.
Buchinsky, M. (1998), “Recent Advances in Quantile Regression Models: A Practical Guideline for Empirical Research,” Journal of Human Resources, 33, 88-126.
Caliendo, M. and S. Kopeinig (2008), “Some Practical Guidance for The Implementation of Propensity Score Matching,” Journal of Economic Surveys, 22, 31-72.
Canarella, G. and S. Pollard (2004), “Parameter Heterogeneity in The Neoclassical Growth Model: A Quantile Regression Approach,” Journal of Economic Development, 29(1), 1-31.
Chinn, M. D. and H. Ito (2008), “A New Measure of Financial Openness,” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 10(3), 309-322.
Compton, R. A., D. C. Giedeman, and G. A. Hoover (2011), “Panel Evidence on Economic Freedom and Growth in The United States,” European Journal of Political Economy,. 27, 423-435.
Cunningham, B. M. (2003), “The Distributional Heterogeneity of Growth Effects: Some Evidence,” The Manchester School, 71(4), 417-446.
Dawson, J. W. (2003), “Causality in The Freedom-growth Relationship.” European Journal of Political Economy, 19, 479-495.
De Haan, J., S. Lundström, and J-E. Sturm (2006), “Market-Oriented Institutions and Policies and Economic Growth: A Critical Survey,” Journal of Economic Surveys, 20, 157-191.
De Haan, J. and J-E. Sturm (2003), “Does More Democracy Lead to Greater Economic Freedom? Evidence for Developing Countries,” European Journal of Political Economy, 19, 547-567.
Dehon, C., M. Gassner, and V. Verardi (2009), “Beware of ‘good’ Outlier and Overoptimistic Conclusions,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71, 437-452.
Dixit, A. (1996), “Investment and Hysteresis,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6, 107-132.
Edison, H., R. Levine, L. A. Ricci, and T. M. Slok (2002), “International Financial Integration and Economic Growth,” Journal of International Money and Finance, 21(6), 749-776.
Edwards, S. (2001), “Capital Mobility and Economic Performance: Are Emerging Economies Different,” In H. Siebert (Ed.), The Worlds New Financial Landscape: Challenges for Economic Policy, 219–244.
Eichengreen, B., R. Gullapalli, and U. Panizza (2011), “Capital Account Liberalization, Financial Development and Industry Growth: A Synthetic View,” Journal of International Money and Finance, 30(2), 1090-1106.
Fatás, A. and L. Mihov (2011), “Policy Volatility, Institutions and Economic Growth,” Review of Economics and Statistic.. (Forthcoming)
Fischer, S. (1998), “Capital Account Liberalization and The Role of The IMF,” In: Should The IMF Pursue Capital-Account Convertibility? Essays in International Finance 207 Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1-10.
Frölich, M., A. Heshmati, and M. Lechner (2004), “A Microeconometric Evaluation of Rehabilitation of Long-Term Sickness in Sweden,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 19, 375-396.
Glick, R., X. Guo, and M. Hutchison (2006), “Currency Crises, Capital-Account Liberalization, and Selection Bias,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 698-714.
Grossman, G. and E. Helpman (1991), “Innovation and Growth in The Global Economy,” MIT Press.
Gwartney, J. D., J. C. Hall, and R. Lawson (2010), “Economic Freedom of The World: 2010 Annual Report,” Vancouver, BC: The Fraser Institute. Data Retrieved from www.freetheworld.com.
Gwarteny, J. D., R. Lawson, and W. Block (1996), “Economic Freedom in the World 1975-1995,” Fraser Institute, Vancouver.
Gwartney, J. D., R. Lawson, and R. Holcombe (1999), “Economic Freedom and The Environment for Economic Growth,” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 155, 641-663.
Hansen, B. E. (1999), “Threshold Effects in Non-Dynamic Panels: Estimation, Testing, and Inference,” Journal of Econometrics, 93, 345-368.
Heckman, J. J., H. Ichimura, and P. Todd (1998), “Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator,” Review of Economic Studies, 65, 261-294.
Heckman, J. J. and J. Smith (1995), “Assessing The Case for Social Experiments,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 84-110.
Henry, P. B. (2000), “Stock Market Liberalization, Economic Reform, and Emerging Market Equity Price,” Journal of Finance, 55(2), 529-564.
Henry, P. B. (2007), “Capital Account Liberalization: Theory, Evidence, and Speculation,” Journal of Economic Literature, 45(4), 887-935.
Imbens, G. W. (2000), “The Role of The Propensity Score in Estimating Dose-Response Functions,” Biometrika, 87, 706-710.
Justesen, M. K. (2008), “The Effect of Economic Freedom on Growth Revisited: New Evidence on Causality from A Panel of Countries 1970-1999,” European Journal of Political Economy, 24, 642-660.
Klein, M. W. (2005), “Capital Account Liberalization, Institutional Quality and Economic Growth: Theory and Evidence,” NBER Working Paper, No. 11112.
Koenker, R. and G. Bassett (1978), “Regression Quantiles,” Econometrica, 46, 33-50.
Koenker, R. and K. Hallock (2001), “Quantile Regression,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 143-156.
Kose, M. A., E. S. Prasad, K. Rogoff, and S. J. Wei (2009), “Financial Globalization: A Reappraisal,” IMF Staff Papers, 56(1), 8-62.
Kose, M. A., E. S. Prasad, K. Rogoff, and S. J. Wei (2010), “Financial Globalization and Economic Policies,” In D. Rodrik and M. Rosenzweig (eds.), Handbook of Development Economics, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 4283-4362.
Kose, M., E. Prasad, and M. Terrones (2009), “Does Openness to International Flows Raise Productivity Growth?” Journal of International Money and Finance, 28(4), 54–580.
Kose, M. A., E. S. Prasad, and A. D. Taylor (2011), “Thresholds in The Process of International Financial Integration,” Journal of International Money and Finance, 30(1), 147-179.
Lane, P. R. and G. M. Milesi-Ferretti (2006), “The External Wealth of Nations Mark II: Revised and Extended Estimates of Foreign Assets and Liabilities, 1970–2004,” IMF Working Paper, 06/69.
Lechner, M. (2001), “Identification and Estimation of Causal Effects of Multiple Treatments Under The Conditional Independence Assumption,” In M. Lechner and D. Pffeifer (eds.), Econometric Evaluation of Labor Market Policies in Europe, Heidelberg: Physica/Springer, 43-56.
Lechner, M. (2002a), “Program Heterogeneity and Propensity Score Matching: An Application to The Evaluation of Active Labor Market Policies,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(2), 205-220.
Lechner, M. (2002b), “Some Practical Issues in The Evaluation of Heterogeneous Labor Market Programmes by Matching Methods,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 165, 59-82.
Levchenko, A. A., R. Rancière, and M. Thoenig (2009), “Growth and Risk at The Industry Level: The Real Effects of Financial Liberalization,” Journal of Development Economics, 89, 210-222.
Levine, R. (1997), “Financial Development and Economic Growth: Views and Agenda,” Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 688-726.
Levine, R. (2001), “International Financial Liberalization and Economic Growth,” Review of International Economics, 9, 688-702.
Mello, M. and R. Perrelli (2003), “Growth Equations: A Quantile Regression Exploration,” The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 43, 643-667.
Obstfeld, M. (1999), “Foreign Resource Inflows, Saving, and Growth,” Center for International and Development Economics Research (CIDER) Working Papers, C98-099, University of California at Berkeley.
Obstfeld, M. (2009), “International Finance and Growth in Developing Countries: What Have We Learned?” IMF Staff Papers, 56(1), 63-111.
Pindyck, R. (1991), “Irreversibility, Uncertainty, and Investment.” Journal of Economic Literature, 29, 1110-1148.
Pitlik, H. (2002), “The Path of Liberalization and Economic Growth.” Kyklos, 55, 57-80.
Quinn, D. and A. M. Toyoda (2003), “Does Capital Account Liberalization Lead to Economic Growth? An Empirical Investigation,” Unpublished working paper, Georgetown University.
Quinn, D. P. and A. M. Toyoda (2008), “Does Capital Account Liberalization Lead to Growth?” Review of Financial Studies, 21(3), 1403-1449.
Ram, R. (2008), “Parametric Variability in Cross-country Growth Regressions: An Application of Quantile-Regression Methodology,” Economics Letters, 99, 387-389.
Rancière, R., T. Aaron, and W. Frank (2008), “Systemic Crises and Growth,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(1), 359-406.
Rodrik, D. (1998), “Who Needs Capital-Account Convertibility?” In Should the IMF Pursue Capital Account Convertibility? Princeton Essays in International Finance, 207.
Rodrik, D. and A. Subramanian (2009), “Why Did Financial Globalization Disappoint?” IMF Staff Papers, 56(1), 112-138.
Rodrik, D. and A. Velasco (1999), “Short-Term Capital Flows,” NBER Working Paper, 7364.
Rogoff, K. (1999), “International Institutions for Reducing Global Financial Instability,” NBER Working Papers, 7265.
Rosenbaum, P. R. and D. B. Rubin (1983), “The Central Role of The Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects,” Biometrika, 70, 41-50.
Roy, A. D. (1951), “Some Thoughts on The Distribution of Earnings,” Oxford Economic Papers, 3, 135-146.
Rubin, D. B. (1974), “Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688-701.
Schularick, M. and T. M. Steger (2010), “Financial Integration, Investment, and Economic Growth: Evidence from Two Eras of Financial Globalization,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(4), 756-768.
Solow, R. M. (1956), “A Contribution to The Theory of Economic Growth,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 65–94.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2000), “Capital Market Liberalization, Economic Growth, and Instability,” World Development, 25, 1075-1086.
Summers, L. H. (2000), “International Financial Crises: Causes, Prevention, and Cures,” American Economic Review, 90 (2), 1-16.
Wang, M. and M. C. S. Wong (2009), “Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth: The Growth Accounting Perspective,” Economic Inquiry, 47(4), 701-710.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top