跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.192.67.10) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/11/09 19:09
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:張珮雯
研究生(外文):Pei-Wen Chang
論文名稱:以生物醫學之專利保護制度為基礎對3C產業消費者權益影響程度之探討
論文名稱(外文):The impact of 3C industry patent protection system on the interests of consumers based on the biomedical patent protection system
指導教授:謝玲芬謝玲芬引用關係
指導教授(外文):Ling-Feng Hsieh
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:中華大學
系所名稱:科技管理學系碩士班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2012
畢業學年度:100
語文別:中文
論文頁數:51
中文關鍵詞:智慧財產權專利權保護相關趨勢生物醫學產業3C產業
外文關鍵詞:Intellectual propertypatent-protectioncorrelation-trendbiomedical industrythe 3C industry
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:91
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
「智慧財產權」對於科技產業與市場開發是一項非常重要的策略工具,許多跨國企業已紛紛投入大量的經費在其研發的產品上進行「專利權保護」手段,並以此手段做為其商業策略來保有比競爭對手擁有更多的商業競爭優勢。因此,近年來,越來越多的台灣企業也意識到專利權保護的重要性並紛紛投入其中。
本論文主要針對兩個產業領域進行探究:(1)生物醫學產業 (2)高科技3C產業。首先蒐集過去十年間生物醫學產業之專利文獻進行文獻分析,發現專利權保護制度與消費者權益之間呈現負相關影響。然而,對高科技3C產業而言,是否在專利權保護制度與消費者權益之間也會存在一樣的相關趨勢?因此,本論文主要探討台灣高科技3C產業中專利權保護制度與消費者權益之間是否存在何種相關趨勢及影響程度?
然而,非常少的研究論文使用定性分析法來證明是否高科技3C產業中存在跟生物醫學產業一樣的負相關影響於專利權保護制度與消費者權益之間。因此,本論文主要採用文獻分析法搭配問卷調查來探討台灣高科技3C產業中專利權保護制度對於消費者權益之影響,並使用交叉分析針對不同消費者族群來探討台灣高科技3C產業中專利權保護制度對於消費者權益會呈現何種相關影響之變化。
本論文研究結果分析得知,其高科技3C產業之專利權保護制度對於消費者權益之影響程度是呈現正相關趨勢成長。除此之外,對於不同的產業別也可以透過本論文所提之研究方法來分析其專利權保護制度對消費者權益會呈現正相關或是負相關之影響。

Intellectual property is a very important strategic tool for the technology industry and the market development. There are many international companies have already invested a lot of funding in the patent-protection for their researches and designs because of preserving more competitive superiority than their competitors. Therefore, more and more Taiwanese industries also realize the importance of patent-protection institution during recent years.
The research target of this thesis mainly focuses on analyzing that what kind of the correlation-trend (positive correlation or negative correlation) exists between the patent-protection institution and the rights and interests of consumers for two important fields. The first field is the biomedical industry and the other one is the high-tech 3C industry. This thesis firstly surveys published literatures and clearly demonstrates that a trend of negative correlation exists between the patent-protection institution and the rights and interests of consumers for the biomedical industry.
However, very few researches address the same qualitative analysis to proof whether the same trend also exists between them for the high-tech 3C industry, especially in Taiwan. Therefore, the trend variation between them will be explored via two research methods further in this thesis. The first research method is the qualitative analysis, namely literature survey, and the second one is the quantitative analysis, namely the questionnaire. After the questionnaire, this thesis further adopts the cross-analysis to find what kind of the variation trend exists between the patent-protection institution and the rights and interests of consumers for the high-tech 3C industry in Taiwan.
The analysis result from this thesis has shown that a trend of positive correlation exists between the patent-protection institution and the rights and interests of consumers for the high-tech 3C industry in Taiwan. In addition, the patent-protection institution and the rights and interests of consumers mutually affect in a positive or a negative correction for different industries via the same research methods presented in this thesis.

Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………ii
誌謝辭……………………………………………………………………………………...iii
目錄………………………………………………………………………………………...iv
表目錄……………………………………………………………………………………… v
圖目錄……………………………………………………………………………………...vi
第一章 緒論……………………………………………………………………………1
第一節 研究背景與動機………………………………………………………………..1
第二節 研究流程………………………………………………………………………..2
第二章 專利制度與消費者權益………………………………………………………4
第一節 專利概述………………………………………………………………………..4
第二節 消費者權益…………………………………………………………………... 12
第三章 生物醫學產業專利保護制度對消費者權益影響…………………………..15
第一節 生物醫學產業定義與分類…………………………………………………....15
第二節 專利保護制度對生物醫學產業之影響……………………………………....20
第四章 3C產業專利保護制度對消費者權益影響………………………………… 23
第一節 台灣3C產業概述………………………………………………………….....23
第二節 定性分析法-文獻回顧……………………………………………………….. 25
第三節 定量分析法-問卷調查……………………………………………………….. 27
第五章 結論與未來展望……………………………………………………………..43
第一節 研究結論……………………………………………………………………... 43
第二節 研究限制與後續建議………………………………………………………... 45
參考文獻………………………………………………………………………………….. 47
附錄A……………………………………………………………………………………... 49

1.王保進(2009)。中文視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究。台北市:心理出版社股份有。

2.吳明隆(2011)。SPSS統計應用學習實務。新北市:易習圖書。

3.林曉芳(2011)。統計學SPSS之應用。台北市:鼎茂圖書出版股份有限公司。

4.柴松林(2000)。消費者主義發展的新方向:專業倫理與教學論文集(三)。臺北市:長榮國際出版。

5.張芳全(2012)。問卷就是要這樣編。台北市:心理出版社股份有限公司。

6.許耀華(2004)。專利分類系統及其應用。台北市:智慧財產局月刊,68期。

7.陳達仁、黃慕萱(2002)。專利資訊與專利檢索。台北市:文華圖書館管理資訊服份有限公司,281-293。

8.謝炅廷(2005)。生物醫學產業之競爭策略與商業模式分析。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣大學商學研究所,台北市。

9.謝寶煖(1998)。專利與專利資訊檢索。台北市:大學圖書館,2-4。

10.Bronwyn H. Hall &; Rosemarie Ham Ziedonis (2000). The patent paradox revisited:An empirical study of patenting in the US semiconductor industry. RAND Journal of Economics , 32(1), 101-128.

11.Daniel J. Kevles(2002). Of mice &; money: The story of the world's first animal patent. Daedalus, Journal of the American Academy of Arts &; Science, Spring 2002, 78-88.

12.Fershtman C. &; Kamien M. I.(1992 ). Cross licensing of complementary technologies. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 10(3), 329-348.

13.Fiona Murray &; Scott Stern (2007). Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? An empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis. Journal of Economic Behavior &; Organization, 63, 648–687.

14.Mazzoleni Roberto &; Nelson Richard R(1998). Economic theories about the benefits and costs of patents. Journal-of-Economic-Issues, 32(4), 1031-1052.

15.Michael Heller(2010)。僵局經濟。台北縣五股鄉:繁星多媒體股份有限公司

16.Mildred K. Cho., Samantha Illangasekare, Meredith A. Weaver, Debra G. B. Leonard, & Jon F. Merz. (2003). Effects of patents and licenses on the provision of clinical genetic testing services. Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, 5(1), 3-8.

17.Mueller, W. F.(1962). The Origins of the Basic Inventions Underlying DuPont's Major Product and Process Innovations. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. New York: Princeton University Press.

18.Nikolaus Thumm(2005). Patents for genetic inventions: a tool to promote technological advance or a limitation for upstream inventions?. Technovation, 25, 1410-1417

19.Ove Granstrand(2000). The economics and management of intellectual property: Towards intellectual capitalism. Massachusetts. Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.

20.Paul A. David(2010). Mitigating “Anticommons” harms to research in science and technology. UNU-MERIT Working Papers ISSN 1871-9872.

21.Pavitt, K.(1988). Uses and abuses of patent statistics. Handbook of quantitative studies of science and technology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.

22.Philippe Aghion, Mathias Dewatripont, &; Jeremy C. Stein(2005). Academic freedom, private-sector focus, and the process of innovation. The national of economic research, NBER Working Paper, No.11542.

23.Reich L. S(1985). The making of American industrial research: Science and business at GE and Bell, 18761926. New York: Cambridge University Press.

24.Richard C. Levin, Alvin K. Klcvorick, Richard R. Nelson, Sidney G. Winter, Richard GiIbcrt,&; Zvi Grilichcs(1987). Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1987 (3), Special Issue On Microeconomics, 783-83 1.

連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top