跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.81) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/15 04:58
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:黃玫瑄
研究生(外文):Mei Hsuan Huang
論文名稱:體制壓力、寬裕資源、綠色產品創新與綠色產品績效關聯性之研究-以台灣電機電子產業為例
論文名稱(外文):The Relationship among Institutional Pressure, Slack Resources, Green Products Innovation and Green Products Performance: An Empirical Study on Electrical and Electronic Industries in Taiwan
指導教授:黃義俊黃義俊引用關係
指導教授(外文):Yi-Chun Huang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立高雄應用科技大學
系所名稱:企業管理系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2012
畢業學年度:100
語文別:中文
論文頁數:156
中文關鍵詞:體制壓力寬裕資源探索型綠色產品創新應用型綠色產創新
外文關鍵詞:institutional pressureslack resourcesexplorative green product innovationexploitative green product innovation
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:10
  • 點閱點閱:675
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:117
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
回顧先前綠色創新的研究,大多數研究利用專利來衡量綠色創新,但受到學者的批評,因此本研究將利用綠色產品創新來衡量企業綠色創新的採行,且將綠色產品創新劃分為探索型綠色產品創新與應用型綠色產品創新。本研究利用體制壓力來解釋當企業面臨壓力促使進行綠色產品創新,但卻不能回答組織在面對相同的體制壓力時,為何採取不同的環境管理實踐或綠色創新?因此以寬裕資源來解釋此現象。而本研究之目的於結合這兩觀點來探討體制壓力、寬裕資源、探索型綠色產品創新、應用型綠色產品創新與綠色產品績效之線性結構模式。
本研究以台灣電機電子產業為對象,以問卷調查法發放 1000 份問卷,有效回收問卷為 170 份,經由 AMOS 18.0 統計軟體分析結果顯示:體制壓力對探索型綠色產品創新有顯著正向影響;體制壓力對應用型綠色產品創新有顯著正向影響;寬裕資源對探索型綠色產品創新有顯著正向影響;寬裕資源對應用型綠色產品創新有顯著正向影響;探索型綠色產品創新對綠色產品績效有顯著正向影響;應用型綠色產品創新對綠色產品績效有顯著正向影響;寬裕資源對綠色產品績效有顯著正向影響。
Review the previous green innovation research, most studies use patent to measure green innovation. But some scholar criticizes this view, this study use green product innovation to measure green innovation of enterprises. In this study, green product innovation is divided into explorative green product innovation and exploitative green product innovation. It use institutional pressure to explain enterprises are facing pressure for green product innovation, but cannot answer why do organization that face same institutional pressures adopt different practice of environmental management or green innovation. In order to explore the questions, this study use slack resources to explain this phenomenon. The purpose of this study is to combine institutional theory and slack resources, and presents the structural equation modeling of institutional pressure, slack resources, explorative green product innovation, exploitative green product innovation and green product performance.
This study adopts the method of questionnaire investigation for electrical and electronic industries in Taiwan. This study mails 1000 questionnaires; the 170 valid questionnaires are turned. And using AMOS 18.0 statistics software to analysis the data, and there are seven main findings. The first, institutional pressure has a significant positive effect on the explorative green product innovation. The second, institutional pressure has a significant positive effect on the exploitative green product innovation. The third, slack resource has a significant positive effect on the explorative green product innovation. The fourth, slack resource has a significant positive effect on the exploitative green product innovation. The fifth, explorative green product innovation has a significant positive effect on the green product performance. The sixth, exploitative green product innovation has a significant positive effect on the green product performance. The seventh, slack resources has a significant positive effect on the green product performance.
中文摘要 i
英文摘要 ii
誌謝 iv
目錄 v
表目錄 vii
圖目錄 ix
第一章緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機 3
第三節 研究目的 5
第四節 研究流程 7
第二章 文獻探討 8
第一節 電機電子產業 8
第二節 綠色產品創新 16
第三節 體制理論 26
第四節 寬裕資源 35
第五節 綠色產品績效 45
第三章 研究方法 51
第一節 研究架構 51
第二節 操作型定義 52
第三節 研究假說 55
第四節 研究範圍與對象 61
第五節 資料收集方法 61
第六節 資料分析方法 67
第四章 研究分析與結果 69
第一節 回收樣本敘述統計分析 69
第二節 信度與效度分析 71
第三節 研究構面之敘述統計 80
第四節 獨立性 T 檢定與 ANOVA 分析 86
第五節 相關分析 92
第六節 迴歸分析 96
第七節 整體模式分析 101
第五章 研究結論與建議 111
第一節 研究結論 111
第二節 管理意涵 117
第三節 研究貢獻 117
第四節 研究限制及未來研究方向 119
參考文獻 120
附錄一:問卷 140
參考文獻
中文部分
工業總會貿易發展組 國際經貿服務 http://www.cnfi.org.tw/wto/all-index.php
方世榮、方世杰、楊舒蜜和黃識銘 (2011),多層級網絡結構特性對探索性與應用性創新之影響,中山管理評論,743-781。
王志旭(2008),探討綠色產品購買態度的影響因素及其對綠色產品購買意願之影響。屏東科技大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
王貞惠 (2007),電機電子產業綠色管理系統模式,中原大學國際貿易研究所碩士論文。
王哲夫 (2008),台灣電機電子產業服務創新對顧客滿意度之研究 ,亞洲大學經營管理學系碩士班碩士論文。
台灣區電機電子工業同業公會 http://www.teema.org.tw/
江家麟(2009),電機電子產業之綠色供應商評選量表的建構,中華大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。
江馥安(2011),歐洲聯盟電子廢棄物管理體制之形成—兼論對我國電子產品出口的影響,淡江大學歐洲研究所碩士論文。
吳春嫻 (2002),台灣電機電子產業對國內投資環境及基礎建設之感受調查分析研究,國立交通大學土木工程系碩士論文。
吳萬益、林清河 (2002)。行銷研究。台北:華泰書局。
呂佩芬 (2007),符合歐盟環保指令之電機電子產業綠色會計系統模式,中原大學國際貿易研究所碩士論文。
李依蓉(2008),策略導向、綠色創造力為前置變數探討整合能耐與綠色新產品競爭優勢關聯性之研究-以台灣地區電機產業為例,國立高雄應用科技大學商務經營研究所碩士論文。
杜瑞澤、張孟哲(2004),綠色產品成功商品化設計之研究,藝術學報,第75期,87-104。
谷婉琳 (2009),兩岸電機電子產業國際驗證服務之品牌權益、關係行銷對再購意願影響之研究─以新產品績效為干擾變數,淡江大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
林易詳 (2009),體制壓力、高階回應、綠色創新的採行與組織績效之關聯性研究-以台灣地區電機電子產業為例,國立高雄應用科技大學企管研究所碩士論文。
林美滿 (2006),台灣電機電子產業因應歐盟WEEE與RoHS指令之研究,國立彰化師範大學電機工程學系碩士論文。
邱仁洲(2005),市場知識能力、組織的環保行動、整合能耐與綠色新產品績效之關聯性研究 -以我國電機電子業為例 ,樹德科技大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。
邱德勳 (2001),推行ISO 9001:2000 標準之關鍵成功因素探討- 以電機、電子產業為例,國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。
柯惠淑(2006),綠色創新能耐之前因與結果模式之實證研究-以台灣地區電機電子業為例,高雄應用科技大學碩士論文。
范元綱(2009),導入綠色價值消費者對綠色產品購買態度影響性之研究。國立交通大學交通運輸學系碩士論文。
夏淑雯 (2006)。體制壓力、人力資本、創新性人力資源管理與人力資源管理效能關係之研究。國立高雄應用科技大學人力資源發展系碩士班碩士論文。
張峻哲(2008),從永續發展觀點探討企業綠色產品開發的意願與績效之研究,大葉大學設計研究所碩士論文。
張偉豪 (2011)。SEM論文寫作不求人。鼎茂圖書出版股份有限公司。
張麗琴 (2007),應用模糊決策分析環保及經營績效之研究 —以台灣電機電子產業為例,中原大學國際貿易研究所碩士論文。
張蘭玉 (2006),歐盟WEEE、RoHS指令對我國電機電子產業之影響,中華大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。
產業永續發展整和資訊網 http://proj.moeaidb.gov.tw/isdn/
陳宥杉(2004),綠色環保壓力對企業競爭優勢影響之研究,以國內資訊電子相關產業為例,國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
陳宥杉、溫肇東、賴士葆 (2005),環保壓力對企業競爭優勢影響之研究-綠色創新之中介效果,企業管理學報,第64期,79-162頁。
陳順宇(2007),多變量分析,台北市:華泰。
陳傳益 (2009),技術創新策略、知識管理對創新績效之影響 -以寬裕資源資源及知識屬性為調節變數。國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。
陳麗旭 (1997),商品出口價格與實質匯率之關係:台灣電機電子產業的實証研究,國立台灣大學國際企業學系研究所碩士論文。
黃俊英(2000),多變量分析,七版,臺北市:中國經企研究所。
黃義俊 (2001)。企業的綠色管理之整合性模式的實證研究-以化工與機電產業為例,國立中山大學企業管理學系博士論文。
黃義俊 (2011),綠色產品創新影響因素的理論建構與實證研究:整合多重觀點,國科會結案報告。
黃義俊、高明瑞 (2003),以利害關係人為前因之綠色創新的採行與環境績效關係之實證研究,管理評論,第二十二卷第三期, 91-121 頁。
黃義俊、高明瑞 (2004),從利害相關人的觀點實證研究綠色創新的採行與組織績效之關係:LISREL 模式。中山管理評論,12(4),663-674。
黃萬居 (2004),企業運用環境管理提昇競爭力之研究-以ISO14000為例,臺灣大學高階公共管理組碩士論文。
溫肇東、陳泰明 (1997),台灣的綠色創新組織初探,台大管理論叢,第八期,第二卷,99-124頁。
經濟部工業局 http://www.moeaidb.gov.tw/
劉子衙 (2005),歐盟電機電子業環保新規定及對產業的影響,兩岸經貿月刊。
鄭吉宏(2009),綠色產品知覺價值、知覺風險與購買意願之研究—以綠能薄型數位電視為例,國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。
鄭凱駿 (2006),台灣電子電機產業應因 WEEE 及 RoHS 指令之綠色管理系統研究,中原大學國際貿易研究所碩士論文。
鄭筱樺 (2011),影響企業導入綠色供應鏈管理系統意圖之研究-以制度理論及資源依賴理論為觀點,國立中正大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
盧柏宏 (2007),學習導向、綠色知識能力、綠色創新表現與競爭優勢之關聯性實證研究:以台灣電子電機產業為例。國立高雄應用科技大學商務經營研究所碩士論文
蕭伊君 (2010),來源國形象企業形象對購買意願之影響 -以綠色產品產品涉入程度為調節作用,國立東華大學國際企業學系碩士論文。
錢銘貴、施勵行 (2007),綠色供應鏈管理實務採行之驅力壓力與組織績效關係之實證研究-以台灣電機電子產業為例,人文社會科學研究,第一卷,第一期,72-98頁。
鍾喜梅 (2002),台灣上市公司人力資源部門專業程度影響緣由之探討,國立中山大學企業管理學系博士論文。
藍雅慧 (2004),台商海外投資據點佈局對經營績效之影響—以台灣電機電子產業為例,銘傳大學管理研究所碩士論文。








英文部分
Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: Pros-pects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27, 17–40.
Ambec, S., & Lanoie, P. (2007). When & why does it pay to be green? (Discussion Paper No. IEA-07-04). Montreal: HEC.
Ancona, D. G., Goodman, P. S., Lawrence, B. S., & Tushman, M. L. (2001). Time: A new research lens. Academy of Management Review, 26, 645–663.
Arago´n-Correa Jorge A. (1998). Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 41(5), 556–567.
Atuahene-Gima, K. (1996). Differential potency of factors affecting innovation performance in manufacturing and service firms in Australia. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13(1), 35-52.
Atuahene-Gima, K. (2005). Resolving the capability-rigidity paradox in new product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 69, 61–83.
Avlonitis, G. J., & Salavou, H. E. (2007). Entrepreneurial orientation of SMEs, product innovativeness, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 60, 566-575.
Azzone, G., & Noci, G (1996).Measuring the environmental performance of new products: an integrated approach. International Journal of Production Research, 34(11), 3055-3078.
Balachandra, R., & Friar, J.H. (1997).Factors for success in R&D projects and new product innovation: a contextual framework. Engineering Management, (3), 276-287.
Ball, A., & Craig, R. (2010). Usingneo-institutionalism to advance social and environmental accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21(4), 283–293.
Banerjee, S. B., Iyer, E. S., & Kashyap, R. K. (2003).Corporate environmentalism: antecedents and influence of industry type. Journal of Marketing, 67, 106-22.
Barczak, G. (1995). New product strategy, structure, process and perfonnance in the telecommunications industry. Journal of Product Innovation management, 12(2), 224-234.
Barney, J. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage: A comment. Management Science, 35, 1511–1513
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and stained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.
Barney, J. B., & Hansen, M. H.(1994). Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 175–190.
Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986), The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:Conceptual,strategic,and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
Bayus, B., Erickson, G., & Jacobson, R. (2003). The financial rewards of new product introductions in the personal computer industry. Management Science, 49(2), 197–210.
Benner, Mary J., & Michael L. Tushman (2003). Exploitation,Exploration, and Process Management: The ProductivityDilemma Revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28 (2), 238–256.
Berchicci, L., & Bodewes, W. (2005), Bridging environmental issues with new product development, Business Strategy & the Environment, 14, 272-85.
Berger, P. L., & Luckman, T. (1967). The social consfnicHon of reality: A treatise in ihe sociology of fenowledge. New York: Anchor Books.
Bourgeois, L. J., & Singh, J. V. (1983). Organizational slack & political behaviour among top management teams. Proceedings of the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, 43–47.
Bourgeois, L.J., III (1981).On the measurement of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review, 6(1), 29-39.
Bowen, F. E. (2002a). Does size matter? Organization slack & visibility as alternative explanation for environmental responsiveness. Business & Society, 41, 118-124.
Bowen, F. E. (2002b). Organizational slack and corporate greening: Broadening the debate. British Journal of Management, 13, 305–316.
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1998). Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
Burgess, G. H. (1989). Industrial organization. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Calantone, R., Vickery, S., & Deoge, C. (1995). Business performance and strategic new product development activities: An empirical investigation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(3), 214-223.
Carter, C. R., Kale, R., & Grimm, C. M., (2000). Environmental purchasing and firm performance: an empirical investigation. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics & Transportation Review, 36 (3), 219–228.
Chen, Y. S. (2008).The driver of green innovation and green image – green core competence. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 531–543.
Chen, Y. S., Lai, S. B., & Wen, C. T. (2006). The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 331-339.
Child, J. (1972). Organization structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6, 1−22.
Chiou, T. Y., Chan, H. K., Lettice, F., & Chung, S. H. (2011). The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part E, 47, 822–836.
Christensen, C. M., & Bower, J. L. (1996). Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 197–218.
Christmann P. (2000). Effects of ‘‘best practices’’ of environmental management on cost advantages: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 663– 680.
Christmann, P. (2004). Multinational companies and the natural environment: Determinants of global environmental policy standardization. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 747-760.
Chung, Y., & Tsai, C. (2007). The effect of green design activities on new product strategies and performance: An empirical study among high-tech companies. International Journal of Management, 24(2), 276–288.
Clarke L. (1994). The essence of change. Prentice Hall International: Hemel Hempstead, UK.

Cleff, T., & Rennings, K. (1999). Determinants of environmental product and process innovation. European Environment, 9 (5), 191–201.
Clemens, B., & Douglas, T. (2006). Does coercion drive firms to adopt ‘voluntary’ green initiatives? Relationships among coercion, superior firm resources, and voluntary green initiatives. Journal of Business Research, 59, 483–491.
Cooper, R. G. (1984). New product strategies: What distinguishes the top performers. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2, 151-164.
Cyert, R. M. & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioural theory of the firm. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
Damanpour, F. (1992). Organizational size and innovation. Organization Studies, 13, 375-402.
Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants & moderators. The Academy of Management Journal, 34, 555-590.
Dangelico, R. M., & Pujari, D. (2010). Mainstreaming green product innovation: Why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 471–486.
Danneels, E. (2002). The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 1095–1121.
Dean, T. J., & Brown, R. L. (1995). Pollution regulation as a barrier to new firm entry: initial evidence and implications for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 288-303.
Delmas, M. (2003). In search of ISO: An institutional perspective on the adoption of international management standards. Working Paper 1784. Stanford Graduate School of Business: Stanford, CA.
Delmas, M. A., & Toffel, M. W. (2008). Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1027-1055.
Delmas, M., & Toffel, M. W. (2004). Stakeholders and environmental management practices: An institutional framework. Business Strategy & the Environment, 13, 209-222.

Denis, D. J., Denis, D. K., & Sarin, A. (1999). Agency theory and the influence of equity ownership structure on corporate diversification strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 1071−1076.
Dierickx, I., & Cool K, (1989), Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35, 1504-1511,
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
Dimick, D., & Murray, V. (1978). Correlates of substantive policy decisions in organizations: The case of human resource management. Academy of Management Journal, 21, 611–623.
Dougherty, D., & Bowman, E. H. (1995). The effect of organizational downisizing of product innovation. California Management Review, 37(4), 28-44.
Dwyer, L. D., & Mellor, R. (1991). New product process activities and project outcomes. R&D Management, 21(2), 1-52.
Dyer, J., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of inter-organizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 660–679.
Elkington, J., & Hailes, J. (1993). The green consumer. Viking Penguin, USA. Inc..
Faems, D., Looy, B. V., & Debackere K. (2005). International collaboration and Innovation: Toward a portfolio approach. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22, 238–250.
Fong, M. (1995). The effect of organizational characteristics on entry timing: A muti-industry study. University of Maryl& College Park, USA.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, V. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
Fraj-andre´s, E., Martinez-Salinas, E., & Matute-Vallejo, J. (2009). A multidimensional approach to the influence of environmental marketing and orientation on the firm’s organizational performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 263–286.
Fussler, C. (1996). Driving eco-innovation: A breaking through discipline for innovation and sustainability. London: Pitman.
Garcia, R, Calantone, R. J., & Levine, R. (2003). The role of knowledge in resource allocation to exploration versus exploitation in technologically oriented organizations. Decision Sciences, 34 (2), 323–350.
Gatingnon, H., & Xuereb, J. M. (1997), Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 77-90.
Geiger, S. W., & Cashen, L. (2002). A multidimensional examination of slack and its impact on innovation. Journal of Managerial Issues, 14, 68−84.
Geiger, S. W., & Makri, M. (2006). Exploration and exploitation innovation processes: The role of organization slack in R&D intensive firms. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 17, 97-108.
George, G. (2005). Slack resource and the performance of privately held firms. Academy of management Journal, 48(4), 661-676.
Greve, H. R. (2003). A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 685–702.
Guler, I., Guillen, M. F., & MacPherson J. M. (2002). Global competition, institutions, and the diffusion of organizational practices: The international spread of the ISO 9000 quality certificates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(3), 507–531.
Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 693–706.
Hair, J., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th). New York: Prentice Hall.
Hambrick, D. C., & Snow, C. C. (1977). A contextual model of strategic decision making in organizations. Academy of Management Proceedings, 109-112.
Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1989). Organizational ecology. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
Harris, P. G. (2006). Environmental perspectives and behavior in China: Synopsis and bibliography. Environment & Behavior, 38 (1), 5–21.
Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986– 1014.

He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15, 481–494.
Herold, D. M., Jayaraman, N. J., & Narayanaswamy, C. R. (2006). What is the relationship hetween organizational slack and Innovation? Journal of Managerial Issues, 18(3), 372-392.
Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28, 383–396.
Hirsch, P. M. (1975). Organizational effectiveness and the institutional environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 327–344.
Hirsch, P. M., & Lounsbury, M. (1997). Putting the organization back into organization theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 6(1), 79-88.
Hoffman, A, J., & Ventresca, M. J. (2002). Organizations, policy, and the natural environment. Stanford, Stanford University Press.
Hoffman, A. J. (1999). Institutionale volution and change: Environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 351-371.
Hoffman, A. J. (2001). Linking organizational and field-level analyses. Organization & Environment, 14(2), 133– 156.
Hopkins, D. S. (1981). New product winners and losers. Research Management, 12(1), 12-17.
Huang, Y. C., & Wu, Y. C. J. (2010). The effects of organizational factors on green new product success. Management Decision, 48(10), 1539-1567.
Huang, Y. C., Ding, H. B., & Kao, M. R. (2009). Salient stakeholder voices: Family business and green innovation adoption. Journal of Management & Organization, 15(3), 309-326.
Huang, Y. F., & Chen, C. J., (2010). The impact of technological diversity and organizational slack on innovation. Technovation, 30, 420–428.
Ingram, P., & Silverman, B. S. (2002). The new institutionalism in strategic management. In Advances in Strategic Management, 19, Ingram P, Silverman BS (eds).JAI Press: New York, 1–30.

Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52, 1661–1674.
Jennings, P. D. & Zandbergen, P. A. (1995). Ecologically sustainable organizations: An institutional approach. Academy of Management Journal, 20(4), 1015–1053.
Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, & takeovers. American Economic Review, 76, 323−329.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency cost, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305−360.
Johannessen, J. A., & Dolva, J. O. (1994). Competence and innovation: Identifying critical innovation factors. Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Change, 3(3), 209-222.
Johansson, G. (2002). Success factors for integration of eco-design in product development, Environmental Management and Health, 13(1), 98-107.
Kagan, R. A., Gunningham, N., & Thornton, D. (2003). Explaining corporate environmental performance: How does regulation matter? Law and Society. Review, 37, 51–90.
Kamin, J. Y., & Ronen, J. (1978). The smoothing of income numbers: some empirical evidence on systematic differences among management-controlled and owner-controlled firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 3(2), 141-157.
Kammerer, D. (2009). The effects of customer benefit and regulation on environmental product innovation: Empirical evidence from appliance manufacturers in Germany. Ecological Economics, 68, 2285-2295.
Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1183–1194.
Kelm, K. M., Narayanan, V. K., & Pinches, G. E. (1995). Shareholder value creation during R&D innovation and commercialization stages. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 770-786.
Khan, Arshad M., & Manopichetwattana, V. (1989). Models for distinguishing innovative and noninnovative small firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 4(3), 187-196.
Khanna, M., & Speir, C. (2007). Motivations for proactive environmental management and innovative pollution control. Paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Portland, OR.
Kilbourne, W. E., Beckmann, S. C., & Thelen, E. (2002). The role of the dominant social paradigm in environmental attitudes: A multinational examination. Journal of Business Research, 55(3), 193–204.
Kim, H., Heechun, K., & Lee, M. P. (2008). Ownership structure and the relationship between financial slack and R&D investments: evidence from Korean firms. Organization Science, 19(3), 404–418.
Kimberly, J. R. (1986). The organizational context of technological innovation. In D. D. Davis (eds), Managing Technological Innovation, 24-43, Dan Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
Kochhar, R., & David, P. (1996). Institutional investors and firm innovation: A test of competing hypotheses. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 73-84.
Kollman, K., & Prakash, A. (2002). EMS-based environmental regimes as club goods: Examining variations in firm-level adoption of ISO14001 and EMAS in U.K., U.S. and Germany. Policy Sciences, 35, 43-67.
Kraatz, M. S., & Zajac, E. J. (2001). How organizational resources affect strategic change and performance in turbulent environments: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12, 632–657.
Lee, J., & Ryu, Y. U. (2002). Exploration, exploitation and adaptive rationality: The Neo-Schumpeterian Perspective. Simulation Modeling Practice and Theory, 10, 297–321.
Levinthal, D., & March, J. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 95–112.
Lewin, A. Y., Long, C. P., & Carroll, T. N. (1999). The coevolution of new organizational forms. Organization Science, 10, 535–550.
Li, T., & Calantone, R. J. (1998). The impact of market knowledge competence on new productadvantage: Conceptualization and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62, 13-29.

Li, Y., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Schoenmakers, W. (2008). Exploration and exploitation in innovation: Reframing the interpretation. Journal compilation, 17, 107-126.
Lin, W. T., & Liu, Y. (2011).Successor characteristics, organisational slack, and change in the degree of firm internationalization. International Business Review, 1-13.
Liu, H., & Ding, X. (2010). Organization slack entrepreneurial orientation and product innovation evidence from China. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 1-7.
Lober, D. J. (1996). Evaluating the environmental performance of corporations. Journal of Managerial Issue, 8, 184-205.
Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifyin the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Journal, 21(1), 135-172.
Lune, H., & Martinez, M. (1999). Old structures, new relations: How community development credit unions define organizational boundaries. Sociological Forum, 14(4), 609-634.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71–87.
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1976), Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Universitetsforlaget, Bergen.
Martinez, R. J., & Dacin, M. T. (1999). Efficiency motives and normative forces: Combing transaction cost and institutional logical. Journal of Management, 25(1), 73-96.
Menon, A., & Menon, A. (1997). Enviropreneurial marketing strategy: The emergency of corporate environmentalism as market strategy. Journal of Marketing, 61, 51-57.
Meyer, A. D. (1982). Adapting to environmental jolts.Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 515-537.
Meyer, J., & Scott, R. (1983). Centralization and the legitimacy problems of local government, In J. Meyer and R. Scott (Eds.), Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality, 198-215, Beverly Hills: Sage.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth & ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
Miles, M. P., & Covin, J. G. (2000). Environmental marketing: A source of reputation, competitive and financial advantage. Journal of Business Ethics, 23, 299– 311.
Miller, C. (2003). Hidden in plain sight: Underst&ing non-profit capital structure. Nonprofit Quarterly, 10(1), 1–8.
Milstein, M. B., Hart, S. L., & York, A. S. (2002). Coercion breeds variation: the different impact of isomorphic pressures on environment strategies. In Organization, Policy and the Natural Environment: Institutional and Strategic Perspectives, Hoffman AJ, Ventresca MJ (edus). Stanford University Press: Stanford, 151-172.
Mishina, Y., Pollock, T. G., & Porac, J. F. (2004). Are moreresources always better for growth? Resource stickiness in market and product expansion. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 1179–1197.
Moses, O. D. (1992).Organizational slack and risk-taking behavior: Tests of product pricing strategy. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 5(3), 38-54.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 242–266.
Noci, G., & Verganti, R. (1999). Managing ‘green’ product innovation in small firms. R&D Management, 29 (1), 3–15.
Nohria, N., & Gulati, R. (1996). Is slack good or bad for innovation? Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1245–1264.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
O’Brien, J. P. (2003). The capital structure implications of pursuing a strategy of innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 415–431.
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responces to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16, 145-179.
Oliver, C., & Holzinger, I. (2008). The effectiveness of strategic political management: A dynamic capabilities framework. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 496-520.
Olson, E. M., Walker, O. C., & Ruekert, R. W. (1995). Organizing for effective new product development: The moderating role of product innovativeness. Journal of Marketing, 59, 48-62.
Ottman, J. A. (1994). Green marketing. NTC Business Books, IL: Lincolnwood.
Ottman, J. A., Stafford, E. R., & Hartman, C. L. (2006). Green marketing myopia, Environment, 48(5), 22–36.
Özsomer, A., & Gençtürk, E. (2003). A resource-based model of market learning in the subsidiary: The capabilities of exploration and exploitation. Journal of International Marketing, 11 (2), 1–29.
Paladino, A. (2007), Investigating the drivers of innovation and new product success: A comparison of strategic orientations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24, 534-553.
Parsons, T. (1956). Suggestions for a sociological approach to the theory of organization. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1, 225– 239.
Peattie, K. (1992). Green marketing. Pearson Higher Education.
Perretti, F., & Negro, G. (2007). Mixing genres and matching people: A study in innovation and team composition in Hollywood. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 563–586.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organization. New York: Harper & Row.
Polonsky, M., & Ottman, J. (1998). Stakeholders’ contribution to the green product development process. Journal of Markting Management, 14, 533–557.
Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, V. C. (1995). Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 120-134.
Prakash, A. (2000). Responsible care: an assessment. Business and Society, 39(2), 183–209.
Pujari, D., & Wright, G. (1996). Developing environmentally conscious product strategies:a qualitative study of selected companies in Germany & Britain. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 14(1), 19-28.
Pujari, D., Wright, G., & Peattie, K. (2003). Green and competitive: Influences on environmental new product development performance. Journal of Business Research, 56(8), 657-671.

Reinhardt, F. L. (1998). Environmental product differentiation: Implications for corporate strategy. California Management Review, 40 (4), 43–73.
Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining innovation and eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 319-332.
Rivera, J. (2004), Institutional pressures and voluntary environmental behavior in developing countries: Evidence from the Costa Rican hotel industry. Society and Natural Resources, 17, 779–797.
Robbins, S. P. (1996). Organization behavior: Concepts, controversies and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
Rothaermel, F., & Deeds, D. L. (2004). Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 201–221.
Roy, R. (1999), Designing and marketing greener products: the Hoover case. in Charter, M. and Polonsky, M. J. (Eds), Greener Marketing: A global perspective to green marketing practice, greenleaf publishing, Sheffield, 126-142.
Russell, R. D. (1995). An investigation of some organizational correlates of corporate entrepreneurship: Toward a system model of organizational innovation, innovation, entrepreneurship. Innovation and Change, 4(4), 295-314.
Sarin, S., & McDermott, C. (2003). The effect of team leader characteristics on learning, knowledge application, and performance of cross-functional new product development teams. Decision Sciences, 34(4), 707–739.
Sarkis, J., Zhu, Q., & Lai, K.H. (2011). An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. International Journal of Production Economics, 130, 1-15.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1939). Business cycles: A theory, historical and statistical analysis of the capitalist process (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
Scott, W. R. (1991). Unpacking institutional arguments. In: Powell Walter, DiMaggio Paul, editors. The new institutionalism in organization analysis. Chicago University of Chicago, 164–182.

Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. SAGE
Scott, W. R. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative scienc quarterly. 32, 493–511.
Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. New York: Hamper & Row.
Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the grass roots: A study in the sociology of formal organization. University of California Press: Berkeley.
Sharfman, M., Wolf, G., Chase, R., & Tansik, D. (1988). Antecedents of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review, 13, 601–614.
Sharma, S., & Henriques, I. (2005). Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 159-180.
Simon, H. A. (1957). Administrative behavior. New York, NY: Free Press.
Simon, J. L. (1995). The Management of advertising. Engelwood Cliffs New Jersey, Prentice-Hall Inc., 39-43.
Singh, J. V. (1986). Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 562–585.
Sirdeshmukh, D., Singh, J., & Sabol, B. (2002). Consumer trust, value and loyalty in relational exchanges. Journal of Marketing, 66, 15–37.
Smith, K. G., Grimm, C. M., Gannon, M. J., & Chen, M. J. (1991). Organizational information processing, competitive responses, and performance in the US domestic airline industry. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 60-85.
Song, X. M., & Montoya-Weiss, M. M. (2001). The effect of perceived technological uncertainty on Japanes new product development. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 61-80.
Song, X. M., & Parry, M. E. (1997). A cross-national comparative study of new product development processes: Japan and the United States. Journal of Marketing. 61(2), 1-18.
Stinchcombe, A. L. (1968). Constructing social theories. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tan, J., & Peng, M. W. (2003). Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: Two studies from an emerging economy. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 1249–1263.
Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York McGraw Hill.
Thomson, N., & Millar, C. C. J. M. (2001). The role of slack in transforming organizations: A comparative analysis of Eeast German and Slovenian companies. International Studies of Management and Organizations, 31(2), 65-83.
Tushman, Michael, L., &. Nadler, D. A (1986). Organizing for innovation. California Management Review, 28, 74-92.
Van Looy, B., Martens, T., & Debackere, K. (2005). Organizing for continuous innovation: On the sustainability of ambidextrous organizations. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14, 208–221.
Voss, G. B., Sirdeshmukh, D., & Voss, Z. G. (2008). The effects of slack resources and environmental threat on product exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 147–164.
Wade-Benzoni, K. A, Hoffman, A. J., Thompson, L. L, Moore, D. A., Gillespie, J. J., & Bazerman, M. H. (2002). Barriers to resolution in ideologically based negotiations: The role of values and institutions. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 41–45.
Wagner, M. (2007). On the relationship between environmental management, environmental innovation and patenting: Evidence from German manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 36, 1587–1602.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171–180.
Williamson, O. E. (1964). The economics of discretionary behavior: Managerial objectives in a theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Wortzel, R. (1979). Multivariatean alysis, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Yalcinkaya, G., Calantone, R. J., & Griffith, D. A. (2007). An examination of exploration and exploitation capabilities: Implications for product innovation market performance. Journal of International Marketing, 15(4), 63-93.
Zahra, S. A., de Belardino, S., & Boxx, W. R. (1988). Organizational innovation: Its correlates and its implications for financial performance. International Journal of Management, 5(2), 133–142.
Zhou, K. Z. (2006). Innovation, imitation, and new product performance: The case of China. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(3), 394-402.
Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2007). The moderating effects of institutional pressures on emergent green supply chain practices and performance. International Journal of Production Research, 45 (18–19), 4333–4355.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 體制壓力、綠色資源對綠色產品創新與綠色產品創新成功關聯性之研究:以台灣電機電子產業為例
2. 消費者品牌偏好與綠色產品知覺對綠色產品購買意願之影響
3. 綠色產品的銷售比例與污染排放稅政策對於綠色產品數量和貿易量之影響
4. 關係品質、綠色產品認知對綠色產品採購意圖之影響-以綠色購買態度為中介變數
5. 體制壓力、管家行為、綠色供應鏈管理實務與組織績效關聯性之研究-以台灣電機電子產業為例
6. 體制壓力、企業綠色資源、綠色供應鏈管理與績效關聯性之研究-以台灣電機電子產業為例
7. 從綠色知識管理觀點探討綠色產品彈性與綠色產品績效之研究─以台灣資訊產業為例
8. 體制壓力、高階回應、綠色創新的採行與組織績效之關聯性研究-以台灣地區電機電子產業為例
9. 環境知識、參考價格、生態情感、價格公平性與綠色產品購買意圖關聯性之研究:以消費者觀點探討
10. 市場導向、綠色供應鏈管理能耐與綠色供應鏈管理績效關聯性之研究—以台灣電機電子產業為例
11. 綠色產品與產品創新程度對顧客接受度影響之研究
12. 探討綠色產品購買態度的影響因素及其對綠色產品購買意願之影響
13. 影響員工綠色創造力之跨層次分析-以環保產業為例
14. 探討綠色共同願景與環保組織文化對於綠色產品開 發績效之影響:以綠色吸收能力為中介變數
15. 利害關係人壓力、企業綠色資源、綠色供應鏈管理與組織績效之關聯研究:以台灣電機電子產業為例