(3.236.231.61) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/05/15 23:43
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

: 
twitterline
研究生:吳春梅
研究生(外文):Chun-Mei Wu
論文名稱:集團企業多角化程度對經營績效之影響~以高階管理團隊特質及家族涉入為干擾
論文名稱(外文):The Relationship between Diversification and Performance in Conglomerate: Top Management Team Characteristics and Family Involvement as Moderations
指導教授:許文宗許文宗引用關係
指導教授(外文):Wen-Tsung Hsu
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:銘傳大學
系所名稱:國際企業學系碩士在職專班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2012
畢業學年度:100
語文別:中文
論文頁數:67
中文關鍵詞:集團企業多角化高階管理團隊家族涉入
外文關鍵詞:ConglomerateDiversificationTop Management TeamFamily Involvement
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:10
  • 點閱點閱:332
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:90
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究主要在探討集團企業多角化程度對經營績度的影響,另外加入高階管理團隊的人格特質及集團企業中家族涉入程度作為干擾變數,觀察其對多角化與績效之間的影響。
本研究以中華徵信所2009年出版之「台灣地區大型集團企業研究」中之一百大集團企業為研究對象,扣除資料不完整的公司後,納入本研究之總樣本數為96家。
實證結果,在集團企業多角化程度與經營績之關係的探討上,發現多角化程度與經營績效之間呈現先增後減的關係,而型成一個倒U的模式。而在以高階管理團隊的人格特質為干擾變項的研究中,本研究證實了,高階管理團隊平均教育程度對多角化與績效之關係產生正向干擾效果;而高階管理團隊的平均任期則會弱化多角化與績效之間的關係;年齡的因素對多角化與績效之關係的解釋力不顯著。而家族涉入程度之衡量變數「家族持股比例」及「高階管理團隊中家族成員比例」在迴歸模式中均未達顯著水準。
This study examines the interaction between diversification and performance in conglomerate. And it also studies how TMT’s characteristics and family involvement moderate the relationship between diversification and performance.
The research data is the Top 100 Conglomerates in Taiwan published by China Credit Information Service in 2009. After elimination of incomplete sample, the total number in this study is 96.
The empirical result shows an inverted U-shaped relationship between conglomerate diversification and performance. Conglomerate’s diversification has a positive effect on performance at the beginning but it becomes negative after a certain level. The study also finds that TMT educational level has positive moderating effect on diversification-performance relationship, but TMT tenure may has negative moderating effect. TMT age and family involvement have no significant moderating effect on the relationship between diversification and performance.
目  錄 I
圖 目 錄 III
表 目 錄 IV
第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景及動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究流程及步驟 6
第貳章 文獻探討 9
第一節 集團企業概述 9
第二節 集團企業多角化程度 11
第三節 高階管理團隊之理論 18
第參章 研究方法 23
第一節 研究架構 23
第二節 研究假設 25
第三節 變數之操作性定義與衡量方法 28
第四節 資料分析方法 32
第肆章 實證結果與分析 33
第一節 樣本資料描述 33
第二節 研究假設之檢定結果 36
第三節 分析結果彙整 42
第伍章 結論與建議 44
第一節 結論 44
第二節 管理意涵 46
第三節 研究限制 48
第四節 後續研究建議 49
參考文獻 50
中文部份 50
英文部份 52
中文部份:
1.中華徵信所 (2003),台灣地區集團企業研究2003年版,自行出版。
2.中華徵信所 (2008),台灣地區集團企業研究2008年版,自行出版。
3.中華徵信所 (2009),台灣地區集團企業研究2009年版,自行出版。
4.方至民、曾志弘、鍾憲瑞、沈如騏 (2000),高階經營團隊特質與財務能力對企業研發支出影響之研究-以台灣上市電子產業公司為例,科技管理學刊,第5卷第3期:29-46。
5.司徒達賢 (1995),策略管理,台北,遠流出版公司。
6.沈育宏 (2008),家族持股、家族管理與公司績效:以台灣上市公司為例,國立台灣科技大學財務金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
7.翁淑育 (2000),台灣上市公司股權結構、核心代理問題與公司價值之研究,私立輔仁大學金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
8.許士軍 (1974),集團企業的管理與社會經濟意義,管理通訊,第九卷,第五期:1-2。
9.許文宗 (2011),聯盟組合國際化與廠商績效--CEO特質調節效果,國科會研究計劃。
10.許致中 (1987),台灣地區企業多角化策略對績效影響之研究,交通大學管理科學研究所未出版碩士論文。
11.陳瓊蓉,陳隆麒,謝劍平(2004),股權結構、多角化程度與公司績效關聯性之研究-以台灣上市公司為例,2004 台灣財務學術研討會。
12.湯明哲 (2003):策略精論-基礎篇,台北,天下遠見出版。
13.黃子菱 (2002),集團企業多角化程度與經營績效相關性之研究-以平衡計分卡觀點探討,東吳大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。
14.楊素暖 (2005),集團企業高階管理團隊、多角化與績效之關係,銘傳大學國際企業學系未出版碩士論文。
英文部份:

1.Ali, A., Chen, T.Y. and Radhakrishnan, S. (2007). Corporate Disclosures by Family Firms, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44(1-2): 238-286.
2.Ansoff, H.I. (1957). Strategies for Diversification, Harvard Business Review, 35(5): 113-124.
3.Bantel, K.A. and Jackson, S. (1989). Top Management and Innovations in Banking: Does the Composition of the Top Team Make a Difference?, Strategic Management Journal, 10(2): 107-124.
4.Barker, V.L. and Mueller, G.C. (2000). CEO Characteristics and Firm R&D Spending, Management Science, 48(6): 782-801.
5.Barontini, R., and Caprio, L. (2006). The Effect of Family Control on Firm Value and Performance: Evidence from Continental Europe, European Financial Management, 12(5): 689-723.
6.Berry, C.H. (1971). Corporate Growth and Diversification, Journal of Law and Economics, 14(2): 371.
7.Carlson, R. and Karlsson, K. (1970). Age, Cohorts, and the Generation of Generations, American Sociological Review, 35: 710-718.
8.Carpenter, M.A. and Fredrickson, J.W. (2001). Top Management Teams, Global Strategic Posture, and the Moderating Role of Uncertainty, Academy of Management Journal, 44(3): 533-545.
9.Carter, J. (1977). In Search of Synergy: A Structure Performance Test, Review of Economics and Statistics, 59: 279-289.
10.Chang, S. and Hong, J. (2000). Economic Performance of Group-affiliated Companies in Korea: Intragroup Resource Sharing and Internal Business Transaction, Academy of Management Journal, 43(3): 429-448.
11.Chang, S., Wu, W., and Wong, Y. (2010). Family and Stock Market Reactions to Innovation Announcements, British Journal of Management, 21: 152–170.
12.Chatterjee, S. and Wernerfelt, B. (1991). The Link between Resources and Type of Diversification: Theory and Evidence, Strategic Management Journal, 12(1): 33-48.
13.Cheng, L.T.W., Fung, H.G. and Leung, T.Y. (2009). Dividend Preference of Tradable-share and Non-tradable-share Holders in Mainland China, Accounting and Finance, 49(2): 291-316.
14.Child, J. (1974). Managerial and Organizational Factors Associated with Company Performance, Journal of Management Studies, 11(1): 13–27.
15.Chung, C. (2003). Managerial Structure of Business Groups in Taiwan: The Inner Circle System and Its Social Organization, Developing Economies, 41: 37-64.
16.Comment, R. and Jarrel, G.A. (1995). Corporate Focus and Stock Return, Journal of Financial Economics, 37: 67-87.
17.Datta, D.K. and Rajagopalan, N. (1998). Industry Structure and CEO Characteristics: An Empirical Study of Succession Events, Strategic Management Journal, 19: 833-852.
18.Denis, D. J., Denis, D. K. and Sarin, A. (1997). Agency Problems, Equity Ownership, and Corporate Diversification, Journal of Finance, 52: 135-160.
19.Finkelstein, S., and Hambrick, D. C. (1996). Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations, Minneapolis: West Publishing.
20.Gollop, F. M. and Monahan, L. (1991). A Generalized Index of Diversification: Trends in U. S. Manufacturing, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 318-330.
21.Gomez-Mejia, L., and Palich, L. (1997). Cultural Diversity and the Performance of Multinational Firms, Journal of International Business Studies, 28(2): 309–335.
22.Gort, M. (1962). Diversification and Integration in American Industry, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.
23.Grant, R.M. (1998). Contemporary Strategy Analysis. Blackwell, Oxford.
24.Grant, R.M., Jammine, A.P. and Thomas, H. (1988). Diversity, Diversification, and Profitability among British Manufacturing Companies, Academy of Management Journal, 31: 771-801.
25.Granovetter, M. (1994). Business Groups, in Neil J. Smelser & Richard Swedberg (Eds)., The Handbook of Economic Sociology: 453–475, NJ: Princeton University and Russell Sage Foundation.
26.Hambrick, D.C., Cho, T. and Chen, M.J. (1996). The Influence of Top Management Team Heterogeneity on Firms’ Competitive Moves, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4): 659-684.
27.Hambrick, D.C. and Mason, P.A. (1984). Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers, Academy of Management Journal, 9(2): 193-206.
28.Hamilton, G.G. and Kao, C. (1990). The Institutional Foundation of Chinese Business: The Family Firm in Taiwan. Comparative Social Research, 12: 95-112.
29.Hart, P. and Mellons, J. (1970). Management Youth and Company Growth: A Correlation, Management Decision, 4(2): 50-53.
30.Herrmann, P. and Datta, D.K. (2005). Relationship between Top Management Team Characteristics and International Diversification: An Empirical Investigation, British Journal of Management, 16(1): 69-78.
31.Hitt, M.A. and Tyler, B.B. (1991). Strategic Decision Models: Integrating Different Perspectives, Strategic Management Journal, 12(5): 327-351.
32.Jacqemin, A.P. and Berry, C.H. (1979). Entropy Measure of Diversification and Corporate Growth, Journal of Industrial Economics, 27(4): 359.
33.Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305-360.
34.Katz, R. (1982). Joint Ventures: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives, Strategic Management Journal, 9(2): 319-332.
35.Keck, S.L. (1997). Top Management Team Structure: Differential Effects by Environmental Context, Organization Science, 8(2): 143-156.
36.Khanna, T. and Palepu, K. (2000). Is Group Affiliation Profitable in Emerging Markets: and Analysis of Indian Diversified Business Groups, Journal of Finance, 55: 867-871.
37.Khanna, T. and Rivkin, J.W. (2001). Estimating the Performance Effects of Business Groups in Emerging Markets, Strategic Management Journal, 22: 45-74.
38.Kim, W.E., Hwang, P. and Burgers, W.P. (1989). Global Diversification Strategy and Corporate Profit Performance, Strategic Management Journal, 10(1): 45-57.
39.Kimberly, J.R. and Evanisko, M.J. (1981). Organizational Innovation: The Influence of Individual, Organization, and Contextual Factors on Hospital Adoption of Technological and Administrative Innovations, Academy of Management Journal, 24(4): 689-713.
40.Leff, N. (1978). Industrial Organization and Entrepreneurship in the Developing Countries: The Economic Groups, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 26: 661-675.
41.Lubatkin, M.H. and Chatterjee, S. (1994). Extending Modern Portfolio Theory into the Domain of Corporate Diversification: Does It Apply?, Academy of Management Journal, 37: 109-136.
42.Luo, X. and Chung, C. (2005). Keeping It All in the Family: The Role of Particularistic Relationships in Business Group Performance during Institutional Transition, Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3): 404-439.
43.Markides, C.C. (1995). Diversification, Refocusing and Economic Performance. MIT Press.
44.McCutcheon, L.E. (1991). A New Test of Misconceptions about Psychology, Psychological Reports, 68: 647-653.
45.Miller, D. (1991). Stale in the Saddle: CEO Tenure and the Match between Organization and the Environment, Management Science, 1: 34–54.
46.Montgomery, C.A. (1985). Product-Market Diversification and Market Power, Academy of Management Journal, 28(4): 789-798.
47.Palich, L.E., Cardinal, L.B. and Miller, C.C. (2000). Curvilinearity in the Diversification-Performance Linkage: An Examination of Over Three Decades of Research, Strategic Management Journal, 21: 155-174.
48.Penrose, E. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, New York: Wiley.
49.Perrow, C. (1972). Complex Organization. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman, and Company.
50.Pfeffer, J. (1983). Organizational Demography. In L.L. Cummings & B.N. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 5: 299-357. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
51.Porter, M.E. (1989). The Competitive Advantage of Nations and Their Firms, New York: Free Press.
52.Ramanujam, V. and Varadarajan, P. (1989). Research on Corporate Diversification: A Hypothesis, Strategic Management Journal, 10(6): 523-551.
53.Rhodes, G. (1983). Transients in the Library: A Problem Statement, Public Library Quarterly, 4: 56.
54.Rumelt, R.P. (1974). Strategy, Structure, and Economic Performance, Cambridge3, MA, Harvard University Press.
55.Sanders, W.M. and Carpenter, M. (1998). International and Firm Governance: The Roles of CEO Compensation. Top Composition, and Board Structure, The Academy of Management Journal, 41: 158-178.
56.Sapienza, H.J., Autio, E., George, G., and Zahra, S.A. (2005). A Capabilities Perspective on the Effects of Early Internationalization on Firm Survival and Growth, Academy of Management Review, 31: 914-933.
57.Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (1997). A Survey of Corporate Governance, Journal of Finance, 52(2): 737-783.
58.Strachan, H. (1976). Family and Other Business Groups in Economic Development: The Case of Nicaragua, New York: Praeger.
59.Taylor, R.N. (1975). Age and Experience as Determinants of Managerial Information Processing and Decision Making Performance, Academy of Management Journal, 18(1): 74-81.
60.Tushman, M.L. and Nadler, D.A. (1978). Information Processing as an Integrating Concept in Organizational Design, Academy of Management Review, 3: 613-624.
61.Tushman, M.L. and Rosenkopf, L. (1992). Organizational Determinants of Technological Change - Toward a Sociology of Technological Evolution, Research in Organizational Behavior, 14: 311-347.
62.Vernon, R. (1971). Sovereignty at Bay: The Multinational Spread of U.S. Enterprises, New York: Basic Books.
63.Villalonga, B., and Amit, R. (2006). How do Family Ownership, Control and Management Affect Firm Value?, Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2): 385-417.
64.Vroom, V. and Pahl, B. (1971). Relationship between Age and Risk-taking Among Manager, Journal of Applied Psychology, 55: 399-405.
65.Wagner, W.G., Pfeffer, J. and O’Reilly, C.A. (1984). Organizational Demography and Turnover in Top Management Group, Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(1): 74-92.
66.Wailderdsak, N. and Suehiro, A. (2004). Top Executive Origins: Comparative Study between Japan and Thailand, Asian Business and Management, 3: 85-104.
67.Wernerfelt, B. and Montgomery, C.A. (1988). Tobin’s Q and the Importance of Focus in Firm Performance, American Economic Review, 78: 246-250.
68.Wierseman, F. and Bantel, A. (1992). Top Management Team Demography and Corporate Strategic Change, Academy of Management Journal, 25(1): 91-121.
69.Yeh, Y.H., T.S. Lee and T. Woidtke (2001). Family Control and Corporate Governance: Evidence from Taiwan, International Review of Finance 2:21-48.
70.Zahra, S.A. (2005). Entrepreneurial Risk Taking in Family Firms, Family Business Review, 18(1): 23–40.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top