英文書籍
1.EPPS, TRACEY, INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND HEALTH PROTECTION: A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE WTO’S SPS AGREEMENT (Edward Elgar Publishing 2008) (2008).
2.GRUSZCZYNSKI, LUKASZ, REGULATING HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS UNDER WTO LAW: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE SPS AGREEMENT (Oxford University Press 2010) (2010).
3.JACKSON, JOHN H., SOVEREIGNTY, THE WTO AND CHANGING FUNDAMENTALS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW (Cambridge University Press 2006).
4.OESCH, MATTHIAS, STANDARDS OF REVIEW IN WTO DISPUTE RESOLUTION (Oxford University Press 2005) (2003).
5.PROSKE, DIRK, CATALOGUE OF RISKS (Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008) (2008).
6.RENN, ORTWIN, RISK GOVERNANCE: COPING WITH UNCERTAINTY IN A COMPLEX WORLD (Earthscan 2008).
7.SCOTT, JOANNE, THE WTO AGREEMENT ON SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES: A COMMENTARY (Oxford University Press 2007) (2007).
8.SUNSTEIN, CASS R., RISK AND REASON: SAFETY, LAW, AND THE ENVIRONMENT (Cambridge University Press 2002) (2002).
英文期刊論文
1.Arcuri, Alessandra, Food Safety at the WTO After “Continued Suspension”: A Paradigm Shift? (Rotterdam Institute of Law and Economics (RILE), Working Paper No. 2010/04, 2010), available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1633390.
2.Bloche, M. Gregg, WTO Deference to National Health Policy: Toward an Interpretive Principle, 5 J.INT’L ECON. L. 825 (2002).
3.Croley, Steven P. & John H. Jackson, WTO Dispute Procedures, Standard of Review, and Deference to National Government, 90(2) AM. J. INT’L L 193 (1996).
4.Dunoff, J. L., The Death of the Trade Regime, 10 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 733 (1999).
5.Du, Michael M., Standard of Review Under the SPS Agreement After EC-Hormones II, 59(2) INT’L & COMP. L.Q. 441 (2010).
6.-, Domestic Regulatory Autonomy Under the TBT Agreement: From Non-Discrimination to Harmonization, 6 CHINESE J. INT’L L. 269 (2007).
7.Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter & Nicolas Lockhart, Standard of Review in WTO Law, 7 J. INT’L ECON. L. 491 (2004).
8.Fraiberg, Jeremy & Michael J. Trebilcock, Risk Regulation: Technocratic and Democratic Tools for Regulatory Reform, 43 MCGILL LAW JOURNAL 835 (1998).
9.Gruszczynski, Lukasz, Science in the Process of Risk Regulation Under the WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, 7 GERMAN LAW JOURNAL 371 (2006), also available at http://www.germanlawjournal.com/pdfs/Vol07No04/PDF_Vol_07_No_04_371-398_Articles_Gruszczynski.pdf.
10.-, How Deep Should we go?-Searching for an Appropriate Standard of Review in the SPS Cases, 1 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RISK REGULATION 55 (2011).
11.-, Standard of Review of Health and Environmental Regulations by WTO Panels, in RESEARCH HANDBOOK ON ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND THE WTO (Geert Van Calster & Denise Prevost eds., Edward Elgar Publishing 2012) (forthcoming).
12.-, The Standard of Review in International SPS Trade Disputes: Some Developments, http://regulation.upf.edu/dublin-10-papers/7F4.pdf.
13.Guzman, Andrew T., Determining the Appropriate Standard of Review in WTO Disputes, 42 CORNELL INT’L L.J. 45 (2009).
14.-, Dispute Resolution in SPS Cases, in TEN YEARS OF WTO DISPUTE SETTLEMENT 215 (Moulis Horovitz & Steger eds., 2007), available at http://works.bepress.com/andrew_guzman/4.
15.Hudec, Robert E. Science and “Post-Discriminatory” WTO Law, 26 B.C. INT’L & COMP. L. REV. 185 (2003).
16.Jackson, John H., The Great 1994 Sovereignty Debate: United States Acceptance and Implementation of the Uruguay Round Results, 36 COLUMBIA JOURNAL OF TRANSNATIONAL LAW 157 (1997).
17.Kraus, Nancy Torbjorn Malmfors and Paul Slovic, Intuitive Toxicology: Expert and Lay Judgments of Chemical Risks, in THE PERCEPTION OF RISK 285 (Earthscan 2000).
18.Neven, Damien J. & Joseph H.H. Weiler, Japan-Measures Affecting the Importation of Apples (AB-2003-4): One Bad Apple? (DS245/AB/R): A Comment, in THE WTO CASE LAW OF 2003 309 (Henrik Horn & Petros C. Mavroids eds., 2006), available at http://www.ali.org/doc/wto/wto2003/Chapter_11_Japan-APPLES.pdf.
19.Palmeter, David, The WTO Standard of Review in Health and Safety Dispute, in TRADE AND HUMAN HEALTH AND SAFETY 224 (George A. Bermann & Petros C. Marvoidis eds., 2006).
20.Pauwelyn, Joost, Expert Advice in WTO Dispute Settlement, in TRADE AND HUMAN HEALTH AND SAFETY 235 (George A. Bermann & Petros C. Marvoidis eds., 2006).
21.Peel, Jacqueline, Risk Regulation Under the WTO SPS Agreement: Science as an International Normative Yardstick? (European Union Jean Monnet Chair, Working Paper No. 2002/04, 2004), available at http://centers.law.nyu.edu/jeanmonnet/archive/papers/04/040201.pdf.
22.-, Of Apples and Oranges (and Hormones in beef): Science and the Standard of Review in WTO Dispute Under the SPS Agreement, 61(2) INT’L & COMP. L.Q. 427 (2012).
23.Slovic, Paul, Baruch Fischhoff and Sarah Lichtenstein, Facts and Fears: Understanding Perceived Risk, in THE PERCEPTION OF RISK 137 (Earthscan 2000).
24.-, James Flynn and Mark Layman, Perceived Risk, Trust and the Politics of Nuclear Waste, in THE PERCEPTION OF RISK (Earthscan 2000).
25.Spamann, Holger, Standard of Review for World Trade Organization Panels in Trade Remedy Cases: A Critical Analysis, http://www.spamann.net/ASSETS/Spamann-standard_of_review.pdf.
26.Sunstein, Cass R., Book Review-The Law of Fear, 115 HARV. L. REV. 1119 (2001).
27.Sykes, Alan O., Domestic Regulation, Sovereignty and Scientific Evidence Requirements, in TRADE AND HUMAN HEALTH AND SAFETY 257 (George A. Bermann & Petros C. Marvoidis eds., 2006).
28.Wiener, Jonathan B. & Michael D. Rogers, Comparing Precautions in the US and Europe, 5(4) Journal of Risk Research 317 (2002).
29.Winickoff, David, Shelia Jasanoff, Lawrence Busch, Robin Grove-White, Brian Wynne, Adjudicating the GM Food Wars: Science, Risk, and Democracy in World Trade Law, 30 YALE J. INT’L L. 81 (2005).
30.Zleptnig, Stefan, The Standard of Review in WTO Law: An Analysis of Law, Legitimacy and the Distribution of Legal and Political Authority, 6(17) EUROPEAN INTEGRATION ONLINE PAPERS (EIOP) 1 (2002), http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2002-017a.htm.
英文學位論文
1.Chen, Tsai-fang Standards of Review in the WTO Dispute Settlement System (Dec. 8, 2011) (unpublished S.J.D dissertation, University of Wisconsin Law School) (on file with author).
中文書籍
1.倪貴榮,《貿易、環境與公共健康-全球治理與在地需求之調和》,1版1刷,元照出版社,台北(2006)。
2.羅昌發,《國際貿易法》,2版1刷,元照出版社,台北(2010)。
中文期刊論文
1.黃昭元,〈憲法權利限制的司法審查標準:美國類型化多元標準模式的比較分析〉,《台大法學論叢》,第33卷第3期,頁45-104頁,2004年。2.林彩瑜,〈從歐體生技產品爭端之裁決論SPS協定對GMO規範之影響〉,《台大法學論叢》,第36卷第4期,頁257-323頁,2006年。3.倪貴榮、吳慈珮,〈由WTO貿易規範檢視美國牛肉(具BSE風險)的進口管制〉,《月旦法學雜誌》,第176期,頁147-159頁,2010年。
4.倪貴榮,〈國際食品安全委員會 (Codex) 在國際貿易體系之地位 ─ 探討作為WTO國際標準之正當性〉,《歐盟與美國生物科技政策》,頁695-746頁,2011年。
其它參考文獻
GATT Cases
1.GATT Panel Report, Report on the Withdrawal by the United States of a Tariff Concession under Article XIX of General Agreement on Tariff and Trade (Hatter’s Fur), CP/106 (Oct. 22, 1951).
2.GATT Panel Report, United States-Imposition of Anti-Dumping Duties on Imports of Fresh anf Chilled Atlantic Salmon from Norway, ADP/87, 41S/229 (Nov. 30, 1992).
3.GATT Panel Report, United States-Measures Affecting Imports of Softwood Lumber from Canada, 40S/358 (Feb. 19, 1993).
4.GATT Panel Report, United States-Restriction on Imports of Tuna, DS29/R (June 16, 1994).
WTO Cases
1.Panel Report, European Communities—Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones), WT/DS26/R/USA (Aug. 18, 1997)
2.Panel Report, Australia—Measures Affecting Importation of Salmon, WT/DS18/R (June 12, 1998)
3.Panel Report, United States-Definitive Safeguard Measures on Imports of Certain Steel Products, WT/DS248/R, WT/DS249/R , WT/DS251/R , WT/DS252/R , WT/DS253/R, WT/DS254/R, WT/DS258/R, WT/DS259/R (July 11, 2003).
4.Panel Report, Japan—Measures Affecting the Importation of Apples, WT/DS245/R (July 15, 2003)
5.Panel Report, European Communities—Measures Affecting the Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products, WT/DS291/R, WT/DS292/R, WT/DS293/R (Sept. 29, 2006)
6.Panel Report, United States—Continued Suspension of Obligations in the EC—Hormones Disputes, WT/DS320/R (Mar. 31, 2008)
7.Panel Report, Australia—Measures Affecting the Importation of Apples from New Zealand, WT/DS367/R (Aug. 9, 2010)
8.Panel Report, United States—Certain Measures Affecting Imports of Poultry From China, WT/DS392/R (Sept. 29, 2010)
9.Appellate Body Report, European Communities—Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones), WT/DS26/AB/R, WT/DS48/AB/R (Jan. 16, 1998)
10.Appellate Body Report, Australia—Measures Affecting Importation of Salmon, WT/DS18/AB/R (Oct. 20, 1998)
11.Appellate Body Report, Japan-Measures Affecting Agricultural Products, WT/DS76/AB/R (Feb. 22, 1999).
12.Appellate Body Report, United States-Imposition of Countervailing Duties on Certain Hot-Rolled Lead and Bismuth Carbon Steel Products Originating in the United Kingdom (US-Lead and Bismuth II), WT/DS138/AB/R (June 7, 2000).
13.Appellate Body Report, United States-Anti-dumping Measures on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Products from Japan, WT/DS184/AB/R (July 24, 2001).
14.Appellate Body Report, United States—Transitional Safeguard Measures on Combed Cotton Yarn from Pakistan, WT/DS192/AB/R (Nov. 5, 2001).
15.Appellate Body Report, United States-Definitive Safeguard Measures on Imports of Certain Steel Products, WT/DS248/R, WT/DS249/R , WT/DS251/R , WT/DS252/R , WT/DS253/R, WT/DS254/R, WT/DS258/R, WT/DS259/R (Nov. 10, 2003).
16.Appellate Body Report, Japan—Measures Affecting the Importation of Apples, WT/DS245/AB/R (Nov. 26, 2003)
17.Appellate Body Report, United States—Continued Suspension of Obligations in the EC—Hormones Disputes, WT/DS320/AB/R (Oct. 16, 2008)
18.Appellate Body Report, Australia—Measures Affecting the Importation of Apples from New Zealand , WT/DS367/AB/R (Nov. 29, 2010)
19.Replies from the scientific experts to questions posed by the Panel, Australia-Measures Affecting the Importation of Apples From New Zealand, WT/DS367/11 (Aug. 9, 2010).
20.Replies of the Scientific Experts to Questions Posed by the Panel, United States-Continued Suspension of Obligation in the EC-Hormones Dispute, WT/DS320/R/Add.4.