跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.9.170) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/02 15:45
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:林政毅
研究生(外文):Lin, Cheng-Yi
論文名稱:集配作業脆弱度與恢復力之評估模式
論文名稱(外文):An Evaluation Model for the Vulnerability and Resilience of the Pickup and Delivery Operations
指導教授:馮正民馮正民引用關係吳沛儒吳沛儒引用關係
指導教授(外文):Feng, Cheng-MinWu, Pei-Ju
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立交通大學
系所名稱:管理學院運輸物流學程
學門:運輸服務學門
學類:運輸管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2012
畢業學年度:100
語文別:中文
論文頁數:92
中文關鍵詞:集配作業脆弱度恢復力評估模式
外文關鍵詞:the Pickup and Delivery OperationsVulnerabilityResilienceEvaluation Model
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:480
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:73
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
有鑑於過去研究鮮少針對集配作業之脆弱度與恢復力進行評估分析。因此,本研究旨在藉由集配作業脆弱度與恢復力之綜合評估與作業流程評估,研擬集配作業之風險管理策略。首先,本研究透過文獻回顧,彙整出脆弱度因子以及恢復力策略。進而本研究針對台灣公路汽車運輸集配作業之物流業者,進行面訪式問卷調查。研究結果顯示,五大關鍵脆弱度因子依序為營運效率不佳、失去控制、組織績效不彰、薪酬制度不良、核心競爭能力衰退。在恢復力策略之評估上,則以敏捷策略為最適之恢復力策略方案。最後,本研究根據研究結果進行討論,並擬定相對應之風險管理策略。
Since few past studies focused on assessing and analyzing the vulnerability and resilience of the pickup and delivery operations, this study aims to devises risk management strategy for the pickup and delivery operations by a comprehensive assessment and process assessment of the vulnerability and resilience of the operations. This study starts with the generation of vulnerability factors and resilience strategies through literature review. Secondly, interview survey was conducted to the Taiwan’s highway logistics providers with the pickup and delivery operations. The results of the study have shown that the top five critical vulnerability factors are low operation efficiency, loss of control, low organizational performance, unhealthy compensation system, and recession of core competitiveness. In the assessment of resilience strategies, agile strategy is the most suitable resilience strategy. Finally, the study discusses and elaborates corresponding risk management strategies based on the results.
中文摘要 i
英文摘要 ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 vii
第一章 緒論 1
1.1研究背景 1
1.2研究動機 2
1.3研究範疇與目的 3
1.4研究方法 4
1.5研究流程 5
第二章 文獻探討 6
2.1集配作業 6
2.2脆弱度與脆弱度因子 7
2.3恢復力與恢復力策略方案 19
2.4小結 24
第三章 集配作業之特性分析 25
3.1業種類別 25
3.2集配作業業者之服務差異比較 27
3.3小結 31
第四章 研究設計 33
4.1研究架構 33
4.2問卷設計 35
第五章 結果與討論 44
5.1敘述統計 44
5.2集配作業脆弱度之綜合評估 45
5.3集配作業恢復力之綜合評估 59
5.4集配作業脆弱度與恢復力之作業流程評估 60
5.5管理意涵 64
第六章 結論與建議 72
6.1研究結論 72
6.2研究建議 73
參考文獻 75
附錄 82
交通部(2004),國家貨運發展政策白皮書,交通部。
交通部(2011),中華民國99年交通統計要覽,交通部統計處。
吳明隆、涂金堂(2010),SPSS與統計應用分析,修訂版,台北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
馮正民、邱裕鈞(2004),研究分析方法,台北:建都文化事業股份有限公司。
經濟部(2000),物流中心作業系統,經濟部商業自動化系列叢書。
經濟部(2000),物流經營管理實務,經濟部商業現代化系列叢書。
經濟部(2009),2008台灣物流年鑑,經濟部商業司。
陳妍方(2009),敏捷供應鏈之適應性配送,國立交通大學交通運輸研究所碩士論文。
張雅雯(2011),顧客導向與資源優排之宅配服務系統設計,國立高雄大學亞太工商管理學系碩士班碩士論文。
榮泰生(2010),SPSS與研究方法,第二版,台北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
趙偉智(2007),宅配業電子化服務品質與關鍵資訊之探討,明志科技大學工業管理研究所碩士論文。
蘇建誌(2002),台灣地區貨車安全風險分析之研究,國立高雄第一科技大學運輸與倉儲營運研究所碩士論文。
Alshamrani, A., Mathur, K., & Ballou, R. H. (2007). Reverse logistics: simultaneous design of delivery routes and returns strategies. Computers & Operations Research, 34(2), 595-619.
Anbuudayasankar, S. P., Ganesh, K., Koh, S. C. L., & Ducq, Y. (2012). Modified savings heuristics and genetic algorithm for bi-objective vehicle routing problem with forced backhauls. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 2296-2305.
Anbuudayasankar, S. P., Ganesh, K., Koh, S. C. L., & Mohandas, K. (2010). Unified heuristics to solve routing problem of reverse logistics in sustainable supply chain. International Journal of Systems Science, 41(3), 337-351.
Balkin, D. B., & Gomezmejia, L. R. (1987). Toward a contingency theory of compensation strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 8(2), 169-182.
Barney, J. B. (2001). Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of Management, 27(6), 643-650.
Barney, J. B., Ketchen, D. J., & Wright, M. (2011). The Future of Resource-Based Theory: Revitalization or Decline? Journal of Management, 37(5), 1299-1315.
Bharadwaj, S. G., Tuli, K. R., & Bonfrer, A. (2011). The Impact of Brand Quality on Shareholder Wealth. Journal of Marketing, 75(5), 88-104.
Bilsel, R. U., & Ravindran, A. (2011). A multiobjective chance constrained programming model for supplier selection under uncertainty. Transportation Research Part B-Methodological, 45(8), 1284-1300.
Blackhurst, J., Dunn, K. S., & Craighead, C. W. (2011). An empirically derived framework of global supply resiliency. Journal of Business Logistics, 32(4), 374-391.
Blome, C., & Schoenherr, T. (2011). Supply chain risk management in financial crises-A multiple case-study approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 134(1), 43-57.
Boone, L. E., & Kurtz, D. L. (Eds.). (1992). Management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bryce, D. J., & Winter, S. G. (2009). A General Interindustry Relatedness Index. Management Science, 55(9), 1570-1585.
Catay, B. (2010). A new saving-based ant algorithm for the Vehicle Routing Problem with Simultaneous Pickup and Delivery. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(10), 6809-6817.
Chen, Y., & Bharadwaj, A. (2009). An Empirical Analysis of Contract Structures in IT Outsourcing. Information Systems Research, 20(4), 484-506.
Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2004). Building the resilient supply chain. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(2), 1-14.
Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economic, 4(16), 386-405.
Craighead, C. W., Blackhurst, J., Rungtusanatham, M. J., & Handfield, R. B. (2007). The severity of supply chain disruptions: Design characteristics and mitigation capabilities. Decision Sciences, 38(1), 131-156.
Day, M., Magnan, G. M., & Moeller, M. M. (2010). Evaluating the bases of supplier segmentation: A review and taxonomy. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(4), 625-639.
Dethloff, J. (2001). Vehicle routing and reverse logistics: the vehicle routing problem with simultaneous delivery and pick-up. Or Spektrum, 23(1), 79-96.
Faisal, M. N., Banwet, D. K., & Shankar, R. (2006). Mapping supply chains on risk and customer sensitivity dimensions. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 106(5-6), 878-895.
Fredericks, E. (2005). Infusing flexibility into business-to-business firms: A contingency theory and resource-based view perspective and practical implications. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(6), 555-565.
Ganesh, K., & Narendran, T. T. (2007). CLOVES: A cluster-and-search heuristic to solve the vehicle routing problem with delivery and pick-up. European Journal of Operational Research, 178(3), 699-717.
Ganesh, K., & Narendran, T. T. (2008). TASTE: a two-phase heuristic to solve a routing problem with simultaneous delivery and pick-up. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 37(11-12), 1221-1231.
Gordon, L. A., Loeb, M. P., & Tseng, C. Y. (2009). Enterprise risk management and firm performance: A contingency perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 28(4), 301-327.
Hallikas, J., Virolainen, V. M., & Tuominen, M. (2002). Understanding risk and uncertainty in supplier networks - a transaction cost approach. International Journal of Production Research, 40(15), 3519-3531.
Ho, C. F. (1996). A contingency theoretical model of manufacturing strategy. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(5), 74-&.
Hong, J. J., Chin, A. T. H., & Liu, B. L. (2004). Logistics outsourcing by manufacturers in China: A survey of the industry. Transportation Journal, 43(1), 17-25.
Irnich, S. (2000). A multi-depot pickup and delivery problem with a single hub and heterogeneous vehicles. European Journal of Operational Research, 122(2), 310-328.
Kleindorfer, P. R., & Saad, G. H. (2005). Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Production and Operations Management, 14(1), 53-68.
Kunc, M. H., & Morecroft, J. D. W. (2010). Managerial decision making and firm performance under a resource-based paradigm. Strategic Management Journal, 31(11), 1164-1182.
Lai, K. H. (2004). Service capability and performance of logistics service providers. Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review, 40(5), 385-399.
Lee, H. L. (2004). The triple-A supply chain. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 1-12.
Levitt, R. E., Thomsen, J., Christiansen, T. R., Kunz, J. C., Jin, Y., & Nass, C. (1999). Simulating project work processes and organizations: Toward a micro-contingency theory of organizational design. Management Science, 45(11), 1479-1495.
Li, S. L., Shang, J., & Slaughter, S. A. (2010). Why Do Software Firms Fail? Capabilities, Competitive Actions, and Firm Survival in the Software Industry from 1995 to 2007. Information Systems Research, 21(3), 631-654.
Liu, Y., Yuan, L., Tao, L., & Wang, Y. (2008). Relationship stability, trust and relational risk in marketing channels: Evidence from China. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(4), 432-446.
Lumpkins, C. Y., Bae, J., & Cameron, G. T. (2010). Generating conflict for greater good: Utilizing contingency theory to assess Black and mainstream newspapers as public relations vehicles to promote better health among African Americans. Public Relations Review, 36(1), 73-77.
Maurer, C. C., Bansal, P., & Crossan, M. M. (2011). Creating Economic Value Through Social Values: Introducing a Culturally Informed Resource-Based View. Organization Science, 22(2), 432-448.
Michael, S. C. (2007). Transaction cost entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(3), 412-426.
Minis, I., & Tatarakis, A. (2011). Stochastic single vehicle routing problem with delivery and pick up and a predefined customer sequence. European Journal of Operational Research, 213(1), 37-51.
Mojsilovic, A., Ray, B., Lawrence, R., & Takriti, S. (2007). A logistic regression framework for information technology outsourcing lifecycle management. Computers & Operations Research, 34(12), 3609-3627.
Murray, J. Y., & Kotabe, M. (2005). Performance implications of strategic fit between alliance attributes,and alliance forms. Journal of Business Research, 58(11), 1525-1533.
Ngwenyama, O. K., & Bryson, N. (1999). Making the information systems outsourcing decision: A transaction cost approach to analyzing outsourcing decision problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 115(2), 351-367.
Nunez, I. (2009). Outsourcing occupational safety and health: an analysis of the make or buy decision. Human Resource Management, 48(6), 941-958.
Ozdamar, L., Ekinci, E., & Kucukyazici, B. (2004). Emergency logistics planning in natural disasters. Annals of Operations Research, 129(1-4), 217-245.
Parente, R., Choi, B. P., Slangen, A. H. L., & Ketkar, S. (2010). Distribution system choice in a service industry: An analysis of international insurance firms operating in the United States. Journal of International Management, 16(3), 275-287.
Peck, H. (2005). Drivers of supply chain vulnerability: an integrated framework. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 35(4), 210 - 232.
Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage - a resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179-191.
Ponomarov, S. Y., & Holcomb, M. C. (2009). Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. International Journal of Logistics Management, 20(1), 124-143.
Richey, R. G. (2009). The supply chain crisis and disaster pyramid A theoretical framework for understanding preparedness and recovery. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 39(7), 619-628.
Schenk, L., & Klabjan, D. (2010). Intra market optimization for express package carriers with station to station travel and proportional sorting. Computers & Operations Research, 37(10), 1749-1761.
Shang, K. C., & Marlow, P. B. (2005). Logistics capability and performance in Taiwan's major manufacturing firms. Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review, 41(3), 217-234.
Shao-Long, T., & Hong, Y. (2010). Pre-distribution vs. post-distribution for cross-docking with transshipments. Omega, 38(3-4).
Sheffi, Y., & Rice, J. B. (2005). A supply chain view of the resilient enterprise. Mit Sloan Management Review, 47(1), 41-48.
Srivastava, R. K., Fahey, L., & Christensen, H. K. (2001). The resource-based view and marketing: The role of market-based assets in gaining competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 27(6), 777-802.
Strack, R., Baier, J., & Fahlander, A. (2008). Managing demographic risk. Harvard Business Review, 86(2), 119-+
Tan, J., & Peng, M. W. (2003). Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: Two studies from an emerging economy. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1249-1263.
Tang, C. S. (2006). Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 9(1), 33-45.
Tate, W. L., & Ellram, L. M. (2009). Offshore outsourcing: a managerial framework. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 24(3-4), 256-268.
Tomlin, B. (2006). On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply chain disruption risks. Management Science, 52(5), 639-657.
Trkman, P., & McCormack, K. (2009). Supply chain risk in turbulent environments-A conceptual model for managing supply chain network risk. International Journal of Production Economics, 119(2), 247-258.
Tsai, M. C., Lai, K. H., Lloyd, A. E., & Lin, H. J. (2012). The dark side of logistics outsourcing - Unraveling the potential risks leading to failed relationships. Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review, 48(1), 178-189.
Tsai, M. C., Liao, C. H., & Han, C. S. (2008). Risk perception on logistics outsourcing of retail chains: model development and empirical verification in Taiwan. Supply Chain Management-an International Journal, 13(6), 415-424.
Wei, Y. H., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2009). The moderating role of reward systems in the relationship between market orientation and new product performance in China. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26(2), 89-96.
Wiggins, R. R., & Ruefli, T. W. (2002). Sustained competitive advantage: Temporal dynamics and the incidence and persistence of superior economic performance. Organization Science, 13(1), 82-105.
Woods, M. (2009). A contingency theory perspective on the risk management control system within Birmingham City Council. Management Accounting Research, 20(1), 69-81.
Yigitbasioglu, O. M. (2010). Information sharing with key suppliers: a transaction cost theory perspective. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 40(7), 550-578.
Zsidisin, G. A., Melnyk, S. A., & Ragatz, G. L. (2005). An institutional theory perspective of business continuity planning for purchasing and supply management. International Journal of Production Research, 43(16), 3401-3420.



連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊