跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.192.26.226) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/09/13 09:57
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:楊承穎
研究生(外文):Cheng-Ying Yang
論文名稱:內隱建言信念對員工沉默行為之研究:建言氣候知覺與感受建言義務的干擾角色
論文名稱(外文):The Relationship between Implicit Voice Theories and Employee Silence: The Moderating Roles of Perceptions of Voice Climate and Felt Obligation for Constructive Change
指導教授:張火燦張火燦引用關係
指導教授(外文):Huo-Tsan Chang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立彰化師範大學
系所名稱:人力資源管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2012
畢業學年度:100
語文別:中文
論文頁數:70
中文關鍵詞:內隱建言信念建言氣候知覺感受建言義務
外文關鍵詞:implicit voice theoriesperceptions of voice climatefelt obligation for constructive change
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:813
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
  對組織而言,員工若不願在發現問題的當下就將它提出,將不利組織防患於未然。因此,瞭解員工為何不積極建言,而是選擇保持沉默就成為一項重要的議題。過去研究指出,「莫越級提出建言」、「莫當眾讓人難堪」等內隱建言信念能正向影響員工沉默行為,然而,迄今卻尚未發現有助減緩此正向關係的因子。本研究試圖分別依據社會認知理論及計畫行為理論,探討建言氣候知覺和感受建言義務可能具有的干擾效果。
  本研究以高科技產業之研發團隊人員為研究母體,抽樣37間高科技公司,共發放120組團隊、計546份研發人員問卷,扣除填答不符標準之問卷後,有效樣本為350份,並以階層迴歸分析檢驗各研究假設。研究結果顯示:(一)高建言氣候知覺能減弱莫越級提出建言與員工沉默行為間的正向關係;(二)高建言氣候知覺能減弱莫當眾讓人難堪與員工沉默行為間的正向關係;(三)高感受建言義務能減弱莫當眾讓人難堪與員工沉默行為間的正向關係。
  根據研究結果,進一步提出三點管理意涵:(一)團隊主管應該積極改變員工可能具有的內隱建言信念;(二)求「言」若渴之主管應致力營造出對建言友善的環境;(三)主管可以透過賦權等實際作為,培養積極視建言為己任的員工。最後,本研究亦提出未來研究方向與限制以供後續研究參考。
Organizaitons may fail to prevent problems from happening in the first place if their employees are unwilling to speak up right after they find mistakes. Understanding why employees do not voice but remain silent thus becomes an important issue. Past research has indicated that implicit voice theories such as “don’t bypass the boss upward” and “don’t embarrass the boss in public” are positively related to employee silence. It is, however, barely known that in what situations these implicit theories are less likely to reinforce employee silence. The present study, using social cognitive theory and the theory of planned behavior, therefore, aimed to explore whether individuals’ perceptions of voice climate and felt obligation for constructive change could moderate the above-mentioned positive relationships.
The data were collected from 120 R&;D teams of the 37 high-tech companies in Taiwan. A total of 546 subjects participated and 350 valid samples were obtained. To test the research hypotheses, hierahical regression analysis was adopted. The results showed three patterns: first, high perception of voice climate did weaken the positive relationship between “don’t bypass the boss upward” and employee silence; second, high perception of voice climate also reduced the positive effect of “don’t embarrass the boss in public” on employee silence; and third, high felt obligation could diminish the relationship between “don’t embarrass the boss in public” and employee silence.
Based on the results, three practical implications were illustrated as following. To start with, team managers should proactively change subordinates’ implicit voice theoies. Second, team managers in thirst for more voice need to build a “voice-friendly” environment. Third, team managers can cultivate employees’ responsibility for voice to elicit more voice. Suggestions for future research and limitations of the present study are also discussed.

中文摘要 I
Abstract II
目錄 III
表目次 V
圖目次 VI
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 4
第三節 研究流程 4
第四節 名詞釋義 6
第二章 文獻探討 8
第一節 內隱建言信念和員工沉默行為 8
第二節 建言氣候知覺的干擾角色 13
第三節 感受建言義務的干擾角色 16
第三章 研究方法 20
第一節 研究架構與假設 20
第二節 研究對象 21
第三節 研究工具 21
第四節 調查實施 27
第五節 資料分析 28
第四章 研究結果與討論 30
第一節 樣本描述 30
第二節 整體樣本之適配度 32
第三節 建言氣候知覺的干擾效果 35
第四節 感受建言義務的干擾效果 38
第五章 結論與建議 41
第一節 研究主要發現 41
第二節 研究結論 43
第三節 研究建議 47
第四節 研究限制 52
參考文獻 55
附錄 67
表 3-1 區別效度分析 25
表 3-2 變項間區別效度檢定分析摘要 25
表 3-3 共同方法變異分析結果 26
表 3-4 問卷發放與回收狀況統計 27
表 4-1 樣本特性統計分析 31
表 4-2 各變項之敘述統計量與相關係數 32
表 4-3 整體驗證性因素分析結果 34
表 4-4 內隱建言信念與建言氣候知覺對員工沉默行為之交互作用 35
表 4-5 內隱建言信念與感受建言義務對員工沉默行為之交互作用 38
表 5-1 結果摘要 41
圖 3-1 研究架構 20
圖 4-1 莫越級提出建言、建言氣候知覺對員工沉默行為交互效果 36
圖 4-2 莫當眾讓人難堪、建言氣候知覺對員工沉默行為交互效果 37
圖 4-3 莫當眾讓人難堪、感受建言義務對員工沉默行為交互效果 40
朱瑞玲(1991)。「面子」壓力及其因應行為。載於楊國樞與黃光國主編,中國人的心理與行為(一九八九)(1版),177-212。臺北:桂冠圖書。
余和祥(1997)。諫術闡幽。魏徵的人生哲學:忠諫人生(1版)。臺北:揚智文化。
吳宗祐(2008)。主管威權領導與部屬的工作滿意度與組織承諾:信任的中介歷程與情緒智力的調節效果。本土心理學研究,30,3-63。
汪美香、楊棠堯與吳朝森(2006)。資訊系統開發團隊成員之自我效能、團隊互動、團隊信任對團隊效能之影響:知識分享之中介效果。臺大管理論叢,16(2),73-100。
周美伶與何友暉(1993)。從跨文化的觀點分析面子的內涵及其在社會交往中的運作。載於楊國樞與余安邦主編,中國人的心理與行為:理念及方法篇(一九九二)(再版),205-254。臺北:桂冠圖書。
林明杰、林鴻均、黃錦華與林信任(2007)。領導風格對團隊學習之影響:團隊心理安全的中介效果。中華管理學報,8(3),1-22。
林鉦棽(2007)。跨層次觀點下印象管理動機與主管導向之組織公民行為的關係:社會互動與組織政治氣候的調節角色。管理學報,24(1),93-111。
姜定宇與鄭伯壎(2003)。組織忠誠、組織承諾、及組織公民行為研究之回顧與前瞻。應用心理研究,19,175-209。
彭台光、高月慈與林鉦棽(2006)。管理研究中共同方法變異:問題本質、影響、測試與補救。管理學報,23(1),77-98。
黃光國(1988)。人情與面子:中國人的權力遊戲。載於黃光國編,中國人的權力遊戲(1版),7-55。臺北:巨流圖書。
黃家齊與許雅婷(2006)。團隊成員人格特質對知識分享及創新績效之影響─個人與團隊層次分析。管理學報,23(2),149-170。
鄭伯壎、洪光遠與張東峰(譯)。心理學。臺北: 桂冠圖書。
貳、 英文部分
Aiken, L. S., &; West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Anderson, J. C., &; Gerbing, D. W. (1998). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
Avery, D. R. (2003). Personality as a predictor of the value of voice. Journal of Psychology, 137(5), 435-446.
Bagozzi, R. P. (1992). The self-regulation of attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(2), 178-204.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Baumgartner, H., Pieters, R., &; Bagozzi, R. P. (2008). Future-oriented emotions: Conceptualization and behavioral effects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(4), 685-696.
Browne, M. W., &; Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen &; J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (Vol. 154, pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Chen, G., Gully, S. M., &; Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4(1), 62-83.
Choi, J. N. (2007). Change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: effects of work environment characteristics and intervening psychological processes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(4), 467-484.
Conner, M., &; McMillan, B. (1999). Interaction effects in the theory of planned behaviour: Studying cannabis use. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38(2), 195-222.
Cropanzano, R., &; Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900.
Delery, J. E., &; Doty, D. H.(1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 802-835.
Detert, J. R., &; Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869-884.
Detert, J. R., &; Edmondson, A. C. (2011). Implicit voice theories: Taken-for-granted rules of self-censorship at work. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 461-488.
Diamantopoulos, A. (1994). Modeling with LISREL: A guide for the uninitiated. Journal of Marketing Management, 10(1-3), 105-136.
Eden, D., &; Zuk, Y. (1995). Seasickness as a self-fulfilling prophecy: Raising self-efficacy to boost performance at sea. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(5), 628-635.
Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.
Edmondson, A. C. (2003). Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1419-1452.
Edwards, M., Ashkanasy, N. M., &; Gardner, J. (2009). Deciding to speak up or to remain silent following observed wrongdoing: The role of discrete emotions and climate of silence. In J. Greenberg &; M. Edwards (Eds.), Voice and silence in organizations (pp. 83-109). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P. D., &; Rhoades, L. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 42-51.
Fornell, C., &; Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Fuller, J. B., Marler, L. E., &; Hester, K. (2006). Promoting felt responsibility for constructive change and proactive behavior: Exploring aspects of an elaborated model of work design. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(8), 1089-1120.
Gioia, D. A., &; Poole, P. P. (1984). Scripts in organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 449-459.
Gouldner, A.W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161-178.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R., &; Black , W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis with readings(5th ed.). Upper Sadde River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., &; Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis(6th ed.). Upper Sadde River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief turorial on the development of measure for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Method, 1(1), 104-121.
Hunton, J., &; Beeler, J. (1997). Effects of user participation in systems development: A longitudinal field experiment. MIS Quarterly, 21(4), 359-388.
Jacobs, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., &; Rogers, R. W. (1984). Understanding persistence: An interface of control theory and self-efficacy theory. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 5(4), 333-347.
Johannesen, R. L. (1974). The functions of silence: A plea for communication research. Western Speech, 38(1), 25-35.
Judge, T. A., Erez, A., &; Bono, J. A. (1998). The power of being positive: The relation between positive self concept and job performance. Human Performance, 11(2/3), 167-187.
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.
Kish-Gephart, J., Detert, J. R., Trevino, L. K., &; Edmondson, A. C. (2009). Silenced by fear: Psychological, social, and evolutionary drivers of voice behavior at work. In B. M. Staw &; A. P. Brief (Eds.), Research in organizatonal behavior (Vol. 29, pp. 163-193). JAI.: Greenwich.
Kuenzi, M., &; Schminke, M. (2009). Assembling fragments into a lens: A review, critique, and proposed research agenda for organizational work climate literature. Journal of Management, 35(3), 634-717.
Lee, C., &; Bobko, P. (1994). Self-efficacy beliefs: Comparison of five measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(3), 364-369.
LePine, J. A., &; Van Dyne, L. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 853-868.
Lewin, K. (1936). Principle of topological psychology. New York: Mcgraw-Hill.
Liang, J., C. Farh, C. I., &; Farh, J.-L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71-73.
Milliken, F. J., Morrison, E. W., &; Hewlin, P. F. (2003). An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don't communicate upward and why. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1453-1476.
Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 373-412.
Morrison, E. W., &; Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 706-725.
Morrison, E. W., &; Phelps, C. C. (1999). Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 403-419.
Morrison, E. W., Wheeler-Smith, S. L., &; Kamdar, D. (2011). Speaking up in groups: A cross-level study of group voice climate and voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 183-191.
Netemeyer, R. G., Durvasula, S., &; Lichtenstein, D. R. (1991). A cross-national assessment of the reliability and validity of the CETSCALE. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 32-327.
Neter, J., Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., &; Wasserman, W. (1996). Applied linear statistical models(4th ed.). Chicago: Irwin.
Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Parker, S. K., &; Turner, N. (2002). Work design and individual work performance: Research findings and an agenda for future inquiry. In S. Sonnentag (Ed.), Psychological management of individual performance. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
Parker, S. K., Wall, T. D., &; Cordery, J. L. (2001). Future work design research and practice: Towards an elaborated model of work design. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(4), 413.
Perugini, M., Gallucci, M., Presaghi, F., &; Ercolani, A. P. (2003). The personal norm of reciprocity. European Journal of Personality, 17(4), 251-283.
Pinder, C. C., &; Harlos, K. P. (2001). Employee silence: Quiescence and acquiescence as responses to perceived injustice. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 20, pp. 331-369). New York: Elsevier Science/JAI.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., &; Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
Podsakoff, P. M., &; Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544.
Robbins, S. P. (2005). Organizational behavior. New Jersey: Pearson Hall.
Schneider, B., &; Reichers, A. E. (1983). On the etiology of climates. Personnel Psychology, 36(1), 19-39.
Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., &; Griskevicius, V. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science (Wiley-Blackwell), 18(5), 429-434.
Segers, J., Inceoglu, I., Vloeberghs, D., Bartram, D., &; Henderickx, E. (2008). Protean and boundaryless careers: A study on potential motivators. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(2), 212-230.
Shih, C.-T., &; Chen, S.-j. (2011). The social dilemma perspective on psychological contract fulfilment and organizational citizenship behaviour. Management and Organization Review, 7(1), 125-151.
Spreitzer, G. M. (1996). Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 483-504.
Takeuchi, R., Yun, S., &; Wong, K. F. E. (2011). Social influence of a coworker: A test of the effect of employee and coworker exchange ideologies on employees’ exchange qualities. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 226-237.
Tangirala, S., &; Ramanujam, R. (2008). Employee silence on critical work issues: The cross level effects of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology, 61(1), 37-68.
Tett, R. P., &; Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 500-517.
Vakola, M., &; Bouradas, D. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of organisational silence: An empirical investigation. Employee Relations, 27(5), 441-458.
Van Dyne, L., &; LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108-119.
Van Dyne, L., Soon, A., &; Botero, I. C. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1359-1392.
Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.
Walumbwa, F. O., &; Schaubroeck, J. (2009). Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior: Mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1275-1286.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., &; Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.
Wood, R., &; Bandura, A. (1989). Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(3), 407-415.
Zhang, Q., Vonderembse, M. A., &; Lim, J.-S. (2003). Manufacturing flexibility: Defining and analyzing relationships among competence, capability, and customer satisfaction. Journal of Operations Management, 21(2), 173.

連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top