跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.192.49.72) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/09/18 18:31
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:留珮祺
研究生(外文):Pei-chi Liou
論文名稱:探討國小學童英語音韻覺識能力及聽解能力對其英語單字記憶效能之影響
論文名稱(外文):The Effect of Young EFL Learners’ Phonological Awareness and Listening Comprehension on Their Word Memorization Efficiency
指導教授:黃春騰黃春騰引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chuen-teng Huang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立彰化師範大學
系所名稱:兒童英語研究所
學門:人文學門
學類:外國語文學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2012
畢業學年度:100
語文別:英文
論文頁數:187
中文關鍵詞:音韻覺識聽解能力單字記憶
外文關鍵詞:phonological awarenesslistening comprehensionword memorization
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:345
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
第二語言學習的研究者常指出,要有良好的英文聽解能力,學習者通常需具備較敏銳的音韻覺識能力及較多的英文單字量。然而外語學習者的音韻覺識能力與其單字記憶能力之相關性,以及聽解能力與其單字記憶能力之間的相關性研究仍相當缺乏。因此本研究的目的在於了解英語學習者的音韻覺識能力及其聽解能力對於其記憶英文單字的影響為何,特別是針對單字記憶的效率及留存率作進一步的探究。
研究對象為四班共124名六年級國小學童。學生接受為期兩週,每週各20分鐘的Phonics記憶術的訓練。研究工具包含目標字彙選字測驗、音韻覺識測驗、聽力理解測驗及單字記憶測驗。其中單字記憶測驗共有兩份,分別用來測量單字記憶的效率及留存率。測驗結果採用皮爾森相關係數檢測作資料分析。研究結果顯示研究對象的英語音韻覺識及聽解能力分別與其單字記憶的效率及留存率,在顯著值採用.05時,皆具顯著相關。此研究結果顯示兒童的英語音韻覺識及聽解能力和其單字記憶的效率及留存率具正面相關。此外研究對象的英語綜合聽力表現,比局部聽力表現,如音韻覺識,和其單字記憶的效率及留存率的相關度更高。

Researchers of second language learning have often suggested that young learners with better listening comprehension may have better performance in regard to their phonological awareness and are likely to understand and make use of a greater number of vocabulary items. However, there is still a lack of relevant research which has documented direct links between L2 learners’ phonological awareness and their word memorization ability, and between their listening comprehension ability and their word memorization ability. The aim of this study was thus aimed at better defining those links.
Four intact classes of elementary sixth graders (N=124) in central Taiwan participated in this study. The participants received two 20-minute sessions of phonics-based English vocabulary mnemonic technique training over a two-week period. A Word Selection Test, a Phonological Awareness Test, a Listening Comprehension Test, and two sets of Word Memorization Tests concerning the subjects’ word memorization efficiency and retention were used for data collection. The Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient was adopted for data analysis.
The results of this study indicate that the participants’ phonological awareness and listening comprehension are significantly (α=.05) correlated with both their word memorization efficiency and retention. The findings provide evidence that young EFL learners’ phonological awareness and listening comprehension are positively related to their word memorization performance in terms of efficiency and retention rate, and that these EFL learners’ overall listening comprehension ability has a higher impact on their word memorization performance than their abilities in such sub-skills of listening as phonological awareness.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABSTRACT (CHINESE) i
ABSTRACT (ENGLISH) ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS vi
LIST OF TABLES ix
LIST OF FIGURES xi
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1
Background and Motivation of the Study 3
Purpose of the Study 9
Research Questions 9
Significance of the Study 10
Definitions of Terms 11
The Organization of the Study 15
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 17
Phonological Awareness and Listening Comprehension 18
The Development of Phonological Awareness 19
Components of Phonological Awareness 21
Factors Influencing Listening Comprehension 23
The Relationships Between Phonological Awareness and Listening Comprehension and Between Listening Comprehension and Vocabulary 27
Memorization of Vocabulary Words and Mnemonics 28
The Role of Vocabulary in Language Learning 29
The Concept of Knowing a Word 31
The Development of Word Recognition 37
Mnemonic Strategies 42
The Role of Mnemonics in Vocabulary Learning 43
Types of Vocabulary Mnemonics 47
Phonological Awareness and Phonics Teaching 54
The Relationships Between Vocabulary and Mnemonics and Between Mnemonics and Phonological Awareness 56
Literature on Memorization of Vocabulary Words, Phonological Awareness and Listening Comprehension 57
Summary of Chapter Two 61
CHAPTER THREE METHODOLOGY 65
Research Design 65
Participants 66
Instruments 67
Word Selection Test 69
Word Memorization Efficiency Test 72
Word Memorization Retention Test 74
Phonological Awareness Test 75
Listening Comprehension Test 78
Phonics-based Mnemonic Technique Instruction 79
Procedures of Data Collection 81
Data Analysis 84
The Pilot Study 85
CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 91
Relationship Between Phonological Awareness and Word Memorization 91
Results of the Correlation Between the Subjects’ Phonological Awareness and Their Word Memorization Efficiency 92
Results of the Correlation Between Both the High and Low Scoring Groups’ Phonological Awareness and Their Word Memorization Efficiency 94
Discussion of the Correlation Between the Subjects’ Phonological Awareness and Their Word Memorization Efficiency 96
Results of the Correlation Between the Subjects’ Phonological Awareness and Their Word Memorization Retention 98
Results of the Correlation Between Both the High and Low Scoring Groups’ Phonological Awareness and Their Word Memorization Retention 100
Discussion of the Correlation Between the Subjects’ Phonological Awareness and Their Word Memorization Retention 102
Relationship Between Listening Comprehension and Word Memorization 103
Results of the Correlation Between the Subjects’ Listening Comprehension and Their Word Memorization Efficiency 103
Results of the Correlation Between Both the High and Low Scoring Groups’ Listening Comprehension and Their Word Memorization Efficiency 105
Discussion of the Correlation Between the Subjects’ Listening Comprehension and Their Word Memorization Efficiency 107
Results of the Correlation Between the Subjects’ Listening Comprehension and Their Word Memorization Retention 109
Results of the Correlation Between Both the High and Low Scoring Groups’ Listening Comprehension and Their Word Memorization Retention 111
Discussion of the Correlation Between the Subjects’ Listening Comprehension and Their Word Memorization Retention 113
Summary 115
CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION 118
Concluding Remarks 118
Limitations of the Study 120
Implications of the Study 121
Suggestions for Future Study 124
REFERENCES 126
APPENDIXES 147
Appendix A Word Selection Test 147
Appendix B Descriptive Statistics for the Results of the Word Selection Test (for Formal Study / N=124) 152
Appendix C English Word List 155
Appendix D Word Memorization Efficiency Test 156
Appendix E Word Memorization Retention Test 158
Appendix F Phonological Awareness Test 160
Appendix G Written Permission from Cambridge University Press 163
Appendix H Listening Comprehension Test 164
Appendix I Phonics-based Mnemonic Technique Training Practice 175
Appendix J Word Selection Test (for Pilot Study) 179
Appendix K Descriptive Statistics for the Results of the Word Selection Test (for Pilot Study / N=60) 183
Appendix L English Word List (for Pilot Study) 185
Appendix M Word Memorization Efficiency Test (for Pilot Study) 186


LIST OF TABLES

Table 2.1 What Is Involved in Knowing a Word 34
Table 2.2 Thompson’s (1987) Classification of Mnemonic Strategies 48
Table 3.1 The Distribution of the 80 Test Items on the Word Selection Test 71
Table 3.2 The Distribution of Parts of Speech Among the 30 Target Words 72
Table 3.3 Summary of the Listening Comprehension Test 79
Table 3.4 The Pearson Product-moment Correlation Coefficient Results for the High Scoring Group (top 50% of scores) 87
Table 3.5 The Pearson Product-moment Correlation Coefficient Results for the Low Scoring Group (bottom 50% of scores) 88
Table 4.1 The Pearson Product-moment Correlation Coefficients for the Phonological Awareness and the Word Memorization Efficiency Tests Scores (N=124) 93
Table 4.2 The Mean, Standard Deviation of Both the High and Low Scoring Groups’ Phonological Awareness and Word Memorization Efficiency Tests Scores 94
Table 4.3 The Pearson Product-moment Correlation Coefficients for the Phonological Awareness and the Word Memorization Efficiency Tests Scores for the High Scoring Group (top 50% of scores) 95
Table 4.4 The Pearson Product-moment Correlation Coefficients for the Phonological Awareness and the Word Memorization Efficiency Tests Scores for the Low Scoring Group (bottom 50% of scores) 96
Table 4.5 The Pearson Product-moment Correlation Coefficients for the Phonological Awareness and the Word Memorization Retention Tests Scores (N=124) 99
Table 4.6 The Mean, Standard Deviation of Both the High and Low Scoring Groups’ Phonological Awareness and Word Memorization Retention Tests Scores 99
Table 4.7 The Pearson Product-moment Correlation Coefficients for the Phonological Awareness and the Word Memorization Retention Tests Scores for the High Scoring Group (top 50% of scores) 100
Table 4.8 The Pearson Product-moment Correlation Coefficients for the Phonological Awareness and the Word Memorization Retention Tests Scores for the Low Scoring Group (bottom 50% of scores) 101
Table 4.9 The Pearson Product-moment Correlation Coefficients for the Listening Comprehension Test and the Word Memorization Efficiency Tests Scores (N=124) 104
Table 4.10 The Mean, Standard Deviation of Both the High and Low Scoring Groups’ Listening Comprehension and Word Memorization Efficiency Tests Scores 105
Table 4.11 The Pearson Product-moment Correlation Coefficients for the Listening Comprehension and the Word Memorization Efficiency Tests Scores for the High Scoring Group (top 50% of scores) 106
Table 4.12 The Pearson Product-moment Correlation Coefficients for the Listening Comprehension and the Word Memorization Efficiency Tests Scores for the Low Scoring Group (bottom 50% of scores) 107
Table 4.13 The Pearson Product-moment Correlation Coefficients for the Listening Comprehension and the Word Memorization Retention Test Scores (N=124) 110
Table 4.14 The Mean, Standard Deviation of Both the High and Low Scoring Groups’ Listening Comprehension and Word Memorization Retention Tests Scores 111
Table 4.15 The Pearson Product-moment Correlation Coefficients for the Listening Comprehension and the Word Memorization Retention Tests Scores for the High Scoring Group (top 50% of scores) 112
Table 4.16 The Pearson Product-moment Correlation Coefficients for the Listening Comprehension and the Word Memorization Retention Test Scores for the Low Scoring Group (bottom 50% of scores) 113

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 2.1 The Process of Word Recognition 37
Figure 3.1 The Instruments of the Present Study 68
Figure 3.2 Steps for Designing the WME Test 73
Figure 3.3 Steps for the Phonics-based Mnemonic Technique Instruction 81
Figure 3.4 The Flow Chart of Procedures for Data Collection 83
Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to Read: Thinking and Learning about Print. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Amiryousefi, M., &; Ketabi, S. (2011). Mnemonic Instruction: A Way to Boost Vocabulary Learning and Recall. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(1), 178-182.
Anderson, A., &; Lynch, T. (1988). Listening. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Anthony, J. L., &; Francis, D. J. (2005). Development of phonological awareness. Current directions in psychological science, 14(5), 255-259.
Atay, D., &; Ozbulgan, C. (2007). Memory strategy instruction, contextual learning and ESP vocabulary recall. English for specific purpose, 26, 39-51.
Atkinson, R. C. (1975). Mnemotechnics in second language learning. American Psychologist, 30, 821-828.
Atkinson, R. C., &; Raugh, M. R. (1975). An application of the mnemonic keyword method to the acquisition of a Russian vocabulary. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 104, 126-133.
Baddeley, A. D. (1999). Essentials of Human Memory. East Sussex: Psychology Press Ltd.
Bassetti, B. (2006). Orthographic input and phonological representations in learners of Chinese as a Foreign Language. Written Language and Literacy, 9(1), 95–114.
Beck, I. L. (2006). Making sense of phonics: The hows and whys. New York: The Guilford Press.
Beech, J. R. (2005). Ehri’s model of phases of learning to read: a brief critique. Journal of Research in Reading, 28(1), 50-58.
Bellezza, F. S. (1996). Mnemonic Methods to Enhance Storage and Retrieval. Memory, Academic Press, Inc.
Berne, J. E. (2004). Listening comprehension strategies: A review of the literature. Foreign Language Annals, 37(4), 521-533.
Bernstein, L., &; Ellis, N. (2000). There are three sounds in the word CAT: How phonemic awareness works to facilitate reading acquisition. Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED448 408.
Blachman, B. (1989). Phonological awareness and word recognition: Assessment and intervention. In Kamhi, G. &; Carts, W. (Eds.), Reading disabilities: A developmental language perspective (pp. 133-158). Boston: College-Hill.
Bolich, B., &; McLaughlin, T. F. (2001). The Use of Mnemonics Strategies As Instructional Tools For Children With learning Disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 16(2), 40-49.
Boyle, J. (1984). Factors affecting listening comprehension. ELT Journal, 38(41), 34-38.
Bradley, L., &; Bryant, P.E. (1983). Categorizing sound and learning to read – a causal connection. Nature 301, 419–421.
Brownell, J. (1995). Improving listening effectiveness. Listening Attitudes, Principles, and Skills, (pp. 11-16). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Bryant, P. E., Maclean, M., Bradley, L. L., &; Crossland, J. (1990). Rhyme and alliteration, phoneme detection, and learning to read. Developmental Psychology, 26, 429–438.
Burgess, S. R., &; Lonigan, C. J. (1998). Bidirectional relations of phonological sensitivity and pre-reading abilities: Evidence from a preschool sample. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 70, 117–141.
Buzan, T., &; Buzan, B. (1993). The mind map book. London: BBC worldwide limited.
Byrne, B., &; Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1991). Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 451–455.
Byrne, B., &; Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1993). Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children: A 1-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 104-111.
Carter, R. (1987). Vocabulary: Applied linguistic perspectives. London: Unwin Hyman.
Catts, H. W., &; Kamhi, A. G. (Eds.). (1999). Language and reading disabilities. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn &; Bacon.
Chaney, C. (1992). Language development, metalinguistic skills, and print awareness in 3-year-children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 485-514.
Chang, S. F. (2004). A Brain-compatible Vocabulary Teaching Strategy Applied to Underachieving EFL Learners. Unpublished master’s thesis, Ming Chuan University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chang, W. T. (2011). Effective of Memorization Activities on Taiwanese High School Students’ English Listening Comprehension. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taipei University of Education, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chard, D. J., &; Dickson, S. V. (1999). Phonological awareness: instructional and assessment guidelines. Intervention in School &; Clinic, 34(5), 261-271.
Chard, D. J., &; Osborn, J. (1999). Phonics and word recognition instruction in early reading programs: Guidelines for accessibility. Learning Disabilities Research &; Practice, 14(2), 107-117.
Chen, H. L. (2010). Beyond Spelling Errors: The Relevance of Phonological Awareness to Taiwanese EFL Children's Spelling. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Chen, J. Y. (2004). Strategies Used by Taiwanese EFL Junior High School Students to Memorize Vocabulary. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Changhua University, Changhua, Taiwan.
Chen, K I. (2006). Phonics Remedial Instruction for English Underachievers at Elementary School: An Action Research. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taipei University of Education, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chen, M. C. (2003). Mnemonic keyword instruction. Journal of Nan Kai,1(1), 119-125.
Chen, S. P. (2007). The Study of EFL Learners' Phonological Awareness, Spelling Ability and Letter Knowledge. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chiayi University, Chiayi, Taiwan.
Cheng, Y. P. (2004). An Investigation of Listening Difficulties Encountered by EFL Students in Senior High Schools. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Changhua University, Changhua, Taiwan.
Cheung, H. (2007). The role of phonological awareness in mediating between reading and listening to speech. Language and Cognitive Processes 22(1), 130-154.
Chiang, C. S., &; Dunkel, P. (1992). The effect of speech modification, prior knowledge, and listening proficiency on EFL lecture learning. TESOL Quarterly, 26(2), 345-374.
Chiang, P. Y., &; Rvachew, S. (2007). English-French bilingual children’s phonological awareness and vocabulary skills. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(3), 292-307.
Chiappe, P., Chiappe, D. L., &; Gottardo, A. (2004). Vocabulary, context and speech perception among good and poor readers. Educational Psychology, 24(6), 825-843.
Chien, L. C. (2002). A Developmental Study on Phonological Awareness, Spelling and Reading in Taiwanese EFL Children. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taipei University of Education, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chou, H. Y. (2010). Effects of Phonics, Dictionary Use and Memory Strategy Instruction on EFL Elementary Students’ Vocabulary Performance. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Yunlin, Taiwan.
Chu, C. W. (2008). The Effects of Memory Strategy Instruction on Vocabulary Learning: A Study of Elementary Fourth-Grade Students. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Pingtung University of Education, Pingtung, Taiwan.
Chuang, C. F. (2011). An Investigation of Listening Difficulties Encountered by EFL Junior High School Students in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Changhua University, Changhua, Taiwan.
Chuang, W. C. (2010). The Effects of English Poetry on Phonological Awareness and Learning Interest of Elementary School Stuents. Unpublished masters’ thesis, National Taipei University of Education, Taipei, Taiwan.
Cisero, C. A., &; Royer, J. M. (1995). The development and cross-language transfer of phonological awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 275-303.
Cohen, A. D. (1994). Assessing language ability in the classroom. Boston, MA: Heinle &; Heinle Publishers.
Connelly, V., Johnston, R., &; Thompson, G. B. (2001). The effect of phonics instruction on the reading comprehension of beginning readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 423-457.
Corona, D., Spangenberger, S., &; Venet, I. (1998). Improving student writing through a language rich environment. M.A. Action Research Project, Saint Xavier University and IRI / Skylight. Retrieved September 2, 2009, from Eric database (ED 420 860).
Cronbach, L. J. (1942). An analysis on techniques for diagnostic vocabulary testing. The Journal of Educational Research, 36(3), 206-217.
Cutler, A., &; Weber, A. (2007). Listening experience and phonetic-to-lexical mapping the in L2. In J. Trouvain, &; W. J. Barry (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 2007) (pp. 43–48). Dudweiler: Pirrot.
Daneman, M., &; Blennerhassett, A. (1984). How to assess the listening comprehension skills of prereaders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1372–1381.
Davidson, M., &; Jenkins, J. R. (1994). Effects of phonemic processes on word reading and spelling. Journal of Educational Research, 87(3), 148-157.
DeCarrico, J. (2001) Vocabulary Learning and Teaching. In Celce-Murcia, M. (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd Ed.) (pp. 153–169). Boston, MA: Heinle &; Heinle.
Dunkel, P. (1988). Academic listening and note taking for L1/L2 students: The need to investigate the utility of the axioms of good note taking. TESL Canada Journal, 6, 11-26.
Ehri, L. C. (1995). Phase of development in learning to read words by sight. Journal of Research in Reading, 18, 116-125.
Ehri, L. C., &; Robbins, C. (1992). Beginners need some decoding skill to read words by analogy. Reading Research Quarterly, 27(1), 13-26.
Eldredge, J. L. (1995). Teaching decoding in holistic classrooms. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Eldredge, J. L. (2005). Foundations of fluency: An exploration. Reading Psychology, 26, 161-181.
Ellis, N. (1990). Reading, phonological skills and short-term memory: Interactive tributaries of development. Journal of Research in Reading, 13, 107–122.
Escudero, P., Hayes-Harb, R., &; Mitterer, H. (2008). Novel second-language words and asymmetric lexical access. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 345–360.
Gairns, R., &; Redman, S. (1986) Working with words: A guide to teaching and learning vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gass, Susan M., &; Selinker, L. (1994). Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goh, C. (1997). How much do learners know about the factors that influence their listening comprehension? National University of Singapore.
Goh, C. (2002). Exploring listening comprehension tactics and their interaction patterns. System, 30(2), 185–206.
Goswami, U., &; Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
Goswami, U., &; Bryant, P. (1992). Rhyme, analogy, and children's reading. Reading acquisition (pp. 49-63). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Graham, S. (2006). Listening comprehension: The learners’ perspective. System, 34(2), 165-182.
Gray, C., Ferguson, J., Behan, S., Dunbar, C., Dunn, J., &; Mitchell, D. (2007). Developing young readers through the linguistic phonics approach. International Journal of Early Years Education, 15(1), 15-33.
Griffiths, R. (1991). Pausological research in an L2 context: A rationale and review of selected studies. Applied Linguistics, 12, 345-364.
Harris, J.R., &; Turkington, C. (2001). Understanding memory: the sourcebook for memory and memory disorders. New York: Checkmark books.
Hayes-Harb, R., Nicol, J., &; Barker, J. (2010). Learning the Phonological Forms of New Words: Effects of Orthographic and Auditory Input. Language and Speech, 53(3), 367-381.
Hennings, D. G. (2001). Vocabulary Growth: strategies for college word study. Prentice Hall.
Henson, K.T., &; Eller, B.F. (1999). Educational psychology for effective teaching. Belmont, CA.: Wadsworth.
Higbee, K. L., &; Kunihira, S. (1985). Cross-cultural applications of Yodai mnemonics in education. Educational Psychologist, 20(2), 57-64.
Hu, C. F. (2004). Learning to spell with poor phonological awareness. English Teaching &; Learning, 28, 31-52.
Huang, C. Y. (2006). Using Nursery Rhymes to Enhance Phonological Awareness and Learning Motivation in Primary School Students. Unpublished masters’ thesis, National Taipei University of Education, Taipei, Taiwan.
Huang, H. C. (2004). Teaching Vocabulary through Drawing: A Case Study. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei City.
Huang, S. L. (2004). An Experimental Study of the Effects of Phonics Instruction on the Acquisition of Phonological Awareness of Junior High School Students in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei City.
Hulme, C. (1988). Short-term memory development and learning to read. In: M.M. Gruneberg,
Kotaman, H., Tekin, A., &; Tekin, G. (2007). Reading acquisition through phonics method in a Turkish public elementary school: A case study. Reading Improvement, 44(4), 199-206.
Kozminsky, L., &; Kozminsky, E. (1995). The effects of early phonological awareness training on reading success. Learning and Instruction, 5, 187-201.
Kucera, H. (1982). The mathematics of language. In The American Heritage Dictionary (2nd edition). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Lee, Y. C. (2009). The Effects of Word Box and Word Sort Phonics Instruction on Third Graders’ Phonological Awareness and Spelling. Unpublished master’s thesis, Taipei Municipal University of Education, Taipei, Taiwan.
Levin, J. R. (1983). Pictorial strategies for school learning. Practical illustrations. In M. Press, &; J. R. Levin (Eds.), Cognitive strategy research: Educational illustrations (pp. 213-237). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Lewis, M. (1997). Implementing the lexical approach. Hove, England: Language teaching publications.
Li, L., (1986). Children’s use of the keyword method to learn simple English vocabulary words. In C.Tang, B. Huang, &; C. Liao, (Eds.), The 3rd Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China (pp. 281-293). Taipei: The Crane.
Liao, Y. H. (2011). Phonological Awareness and Spelling in Secondary School Studies: The Effect of Onset/rime-based Phonics. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan.
Lin, A. J. (2010). The Relationship Between Taiwanese EFL Young Learners’ Phonological Awareness and Listening Comprehension. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Changhua University of Education, Chuanghua, Taiwan.
Liu, N., &; Nation, I .S. P. (1985). Factors affecting guessing vocabulary in context. RELC Journal, 16(1), 33-42.
Lin, F. Y. (2009). The Combined Effects of Keyword Method and Phonics Instruction on 5th Graders’ English Vocabulary Learning in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, Taipei Municipal University of Education, Taipei, Taiwan.
Lin, Y. L. (2009). The Effect of Phonics Instruction on Word Recognition and Reading Comprehension Among EFL Low-achieving Learners in a Taiwanese Junior High School. Journal of Education Research, 5, 293-355.
Lo, C. Y. (2009). The Correlations Between EFL Young Learners' Listening Comprehension and Their Reading Abilities. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Changhua University of Education, Chuanghua, Taiwan.
Lu, L. T. (2008). The Correlation between English Word Recognition and Phonological Awareness among Junior High School Students. Unpublised master’s thesis, National University of Tainan, Tainan, Taiwan.
Lundberg, I., Frost, J., &; Petersen, O. P. (1988). Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 263–284.
Mastropieri, M. A., &; Scruggs, T. E. (1991). Teaching students ways to remember: Strategies for learning mnemonically. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
Mastropieri, M. A., &; Scruggs, T. E. (1998). Enhancing School Success with Mnemonic Strategies. Intervention in School and Clinic, 33, 201–208.
Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., &; Fulk, B. M. (1990). Teaching abstract vocabulary with the keyword method: Effects on recall and comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 92-96.
Mastropieri, A. M., Scruggs, E. T., &; Fulk, J. M. B. (2001). Teaching abstract vocabulary with the keyword method: effects on recall and comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 92-97.
Mehrpour, S., &; Rahimi, M. (2010). The impact of general and specific vocabulary knowledge on reading and listening comprehension: A case of Iranian EFL learners. System, 38, 292-300.
Melka, F. (1997). Receptive vs. productive aspects of vocabulary. In N. Schmitt, &; M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 203-224). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Metsala, J. L. (1999). Young children’s phonological awareness and nonword repetition as a function of vocabulary development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 3-19.
Ministry of Education. (2008). The Fundamentals of Curriculum for Elementary and Junior High School in 2008. Retrieved July 28, 2010, from http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC2/9cc_97.php?login_type=1
Nagy, W. E., &; Scott, J.A. (2000). Vocabulary processes. In M. L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, &; R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 269–284). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Nation, I. S. P. (1982). Beginning to Learn Foreign Language Vocabulary: A Review of the Research. RELC Journal, 13(1), 14-36.
Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Boston: Heinle &; Heinle.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. London: Cambridge University Press.
Nation, K., &; Hulme, C. (1997). Phonemic segmentation, not onset-rime segmentation, predicts early reading and spelling skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 154-167.
Nation, K., &; Snowling, M. J. (1998). Semantic processing and the development of word-recognition skills: Evidence from children with reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 85-101.
Nation, P., &; Waring, R. (1997). Vocabulary size, text coverage and word lists. In N. Schmitt, &; M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: description, acquisition, and pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Olofsson, Å., &; Lundberg, I. (1983). Can phonemic awareness be trained in kindergarten? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 24, 35–44.
Olson, L. O. (2000). Can your students spell millennium? Retrieved August 15, 2010, from Eric database (ED 438 549).
Orton, J. G. (2000). Phonemic awareness and inventive writing. New England Reading Association Journal, 36, 17-21.
Osburne, A. G. (1993). Reexamining memorization. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages. 24th, San Francisco, CA.
Ota, M., Hartsuiker, R. J., &; Haywood, S. L. (2009). The KEY to the ROCK: Nearhomophony in nonnative visual word recognition. Cognition, 111(2), 263–269.
Oxford, R.L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. Heinle &; Heinle, Boston.
Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 255-287.
Palmberg, R. (1987). Patterns of vocabulary development in foreign language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 201-220.
Parker, F., &; Riley, K. (1994). Linguistics for non-linguistics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Phythian-Sence, C., &; Wagner, R. K. (2007). Vocabulary acquisition: a primer. In R. Wagner, &; A. Muse (Eds.), Vocabulary acquisition: implications for reading comprehension (pp. 1-14). New York: The Guilford Press.
Pillai, N. R. (2004). Using mnemonics to improve vocabulary, boost memory and enhance creativity in the ESL classroom. Retrieved July19, 2010, from http://melta.org.my/ET/2004/2004-62.pdf
Pufpaff, L. A. (2009). A developmental continuum of phonological sensitivity skills. Psychology in the Schools, 46(7), 679-691.
Rhoder, C., &; Huerster, P. (2002). Use dictionaries for word learning with caution. Journal of Adolescent &; Adult Literacy, 45(8), 730-735.
Read, J. (1993). The development of a new measure of L2 vocabulary knowledge. Language Testing, 11, 355-371.
Richards, J. C. (1976). The role of vocabulary teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 10(1), 77-89.
Richards, J., Platt, J., &; Platt, H. (1998). Longman dictionary of language teaching &; applied linguistics. Hong Long: Person Education North Asia Limited.
Richardson, J. T. E. (1980). Mental Imagery and Human Memory. New York. St. Martin’s Press.
Rivers, W. M., &; Temperly, M. S. (1978). A practical guide to the teaching of English as a second or foreign language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roediger, H. L., III. (1980). The effectiveness of four mnemonics in ordering recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human learning &; memory, 6(5), 558-567.
Rost, M. (2002). Teaching and researching listening. New York: Longman.
Rubin, J. (1994). A review of second language listening comprehension research. Modern Language Journal, 78(2), 199-221
Rubin, J., &; Thompson, I. (1994). How to be a more successful language learner: Toward learner autonomy. Boston, MA: Heinle &; Heinle.
Ruddell, M. R., &; Shearer, B. A. (2002). “Extraordinary,” “tremendous,” “exhilarating,” “magnificent”: Middle school at-risk students become avid word learners with the vocabulary self-collections strategy (VSCS). Journal of Adolescent Adult Literacy. 45(5), 352-363.
Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., &; Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behavior of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing, 18(1), 55-89.
Scruggs, T.E., &; Mastropieri, M.A. (2000). The effectiveness of mnemonic instruction for students with learning and behavior problems: An update and research synthesis. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10, 163–173.
Scruggs, T. E., &; Mastropieri, M. A. (2002) Teaching Tutorial: Mnemonics instruction. Division for Learning Disabilities Website: http://www.TeachingLD.org.
Share, D. L., Jorm, A. F., Maclean, R., &; Matthews, R. (1984). Sources of individual differences reading acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1309–1324.
Sheu, W. L. (2008). The Effects of Explicit Phonics Instruction on the Development of Phonological Awareness. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
Shohamy, E., &; Inbar, O. (1991). Validation of listening comprehension tests: The effect of text and question type. Language Testing, 8, 23-40.
Silven, M., Niemi, P., &; Voeten, M. J. M. (2002). Do maternal interaction and early language predict phonological awareness in 3 to 4 year olds? Cognitive Development, 17, 1133–1155.
Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instructions. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 38-62.
Stahl, S.A., &; Stahl, K.E. (2004). Word wizards All! Teaching word meanings in preschool and primary education. In F. B. James, &; J. K. Edward (Eds.), Vocabulary instruction: research to practice. New York: The Guilford Press.
Stahr, L. S. (2009). Vocabulary Knowledge and Advanced Listening Comprehension in English as a Foreign Language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(4), 577-607.
Stanovich, K. E., Cunningham, A. E., &; Cramer, B. B. (1984). Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten children: Issues of task comparability. Journal of Experimental Child psychology, 38, 37-51.
Steingart, S. K., &; Glock, M. D. (1979). Imagery and the recall of connected discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 15(1), 66-83.
Stuart, M. (1995). Recognizing printed words unlocks the door to reading: How do children find the key? In E. Funnell, &; M. Stuart (Eds.), Learning to read: Psychology in the classroom (pp. 30-60). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Su, C. Y. (2011). A Study on English Vocabulary Mnemonics and its Application for Junior High School EFL Learners. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Changhua University of Education, Chuanghua, Taiwan.
Su, F. H. (2001). Phonological awareness as a predictor of spelling proficiency. Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on English Teaching &; Learning in the Republic of China, pp. 273-287. Taipei: Crane.
Thompson, I. (1987). Memory in language learning. In A. Wenden, &; J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner Strategies in Language Learning (pp. 15-30). Newjersy: Prentic-Hall.
Treiman, R., &; Baron, J. (1983). Phonemic-analysis training helps children benefit from spelling-sound rules. Memory &; Cognition, 11(4), 382-389.
Treiman, R., &; Zukowski, A. (1991). Levels of phonological awareness. In S. A. Brady, &; D. P. Shankweiler (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawarence Erlbaum Associates.
Tsai, B. Y. (2005). The Relationship Between Receptive English Vocabulary Size and Listening Comprehension Competence of College EFL Students. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Tsai, H. C. (2010). The Efficacy of Phonics and Phonological Awareness Training for Hard-of-Hearing EFL College Students. Taipei Municipal University of Education, Taipei, Taiwan.
Uberti, Z. H., Scruggs, E. T., &; Mastropieri, A. M. (2003). Keywords make the difference! Mnemonic instruction in inclusive classroom. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35, 56-61.
Underwood, M. (1994). Teaching listening. (4th Ed.). London: Longman.
White, T. G. (2005). Effects of systematic and strategic analogy-based phonics on grade 2 students’ word reading and reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(2), 234-255.
Wise, J. C., Sevcik, R. A., Romski, M., S., &; Morris, R. D. (2010). The relationship between phonological processing skills and word and nonword identification performance in children with mild intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31, 1170-1175.
Wolvin, A., &; Coakely, C. G. (1996). Listening (5th Ed.). Dubuque: Brown &; Benchmark.
Woolfolk, A. E. (1993). Educational Psychology (5th Ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Wu, M. H. (2009). Integrating Chinese Phonological Awareness Skills into Phonics Instruction. Unpublished masters’ thesis, National Taipei University of Educaiton, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yopp, H. K. (1988). The validity and reliability of phonemic awareness tests. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 159-177.
Zimmerman, C. B. (2000). Historical trends in second language vocabulary instruction. In J. Coady, &; T. Huckin (Eds.), Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top