(54.236.58.220) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/03/01 18:35
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:黃詩婷
研究生(外文):Shih-Ting Huang
論文名稱:公司治理與公司績效之關係研究:以雙元性創新策略為調節變項
論文名稱(外文):The Moderating Role of Ambidextrous Innovation Strategy on the Relationship Between Corporate Governance and Firm Performance
指導教授:周慧君周慧君引用關係
指導教授(外文):Hui-Chun Chou
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立東華大學
系所名稱:國際企業學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2012
畢業學年度:100
語文別:中文
論文頁數:87
中文關鍵詞:公司治理獨立董事雙元性創新策略外國機構投資人
外文關鍵詞:corporate governanceindependent directorshipforeign institutional ownershipambidextrous innovation strategy
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:776
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:200
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
為了維持公司的競爭力,公司需透過其公司治理與策略的配合,來達到企業所設定的目標。為了達到組織績效目標,公司致力於不同的創新,同時追求探索性創新策略與利用性創新策略,即雙元性創新策略。過去有很多研究探討公司治理與績效之間的關係,其結果是不一致的,本研究將擬以公司治理中獨立性較高的董事會以及外國機構投資人作為公司治理主要變數,重新檢視公司治理與公司績效之間的關係,並探討雙元性創新策略對於其關係的影響。本研究以台灣電子製造業中的640家企業為研究對象。透過階層迴歸分析實證結果發現:一、獨立董事比例與外國機構投資人持股比例皆對於公司績效有正向影響;二、當企業採用雙元性創新策略時,對外國機構投資人持股比例與公司績效之關係有正面調節效果;三、當企業採用雙元性創新策略時,對獨立董事比例與公司績效之間無顯著關係。最後提出相關建議及管理意涵作為參考。
To keep competitive, a firm needs to combine corporate and strategy to achieve the target. In order to achieve organization’s goal, a firm engages in different innovation strategy that comprises exploitative and exploratory innovation strategies, that is ambidextrous innovation strategy. Past research on the relationship between corporate governance and performance shows inconsistent results. We plan to use Independent Directorship and Foreign Institutional Ownership to recheck this relationship. A total of 640 electronic manufacturing firms constitute the analytical sample. Hierarchical regression analysis reveals that foreign institutional ownership and independent directorship have a positive effect on firm performance. Results also show that, when a firm adopts ambidextrous innovation strategy, the positive effect of foreign institutional ownership on firm performance will be strengthened. However, there is no interaction effect with independent directorship on firm performance. The implications of the findings in this study on the theory and practice are further discussed.
第一章 導論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究問題與目的 4
第三節 研究流程 5
第二章 文獻回顧與研究假說 7
第一節 公司治理之背景 7
第二節 獨立董事與績效之間的關係 17
第三節 外國機構投資人持股與績效之間的關係 26
第四節 雙元性創新策略 29
第五節 雙元性創新策略、公司治理與公司績效之關係 39
第三章 研究方法 47
第一節 研究架構 47
第二節 資料來源與樣本 48
第三節 變數的衡量 49
第四節 統計分析方法 55
第四章 實證結果與討論 56
第一節 樣本描述 56
第二節 迴歸分析結果 61
第三節 實證結果分析之討論 64
第五章 結論與未來研究建議 71
第一節 研究結論 71
第二節 理論貢獻與管理意涵 74
第三節 研究限制與後續研究方向 76
參考文獻 77
一、 中文文獻
吳思華. 2000. 策略九說:策略思考的本質. 台北:臉譜出版.
周行一, 游智賢 and 林岳喬. 2005. 開放外資參與我國期貨交易對我國金融市場之影響.
陳茵琦. 2005. 機構投資人與公司治理. 證券櫃檯月刊, 111: 57.
曾宛如. 2002. 公司管理與資本市場法制專論(一). 初版.
劉彤. 2002. 所有權結構研究綜述(上). 經濟研究資料第7期
二、 網站
1. 台灣證券交易所股份有限公司 http://www.twse.com.tw/ch/investor/foreign_invest/OCFID_01.php
2. 台灣經濟新報資料庫
http://www.tej.com.tw/twsite/
3. 中華公司治理協會
http://www.cga.org.tw/
4. 證券期貨局
http://www.sfi.org.tw/watch/define.asp
5. 中華民國證券暨期貨市場發展基金會
http://www.sfi.org.tw/newsfi/chinese.asp

三、英文文獻
Adawi, M. and Rwegasira, K. 2010. Toward Developing an Effective Board: Evidence From UAE-Listed Companies. 15(2): 151-175.
Agrawal, A. and Knoeber, C. R. 1996. Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(3): 377-397.
Agrawal, A. and Nagarajan, N. J. 1990. Corporate Capital Structure, Agency Costs, and Ownership Control: The Case of All-Equity Firms. Journal of Finance, 45(4): 1325-1331.
Ahuja, G. and Lampert, C. M. 2001. Enterpreneurship in the Large Corporation: A Longitudinal Study of How Established Firms Create Breakthrough Inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7): 521-543.
Aiken, L. S. and West, S. G. 1991. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage Publications Inc.
Anthony, J. H. and Ramesh, K. 1992. Association between accounting performance measures and stock prices. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 15(2/3): 203-227.
Atuahene-Gima, K. 2003. The Effects of Centrifugal and Centripetal Force on Product Development Speed and Quality: How Does Problem Solving Matter? Academy of Management, 46: 359-374.
Bae, K.-H., Kang, J.-K. and Kim, J.-M. 2002. Tunneling or Value Added? Evidence from Mergers by Korean Business Groups. Journal of Finance, 57(6): 2695-2740.
Barney, J. 1991. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99.
Barnhart, S. W., Marr, M. W. and Rosenstein, S. 1994. Firm Performance and Board Composition: Some New Evidence. Managerial and Decision Economics, 15(4): 329-340.
Baysinger, B. and Hoskisson, R. E. 1990. The Composition of Boards of Directors and Strategic Control: Effects on Corporate Strategy. Academy of Management Review, 15(1): 72-87.
Baysinger, B. D. and Butler, H. N. 1985. Corporate Governance and the Board of Directors: Performance Effects of Changes in Board Composition. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 1(1): 101.
Bazerman, M. H. and Schoorman, F. D. 1983. A Limited Rationality Model of Interlocking Directorates. Academy of Management Review, 8(2): 206-271.
Beckman, C. M. 2006. The Influence of Funding Team Company Affiliations on Firm Behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4): 741-758.
Benner, M. J. and Tushman, M. L. 2003. Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2): 238-256.
Berle, A. A. and Means, G. C. 1932. The Modern Corporate and Private Property. New York:MacMillan Company
Bhagat, S. and Black, B. 2002. The non-correlation between board independence and long-term firm performance. Journal of Corporation Law, 27(231-273).
Bierly, P. E. and Daly, P. S. 2007. Alternative Knowledge Strategies, Competitive Environment, and Organizational Performance in Small Manufacturing Firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 31(4): 493-516.
Booth, J. R. and Deli, D. N. 1996. Factors affecting the number of outside directorships held by CEOs. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(1): 81-104.
Bruderer, E. and Singh, J. V. 1996. Organizational evolution, learning, and selection: A genetic-algorithm-based model. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5): 1322-1349.
Burt, R. S. 1980. Cooptive Corporate Actor Networks: A Reconsideration of Interlocking Directorates Involving American Manufacturing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(4): 557-582.
Chibber, P. and Majumdar, S. 1999. Foreign ownership and profitability: property rights, control and the performance of firms in Indian industry. Journal of Law and Economics, 42: 209-238.
Clarkson, M. E. 1995. A Stakeholder Framwork For Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 92-117.
Cochran, P. L., Wartick, S. L. and Wood, R. A. 1984. The Average Age of Boards and Financial Performance, Revisited. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 23(4): 57.
Combs, J. G., Ketchen, D. J., Perryman, A. A. and Donahue, M. S. 2007. The Moderating Effect of CEO Power on the Board Composition–Firm Performance Relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 44(8): 1299-1323.
Daily, C. M., Certo, S. T. and Dalton, D. R. 1999. A decade of corporate women: Some progress in the boardroom, none in the executive suite. Strategic Management Journal, 20(1): 93.
Daily, C. M. and Dalton, D. R. 1992. The Relationship Between Governance Structure and Corporate Performance in Entrepreneurial Firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(5): 375.
Daily, C. M. and Dalton, D. R. 1994. Corporate Governance and The Bankrupt Firm: An Empirical Assessment. Strategic Management Journal, 15(8): 643-654.
Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Johnson, J. L. and Ellstrand, A. E. 1999. Number of Directors and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6): 674-686.
Damanpour, F. 1991. Organizational Innovation: A Meta-analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3): 555-590.
Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D. and Donaldson, L. 1997. Toward A Stewardship Theory of Management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1): 20-47.
Delios, A. and Beamish, P. W. 1999. Geographic scope, product diversification and the corporate performance of Japanese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 20(8): 711-727.
Demb, A. and Neubauer, F. F. 1992. The Corporate Board: Confronting the Paradoxes. Long Range Planning, 25(3): 9-20.
Donaldson, L. and Davis, J. H. 1991. Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1): 49.
Doukas, J. A. and Lang, L. H. P. 2003. Foreign direct investment, diversification and firm performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(2): 153-172.
Douma, S., George, R. and Kabir, R. 2006. Foreign and domestic ownership, business groups, and firm performance: Evidence from a large emerging market. Strategic Management Journal, 27(7): 637-657.
Duncan, R. B. 1976. The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. The Management of Organization, 1: 167-188.
Dwivedi, N. and Jain, A. K. 2005. Corporate Governance and Performance of Indian Firms: The Effect of Board Size and Ownership. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 17(3): 161-172.
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1): 57-74.
Fama, E. F. 1980. Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88(2): 288-307.
Fama, E. F. and Jensen, M. C. 1983. Agency Problems and Residual Claims. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2): 327-350.
Feugang, J. M., Kaya, A., Page, G. P., Lang, C., Mehta, T., Hirani, K., Nazareth, L., Topper, E., Gibbs, R. and Memili, E. 2009. Two-stage genome-wide association study identifies integrin beta 5 as having potential role in bull fertility. BMC Genomics, 10: 1-10.
Firstenberg, P. B. and Malkiel, B. G. 1980. Why corporate boards need independent directors. Management Review, 69(4): 26.
Fiss, P. C. and Zajac, E. J. 2004. The Diffusion of Ideas over Contested Terrain: The (Non)adoption of a Shareholder Value Orientation among German Firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(4): 501-534.
Floyd, S. W. and Lane, P. J. 2000. Strategizing Throughout The Organization: Managing Role Conflict in Strategic Renewal. Academy of Management Review, 25(1): 154-177.
Gibson, C. B. and Birkinshaw, J. 2004. The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2): 209-226.
Gilbert, C. 2005. Unbundling The Structure of Inertia: Resource Versus Routine Rigidity. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5): 741-763.
Grossman, S. J. and Hart, O. D. 1986. The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration. Journal of Political Economy, 94(4): 691-719.
Groysberg, B. and Lee, L.-E. 2009. Hiring Stars and Their Colleagues: Exploration and Exploitation in Professional Service Firms. Organization Science, 20(4): 740-758.
Harry, M. J. and Richard, S. 2000. Six Sigma. Bantam Audio.
Haunschild, P. R. and Beckman, C. M. 1998. When Do Interlocks Matter?: Alternate Sources of Information and Interlock Influence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4): 815-844.
He, Z. L. and Wong, P. K. 2004. Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4): 481-494.
Hendry, K. and Kiel, G. C. 2004. The Role of the Board in Firm Strategy: integrating agency and organisational control perspectives. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(4): 500-520.
Hermalin, B. E. and Weisbach, M. S. 1988. The determinants of board composition. RAND Journal of Economics, 19(4): 589-606.
Hill, S. A. and Birkinshaw, J. 2006. Ambidexterity in Corporate Venturing: Simultaneously Using Existing and Building New Capabilities.
Hillman, A. J. and Dalziel, T. 2003. Boards of Directors and Firm Performance: Integrating Agency and Resourse Dependence Perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3): 383-396.
Huang, R. D. and Shiu, C.-Y. 2009. Local Effects of Foreign Ownership in an Emerging Financial Market: Evidence from Qualified Foreign Institutional Investors in Taiwan. Financial Management, 38(3): 567-602.
Hull, F. and Hage, J. 1982. Organizing for Innovation: Beyond Burns and Stalker's Organic Type. Sociology, 16(4): 564-577.
Jackling, B. and Johl, S. 2009. Board Structure and Firm Performance: Evidence from India's Top Companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(4): 492-509.
Jaikumar, R. and Bohn, R. E. 1992. A dynamic approach to operations management: An alternative to static optimization. International Journal of Production Economics, 27(3): 265-282.
Jansen, J. J. P., Tempelaar, M. P., van den Bosch, F. A. J. and Volberda, H. W. 2009. Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms. Organization Science, 20(4): 797-811.
Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J. and Volberda, H. W. 2006. Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators. Management Science, 52(11): 1661-1674.
Jensen, M. C. 1986. Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2): 323.
Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H. 1976. Thoery of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305-360.
Jin, K., ., Kim, N. and Kim, H.-B. 2001. Entry Barriers: A Dull-, One-, or Two-Edged Sword for Incumbents? Unraveling the Paradox from a Contingency Perspective. Journal of Marketing, 65(1): 1-14.
Johnson, J. L., Ellstrand, A. E. and Daily, C. M. 1996. Boards of Directors: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 22(3): 409.
Judge, J., William, Q., and Zeithaml, C. P. 1992. Institutional and Strategic Choice Perspectives on Board Involvement in The Strategic Decision Process. Academy of Management Journal, 35(4): 766-794.
Katila, R. and Ahuja, G. 2002. Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6): 1183-1194.
Keenan, J. and Aggestam, M. 2001. Corporate Governance and Intellectual Capital: some conceptualisations. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 9(4): 259.
Kiel, G. C. and Nicholson, G. J. 2003. Board Composition and Corporate Performance: how the Australian experience informs contrasting theories of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(3): 189-205.
Kim, S., Sul, W. and Kang, S. A. 2010. Impact of Foreign Institutional Investors on
Dividend Policy in Korea: A Stock Market Perspective. Journal of Financial Management and Analysis, 23(1): 10-26.
Klein, A. 2002. Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(3): 375.
Kyriakopoulos, K. and Moorman, C. 2004. Tradeoffs in marketing exploitation and exploration strategies: The overlooked role of market orientation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3): 219-240.
Lan, L. L. and Heracleous, L. 2010. Rethinking Agency Theory: The View From Law. Academy of Management Review, 35(2): 294-314.
Lavie, D. and Rosenkopf, L. 2006. Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Alliance Formation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4): 797-818.
Le, S. A., Walters, B. and Kroll, M. 2006. The moderating effects of external monitors on the relationship between RandD spending and firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 59(2): 278-287.
Levinthal, D. A. and March, J. G. 1993. The Myopia of Learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 95-112.
Lewis, M. W., Welsh, M. A., Dehler, G. E. and Green, S. G. 2002. Product Development Tensions: Exploring Contrasting Styles of Project Management. Academy of Management Journal, 45(3): 546-564.
Lin, Z. J., Yang, H. and Demirkan, I. 2007. The Performance Consequences of Ambidexterity in Strategic Alliance Formations: Empirical Investigation and Computational Theorizing. management Science, 53: 1645-1658.
Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Yan, L. and Veiga, J. F. 2006. Ambidexterity and Performance in Small- to Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration. Journal of Management, 32(5): 646-672.
Mace, R. E. 1971. Factors influencing the decisions of teachers to become administrators: A study of the differences in self-actualization and job satisfaction occurring between future administrators and career teachers. ProQuest Information and Learning, US.
Mallette, P. and Fowler, K. L. 1992. Effects of Board Composition and Stock Ownership on The Adoption of "Poison Pills". Academy of Management Journal, 35(5): 1010-1035.
March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 2(1): 71-87.
McConnell, J. J. and Servaes, H. 1990. Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2): 595-612.
McIntyre, M., L.,, Murphy, S., A., and Mitchel, l. 2007. The top team: examining
board composition and firm performance. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Effective Board Performance, 7(5): 547-561.
Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D. and Coleman, J. H. J. 1978. Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process. Academy of Management Review, 3(3): 546-562.
Miller, D. 1987. The Structural and Environmental Corporates of Business Strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 8(1): 55-76.
Mizruchi, M. S. 1983. Who Controls Whom? An Examination of the Relation Between Management and Boards of Directors in Large American Corporations. Academy of Management Review, 8(3): 426-435.
Mizruchi, M. S. and Stearns, L. B. 1988. A Longitudinal Study of the Formation of Interlocking Directorates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(2): 194-210.
Muth, M. M. and Donaldson, L. 1998. Stewardship Theory and Board Structure: a contingency approach. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 6(1): 5.
Neter, J. 1990. Comment. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85(411): 864-865.
Norburn, D. 1986. Gogos, Yoyos and Dodos: Company Directors and Industry Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7(2): 101-117.
OECD. 1999. OECD Principles of Corporate Governance: 1.
Pearce, I., John A. and Zahra, S. A. 1992. Board Composition From A Stratrgic Contingency Perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 29(4): 411-438.
Pfeffer, J. 1972. Merger as a Response to Organizational Interdependence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3): 382-394.
Pound, J. 1988. Proxy contexts and the efficiency of shareholder oversight. Journal of Financial Economics, 20: 237-265.
Prieto, E., Revilla, E. and Rodriguez, B. 2007. Information Technology and the Ambidexterity Hythesis: An Analysis In Product Development. Social Science Research Network(SSRN) Working Paper.
Provan, K. G. 1980. Board Power and Organizational Effectiveness Among Human Service Agencies. Academy of Management Journal, 23(2): 221-236.
Randoy, T. and Goel, S. 2003. Ownership structure, founder leadership, and performance in Norwegian SMEs: implications for financing entrepreneurial opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(5): 619.
Roberta, R. 1993. Foundations of Corporate Law. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rosenstein, S. and Wyatt, J. G. 1990. Outside Directors, Board Independence, and Shareholder Wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 26(2): 175-191.
Ruigrok, W., Peck, S. I. and Keller, H. 2006. Board Characteristics and Involvement in Strategic Decision Making: Evidence from Swiss Companies. Journal of Management Studies, 43(5): 1201-1226.
Schellenger, M. H., Wood, D. D. and Tashakori, A. 1989. Board of director composition, shareholder wealth, and dividend policy. Journal of Management, 15: 457-467.
Schoorman, F. D., Bazerman, M. H. and Atkin, R. S. 1981. Interlocking Directorates: A Strategy for Reducing Environmental Uncertainty. Academy of Management Review, 6(2): 243-251.
Selznick. 1949. T. V. A. and the Grass Roots: A Study in the Sociology of Formal Organization. American Sociological Review, 14(6): 824-825.
Siggelkow, N. and Levinthal, D. A. 2003. Temporarily Divide to Conquer: Centralized, Decentralized, and Reintegrated Organizational Approaches to Exploration and Adaptation. Organization Science, 14(6): 650-669.
Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., Veiga, J. F. and Souder, D. 2009. A Typology for Aligning Organizational Ambidexterity's Conceptualizations, Antecedents, and Outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5): 864-894.
Singh, D. A. and Gaur, A. S. 2009. Business Group Affiliation, Firm Governance, and Firm Performance: Evidence from China and India. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(4): 411-425.
Smith, W. K. and Tushman, M. L. 2005. Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams. Organization Science, 16(5): 522-536.
Sorensen, J. B. and Stuart, T. E. 2000. Aging, obsolesence and organizational innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 81-113.
Tempelaar, M. P. and Bezemer, P.-J. 2010. Boards of Directors and Ambidexterity: A Longitudinal Study of Board Social Capital and Integration. Academy of Management Journal.
Thomas, W. J. 2004. Corporate Governance: Law, Theory and Policy. N.C.: Carolina Academic Press: 271-272.
Ting, W., Yen, S.-H. and Chiu, C.-L. 2008. The Influence of Qualified Foreign Institutional Investors on the Association between Default Risk and Audit Opinions: Evidence from the Chinese Stock Market. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(5): 400-415.
Tushman, M. L. and O'Reilly, C., III. 2004. The Ambidextrous Organization: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change. In M. L. Tushman and P. Anderson (Eds.), Managing strategic innovation and change: A collection of readings: 276-291: Second edition. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tushman, M. L. and Romanelli, E. 1985. Organizational Evolution: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence Reorientation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7: 171.
Wagner, I., John A., Stimpert, J. L. and Fubara, E. I. 1998. Board Composition and Organizational Performance: Two Studies of Insider/outside Effects. Journal of Management Studies, 35(5): 655-677.
Wang, L. and Yen, Y. 2009. Corporate Governance, Industry Clustering and Corporate Performance. The Business Review, Cambridge, 12(1): 227-234.
Wei, Z., Xie, F. and Zhang, S. 2005. Ownership Structure and Firm Value in China's Privatized Firms: 1991-2001. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 40(1): 87-108.
Weisbach, M. 1988. The Role and Selection of Boards of Directors. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A Resource-based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2): 171-180.
Wernerfelt, B. and Montgomery, C. A. 1988. Tobin's q and the Importance of Focus in Firm Performance. American Economic Review, 78(1): 246.
World Bank. 1999. Corporate Governance Annual Report.
Xie, B., Davidson, W. N., III and DaDalt, P. J. 2003. Earnings Management and Corporate Governance: The Role of the Board and the Audit Committee. Journal of Corporate Finance, 9(3): 295-316.
Yermack, D. 1996. Higher market valuation for firms with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40: 185-211.
Zahra, S. A. and Pearce, I., John A. 1989. Boards of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance: A Review and Integrative Model. Journal of Management, 15(2): 291.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔