(54.236.58.220) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/02/27 11:58
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:洪浩恩
研究生(外文):Hao-An Hung
論文名稱:店內廣告出現下廠商之最適網路共同零售商策略與溝通決策
論文名稱(外文):The Optimal Online Common Agency Strategy in the Presence of In-Store Display Advertising
指導教授:吳奕慧吳奕慧引用關係
指導教授(外文):I-Huei Wu
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:全球經營與策略研究所
學門:社會及行為科學學門
學類:國際事務學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2011
畢業學年度:100
語文別:英文
論文頁數:159
中文關鍵詞:賽局理論店內展示廣告網路共同零售商機制整合行銷溝通策略
外文關鍵詞:game theoryin-store display advertisingonline common agencycommunication strategy
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:152
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
隨著資訊科技不斷進步,網際網路時代的來臨,使得企業透過電子商務的應用,可以將產品與服務資訊傳遞給全世界的網路使用者,並縮短以往繁複的交易流程;其中,零售機制在網際網路上的應用可說是當下重要的管理議題之一,在部分零售與旅遊相關行業中,網路共同零售商如Priceline的使用更是備受業界與學界的矚目與討論;這種銷售「不透明資訊產品」(opaque product)的全新通路策略,其最主要特色為所銷售產品具有不確定性且價格較低廉,主要目標客群則為價格敏感度高的消費者。而服務提供廠商如航空公司為了提升其本身的競爭優勢,則是試圖透過店內廣告的設置,迎合消費者的偏好並建立企業本身正面的品牌形象,本研究主要是以賽局理論模型探討網路共同零售機制背後的價格歧視功能,並加入服務提供廠商投資店內廣告對於消費者願付價格的衝擊效應,藉由分析模型,本研究發現在大多數行銷情境中,店內展示廣告的出現可以提升消費者願付價格的情況下,廠商會更有誘因去執行網路共同零售商機制;而僅有少數行銷環境中,廠商會選擇投資店內展示廣告並放棄使用網路共同零售商機制。另外,本研究亦發現店內展示廣告的出現會改變廠商現有之通路結構,進而影響廠商之定價策略,並能夠有效減緩服務提供廠商之間的價格競爭。我們希望透過此研究可以提供給予對網路共同零售商與店內廣告有興趣之學者與行銷人士管理實務上可用之建言。
In the tourism and some retail industries, the online common agency such as Priceline has attracted much attention from both marketers and researchers. This kind of new channel sells opaque products which contains limited product information and may intend to serve only those price-sensitive segments. In order to compete with the others in the industry, service providers (i.e., airlines) tend to redesign their in-store display advertising to fit consumer’s preference much better and to create the image differentiation. In this paper, we try to not only capture the price discrimination effect behind the online common agency but also consider the impact of in-store display advertising invested by service providers. We build a game-theoretic model where service providers can decide to invest on either the online common agency or their own websites and consider whether to launch in-store display advertising. By analyzing this model, we find that in the most marketing circumstance, the presence of the in-store display advertising which could enhance the valuation of consumers, service providers would have more incentives to use the online common agency mechanism. Besides, only in few marketing circumstance, service providers would invest in in-store display advertising without using the OCA mechanism. We find that the emergence of in-store display advertising would change service provider’s channel structure and thereby affect their pricing strategy. Moreover, we show that in-store display advertising could mitigate the price competition among service providers. We hope this study can provide some suggestions for marketers who are interested in the impact of the online common agency and in-store display advertising.
Abstract in Chinese …………………………………….………I
Abstract …..……………………………………………………II
Contents ………………………………………………………III
1 Introduction …………………………………………………1
2 Literature Review …………………………………………7
2.1 The Opaque Selling …………………………………7
2.2 The Name-Your-Own-Price Mechanism ……………9
2.3 The In-Store Display Advertising ……………………11
3 The Base Model …………………………………………13
4 Results…………..…………………………………………16
4.1 Case 1 ………………….……………….……………20
4.2 Case 2 ………………………….……….……………37
4.3 The Comparison of Case 1 &; Case 2 …………………56
4.4 Case 3 ………………………………….……………59
4.5 Case 4 ……………………………………………….86
5 Conclusion ………………………………………………104
5.1 Concluding Remarks ………………………………104
5.2 Contributions and Managerial Implications ………107
5.3 Research Limits &; Future Directions ………………110
Reference ……………………………………………………111
Appendix ……………………………………………………115

[1] AISP. http://mic.iii.org.tw/aisp/.
[2] Allenby, G. M., &; Ginter J. L. (1995). The effects of in-store displays and feature advertising on consideration sets. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12, 67-80.
[3] Anderson, C.K., &; Xie, X. (2009). Pricing and market segmentation using opaque selling mechanisms. Working Paper.
[4] Arnold, M. A., Li, C., Saliba, C., &; Zhang, L. (2008). Asymmetric market shares, advertising, and pricing: Equilibrium with an information gatekeeper. Working paper.
[5] Batra, R., Myers, J.G., &; Aaker D.A. (1996). Advertising Management. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
[6] Chevalier, M. (1975). Increase in sales due to in-store display. Journal of Marketing Research, 12 (4), 426–431.
[7] Chioveanu, I. (2008). Advertising, brand loyalty and pricing. Games and Economic Behavior, 64, 68–80
[8] Deighton, J., Henderson, C.M., &; Neslin, S.A. (1994). The effects of advertising on brand switching and repeat purchasing. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(1), 28-43.
[9] D’Souza, G., &; Rao, R.C. (1995). Can repeating an advertisement more frequently than the competition affect brand preference in a mature market? Journal of Marketing, 59(2), 32-42.
[10] Dukes, A., &; Liu, Y. (2010). In-Store media and distribution channel coordination. Marketing Research, 29(1), 94-107.
[11] Erdem, T., Sun, B. (2002). An empirical investigation of the spillover effects of advertising and sales promotions in umbrella branding. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(4), 408–420.
[12] Fay, S. (2004). Partial-repeat-bidding in the name-your-own-price channel. Marketing Science, 23(3), 407-418.
[13] Fay, S. (2008). Selling an opaque product through an intermediary: The case of disguising one's product. Journal of Retailing, 84(1), 59-75.
[14] Fay, S., &; Laran J. (2008). Implications of expected variability in the seller's price in Name-Your-Own-Price auctions. Working paper.
[15] Fay, S., &; Xie, j. (2008). Probabilistic Goods: A Creative Way of Selling Products and Services. Marketing Science, 27, 674-690.
[16] Gönsch, J., &; Steinhardt, C., (2010). Revenue management with opaque products. Working paper.
[17] Gutierrez, B. P. B. (2008). In-store media: how effective are they? Evidence from the Philippines. Philippine Management review, 15, 65-82.
[18] Hann, I., &; Terwiesch, C. (2003). Measuring the frictional costs of online transactions: The case of a Name-Your-Own-Price channel. Management Science, 49(11), 1563-1579.
[19] Hotwire. http://www.hotwire.com.
[20] Huang, X., and Sošić, G. (2010). Name-Your-Own-Price as a competitive secondary channel in the presence of posted prices. Working paper.
[21] Inman, J. J., Winer R. S., &; Ferraro R. (2009). The Interplay Among Category Characteristics, Customer Characteristics, and Customer Activities on In-Store Decision Making. Journal of Marketing, 73, 19–29.
[22] Janssen, M. C. W., &; Non, M. C. (2008). Advertising and consumer search in a duopoly model. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 26, 354–371.
[23] Jerath, K., Netessine, s., &; Veeraraghavan, S.K. (2008). Revenue management with strategic customers: last-minute selling and opaque selling. Working Paper.
[24] Jerath, K., Netessine, s., &; Veeraraghavan, S.K. (2009). Selling to strategic customers: opaque selling strategies. Working paper.
[25] Jiang, Y. (2007). Price discrimination with opaque products. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 6(2), 118-134.
[26] Koças, C., &; Bohlmann, J. D. (2008). Segmented switchers and retailer pricing strategies. Journal of Marketing, 72, 124–142.
[27] Lauga, D.O. (2010). Persuasive advertising with sophisticated but impressionable consumers. Working paper.
[28] McGee, W. J. (2003). Booking and Bidding Sight Unseen: A Consumer’s Guide to Opaque Travel Web Sites. Consumer WebWatch Research Report. Retrieved Sep 25, 2010 from http://www.consumerwebwatch.org/pdfs/booking-and-bidding-sight-unseen.pdf
[29] Ogonowska, M., &; Torre, D. (2010). Joint opaque booking systems for online travel agencies. Working paper.
[30] Post, D. (2010). Variable opaque products in the airline industry: A tool to fill the gaps and increase revenues. Journal of Revenue &; Pricing Management, 9, 292-299
[31] Priceline. http://www.priceline.com.
[32] Raj, S.P. (1982). The effects of advertising on high and low loyalty consumer segments. The Journal of Consumer Research, 9(1), 77-89.
[33] Richardson, P.S., Dick, A.S. &; Jain, A.K. (1994). Extrinsic and intrinsic cue effects on perceptions of store brand quality. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 28-36.
[34] Shaffer, G., &; Zettelmeyer F. (2009). Comparative advertising and in-store displays. Marketing Science, 28(6), 1144-1156.
[35] Shapiro, D. &; Shi, X. (2008). Market segmentation: The role of opaque travel agencies. Working paper.
[36] Shum, M. (2004). Does advertising overcome brand loyalty? Evidence from the breakfast-cereals market. Journal of Economics &; Management Strategy, 13(2), 241–272.
[37] Spann, M., &; Tellis, G.J. (2006). Does the internet promote better consumer decisions? The case of Name-Your-Own-Price auctions. Journal of Marketing, 70(1), 65-78
[38] Spann, M., Skiera, B., &; Schäfers, B.(2004). Measuring individual frictional costs and willingness-to-pay via name-your-own-price mechanisms. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(4), 22-36.
[39] Tellis, G.J. (1988). Advertising exposure, loyalty, and brand purchase: a two stage model of choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(2), 134-144.
[40] von der Fehr, N.-H. M., &; Stevik, K. (1998). Persuasive advertising and product differentiation. Southern Economic Journal, 65(1), 113-126.
[41] Wall Street Journal. New York, N.Y.: Aug 8, 2010.
[42] Wang, T., Gal-Or, E., and Chatterjee, R. (2009). The Name-Your-Own-Price channel in the travel industry: an analytical exploration. Management Science, 55(6): 968-979.
[43] Wu, I. H. (2009). Essays on online marketing strategies in imperfect competition under demand uncertainty. The doctor thesis of National Taiwan University.
[44] Yin, R. &; Tang, C. S. (2006). The implications of customer purchasing behavior and in-store display formats. Working paper.

連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔