跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.222.104.206) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/05/29 23:38
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:江承佩
研究生(外文):Chiang, Cheng-Pei
論文名稱:都市能量階層與地景空間格局之關係: 台北都會區為例
論文名稱(外文):Relationships between Urban Energetic Hierarchy and Landscape Spatial Pattern- A Case Study of Taipei Metropolitan Area.
指導教授:葉佳宗葉佳宗引用關係黃書禮黃書禮引用關係
指導教授(外文):Yeh, Chia-TsungHuang, Shu-Li
口試委員:陳維斌詹士樑李俊霖葉佳宗黃書禮
口試委員(外文):Chen, Wei-BinChan, Shih-LiangLee, Chun-LinYeh, Chia-TsungHuang, Shu-Li
口試日期:2012-07-09
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺北大學
系所名稱:都市計劃研究所
學門:建築及都市規劃學門
學類:都市規劃學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2012
畢業學年度:100
語文別:中文
論文頁數:164
中文關鍵詞:能量階層地景格局能值分析地景指數都市空間結構
外文關鍵詞:Energetic hierarchyLandscape patternEmergy analysisLandscape metricsUrban spatial structure
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:648
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:155
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
在生態能量觀下,都市系統的空間之發展具有能量流動之特性,此有別於過去傳統以人文經濟角度探討都市空間結構發展之意涵。近年來,有相關研究以生態經濟之觀點,以都市中各種能量輸流動分析都市發展與環境變遷之動態關係。如Huang et al., (2003)對於台北的都市能量系統之空間階層之研究深入分析生態能量於地理空間之差異分佈,以及能量階層所塑造都市生態空間結構與特徵。然而,人類對都市生態系統影響隨著全球都市化發展趨勢而而加劇,由於不同類型的地景具有不同的功能與作用,提供各種類型的生態維生服務,因此地景型態的變化會造成生態維生服務功能的變化。有鑑於國內外相關研究甚少探討都市能量階層與地景變遷之間的相互關係本研究本研究以台北都會區為研究範圍,融合能量階層分析與地景格局空間分析兩種方法,以空間分析及時間序列方式來分析台北都會區的能量與地景空間格局的變遷情形,並藉由GIS繪製台北都會區能值空間分佈與地景格局分析,進而探討能值指標和地景因子之關聯性。於研究成果中顯示,能量的流動和地景的變遷是存在著關係性。本研究的分析成果呈現更多有關地景、能量的空間動態資訊,能有助於了解都市化對於生態環境的影響。

關鍵詞:能量階層、地景格局、能值分析、地景指數、都市空間結構

From viewpoint of ecological energetics, energy flow is a specific characteristic of urban spatial development . This concept of energetics study is different from the traditional studies concentrated on human and economic dimensions of urban development. In recent years, some emerging studies analyze the dynamic relationship between urban development and environmental change based on energy flows in urban system. For example, the study of Huang et al. (2003) on Taipei’s energetic hierarchy Huang(1997)analyzed the spatial distributions of energy use in Taipei basin and investigated the characteristics of spatial organization of energetic hierarchy. Global urbanization is sharpening the impacts of human development on ecological system. Spatial and temporal patterns of landscape responded to urbanization causes the changes of ecosystem services landscape pattern in urban ecosystem, due to the different types of landscape provide a different functions and services.
However, fewer studies have focused on the relationships between spatial distribution of urban energetic hierarchy and urban landscape patterns. Therefore, this study choose Taipei Metropolitan as the study area and integrate the researches of energetic hierarchy and landscape spatial pattern. The relationships between energetic hierarchy and landscape spatial pattern are calculated by using the emergy index and landscape metrics. Our analytical results show more detailed information about the landscape pattern and energy flows of the spatial dynamic sand are contributive to the understanding on the impact of urbanization on urban environment.
Key words: Energetic hierarchy, Landscape pattern, Emergy analysis, Landscape metrics, Urban spatial structure.

第一章 緒論
第一節 研究動機
第二節 研究目的
第三節 研究流程
第四節 研究範圍
第二章 文獻回顧
第一節 都市能量階層與空間結構
第二節 地景生態學
第三節 都市地景
第四節 小結
第三章 研究架構與方法
第一節 研究架構
第二節 生態系統能值分析方法
第三節 地景生態分析方法
第四章 台北都會區空間分析與討論
第一節 台北都會區之基礎分析
第二節 尺度大小之設定
第三節 台北都會區地景空間結構分析
第四節 台北都會區生態系統服務能值空間分析
第五章 地景與能值空間結構之相關性分析
第一節 都市能量與地景空間階層
第二節 台北都會區△地景與△能量變動之相關性
第三節 台北都會區地景與能量變動之關係-(都市中心、都市周邊地區、鄉村地區)
第五節 研究結果與討論
第六章 結論與建議
第一節 結論
第二節 後續研究之建議
參考文獻
附錄 一 1971-2006年台北都會區土地使用面積增減表
附錄 二 台北都會區能值分析評估表
附錄 三 台北都會區能值分析評估表(都市中心、都市周邊、鄉村地區)

1.Aguilera, F., Valenzuela, L.M.and Botequilha-Leitao, A.(2011). Landscape metrics in the analysis of urban land use patterns:A case study in a Spanish metropolitan area. Landscape and Urban Planning 99(3-4): 226-238.
2.Alberti M., Marzluff J. M., Shulenberger E., Bradley G., Ryan C. and Zumbrunnen C.(2003). Integrati Hnugms into Ecology: Opportunities and Challenges for Studying Urban Ecosystems. American Institute of Biological Sciences 53(12):1169-1179
3.Alberti, M.(2008).Advances in Urban Ecology: Integrating Humans and Ecological Processes in Urban Ecosystems, New York:Springer.
4.Alberti, M., Marzluff, J.M., Shulenberger, E., Bradley, G.and Ryan,C.(2008). Integrating Humans into Ecology: Opportunities and Challenges for Studying Urban Ecosystems. Urban Ecology2: 143-158.
5.Alberti,M. and Marzluff M.(2004). Ecological resilience in urban ecosystems: Linking urban patterns to human and ecological functions. Urban Ecosystems 7(3): 241-265.
6.Antrop, M.(2005). Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landscape and Urban Planning 70(1): 21–34.
7.Antrop,M. (2006). Sustainable landscapes: contradiction, fiction or utopia?. Landscape and Urban Planning75(3):187-197.
8.Antrop,M.(2004). Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. Landscape and Urban Planning 67( 1–4): 9-26.
9.Arnold, CL. and Gibbons , C. (1996). Impervious surface coverage: The emergence of a key environmental indicator. Journal of the American Planning Association 62 (2): 243–258
10.Ascione, M., Campanella, L., Ulgiati,S. (2009). Environmental driving forces of urban growth and development An emergy-based assessment of the city of Rome, Italy. Landscape and Urban Planning 93(3-4): 238–249.
11.Brand, F. (2009). Critical natural capital revisited: Ecological resilience and sustainable development. Ecological Economics 68(3): 605–612.
12.Brown, M. T., Odum, H.T. and Jorgensen, S.E.(2004). Energy hierarchy and transformity in the universe. Ecological Modelling 178(1–2): 17-28.
13.Burgess E. W. (1925). “The Growth of the City: An Introduction to a Research Project”, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14.Cheng, J. , Masser I.(2003).Modelling urban growth patterns: a multiscale perpective. Environment Planning A 35:(679-704).
15.Colding ,J. (2007). Ecological land-use complementation’ for building resilience in urban ecosystems. Landscape and Urban Planning 81(1-2):46–55.
16.Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot ,R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neil,l R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton and P., van den Belt, M..(1998). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecological Economics 25(1): 3-15.
17.Costanza, R., Voinov, A., Roumans, R., Maxwell, T., Villa, F., Wainger, L. and Voinov, H. (2002). Integrated ecological economic modeling of the Patuxent river watershed, Maryland. .Ecological Monographs 72:203–231.
18.Douglas,l.(2006). Peri-Urban Ecosystems and Societies:Transitional Zones and Contrasting, UK: Earthscan.
19.Feddema, J.J., Oleson, K. W., Bonan, G.B., Mearns, L.O., Buja, L.E., Meehl, G.A. and Washington, W. M.(2005). The Importance of Land-Cover Change in Simulating Future Climates. Science 310(5754): 1674-1678
20.Forman, R. T. T. (2008). The urban region: natural systems in our place, our nourishment, our home range, our future. Landscape Ecology 23(3): 251-253.
21.Forman, R. T. T. and Godron M. (1986). Landscape Ecology, New York: Wiley.
22.Groot,R.(2006). Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use
23.Herold, M., Couclelis, H. and Clarke, K.C. (2005). The role of spatial metrics in the analysis and modeling of urban land use change.Environment and Urban Systems 29(4): 369-399
24.Hitz,S. and Smith, J.(2004).Estimating global impacts from climate change. Global Environmental Change 14(3): 201–218.
25.Huang, S. L. and Chen, C.W.(2005).Theory of urban energetics and mechanisms of urban development. Ecological Modelling 189(1–2): 49-71.
26.Huang, S., Chen, Y., Kuo, F. and Wang, S.(2011). Emergy-based evaluation of peri-urban ecosystem services. Ecological Complexity 8(1): 38–50.
27.Huang, S., Wang, S. and Budd W.W. (2009). Sprawl in Taipei’s peri-urban zone: Responses to spatial planning and implications for adapting global environmental change. Landscape and Urban Planning 90(1): 20–32
28.Huang, S.L., Budd, W. W., Chan, S.L. and Lin,Y.C. (2007). Stream order, hierarchy, and energy convergence of land use. Ecological Modelling 205(1-2): 255–264.
29.Huang, S.L., Chen, Y.H., Kuo, F.Y. and Wang, S.H.(2011).Emergy-based evaluation of peri-urban ecosystem service.Ecological Complexity 8(1): 38-50.
30.Kroll, F., Müller,F., Haase,D. and Fohrer,N.(2012).Rural–urban gradient analysis of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics. Land Use Policy 29(3): 521-535.
31.Li, H., Wu, J., 2004. Use and misuse of landscape indices. Landscape Ecology 19:389–399.
32.Li, H.,Wu, J., (2007). Landscape pattern analysis: key issues and challenges.Landscape Ecology. pp. 39–61.
33.Lua, J. and Guldmannb, J.M.(2012). Landscape ecology, land-use structure, and population density: Case study of the Columbus Metropolitan Area.Landscape and Urban Planning 105(1–2): 74–85.
34.Luck, M. and Wu, J. (2002). A gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern: a case study form the phoenix metropolitan region, Arizona, USA. Landscape Ecology 17: 327-339.
35.Machlis, G.E., Force J.E. and Burch, Jr, W.R. (1997) The human ecosystem part I: The human ecosystem as an organising concept in ecosystem management. Society and Natural Resources 10:347–368.
36.Madlener,R. and Sunak,Y.(2011). Impacts of urbanization on urban structures and energy demand: What can we learn for urban energy planning and urbanization management?. Sustainable Cities and Society 1(1): 45-53.
37.Martinuzzi, S., Gould, W.A. and González, O.M.(2007).Land development, land use, and urban sprawl in Puerto Rico integrating remote sensing and population census data.Landscape and Urban Planning 79(3-4): 288-297.
38.McDonnell, M.J. and Pickett, S.T.A. (1990). Ecosystem structure and function along urban–rural gradients: an unexploited opportunity for ecology. Ecology 71: 1232-1237.
39.Mumford L. (1937) .What is a City?, London: The City Reader.
40.Odum,H.T. (1983).Systems Ecology, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
41.Odum,H.T. (1996).Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Environmental Decision Making, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
42.Odum,H.T. and Odum,E.C.(1987). In:System & Control Encyclopedia: Theory, Technology, Applications,Oxford: Pergamon Press.
43.Odum,H.T.(1988).Self-organization,transformity,and information.Science 242:1132-1139
44.Odum,H.T., Brown, M.T. Whitified, Lopez,S.,Woithe,R. and Doherty,S.(1995).Zonal Organization of Cities and Environment: A Study of Energy Systems Basis for Urban Society. A Report to the Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange on the project: Ecological Energetic Evolution of Urban System-Cross Comparisn of Chinese and American Societies. Gainesville,F1:Cener for Environment Policy, University of Florida.
45.Rescia,A.J., Willaarts,B.A., Schmitz,M.F. and Aguilera, P.A.(2010). Changes in land uses and management in two Nature Reserves in Spain: Evaluating the social–ecological resilience of cultural landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning 98(1): 26-35.
46.Saunders,M. J., Kuhnimhof,T. and Chlond,B.(2008). Incorporating transport energy into urban planning. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 42(6): 874-882.
47.Tratalos, J. , Fuller, R.J., Warren, P.H., Davies, R. G. and Gaston, K.J.(2007). Urban form, biodiversity potential and ecosystem services. Landscape and Urban Planning 83(4): 308–317.
48.Turner, M. G. , O'Neill, R. V. , Gardner, R. H. and Milne, B. T.(1989). Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology 3(3):153–162.
49.Turner,M. G. , Gardner,R. H. and Neill,R. V. O.(2001). Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice, New York: Springer.
50.Wanga,H., Hea,Q., Liub,X., Zhuanga,Y. and Honga,S. (2012). Global urbanization research from 1991 to 2009: A systematic research review. Landscape and Urban Planning 104(3–4): 299–309.
51.Williams,K., Burton, E. and Jenks, M. (2000).Sustainable Urban Form,London and New York: E & FN Spon.
52.Wu ,J. , Shen,W., Sun, W. and Tueller, P. T.(2002). Empirical patterns of the effects of changing scale on landscape metrics. Landscape Ecology17(8): 761–782.
53.Wu, J. (1999). Hierarchy and scaling: Extrapolating information along a scaling ladder. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 25: 367–380.
54.Wu, J.(2011). Urban sustainability: an inevitable goal of landscape research. Landscape Ecology 25: 1-4.
55.Wu,J.(2010). Urban sustainability: an inevitable goal of landscape research. Landscape Ecology 25(1):1–4.
56.Yu, X. J. and Ng, C.N.(2007). Spatial and temporal dynamics of urban sprawl along two urban–rural transects: A case study of Guangzhou, China. Landscape and Urban Planning 79(1): 96–109.
57.Yu, X.J. and Ng,C.N.(2007).Spatial and temporal dynamics of urban sprawl along two urban–rural transects: A case study of Guangzhou, China. Landscape and Urban Planning 79(1): 96-109.
58.Zhang, L., Wu, J., Zhen, Y. and Shu, J. (2004). A GIS-based gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern of Shanghai metropolitan area, China. Landscape and Urban Planning 69: 1-16.
59.王思樺、張力方,(2009),「都市周邊土地使用與地表覆蓋變遷:驅動力與環境變遷議題」,「都市與計劃」,36(4):361-385。
60.江瑞如,(2011),「都市計畫農業區多功能性績效管制機制之探討」,國立政治大學地政學系私立中國地政研究所:台北。
61.肖篤寧、李秀珍、高峻、常禹,(2002),『景觀生態學』,北京:科學出版社。
62.周志龍,(2002),「全球化、國土策略與台灣都市系統變遷」,「都市與計劃」,29(4):491-512。
63.周志龍,(2003),「後工業台北多核心的空間結構化及其治理政治學」,「地理學報」,34:1-18。
64.孟曉蘭,(2008),「道路建設造成景觀格局變遷之研究」,臺灣大學地理環境資源學研究所:台北。
65.林裕彬、吳振發、鄧東波,(2004) 「景觀生態面指數分析汐止地區1990一2001年土地利用時空問鑲嵌特徵」,「都市與計劃」,31(3):239-268。
66.徐國城、賴宗裕、詹士樑,(2010),「台北都會區空間蔓延與緊密發展型態趨勢之研究」,「都市與計劃」,37(3):281-303。
67.張啟德譯,(1994),「景觀生態學」,台北:田園城市。
68.郭瓊瑩、葉佳宗,(2011) ,「自景觀生態取向之綠色基盤系統建設探討氣候變遷回應之城市治理」,「城市學學刊」,2(1): 31 -63
69.黃書禮,(1997),「都市能量階層系統之空間階層分析」,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。國立中興大學都市計畫研究所。
70.黃書禮,(2004),「都市生態經濟與能量」,台北:詹氏書局。
71.楊敏嘉,(2008),「都市化對農地地表覆蓋景觀及生態系統服務變化之影響研究」,國立台北大學都市計劃研究所:台北。
72.鄔建國,(2000),『景觀生態學-格局、過程、尺度與等級』,台中:五南書局。
73.蔡厚男、呂慧穎,(2003),「都市化對景觀碎裂影響的碎形分析」,「中國園藝」,49(2): 233 -248.
74.賴進貴,(1996),「數值高度模型與地形計測研究資料寫析度問題」,「地理學報」,20:61-73。
75.賴曉瑩,(1997),「台北盆地都市空間結構與生態能量階層之應用」,國立中興法商學院都市計劃研究所:台北。

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top