跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(3.95.131.146) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/07/29 00:50
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:鄭景瀚
研究生(外文):Cheng, Jin-Han
論文名稱(外文):Using the Technology Acceptance Model to Explore the Effect of Learning Intention and Self-Directed Learning on Smartphone Learning Outcomes
指導教授:羅彥棻羅彥棻引用關係
指導教授(外文):Lo, Yen-Fen
口試委員:洪鉛財劉仲矩
口試委員(外文):Hong, Cian-CaiLiu, Jhong-Ju
口試日期:2012-06-15
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:實踐大學
系所名稱:企業管理學系碩士班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2012
畢業學年度:100
語文別:英文
論文頁數:88
外文關鍵詞:technology acceptance modelearning usage intentionself-directed learninglearning outcomes
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:285
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:9
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
As burgeoning development of Communication Technology initiates a new milestone for education systems, the invention of smart mobile devices allow students convenient access to various types of educational applications. Through wireless network, aforementioned softwares are transferred from a device to an operation system by way of wireless network transmission. Learners benefit from the privilege to obtain learning materials at any given time, place, and under any circumstances, thus achieving ubiquitous learning. Smartphone learning is an innovative form of teaching which rectifies the shortcomings of traditional education, dissociates the negative impression of previous learning experience, thereby triggering greater motivation among participants. This study considers the Technology Acceptance Model by Davis et al. (1989) as the fundamental principle to conduct an in-depth research of participant’s perceptions, learning usage intention, and self-directed learning ability. Subsequently, this study seeks correlation or affected learning outcomes. The objective of this publication aims to offer software developers a reference for the future designs of learning applications.
Samples of this study are primarily taken from smartphone users who posses learning applications downloaded on their devices. Invalid samples discarded, a total of 420 samples are retrieved with retrieval rate of 53% for valid retrieval. Empirical results reveal that learning outcomes are not only affected by user perceptions, but partial influence by learning behavior intention. In the dimension of self-directed learning ability, factors of independent study and fondness for learning also significantly intervene one’s learning intention and learning outcomes. Related hypothetical studies on the learning intentions of participants in adopting new technology, it has been found that there is a positive correlation between usage perceptions and usage intentions for new technology.

1. Introduction 1
1.1 Research Background 1
1.2 Research motivation and objectives 3
1.3 Research Scope 4
1.4 Research process 5

2. Literature Review 6
2.1 Technology Acceptance Model 6
2.2 Self-directed learning ability 9
2.3 Learning Outcome 18

3. Research Method 24
3.1 Research framework 24
3.2 Research Hypotheses 25
3.3 Operational definition of research constructs 29
3.4 Research tool 30
3.5 Implement the formal survey 37
3.6 Data analysis 37

4. Empirical Study 39
4.1 Sample Description 39
4.2 Descriptive statistics 39
4.3 Correlation analysis of user’s perception to smartphone learning usage intention 42
4.4 Analysis of the influence of user’s perception on learning outcomes 42
4.5 Analysis of mediating effect of usage intention on user’s perception and learning outcomes 45
4.6 Analysis of the moderating effect of self-directed learning ability on Smartphone learning usage intention and learning outcome 50
4.7 The Result of hypotheses 64

5. Conclusion and Managerial Implications 67
5.1 Conclusion 67
5.2 Research limitation 68
5.3 Future work and suggestions 68

References 70
Appendix 78
Appendix-1 Questionnaire with scholar and expert suggestions 79
Appendix-2 Formal Questionnaire 85

Chinese Reference:
1.Barry J., Zimmerman, Sebastian Bonner & Robert Kovach (2000), 自律學習; Self-directed learning, 台北:遠流。 譯自:林芯茹。
2.王淑玲 Shu-Ling, Wang (2009),國小校內外課後照顧成效差異之分析-以高雄縣某鄉鎮為例; A Study on the Efficacy Differences between After School Care at Elementary Schools and Private After-school Programs- A Township of Kaohsiung County as an Example,國立台南大學社會科教學研究所碩士論文。
3.王惠茹Hui-Ju,Wang (2005),e-learning情境對學習成效之影響-以知識創造SECI模式來探討; The Impact of e-Learning Environment on Learning Outcomes-Based on SECI Model of Knowledge Creation,國立中山大學資訊管理學系電子商務在職專班碩士論文。
4.朱彩馨 Tsai-Hsin, Chu (2002),以科技中介架構探討線上學習成效之詮釋研究;An interpretive Study of E-learning based on the Framework of Technology-Mediated Learning,國立中山大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
5.何英奇 Ying-Ji, He (2001),學習困難的診斷與補救教學; Diagnose learning difficulties and remedial teaching,台北:心理出版社。
6.余泰魁 T. K., Yu、楊淑斐 S. F., Yang、陳慧珠H. C., Chen (2003),網路教學接受度之因果模式建構-以某科技大學網路教學實證; Constructing the Causal Model for Internet Instruction Acceptance – Empirical Study on Internet Instruction at a Technical University,資訊管理展望,第5卷,第1期,79-100。
7.余雅屏Ya-Ping, Yu (2003),人格特質、自我導向學習以及工作績效之相關性研究; A Study on the Relationships among Employee Personality, Self-Directed Learning, and Work Performance,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
8.吳佳儒 Chia-Ju, Wu (2010),不同自我導向學習能力國小學童在網路合作契約是學習活動中語文能力提升成效之研究; The Study of the Effects for Improving Language Abilities of the Elementary School Students with Different Ability of Self-directed Learning in Web-based Cooperative Contract Learning Activities,國立臺南大學數位學習科技學系研究所碩士論文。
9.吳明隆Ming-Rong, Wu (2007),SPSS操作與應用:問卷設計分析實務; SPSS Operation and Application: Practice in Questionnaire Design and Analysis,台北:五南圖書出版公司。
10.吳秉恩(1984),管理才能發展方案實施與成效關係之研究; A study on management development program implementation and its outcome,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
11.吳俊育 Chun-Yu, Wu (2009),從文化層面探討修正後科技接受模式影響數位學習之研究; Using TAM 2 to Examine Factors Affecting E-learning Adoption: A Cultural Perspective,逢甲大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
12.吳清山 C. S., Wu、林天佑 T. Y., Lin (2003),自我引導學習; Self-directed learning,教育研究月刊,第105期,155。
13.沈許真Hsu-Chen, Shen (2008),公務人員自我導向學習傾向、網路素養與線上學習成效關係之研究; A Study of the Relationship between Civil Servants’ Self-directed Learning Readiness, Network Literacy and On-line Learning Effectiveness,國立暨南國際大學成人與繼續教育研究所碩士論文。
14.林盈伶 Ying-Ling, Lin (2006),人格特質、學習型態對學習成效之影響;The influence of Personality Traits and Learning Styles to Learning performance,朝陽科技大學企業管理學系碩士班。
15.林書鍰Shu-Huan,Lin (2010),國小教師對自主學習觀點之研究; Teachers' Perspectives on Self-regulated Learning in Elementary School,台北市立教育大學課程與教學研究所碩士論文。
16.邱錦昌Jin-Chang, Ciou (2003),教育視導與學校效能; Educational Supervision and School Effectiveness,台北:高等教育。
17.洪憲能 Shian.Neng, Hong (2007),影響網路合作學習成效因素探討; A study of affecting factors on learning effectiveness of web-based cooperative learning,樹德科技大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
18.紀浩成 Hao-Cheng, Ji (2010),以符號互動論探討社區大學學員學習行為-以南投社區大學為例; A Study on Symbolic Interaction Model of Students'' Learning Behavior:The Case of Nantou Community College,朝陽科技大學企業管理學習碩士論文。
19.胡駿松Jyun-Song, Hu (2009),大學生知識信念型態與自主學習策略之相關研究; Relationship between Epistemological Beliefs and Self-regulatory Strategies of College Students,台北市立教育大學課程與教學研究所碩士論文。
20.徐連梅 Lien-Mei, Hsu (2009),師資培育課程應用小組合作學習促進學生自主學習成效之個案研究; Effects of Students’ Small Group Cooperative Learning on Active Learning: A Case Study of Teacher Education Course,國立台灣海洋大學教育研究所碩士論文。
21.翁榮茂Jung-Mao, Weng (2008),以TAM及資訊系統成功模式探討線上輔助教學平台之功能設;The Functional Analysis of Computer Assisted Instruction Platform based on TAM and IS Success Model,國立屏東科技大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
22.張春興 Chun-Hsing, Chan (2005),現代心理學; Modern Psychology,台北:東華。
23.梁佳玲 Jia-Ling, Liang (2002),影響網路學習成效之因素研究;A Study of Affecting Factors on Effects of Web-based Instructional Systems,屏東科技大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
24.郭麗玲Li-Ling, Kuo (2002),成功自我導向學習與五行,台北:秀威資訊科技。
25.陳玉婷Yu-Ting, Chen (2008),影響網路學習成效之相關研究-以南部某科技大學為例; A Study of Affecting Factors on Web-based Learning Performance- An Example of a University of Technology in Taiwan,中臺學報,第20卷,第2期,67-87。
26.陳志光Jhih-Guang, Chen (2006),電腦輔助教學對國小學生科學態度及自學能力之影響—以國小六年級自然與生活領域為例; Influence of Computer-Assisted Instruction on Science Attitudes and Self-Learning Abilities of Junior High and Elementary School Students – Nature and Life Fields for Sixth Grade Students as Case Study,國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文。
27.陳芸珊 Yun-Shan, Chen(2010),國中小學生自主學習策略之使用及其影響因素之研究; The Effects of Grade levels, Individual and Family Factors on the Use of Self-regulated Learning Strategies,台北市立教育大學課程與教學研究所碩士論文。
28.陳靜怡Ching-I, Chen(2003),組織氣候認知、員工自我導向學習與工作投入之關係研究-以某國際快遞公司為例; The Study of the Relationship among Organizational Climate Awareness, Self-directed Learning, and Job Involvement - Taking One International Express Corporation as Example,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文。
29.麥孟生Meng- Sheng, Mai (2000),個人心理類型、自我效能及態度對電腦學習成效之影響; Effect of Personal Psychological Types, Self-Efficacy, and Attitude on Computer Learning Process,國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
30.曾雪如Hsueh-Ju, Tseng (2009),探討網路悅趣化學習及自主學習成效之研究; Exploring the effects of web-based game-based learning and self-regulated learning,世新大學傳播管理學系碩士論文。
31.馮丹白D. B., Feng、吳明振M. J., Wu、陳瑞榮R. R., Chen、周碩樑J. S., Liang、吳明全M. C., Wu(2002),技專校院學生學習成效評量研究報告;The report of assessing student learning outcomes for universities and colleges of technology,臺北:國立台灣師範大學(教育部委託專案)。
32.黃一蜂Y. F., Huang、何慧卿 H. Q., He (2003),自主學習:遠距教學的成功要素; Self-regulated Learning: Elements for Successful Distance Learning,T&D飛訊,第12期,1-5。
33.黃國禎 Guo-Jhen, Huang (2012),行動與無所不在學習的發展與應用; Development and applications of mobile and ubiquitous learning,T&D飛訊,第141期,1-16。
34.歐慧敏 Huei-Min, Ou (2002),學生自主學習的意涵與引導策略; Strategy and implications of students’ self-directed learning,教育研究月刊,第94期,99-106。
35.蔡尚瑩 Shang-Ying, Tsai (2005),企業員工自我導向學習傾向、電腦態度與e-learning學習成效之關係研究; The Interrelationships Between Self-directed Learning Readiness, Computer Attitude and E-learning Effectiveness for Business Employees,國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
36.蔡瑞敏 Jui-Min, Tsai (2006),組織變革知覺、學習動機對學習成效之影響; The Influence of Organization Readiness for Change and Learning Motivation to Learning Performance,朝陽科技大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
37.鄭玉杏Yu-Shing, Cheng (2007),運用合作學習於高職學生專題製作課程之學習成效及學習滿意度研究; A Study of Applying Cooperative Learning to The Vocational High School Student's Learning Achievement and Learning Satisfaction in Project Work Curriculum,國立台灣師範大學工業教育在職進修班碩士論文。
38.鄭田Tien, Cheng (1995),交通部電信訓練所學員覺察之學習滿意度調查研究; A Study of the Trainee Reaction on Learning Satisfaction to the Telecommunication Training Institute,國立交通大學管理科學研究所。
39.鄭勝友Sehng-Yu, Cheng (2010),社群網站用於電腦課程輔助的學習成效與學習滿意度; Learning Effectiveness and Learning Satisfaction in Computer Auxiliary Programs for Community Websites,世新大學資訊傳播研究所碩士論文。
40.鄧運林 Yun-Lin, Deng (1995),成人教學與自我導向學習;Adult Education and Self-directed learning,台北:五南圖書出版公司。
41.蕭文龍 Wen-Long, Xiao (2009) ,多變量分析最佳入門實用書(第二版):SPSS+LISEREL; Best Introduction to Multivariant Analysis(2nd Edition):SPSS+LISEREL,台北:碁峰資訊。
42.戴幼農(1994),訓練評核的原則與方法; Principles and methods of training assessment,就業與訓練,第12卷,第4期,16-22。
43.薛雅明Y. M., Hsueh、徐玉瓊 Y. Q., Hsu (2006),影響案例式網路學習系統學習成效之研究; Learning Achievements in Internet Learning Systems Influenced in Cases,教育研究學報,第40卷,第1期,173-194。
44.謝子樵 Zih-Ciao, Hsieh (2008),數位學習市場趨勢與創新服務模式研究; Market trends and service innovation,台北: 資策會資訊市場情報中心。
45.鍾瑞國 R. K., Chung、張婉玲W. L., Chang (2007),從自我導向學習觀點探討三明治課程之學習歷程; Learning Process for Sandwich Course: A Self-Directed Learning Perspective,花蓮教育大學學報,第25期,85-103。
46.韓美齡 Mei-Lin, Han (2007),建教合作學生就讀因素、學習滿意度與學習成就之關係— 以一所私立高級職業學校為例; The relationship between students’ reasons of attending Cooperative Educational Program as well as their learning satisfaction and academic achievement-using a Private Vocational High School as an example,國立東華大學教育研究所。
47.簡正郎 Jheng-Lang, Jian (2008),屏東縣國小體育教師有效教學與學生學習成效之研究; The Study on the Effective Teaching of Physical Education teachers and the Learning Effect of Students in Pintung County’s Elementary School,國立台東大學體育教學研究所碩士論文。
48.龐維國Wei-Guo, Pang(2003),自主學習-學與教的原理和策略;Self-regulated Learning principles and Educational Applications,上海:華東師範大學出版社。
49.羅美娟 Mei-Chuan, Lo (2001),電腦自我效能、電腦焦慮與參訓者在網路化訓練方案後自評成效之相關性研究; The Correlation Study of Computer Self-Efficacy, Computer Anxiety, and Self-Appraisal Effectiveness of Web-Based Training Programs,國立暨南大學成人與繼續教育研究所碩士論文。

English Reference:
1.Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., Todd, P. A. (1992), Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication, MIS Quartely, 16 (2), 227-247.
2.Alliger, G. M., & Janak, E. A. (1989), Kirkpatrick’s levels of training criteria: thirty years later. Personnel Psychology, 42, pp.331-342.
3.Baldwin, T. T. & Ford, J. K. (1988), Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41(3), pp.63-105.
4.Bonham, L. A. (1989), “Self-directed orientation toward learning: A learning style” Self-Directed Learning: Emerging Theory & Practice, OA: Oklahoma Research Center.
5.Bonham, L. A. (1989), Self-directed orientation toward learning: A learning style. In Long, H. B. & associates (Eds). Self-directed learning: Emerging theory and practice. Norman, OK: Oklahoma Research Center for Continuing Professional and Higher Education, University of Okalahoma.
6.Brockett, R. G. & Hiemstra, R. (1991), Self-direction in adult learning: Perspectives on theory, research and practice. London: Routledge.
7.Brockett, R.G. (1982), Self-directed learning readiness and life satisfaction among older adults. Doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University.
8.Brookfield, S. (1986), Understand the facilitating adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9.Browne, M. N. & Keeley, S. (1997), Striving for Excellence in College: tips for active learning, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
10.Caffarella, Rosemary S. & O’ Donnell, Judith M. (1987), Self-directed adult learning: A critical paradigm revisited, Adult Education Quarterly, 37(4), pp.199-211.
11.Cheren, M. (1983), Helping learners achieve greater self-direction. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12.Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J. & Tsai, C. C. (2010), A knowledge engineering approach to developing mindtools for context-aware ubiquitous learning, Computers & Education, 54(1), pp.289-297.
13.Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., Huang, S. X. & Wu, T. T. (2008), A Knowledge Engineering approach to developing e-libraries for mobile learning, Electronic Library, 26(3), pp.303-317.
14.Davis, F. D., Bagozzi R. P. &Warshaw P. R. (1989), User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models, Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
15.E.M. Van Raaij & J.J.L. Schepers (2008), The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China”, Computer & Education, 50, 838-852.
16.Even, M. J. (1979), Overview of cognitive styles and hemispheres of the brain research and interpolation of cognitive styles and hemispheres of the brain research into adult education terminology toward formulation of research hypotheses. (A two-part paper). Paper presented at the meeting of the Adult Education Research Conference, San Antonio, TX.
17.Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975), Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, MA: Addison-Wesley.
18.Gelpi, E. (1979), A Future for Lifelong Education. Vol.1& 2 (Manchester Monographs No.13) Manchester, England: University of Manchester.
19.Gerstner, L. S. (1992), What’s a name? The language of self-directed learning. In Long, H. B. & associates (Eds). Self-directed learning: Application and research. Norman, Okla: Oklahoma Research Center for Continuing professional and Higher Education, University of Oklahoma.
20.Gugliemino, L. M. (1977), Development of self-directed learning readiness scale, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Georgia.
21.Hwang, G. J. & Chang, H. F. (2011), A Formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students, Computers & Education, 56(4), pp.1023-1031.
22.Hwang, G. J. & Tsai, C. C. (2011), Research Trends in Mobile and ubiquitous Learning: A Review of Publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010, British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), pp.65-70.
23.Hwang, G. J., Wu, C. H., Tseng, Judy C. R. & Huang, I. W. (2011), Development of a ubiquitous learning platform based on a real-time help-seeking mechanism, British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(6), pp.992-1002.
24.Igbaria, M. & Tan, M (1997), The consequences of information technology acceptance on subsequent individual performance, Information & Management, 32, 113-121.
25.Ijab, M. T., Anwar, R. & Hamid, S. (2004), Teaching and Learning of E-commerce Courses via Hybrid E-learning Model in Unitar, Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 2(2), 78-94.
26.Kasworm, C. E. (1983). An examination of self-directed contract learning as an instructional strategy, Innovative Higher Education, 8(1), pp. 45-54.
27.Kirkpatrick, D.L. (1975), Evaluating Training Programs, Wisconsin: American Society For Training and Development, Madison.
28.Knowles, M. S. (1975), Self-directed learning. New York: Association Press.
29.Latham, G. P. & Wexley, K. N. (1981), Developing and Training:Human Resources in Organizations. 2nd ed. Glenview, IL: Scott Foreman & Company.
30.Merriam, S. B. & Caffarella, R. S. (1991), Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
31.Mocker, D. W., & Spear, G. E. (1984), The organization circumstance: Environmental determinants in self-directed learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 35, 1-10.
32.Morris, M. G., & Dillon, A. (1997), How User perceptions Influence Software Use, IEEE Software, 14(4), 58-65.
33.Oddi, L. F., (1986), Development and validation of an instrument to identify self-directed continuing learners, Adult Education Quarterly, 36 (2), 92-107.
34.Patterson, F. & Hobley, S. (2003), A New Way to Evaluate learning and Training, KM review, 6(3), 20-23.
35.Piskurich, George M. (1993), Self-directed learning: A practical guide to design, development, and implementation, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.
36.Rogers, C. R. (1969). Freedom to learn, Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
37.Rogers, C. R. (1983), Freedom to learn for the eighties, Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
38.Sarapuu, T. and Adojaan, K. (1998), Evaluation scale of educational web sites, Paper presented at the WebNet 98 World Conference of the WWW, Internet and Intranet, Vol.24, pp.192-204.
39.Skager, R. W. (1978), Lifelong education and evaluation practice. Oxford, MA: Pergamon Press.
40.Smith, R. M. (1982), Helping adults learn how to learn. New Directions for Continuing Education, No.19, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
41.Szajna, B. (1996), Empirical Evaluation of the Revised technology Acceptance Model, Management Science, 42(1), 85-92.
42.Tough, A. (1966), The Assistance obtained by adult self-teachers. Adult Education, 17(1), pp. 30-37.
43.Tough, A. M. (1979), The Adult’s learning projects. (2nd ed.). Toronto: The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
44.Venkatesh, V. & Davis, F. D. (2000), A theoretical extension of the technologyacceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies, Management Research, 46(2), 186-204.
45.Venkatesh, V. (2000), Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model, Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365
46.Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996), A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test, Decision sciences, 27, 451-481.
47.Wu, P. H., Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C., Chen, Y.C. & Huang, Y. M.(2011), A Pilot Study on Conducting Mobile Learning activities for Clinical Nursing courses based on the repertory grid approach, Nurse Education Today, 31(8), pp8-15.
48.Zimmerman, B. J (1998). Academic Studying and the Development of Personal Skill: A self-Regulatory Perspective, Educational Psychologist, 33(2/3), 73-86.
49.Zimmerman, B. J. (1994), Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In D. H. Schunk& B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 3-21). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Websites:
1.吳欣蓉 Sin-Rong, Wu (2010),行動學習現況與未來趨勢; Current and future trend of mobile learning,Retrieved on February 9, 2012 http://www.huayuworld.org/wp-course/99_huayu_seed_plan_digital_course/9/WuXinrong.pdf.
2.潘朝明 Chao-Ming, Pan (2009),以科技接受模式探討Moodle應用於高中音樂課程教學之學習滿意度及學習成效之研究; Using Technology Acceptance Model to Explore Learning Satisfaction and Learning Achievements from Applying Moodle to High School Music Curriculum and Instruction,Retrieved on March 2, 2012 http://irs.lib.ksu.edu.tw/NKNUIR/handle/987654321/1386.
3.蔡易倫 Y. L., Tsai、杜信平S. P., Du、楊珮琪 P. C., Yang (2011),行動學習─智慧型行動載具的應用; Mobile learning-The application of Smart Mobile Devices,Retrieved on February 15, 2012 http://ep.tku.edu.tw/ashx/OpDlFile.aspx?id=BB39D05BFE8D2E78.
4.Digital Wall (2005), Smartphones (1) Starting with Definitions, Retrieved on February 15, 2012 http://www.digitalwall.com/scripts/display.asp?UID=277.
5.Yarow, J. (2011), Android Blows Past Apple to Take the Lead in market Share for App Downloads, Retrieved on November 2, 2011 http://www.businessinsider.com/android-apple-mobile-downloads-2011-10?op=1.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top