跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.204.48.69) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/07/28 00:29
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:詹鈞貿
研究生(外文):Chan,Chun-Mao
論文名稱:區域創新系統中介平台之要因研究:中台灣產業群落為例
論文名稱(外文):Exploring Critical Factors of Developing Cross Domain Intermediaries of Regional Innovation Systems: A Case Study of Central Taiwan Industrial Cluster
指導教授:金必煌金必煌引用關係蔡千姿蔡千姿引用關係
指導教授(外文):Jin,Bih-HuangTsai,Chien-Tzu
口試委員:黃孝怡吳祉芸王信文金必煌蔡千姿
口試日期:2012-06-30
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:東海大學
系所名稱:企業管理學系碩士班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2012
畢業學年度:100
語文別:中文
論文頁數:79
中文關鍵詞:區域創新系統行業創新系統創新中介平台產業群落ANP
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:254
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:23
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
台灣之產業集群在世界上廣為人知,據世界經濟論壇公佈之國家競爭力評比報告中,台灣之”產業聚落”競爭力多年列名全球第一。台灣目前有很多優秀的產業集群,諸如北台灣之電子產業集群、中臺灣精密機械集群以及位於潭子之光電集群,等不同產業參與者之互動,通過各種中間平台,來發展他們的創新。在同一產業內的組織間的合作在過去的研究中得到了廣泛的討論,然而我們往往很少關注跨學科合作之中介平台。本文試圖探討跨域中介機構,以及探討其幫助產業多領域發展項目的重點發展之因素。

根據文獻回顧與台灣產業集群的經驗分類基礎,蒐集有效的創新中介機構在區域創新系統及行業創新系統之關鍵因素。形成一個較完整的的框架,透過分析網絡程序法(ANP)來驗證關鍵因素,並通過專業人士的意見建立其關係。所蒐集的因素和結果的框架,加上台灣產業集群的經驗,幫助指出跨學科的中介機構如何促進區域創新,並提出一些區域創新體系參與者之間的成功互動之建議。從研究的貢獻希望能幫助從業人員和學術界的研究者更了解區域創新,以提高他們的創新能力,並且發展一個區域創新更好的機制。


Taiwan has been recognized worldwide for its industrial clusters. According to the Global Competitiveness Report published by the World Economic Forum, Taiwan has topped the world in terms of the index of state of cluster development for several years. Taiwan currently has many outstanding clusters, including electronics clusters in the northern Taiwan, Precision Machinery clusters in the central Taiwan, Optoelectronics clusters in the Tanzi-county, etc. The different sectoral actors may interact through various intermediate platforms to foster their innovation. Inter-organizational collaboration within the same industry has been widely discussed in the past research; however, little attention was paid on the intermediation for interdisciplinary collaboration. This paper tried to investigate the critical factors of developing cross domain intermediary that can help industries to construct the integrated interdisciplinary platform.
Based on the classification from literature review and the experiences of Taiwan industrial clusters, the critical factors for effective innovation intermediaries in the sectoral systems are collected. To form a comprehensive framework, the analytic network process (ANP) method is used to verify the critical factors and build up their relations via the professionals’ opinions. The potential framework, together with Taiwan industrial clusters’ experience, help to point out how the interdisciplinary intermediaries can foster the regional innovation and to provide some advices for successful interactions between actors in the regional innovation systems. The current study could be useful for researchers and practitioners to enhance their understanding of innovation capabilities and to construct a better mechanism for the regional innovation.

第一章緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第三節 研究流程 3
第二章文獻探討 5
第一節 產業群落 5
第二節 行業創新 6
第三節 創新中介 7
第四節 產學合作 10
第五節 平台採納 11
第六節 分析網絡程序法 11
第三章資料蒐集與分析方法 14
第一節 研究方法 14
第二節 分析架構 19
第四章創新平台要因分析 27
第一節 文獻法 27
第二節 個案分析 34
第三節 專家意見 40
第四節 要因構面分析 47
第五章結論與討論 52
第一節 管理意涵 53
第二節 研究限制及後續研究建議 54
參考文獻 55
附錄一 問卷 58
附錄二 訪談重點摘要 64
附錄三 焦點座談會重點摘要 67
附錄四 研討會重點摘要 68
附錄五 成對比較矩陣 69
附錄六 極限矩陣 71

Andersson, M. and C. Karlsson (2006). "Regional innovation systems in small and medium-sized regions." The Emerging Digital Economy: 55-81.

Asheim, B. T. and A. Isaksen (1997). "Location, agglomeration and innovation: towards regional innovation systems in Norway?" European Planning Studies 5(3): 299-330.

Benassi, M. and A. Di Minin (2009). "Playing in between: patent brokers in markets for technology." R&D Management 39(1): 68-86.

Bessant, J. and H. Rush (1995). "Building bridges for innovation: the role of consultants in technology transfer." Research Policy 24(1): 97-114.

Biglaiser, G. (1993). "Middlemen as experts." The RAND Journal of Economics: 212-223.

Bullock, M. (1985). "Cohabitation: small research-based companies and the universities." Technovation 3(1): 27-38.

Cooke, P. (2002). "Regional innovation systems: general findings and some new evidence from biotechnology clusters." The Journal of Technology Transfer 27(1): 133-145.

Cooke, P., M. G. Uranga, et al. (1998). "Regional systems of innovation: an evolutionary perspective." Environment and planning A 30: 1563-1584.

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). "Building theories from case study research." Academy of management review: 532-550.

Grbich, C. (1999). Qualitative research in health: An introduction, Sage Publications Ltd.

Hauknes, J. (1998). "Services in innovation–innovation in services." STEP Report series.

Howells, J. (2006). "Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation." Research Policy 35(5): 715-728.

Kaiser, R. and H. Prange (2004). "The reconfiguration of National Innovation Systems--the example of German biotechnology." Research Policy 33(3): 395-408.

Kash, D. E. and R. W. Rycoft (2000). "Patterns of innovating complex technologies: a framework for adaptive network strategies." Research Policy 29(7-8): 819-831.

Maccoby, E. E. and N. Maccoby (1954). "The interview: A tool of social science." Handbook of social psychology 1: 449-487.

Maguire, K. and A. Davies (2007). Competitive regional clusters: national policy
approaches, Publications de l'OCDE.

Malerba, F. (2005). "Sectoral systems of innovation: a framework for linking innovation to the knowledge base, structure and dynamics of sectors." Economics of Innovation and New Technology 14(1-2): 63-82.

Mian, S. A. (1994). "US university-sponsored technology incubators: an overview of management, policies and performance." Technovation 14(8): 515-528.

Mian, S. A. (1996). "Assessing value-added contributions of university technology business incubators to tenant firms." Research policy 25(3): 325-335.

Nambisan, S. and M. Sawhney (2007). The global brain: your roadmap for innovating faster and smarter in a networked world, Wharton School Publishing.

Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations, Free Pr.

Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision making with dependence and feedback: the analytic network process: the organization and prioritization of complexity, RWS publications Pittsburgh, PA, US.

Satty, T. (1982). "Priorities setting in complex problems: lecture notes in economics and mathematical system." Essays and surveys on multiple decision making 209: 326-338.

Saaty T. L.(1980).The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York: McGraw-Hill.

Saunders, M. L. P. & Thornhill, A.(2007). Research Methods for Business Students. Essex, Pearson Education Limited.

Scott, D. R. and T. von der Heidt (2009). "Does e-store service quality affect customer loyalty?" School of Commerce and Management Papers: 292.

Smilor, R. W. and M. D. Gill (1986). The new business incubator: linking talent, technology, capital, and know-how, Lexington Books Lexington, MA.

Stewart, D. W., P. N. Shamdasani, et al. (2007). Focus groups: Theory and practice, Sage Publications, Inc.

Yang, C. H., C. J. Chen, et al. (2008). Innovation intermediary for creating regional knowledge capabilities in knowledge cluster, Ieee.

徐作聖, 曾國雄, et al. (2004). "ANP 多準則決策於生物科技園區區位選擇之研究." 國家政策季刊 3(4): 185-202.

陳虹遐 (2004). "應用分析網路程序法於液晶電視之生態效益評估."國立成功大學.工業設計研究所.碩士論文.台南市

黃俊榮 (2007). "運用分析網路程序法於供應商評選之實證研究-以連鎖生鮮超市乳品供應商評選為例."國立勤益科技大學.流通管理系碩士論文.台中縣

衛萬里 (2006). "應用分析網路程序法選擇最佳產品設計方案之決策分析模式."國立台灣科技大學.設計研究所博士論文.台北市




連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top