臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

有鑑於國內工程領域學術單位已累積豐碩之研究成果，為能促使研究成果更符合產業實務應用，縮短廠商商品化研發時程，本研究以國科會工程處規劃與發展「跨領域創意加值創新的研發模式」為研究對象，希望經由實務面的推動與學術研究上的探討，建立一個藉由跨領域團隊合作，從創意方案到可行性評估與原型品製作一連貫知識整合協作過程的創新研發模式。並以這些執行計畫作為研究對象，探討跨領域創新社群的網絡建構、知識整合與價值創造的過程，以及對社群成員所帶來的雙面創新(Ambidexterity in innovation）之學習效益，提供未來「跨領域創意加值推動計畫」的推動機制和標準作業程序建議。

According to the domestic engineering academic department have already been accumulated to the fruitful results of the study, in order to enable more in line with industry practice applications to promote the research, shorten manufacturers’ commercialization of research and develop time. This study focus on the engineering section at the National Science Council, planning and development of interdisciplinary creative value-added innovative research and develop model for the study, through the surface of the practice to promote academic research of the establishment of a cooperation by the interdisciplinary team to produce a coherent knowledge integration collaborative process innovation, creative solutions to the feasibility assessment and prototype products research and develop model. And use these execution plans for the study of interdisciplinary innovation community network construction, the process of knowledge integration and value creation, as well as members of the community brought about by the double-sided innovative learning effectiveness (Ambidexterity in innovation), provide interdisciplinary creative value-added promotion plan to promote mechanisms and standard operating procedures recommendation.

謝 辭....................................................I
中文摘要................................................II
英文摘要...............................................III
目錄....................................................IV
表目錄..................................................VI
圖目錄.................................................VII
第一章 緒論..............................................1
1.1 研究背景與動機...................................1
1.2 研究目的.........................................2
1.3 研究流程.........................................3
1.4 研究.............................................4
第二章 文獻探討..........................................5
2.1 開放式創新.......................................5
2.2 倡導者理論與創新社群.............................6
2.3 知識價值創造與開放式創新.........................7
2.4 綠色科技發展趨勢.................................9
2.5 互動式平台與媒合機制............................11
第三章 研究方法.........................................14
3.1 執行作業流程....................................14
3.1.1 建置綠色創作開放式平台........................15
3.1.2 徵求綠色科技創意方案..........................18
3.1.3 媒合及籌組跨領域團隊..........................20
3.1.4 執行可行性評估計畫............................21
3.1.5 可行性評估計畫成果發表........................22
3.1.6 執行原型製作計畫..............................23
3.1.7 成果及橋接....................................24
第四章 個案研究.........................................30
4.1 概述............................................30
4.2 執行計畫創意概念訴求............................31
4.3 可行性計畫評估階段..............................32
4.4 原型製作階段....................................33
4.5 事業計劃書......................................34
4.6 價值創造........................................39
第五章 專家訪談.........................................42
5.1 專家訪談問項....................................42
5.2 訪談專家學經歷..................................42
5.3 專家訪談........................................46
5.4 訪談內容分析....................................72
第六章 結論與建議.......................................74
6.1 研究結論........................................74
6.1.1 建置跨領域開放式創新平台......................75
6.1.2 媒合跨領域社群與產業界創新合作................76
6.1.3 推動跨領域社群參與創意與技術加值平台..........77
6.2 個案研究流程建議................................78
6.2.1 跨領域創意加值計畫執行流程修正................79
6.3 後續研究建議....................................80
參考文獻................................................81

表目錄
表2-1 各種不同開放式創新平台............................12
表3-1 Scenario 的評選與呈現.............................19
表3-2 媒合跨領域團隊的方式..............................20
表3-3 第一屆入選可行性評估計畫的14個團隊................21
表3-4 第一屆入選原型製作計畫的9個團隊...................23
表3-5 九原型製作團體成果................................26
表3-6 跨領域創意加值團隊參與競賽得獎列表................28
表3-7 第一屆原型製作計畫成果媒合/橋接進度...............29
表4-1 墾丁後壁湖浮潛場探勘實況..........................37
表4-2 漂遊海灣浮潛經營模式相對於傳統經營模式競爭分析....38
表4-3 漂遊海灣浮潛經營模式的優勢與機會..................39
表6-1 推動跨領域創意加值計畫改進與建議事項..............78

圖目錄
圖2-1 知識價值創造.......................................8
圖3-1 跨領域創意加值概念................................14
圖3-2 e-Top工程科技推展平台登入首頁.....................16
圖3-3 創意加值平台首頁..................................17
圖3-4 漂遊海灣籌組團隊需要的關鍵技術與人才..............25
圖3-5 漂遊海灣跨領域團隊形成多元知識的整合..............25
圖3-6 漂遊海灣研發成果於台北國際發明及技術交易展中展出..28
圖4-1 太陽能浮潛載具....................................31
圖4-2 太陽能浮潛載具於高雄港內進行下水試俥..............34
圖4-3 漂遊海灣產品功能與服務內容........................36

中文部份：
1.王怡分（2007）。「開放式創新對新產品研發績效之影響─以國內光電產業為例」，國立台南大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
2.天下雜誌（2009）。「新競爭時代教戰守則：超級5力」， 84-110頁。
3.吳韻儀（2007）。「開放式創新的九個關鍵解答：專訪《開放式經營作者》伽斯柏」，天下雜誌，381，142-146頁。
4.洪明正（1995）。「綠色設計」，中華民國對外貿易發展協會。
5.許牧彥（1998）。「綠色專利初探—如何將環保納入研究發展過程的初步研究（I）」，清潔生產資訊雙月刊，第二十期，52-60頁。
6.許牧彥（1998）。「綠色專利初探—如何將環保納入研究發展過程的初步研究（II）」， 清潔生產資訊雙月刊，第二十一期，19-31頁。
7.陳家豪（2006）。「綠色創新案例介紹—超級綠色產品」，綠色設計聯盟電子報，第33期。
8.廖肇弘（2007）。「Open the door to welcome the Open Innovation」，管理雜誌。
9.魏茂國（2007）。「開放式創新打造企業開放力與競爭力」，工業技術與資訊193期11月號。
10.2011年中小企業白皮書，經濟部中小企業處。

英文部份：
1.Alberto, J. and Sandra A. (2007). Familiarity, Complexity, and Team Performance in Geographically Distributed Software Development, Organization Science, Vol. 18, No 4.
2.Bammer, G. (2008). Enhancing Research Collaborations: Three key Management Challenges. Research Policy,37,5, 875-887.
3.Bergman, J., Ari jantunen, and Juha-Matti Saksa (2009).Enabling open innovation process through interactive methods: scenarios and group decision support systems. International Journal of Innovation Management,13,1,139-156.
4.Brezet, J.C., A Bijma and S.Silvester (2000). Innovative Electrics as an Opportunity for Eco-efficient Services Proceedings of Joint International Congress and Exhibition. Electronics Goes Green 2000+, Berlin, Germany, 859-865.
5.Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovations: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. New York: Harvard Business School Press.
6.Fichter and Klaus (2009). Innovation communities:the role of networks of promotors in Open Innovation. R&D Management 39,4,357~371.
7.Lichtenthaler, U. and Ernst, H. (2009). Opening up the innovation process: the role of technology aggressiveness. R&D Management, 39(1), 38-54.
8.Tanawat, Hirunyawipada, Michael Beyerlein and Charles Blankson (2010). Cross-functional integration as a knowledge transformation mechanism: Implications for new product development. Industrial marketing Management, 39,650~660.
9.Winfried, E., Jan Marco Leimeister and Helmut Krcmar (2009). Community engineering for innovations: the ideas competition as a method to nurture a virtual community for innovations. R&D Management,39,4,342-356.