跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.220.247.152) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/09/19 00:26
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:曾馥珊
研究生(外文):Fu-Shan Tseng
論文名稱:Co-opetition Dynamics: Antecedents and Its Impacts on Service Innovation
論文名稱(外文):Co-opetition Dynamics: Antecedents and Its Impacts on Service Innovation
指導教授:陳家祥陳家祥引用關係
口試委員:嚴秀茹李中興
口試日期:2012-6-21
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:元智大學
系所名稱:經營管理碩士班(企業管理與服務科學學程)
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2012
畢業學年度:100
語文別:英文
論文頁數:75
中文關鍵詞:服務主導邏輯服務創新資源基礎理論競合
外文關鍵詞:Service-Dominant LogicService InnovationResource Based ViewCo-opetition
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:299
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究主要針對台灣旅行社躉售的關係,探討其中競合動態對於服務創新的影響。透過服務主導邏輯、服務創新、資源基礎理論、競合等文獻回顧,本研究歸納競合動態的前置因素,並推導出數個研究假設,瞭解其對服務創新之影響,進而對創新及公司績效影響,並從中探討創新績效的中介角色;以從業人員心態做為競合動態及服務創新之調節變數。
透過問卷的發放及回收,本研究從綜合旅行社及甲種旅行社的角度探討競合動態的研究及其對服務創新之影響,並使用Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS)及Partial Least Squares (PLS)分析其研究結果。結果顯示,競合動態對服務創新、創新績效及公司績效皆有正面的影響,且創新績效具有其中介效果。競爭強度及互補性皆為競合動態之前因,並於本文中提出與競爭者形成合作關係,維持及平衡其關係,將有助於服務創新。本研究對旅遊業的研究貢獻,主要在於選擇良好的競爭夥伴,透過彼此間互補的能力及資源,將有助於公司績效的提升。
According to our study, the wholesale of travel agency in Taiwan will be our target. This research focus on co-opetition dynamics had a positive effect on service innovation, and influence on innovation performance and firm performance also. We proposed several antecedents as our variables and based on service-dominant logic (SDL), service innovation, resource based view, co-opetition theory and we came up with several hypotheses. According to questionnaire we distributed, the result showed that co-opetition dynamics had a positive effect on service innovation, innovation performance and firm performance. Innovation performance played a mediating role between service innovation and firm performance. There are two antecedents should be considered including competitive intensity and complementarities, affecting the formation and evolution of co-opetition relationship. In the end of this study, we will provide some contributions and implications that will be delivered to this industry.
Inside Cover i
Chinese Abstract ii
English Abstract iii
Acknowledgement iv
Table of Contents v
List of Tables vii
List of Figures viii
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Research background and motivation 1
1.2 Research objectives 6
Chapter 2 Literature Review and Hypotheses 7
2.1 Service-dominant logic (SDL) 7
2.2 Service innovation 9
2.3 Resource based view (RBV) 11
2.4 Co-opetition 14
2.4.1 The value net 16
2.4.2 Co-opetition dynamics 17
2.5 Research model 20
Chapter 3 Research Methodology 27
3.1 Instrument development 27
3.2 Operational definitions of variables 27
3.3 Sampling 33
3.4 Data collection process 33
Chapter 4 Data Analysis and Results 38
4.1 Sample demographics 38
4.2 Test of measurement model 40
4.3 The result of the structural model 45
4.3.1 The results for direct effects 45
4.3.2 The result for the mediating effect 47
4.3.3 The result for the moderating effect 49
Chapter 5 Discussion and Conclusion 51
5.1 Discussion 51
5.1.1 Co-opetition dynamics and service innovation 51
5.1.2 Competitive intensity and complementarities on co-opetition dynamics 52
5.1.3 Cost and co-opetition dynamics 52
5.1.4 Service innovation, innovation performance, firm performance 52
5.1.5 Mindset and co-opetition dynamics 53
5.1.6 Control variables 53
5.2 Contributions 54
5.3 Implications for practice 55
5.4 Implications for research 56
5.5 Limitation and future research 57
Reference 59
Appendix 65
1.Andrews, J. C., Netemeyer, R. G., Burton, S., Moberg, D. P., &; Christiansen, A. (2004). Understanding Adolescent Intentions to Smoke: An Examination of Relationships Among Social Influence, Prior Trial Behavior, and Antitobacco Campaign Advertising. Journal of Marketing, 68(3), 110-123.
2.Armstrong, J. S., &; Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of marketing research, 396-402.
3.Arya, B., &; Lin, Z. (2007). Understanding Collaboration Outcomes From an Extended Resource-Based View Perspective: The Roles of Organizational Characteristics, Partner Attributes, and Network Structures†. Journal of management, 33(5), 697-723.
4.Atuahene-Gima, K., &; Ko, A. (2001). An empirical investigation of the effect of market orientation and entrepreneurship orientation alignment on product innovation. Organization Science, 12(1), 54-74.
5.Avlonitis, G., Papastathopoulou, P., &; Gounaris, S. (2001). An empirically-based typology of product innovativeness for new financial services: Success and failure scenarios. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(5), 324-342.
6.Bala, H., &; Viswanath, V. (2007). Assimilation of Interorganizational Business Process Standards. Information Systems Research, 18(3), 340-363,365.
7.Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.
8.Barney, J., Wright, M., &; Ketchen, D. J. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of management, 27(6), 625-641.
9.Baum, J. A. C., Calabrese, T., &; Silverman, B. S. (2000). Don't go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 267-294.
10.Bengtsson, M., Eriksson, J., &; Wincent, J. (2010). Co-opetition dynamics - an outline for further inquiry. Competitiveness Review, 20(2), 194-214.
11.Blazevic, V., &; Lievens, A. (2004). Learning during the new financial service innovation process: antecedents and performance effects. Journal of Business Research, 57(4), 374-391.
12.Boyd, N. G., &; Hanlon, S. C. (1997). Competition, cooperation, and the search for economic rents: A syncretic model. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 110-141.
13.Brandenburger, A. M., &; Nalebuff, B. J. (1996). Co-opetition. New York: Doubleday.
14.Brouthers, K., &; Brouthers, L. (2003). Why service and manufacturing entry mode choices differ: The influence of transaction cost factors, risk and trust. The Journal of Management Studies, 40(5), 1179-1204.
15.Chan, B. L. (2008). Identifying and prioritizing critical success factors for coopetition strategy. Industrial Management + Data Systems, 108(4), 437-454.
16.Chen, C. J., &; Huang, J. W. (2009). Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance—The mediating role of knowledge management capacity. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 104-114.
17.Chen, J.-S., Tsou, H.-T., &; Ching, R. K. H. (2011). Co-production and its effects on service innovation. industrial Marketing Management, 03.
18.Chen, J.-S., Tsou, H. T., &; Huang, A. Y.-H. (2009). Service Delivery Innovation: Antecedents and Impact on Firm Performance. Journal of Service Research : JSR, 12(1), 36.
19.Cheng, C. C., &; Krumwiede, D. (2010). The effects of market orientation and service innovation on service industry performance: An empirical study. Operations Management Research, 3(3), 161-171.
20.Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., &; Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 189-217.
21.Creating New Markets Through Service Innovation. (2006). MIT Sloan Management Review, 47, 56-56.
22.Dale Stoel, M., &; Muhanna, W. A. (2009). IT capabilities and firm performance: A contingency analysis of the role of industry and IT capability type. Information &; Management, 46(3), 181-189.
23.Das, T. K., &; Teng, B. S. (2000). A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of management, 26(1), 31-61.
24.de Vries, E. J. (2006). Innovation in services in networks of organizations and in the distribution of services. Research Policy, 35(7), 1037-1051.
25.Den Hertog, P. (2000). Knowledge-intensive business services as co-producers of innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 4(4), 491-528.
26.Drejer, I. (2004). Identifying innovation in surveys of services: a Schumpeterian perspective. Research Policy, 33(3), 551-562.
27.Dyer, J. H., &; Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679.
28.Eisingerich, A., Rubera, G., &; Seifert, M. (2009). Managing Service Innovation and Interorganizational Relationships for Firm Performance: To Commit or Diversify? Journal of Service Research : JSR, 11(4), 344.
29.Fornell, C., &; Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research (pre-1986), 18(000001), 39-39.
30.Glynn, W. J., de Burca, S., Brannick, T., Fynes, B., &; Ennis, S. (2003). Listening practices and performance in service organisations. Journal of Service Management, 14(3/4), 310-330.
31.Gnyawali, D., He, J., &; Ravindranath, M. (2006). Impact of Co-Opetition on Firm Competitive Behavior: An Empirical Examination. Journal of Management, 32(4), 507-507.
32.Gnyawali, D., &; Park, B.-J. (2009). Co-opetition and Technological Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Multilevel Conceptual Model. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(3), 308-330.
33.Gnyawali, D., &; Park, B.-J. (2011). Co-opetition between giants: Collaboration with competitors for technological innovation. Research Policy, 40(5), 650.
34.Gomes-Casseres, B. (1997). Alliance strategies of small firms. Small Business Economics, 9(1), 33-44.
35.Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage. Strategy: Critical Perspectives on Business and Management, 135.
36.Hamel, G., Doz, Y. L., &; Prahalad, C. K. (1989). Collaborate with Your Competitors -- and Win. Harvard Business Review, 67, 133-133.
37.Harris, L. C., &; Mark, M. H. G. (2010). Online servicescapes, trust, and purchase intentions. The Journal of Services Marketing, 24(3), 230-243.
38.Holcomb, T., &; Hitt, M. (2007). Toward a model of strategic outsourcing. Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 464.
39.Ketchen, D., Snow, C., &; Hoover, V. (2004). Research on Competitive Dynamics: Recent Accomplishments and Future Challenges. Journal of Management, 30(6), 779-804.
40.Kristandl, G., &; Bontis, N. (2007). Constructing a definition for intangibles using the resource based view of the firm. Management Decision, 45(9), 1510-1510.
41.Kwai-Sang, C., Chan, B., &; Ping-Kit, L. (2008). Identifying and prioritizing critical success factors for coopetition strategy. Industrial Management + Data Systems, 108(4), 437-454.
42.Lambe, C., Spekman, R., &; Hunt, S. (2002). Alliance competence, resources, and alliance success: Conceptualization, measurement, and initial test. Academy of Marketing Science. Journal, 30(2), 141-141.
43.Lau, A. K. W., Tang, E., &; Yam, R. (2010). Effects of supplier and customer integration on product innovation and performance: empirical evidence in Hong Kong manufacturers. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(5), 761-777.
44.Lavie, D. (2006). The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: an extension of the resource-based view Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 638-658.
45.Luo, Y. (2007). A coopetition perspective of global competition. Journal of World Business, 42(2), 129-144.
46.Lusch, R., Vargo, S., &; O'Brien, M. (2007). Competing through service: Insights from service-dominant logic. Journal of Retailing, 83(1), 5-18.
47.Madhavaram, S., &; Hunt, S. D. (2008). The service-dominant logic and a hierarchy of operant resources: developing masterful operant resources and implications for marketing strategy. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 67-82.
48.Majchrzak, A., Beath, C. M., Lim, R. A., &; Chin, W. W. (2005). Managing clinet dialogues during information systems design to facilitate client learning 1 Mis Quarterly, 29(4), 653-672.
49.Mansury, M. A., &; Love, J. H. (2008). Innovation, productivity and growth in US business services: A firm-level analysis. Technovation, 28(1/2), 52.
50.Menor, L. J., Tatikonda, M. V., &; Sampson, S. E. (2002). New service development: Areas for exploitation and exploration. Journal of Operations Management, 20(2), 135-157.
51.Michel, S., Brown, S. W., &; Gallan, A. S. (2008). An expanded and strategic view of discontinuous innovations: deploying a service-dominant logic. Academy of Marketing Science. Journal, 36(1), 54-66.
52.Monica Hu, M. L., Horng, J. S., &; Christine Sun, Y. H. (2009). Hospitality teams: Knowledge sharing and service innovation performance. Tourism Management, 30(1), 41-50.
53.Morgan, R. E., &; Strong, C. A. (2003). Business performance and dimensions of strategic orientation. Journal of Business Research, 56(3), 163-176.
54.Morris, M., Kocak, A., &; Ozer, A. (2007). Coopetition as a small business strategy: implications for performance. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 18(1), 35-55.
55.Nambisan, S. (2002). Complementary product integration by high-technology new ventures: The role of initial technology strategy. Management Science, 48(3), 382-398.
56.Nambisan, S., &; Baron, R. A. (2010). Different Roles, Different Strokes: Organizing Virtual Customer Environments to Promote Two Types of Customer Contributions. Organization Science, 21(2), 554-572,587,589.
57.Oke, A. (2007). Innovation types and innovation management practices in service companies. International Journal of Operations &; Production Management, 27(6), 564-587.
58.Quintana-Carcias, C., &; Benavieds-Velasco, C. (2004). Cooperation, competition, and innovative capability: a panel data of European dedicated biotechnology firms. Technovation, 24(12), 927-938.
59.Rita Gunther, M., &; MacMillan, I. (2000). Assessing technology projects using real options reasoning. Research Technology Management, 43(4), 35-49.
60.Ritala, P., &; Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P. (2009). What's in it for me? Creating and appropriating value in innovation-related coopetition. Technovation, 29(12), 819.
61.Rothaermel, F. T. (2001). Incumbent's advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6‐7), 687-699.
62.Sanders, W., &; Boivie, S. (2004). Sorting things out: valuation of new firms in uncertain markets. Strategic Management Journal, 25(2), 167-167+.
63.Sarkar, M., Echambadi, R., Cavusgil, S., &; Aulakh, P. (2001). The influence of complementarity, compatibility, and relationship capital on alliance performance. Academy of Marketing Science. Journal, 29(4), 358-358.
64.Shaw, G., Bailey, A., &; Williams, A. (2011). Aspects of service-dominant logic and its implications for tourism management: Examples from the hotel industry. Tourism Management, 32(2), 207-214.
65.Sheehan, J. (2006). Understanding service sector innovation. Communications of the ACM, 49(7), 42-47.
66.Song, M., Droge, C., Hanvanich, S., &; Calantone, R. (2005). Marketing and technology resource complementarity: an analysis of their interaction effect in two environmental contexts. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 259-259+.
67.Taiwan, B. o. Foreign Exchange Rate, from http://rate.bot.com.tw/Pages/Static/UIP003.en-US.htm
68.Talke, K., &; Hultink, E. (2010). The Impact of the Corporate Mind-set on New Product Launch Strategy and Market Performance. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(2), 220.
69.Tanriverdi, H. (2006). Performance effects of information technology synergies in multibusiness firms. Mis Quarterly, 57-77.
70.Tellis, G. J., Prabhu, J. C., &; Chandy, R. K. (2009). Radical Innovation Across Nations: The Preeminence of Corporate Culture. Journal of Marketing, 73(1), 3.
71.Teo, H. H., Wei, K. K., &; Benbasat, I. (2003). Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: An institutional perspective. Mis Quarterly, 19-49.
72.Tomlinson, P. R. (2010). Co-operative ties and innovation: Some new evidence for UK manufacturing. Research Policy, 39(6), 762.
73.Tourism Bureau, M. O. T. C. R. o. C. (2012.3.05) Retrieved 6.3, 2012, from http://admin.taiwan.net.tw/law/law_d.aspx?no=130&;d=500
74.Tsai, W. (2000). Social capital, strategic relatedness and the formation of intraorganizational linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 21(9), 925-939.
75.Tsai, W. (2002). Social structure of "coopetition" within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowlege sharing. Organization Science, 13(2), 179-190.
76.Tsou, H. T., &; Chen, J.-S. (2011). The Influence of Interfirm Codevelopment Competency on e-Service Innovation.
77.Vargo, S. L., &; Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1-17.
78.Vargo, S. L., &; Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1-10.
79.Wolfl, A. (2010). The service economy in OECD countries.
80.Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A Resource-based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal (pre-1986), 5(2), 171-171.
81.Zhou, K. Z., Kin, C., &; Tse, D. K. (2005). The effects of strategic orientations on technology-and market-based breakthrough innovations. Journal of Marketing, 42-60.
82.Zineldin, M. (2004). Co-opetition: the organisation of the future. Marketing Intelligence &; Planning, 22(6/7), 780-789.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊