跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.80) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/04 04:33
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:沈育綺
研究生(外文):Yu Chi Shen
論文名稱:地圖呈現方式對於空間認知的影響
論文名稱(外文):The Influence of Map Design on Spatial Cognition
指導教授:羅承浤羅承浤引用關係
指導教授(外文):C. H. Lo
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:長庚大學
系所名稱:工業設計學系
學門:設計學門
學類:產品設計學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2013
畢業學年度:101
論文頁數:92
中文關鍵詞:服務設計空間認知認知地圖眼動追蹤空間記憶
外文關鍵詞:Service DesignSpatial CognitionCognitive MapEye trackingSpatial memory
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:1087
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:196
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
視覺資訊呈現,為整體服務系統中一項重要元素。如使用服務者可藉由有效的視覺設計得到服務系統資訊,或可減少服務人力配置及工作量。地圖是傳達尋路知識的一項重要媒介,當人們初次置身於陌生場域中,可透過地圖此項視覺服務工具了解空間環境配置。過往設計及製作呈現地圖方式多使用2D 平面地圖,以透視方式呈現的3D單點透視地圖則較不普遍,也較少研究著眼於2D 平面地圖或3D 單點透視地圖對「空間認知」的影響。本研究採用「服務設計」觀點並以醫療場域地圖設計為例,探究其地圖呈現方式對於使用者「視覺動線及空間記憶」的影響。以科學實證方法,擷取使用者解讀地圖之經驗,作為現有地圖創新設計基礎。本研究使用眼動儀及空間記憶測驗,作為觀察與評估工具。眼動儀紀錄結果顯示:以2D 平面方式所呈現之地圖,會引發近似閱讀文件之視覺動線;而以3D 單點透視方式所呈現之地圖,則引發近似瀏覽立體空間之視覺動線。空間記憶測驗結果顯示:於透視角度方面,受試者觀看3D45°單點透視地圖之記憶表現,顯著比2D 平面及2.5D 透視地圖佳。於渲染擬真度方面,受試者觀看線稿地圖之記憶表現,顯著比低擬真地圖佳。但透視角度與渲染擬真度,兩者間無交互作用影響。
Presenting visual information is a key task in designing a good service system. If service users can obtain the required information from visual elements such as signs or displays, the work load and numbers of manpowers needed may be reduced. In this paper, we propose the idea of “Visual Service Design” to specify the design issues of visual media used in a service delivery system. We demonstrate how one can scientifically evaluate a user’s viewing experience of a particular visual design for service purposes. Common service systems such as hospitals usually
provide maps to support the patients and visitors in finding their ways around the environments. There seem to be a dominant use of 2D map in this regard, which may be adapted from the original CAD diagrams for designing and building the interiors. Using the map design as an example, we firstly carried out an eye-tracking experiment to investigate a user’s viewing patterns on the maps illustrating a hospital floor. We then used spatial memory tasks to evaluate the users’ performances on reading the maps. The maps were presented to the participants with different designs, including the traditional 2D diagrammatic approach and the 3D rendered scenes with varied levels of fidelity. The results from the eye movement analysis indicate that there may be a fundamental difference between
viewing the maps designed as 2D diagrams and those designed as 3D rendered scenes. For the 2D maps, the participants exhibit a viewing pattern similar to reading texts or documents (i.e. top to bottom, left to right). For the maps drawn in 3D, however, the participants generally move their eyes from bottom to top, which means “from the near to the far sides of the scene” in the 3D perspective. The results from the spatial memory tasks are also in favour of the 3D maps. In addition, no interactional effect has been observed between the dimensional factor and
rendering fidelities.
目錄
指導教授推薦書 ..........................................................................................
口試委員會審定書 ......................................................................................
國家圖書館授權書 .................................................................................. iii
長庚大學授權書 ....................................................................................... iv
誌謝 ............................................................................................................ v
摘要 ........................................................................................................... vi
Abstract .................................................................................................... vii
目錄 ........................................................................................................... ix
圖目錄 ..................................................................................................... xii
表目錄 ..................................................................................................... xiv
第一章 緒論 .............................................................................................. 1
1-1 研究背景 ......................................................................................... 1
1-2 研究目的與研究假設 ..................................................................... 6
1-3 論文架構 ......................................................................................... 7
第二章 文獻探討 ...................................................................................... 9
2-1 服務科學 ......................................................................................... 9
2-2 服務設計 ....................................................................................... 10
2-3 知覺與認知 ................................................................................... 17
2-4 認知地圖 ....................................................................................... 20
2-5 眼動儀 ........................................................................................... 26
2-6 空間記憶 ....................................................................................... 30
第三章 研究方法 .................................................................................... 34
3-1 醫療場域實地觀察 ....................................................................... 34
3-2 實驗地圖設計 ............................................................................... 35
3-3 觀看地圖之視覺動線實驗 ........................................................... 41
3-4 觀看地圖之空間記憶測驗 ........................................................... 43
第四章 結果與分析 ................................................................................ 45
4-1 視線焦點展示圖 ........................................................................... 45
4-2 視覺動線分析圖 ........................................................................... 45
4-3 觀看模式分析表 ........................................................................... 48
4-4 透視角度與渲染擬真度之空間記憶效應項檢定 ....................... 49
4-5 透視角度之空間記憶Post Hoc 檢定 ........................................... 50
4-6 透視角度變化與空間記憶表現之直條圖 ................................... 50
4-7 渲染擬真度變化與空間記憶表現之直條圖 ............................... 52
4-8 地圖呈現方式與性別空間記憶表現之直條圖 ........................... 53
4-9 討論 ............................................................................................... 54
第五章 結論與未來建議 ........................................................................ 58
5-1 結論 ............................................................................................... 58
5-2 未來研究方向 ............................................................................... 60
參考文獻 .................................................................................................. 61
附錄 .......................................................................................................... 72
(附錄一)醫療場域實地觀察之個案 ............................................... 72
(附錄二)視覺動線分析圖 ............................................................... 73

圖目錄
圖1-1 論文架構 ...................................................................................... 8
圖2-1 傳統生產過程 ............................................................................ 11
圖2-2 服務生產過程 ............................................................................ 11
圖2-3 大眾運輸系統圖原型 ................................................................ 13
圖2-4 顧客旅程中之服務互動接觸點 ................................................ 14
圖2-5 視覺知覺表現方式 .................................................................... 18
圖2-6 EyeLink II 眼動儀 ..................................................................... 27
圖2-7 利用攝影機計算瞳孔位置 ........................................................ 27
圖2-8 凝視位置校正程序 .................................................................... 28
圖2-9 九點校正程序 ............................................................................ 28
圖2-10 克羅斯積木點選作業 .............................................................. 32
圖3-1 醫療場域提供之地圖 ................................................................ 34
圖3-2 2D 平面線稿地圖 ....................................................................... 36
圖3-3 2.5D 透視地圖 ............................................................................ 37
圖3-4 3D 30°單點透視地圖 ............................................................... 38
圖3-5 3D 45°單點透視地圖 ............................................................... 39
圖3-6 3D 60°單點透視地圖 ............................................................... 40
圖3-7 受試者配戴眼動儀樣貌 ............................................................ 42
圖3-8 進行凝視位置校正程序 ............................................................ 42
圖3-9 空間記憶測驗題觀看 ................................................................ 44
圖3-10 空間記憶測驗題答題 .............................................................. 44
圖3-11 空間記憶測驗評分方式 .......................................................... 44
圖4-1 視線焦點展示圖 ........................................................................ 46
圖4-2 視覺動線分析圖 ........................................................................ 47
圖4-3 透視角度空間記憶之直條圖與標準差 .................................... 51
圖4-4 渲染擬真度之空間記憶直條圖與標準差 ................................ 52
圖4-5 地圖呈現方式之性別空間記憶直條圖與標準差 .................... 54
圖4-6 3D 單點透視地圖設計建議樣本 ............................................... 55
圖4-7 空間記憶測驗之地圖建議樣本 ................................................ 57

表目錄
表4-1 觀看模式分析表 ........................................................................ 49
表4-2 透視角度與渲染擬真度之空間記憶效應項檢定 .................... 50
表4-3 透視角度之空間記憶Post Hoc 檢定 ....................................... 50
英文文獻:
Abu-Obeid, N. (1998). Abstract and scenographic imagery: The effect of environmental form on wayfinding. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18(2), 159-173.
Apostolopoulou, E., &; Klonari, A. (2011). Pupils’ representations of rivers on 2D and 3D maps. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 19, 443-449.
Appleyard, D. (1970). Styles and methods of structuring a city. Environment and Behavior.
Axia, G., Peron, E. M., &; Baroni, M. R. (1991). Environmental assessment across the life span. Environment, Cognition and Action: An Integrated Approach, 221-244.
Bell, P., Greene, T., Fisher, J., &; Baum, A. (2001). High density and crowding. Environmental psychology, 5th edition. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth, 293-332.
Bitner, M. J., Brown, S. W., Goul, M., &; Urban, S. (2008). Services science journey: foundations, progress, and challenges. Service science, management and engineering education for the 21st century, 227-233.
Brewer, W. F., &; Treyens, J. C. (1981). Role of schemata in memory for places. Cognitive psychology, 13(2), 207-230.
Brinkmann, R., 1999. The Art and Science of Digital Compositing. Morgan Kaufman, Los Altos, CA, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
Capitani, E., Laiacona, M., &; Ciceri, E. (1991). Sex differences in spatial memory: a reanalysis of block tapping long-term memory according to the short-term memory level. The Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 12(4), 461-466.
Coluccia, E., Iosue, G., &; Antonella Brandimonte, M. (2007). The relationship between map drawing and spatial orientation abilities: A study of gender differences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(2), 135-144.
Corsi, P. M. (1973). Human memory and the medial temporal region of the brain. ProQuest Information &; Learning.
Cubukcu, E., &; Nasar, J. L. (2005a). Relation of physical form to spatial knowledge in largescale virtual environments. Environment and Behavior, 37(3), 397-417.
Cubukcu, E., &; Nasar, J. L. (2005b). Influence of physical characteristics of routes on distance cognition in virtual environments. Environment and Planning B, 32(5), 777.
Debevec, P. E., Taylor, C. J., &; Malik, J. (1996). Modeling and rendering architecture from photographs: A hybrid geometry-and image-based approach. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques.
Devlin, A. S., &; Bernstein, J. (1997). Interactive way-finding: Map style and effectiveness. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17(2), 99-110.
Dhaliwal, J. S., Macintyre, M., &; Parry, G. (2011). Understanding Services and the Customer Response. Service Design and Delivery, 1-18.
Djamasbi, S., Siegel, M., &; Tullis, T. (2010). Generation Y, web design, and eye tracking. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(5), 307-323.
Downs, R., &; Stea, D. (1973). Cognitive and spatial behavior: Processes and products. Image and Environment. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
Evans, G. W., Skorpanich, M. A., Garling, T., Bryant, K. J., &; Bresolin, B. (1984). The effects of pathway configuration, landmarks and stress on environmental cognition. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4(4), 323-335.
Faugeras, O., &; Robert, L. (1996). What can two images tell us about a third one? International Journal of Computer Vision, 18(1), 5-19.
Garling, T., Book, A., &; Lindberg, E. (1984). Cognitive mapping of large-scale environments the interrelationship of action plans, acquisition, and orientation. Environment and Behavior, 16(1), 3-34.
Garling, T., Book, A., &; Lindberg, E. (1986). Spatial orientation and wayfinding in the designed environment: A conceptual analysis and some suggestions for postoccupancy evaluation. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research.
Golledge, R. G., Ruggles, A. J., Pellegrino, J. W., &; Gale, N. D. (1993). Integrating route knowledge in an unfamiliar neighborhood: Along and across route experiments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13(4), 293-307.
Golledge, R. G., Smith, T. R., Pellegrino, J. W., Doherty, S., &; Marshall, S. P. (1985). A conceptual model and empirical analysis of children's acquisition of spatial knowledge. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 5(2), 125-152.
Gomez, A., Rousset, S. p., &; Baciu, M. (2009). Egocentric-updating during navigation facilitates episodic memory retrieval. Acta psychologica, 132(3), 221-227.
Gooch, B., &; Gooch, A. (2001). Non-photorealistic rendering (Vol. 201): AK Peters.
Graham, D. J., Orquin, J. L., &; Visschers, V. H. (2012). Eye tracking and nutrition label use: A review of the literature and recommendations for label enhancement. Food Policy, 37(4), 378-382.
Gross, M. D., &; Zimring, C. (1990). BUILDINGS, MEMORY, AND WAYFINDING.
Gross, M. D., &; Zimring, C. (1992). Predicting wayfinding behavior in buildings: A schemabased approach. Evaluating and predicting design performance, 367-377.
Halper, N., Mellin, M., Herrmann, C. S., Linneweber, V., &; Strothotte, T. (2003). Psychology and Non-photorealistic rendering: the beginning of a beautiful relationship. Paper presented at the Mensch &; Computer.
Haq, S., &; Zimring, C. (2003). Just Down The Road A Piece The Development of Topological Knowledge of Building Layouts. Environment and Behavior, 35(1), 132-160.
Hasher, L., &; Zacks, R. T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108(3), 356.
http://www.service-design-network.org/
Hunt, M. E. (1984). Environmental learning without being there. Environment and Behavior, 16(3), 307-334.
IfM, &; IBM. (2007). Succeeding through Services Innovation: A discussion paper. Cambridge Institute for Manufacturing.
Jacob, R. J. (1991). The use of eye movements in human-computer interaction techniques: what you look at is what you get. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 9(2), 152-169.
Johnson, E. A. (2010). A Study of the Effects of Immersion on Short-term Spatial Memory.
Kaplan, S., &; Kaplan, R. (1982). Cognition and environment: Praeger New York.
Kealy, W. A. (1995). Map perspective and the learning of text.
Kitchin, R. M. (1994). Cognitive maps: What are they and why study them? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14(1), 1-19.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1989). Understanding charts and graphs. Applied cognitive psychology, 3(3), 185-225.
Kuipers, B. (1983). The cognitive map: Could it have been any other way. Spatial orientation: Theory, research, and application, 345-359.
Kulhavy, R. W., &; Stock, W. A. (1996). How cognitive maps are learned and remembered. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 86(1), 123-145.
Liu, H.-C., Lai, M.-L., &; Chuang, H.-H. (2011). Using eye-tracking technology to investigate the redundant effect of multimedia web pages on viewers’ cognitive processes. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2410-2417.
MacEachren, A. M. (1992). Application of environmental learning theory to spatial knowledge acquisition from maps. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 82(2), 245-274.
Maglio, P. P., Srinivasan, S., Kreulen, J. T., &; Spohrer, J. (2006). Service systems, service scientists, SSME, and innovation. Communications of the ACM, 49(7), 81-85.
Mandler, J. M. (1984). Stories, Scripts, and Scenes: Aspects of Schema Theory: ERIC.
Marr, D., &; Vision, A. (1982). A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. WH San Francisco: Freeman and Company.
McAndrew, F. T., &; Mac Andrew, F. T. (1993). Environmental psychology: Brooks/Cole Pacific Grove, CA.
Milner, B. (1971). Interhemispheric differences in the localization of psychological processes in man. British Medical Bulletin; British Medical Bulletin.
Moeser, S. D. (1988). Cognitive mapping in a complex building. Environment and Behavior, 20(1), 21-49.
Montello, D. R. (2005). Navigation. The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking, 18, 257-294.
Morris, R., Garrud, P., Rawlins, J., &; O'Keefe, J. (1982). Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions. Nature, 297(5868), 681-683.
Mundy, J. L., &; Zisserman, A. (1992). Appendix-Projective geometry for machine vision.
Murakoshi, S., &; Kawai, M. (2000). Use of knowledge and heuristics for wayfinding in an artificial environment. Environment and Behavior, 32(6), 756-774.
Ng, I. C. L., Maull, R., &; Yip, N. (2009). Outcome-based contracts as a driver for systems thinking and service-dominant logic in service science: Evidence from the defence industry. European Management Journal, 27(6), 377-387.
O'keefe, J., &; Nadel, L. (1978). The hippocampus as a cognitive map (Vol. 3): Clarendon Press Oxford.
O'Neill, M. J. (1992). Effects of familiarity and plan complexity on wayfinding in simulated buildings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12(4), 319-327.
Orsini, A., Schiappa, O., &; Grossi, D. (1981). Sex and cultural differences in children's spatial and verbal memory span. Perceptual and motor skills, 53(1), 39-42.
Passini, R. (1984). Wayfinding in architecture (Vol. 4): Van Nostrand Reinhold New York.
Passini, R., Rainville, C., Marchand, N., &; Joanette, Y. (1998). Wayfinding and dementia: Some research findings and a new look at design. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 15, 133-151.
Paton, R. A., &; McLaughlin, S. (2008). Services innovation: Knowledge transfer and the supply chain. European Management Journal, 26(2), 77-83.
Peponis, J., Zimring, C., &; Choi, Y. K. (1990). Finding the building in wayfinding. Environment and Behavior, 22(5), 555-590.
Purcell, A. T. (1986). Environmental Perception and Affect A Schema Discrepancy Model. Environment and Behavior, 18(1), 3-30.
Richardson, A. E., Montello, D. R., &; Hegarty, M. (1999). Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps and from navigation in real and virtual environments. Memory &; cognition, 27(4), 741-750.
Roth, S. P., Tuch, A. N., Mekler, E. D., Bargas-Avila, J. A., &; Opwis, K. (2012). Location matters, especially for non-salient features-An eye-tracking study on the effects of web object placement on different types of websites. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies.
Rovine, M. J., &; Weisman, G. D. (1989). Sketch-map variables as predictors of way-finding performance. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9(3), 217-232.
Schacter, D. L., &; Nadel, L. (1991). Varieties of spatial memory: A problem for cognitive neuroscience.
Sherry, D. F., Jacobs, L. F., &; Gaulin, S. J. C. (1992). Spatial memory and adaptive specialization of the hippocampus. Trends in neurosciences, 15(8), 298-303.
Shostack, G. L. (1984). Designing services that deliver. Harvard business review, 62(1), 133-139.
Shostack, G. L. (1993). How to design a service. European Journal of Marketing, 16(1), 49-63.
Siegel, A. W., &; White, S. H. (1975). The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. Advances in child development and behavior, 10, 9-55.
Smyth, M. M., &; Scholey, K. A. (1992). Determining spatial span: The role of movement time and articulation rate. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 45(3), 479-501.
Spohrer, J., &; Maglio, P. (2005). Emergence of service science: Services sciences, management, engineering (SSME) as the next frontier in innovation. Presentation at IBM Almaden Research Center,(Oct. 2005).
Taylor, H. A., &; Tversky, B. (1992). Spatial mental models derived from survey and route descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language, 31(2), 261-292.
Thorndyke, P. W., &; Hayes-Roth, B. (1982). Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation. Cognitive psychology, 14(4), 560-589.
Tolman, E. C. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological review, 55(4), 189.
Weisman, G. D. (1979). Way-finding in the built environment: A study in architectural legibility. University of Michigan.
Weisman, J. (1981). Evaluating Architectural Legibility Way-Finding in the Built Environment. Environment and Behavior, 13(2), 189-204.
Wickens, C. D., Olmos, O., Chudy, A., &; Davenport, C. (1997). Aviation display support for situation awareness: DTIC Document.
Winn, W. (1991). Learning from maps and diagrams. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 211-247.
Wu, F. G., Lee, Y. J., &; Chen, C. H. (2003). Evaluation of the realistic effect of image compositing to assist in curtain selection. International journal of industrial ergonomics, 32(1), 1-12.
Zeng, K., Zhao, M., Xiong, C., &; Zhu, S. C. (2009). From image parsing to painterly rendering. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 29(1), 2.
Zhang, Z., Deriche, R., Faugeras, O., &; Luong, Q. T. (1995). A robust technique for matching two uncalibrated images through the recovery of the unknown epipolar geometry. Artificial intelligence, 78(1), 87-119.
Zimring, C. (1982). The built environment as a source of psychological stress: Impacts of buildings and cities on satisfaction and behavior. Environmental Stress. New York, NY: Cambridge, 151-198.

中文文獻:
2011體驗未來!(民100)。台北市:財團法人台灣創意設計中心及舊金山台北設計中心。
王滿堂(民93)。視覺與知覺生理學。新北市:藝軒。
史帝克敦及史奈德(民102)。這就是服務設計思考。(池熙璿譯)。新北市:中國生產力中心。
布魯斯.漢寧頓及貝拉.馬汀(民101)。設計的方法。(趙慧芬、林潔盈及吳莉君譯)。台北市:原點。
汪建鈞(民101)。服務設計 激盪中小企業軟實力。台北產經,10,23-30。
楊振甫及黃則佳(民100)。打開服務設計的秘密。台北市:台灣創意設計中心。
傳意設計入門視覺感知。民102年1月27日,取自:香港理工大學工業中心網頁:http://tds.ic.polyu.edu.hk/ds/
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊