跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.89) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/10 01:23
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:阮泰專
研究生(外文):Thai-Chuyen Nguyen
論文名稱:香水業的美學應用-台灣市場案例研究
論文名稱(外文):Application of Aesthetics In Perfume Industry - Taiwan Market
指導教授:林瓊菱林瓊菱引用關係
指導教授(外文):CHYONG-LING LIN
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:中原大學
系所名稱:國際商學碩士學位學程
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:貿易學類
論文種類:學術論文
畢業學年度:101
語文別:英文
論文頁數:35
中文關鍵詞:美學品牌資產品牌忠誠顧客滿意
外文關鍵詞:AestheticsBrand EquityBrand LoyaltyCustomer Satisfaction
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:370
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:9
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
對於每一家企業,美學起著很重要的作用.它可以使產品差異化來獲得競爭優勢. 但如果要達到顧客滿意, 企業還需要建立品牌資產與品牌忠誠.這就是Bvlgari與Chanel已在全球舉行, 尤其是在台灣. 從收集140台灣人的問卷答案, 研究者已收到很多重要的結果可以贊成figure 1. 每個品牌都有自己的方法傳送美學給顧客.根據比較高的再買百分率, Chanel成功的介紹當代女性描繪為年輕女孩.在研究中還有一些限制像薪水問題.

Aesthetics plays a very important role for a company to make product differentiation to gain competitive advantages. But to reach customer satisfaction, company still need to build their brand loyalty and brand equity. That’s what Bvlgari and Chanel have done in worldwide, especially In Taiwan. After asking more than 140 Taiwanese participants to fill in the survey, there are many findings that approve the relationship between aesthetics, brand equity and brand loyalty with customer satisfaction. Each of brands has their own way to deliver aesthetics which concentrates on certain consumer categories. With higher percentage of repurchasing, Chanel successfully introduces the contemporary female depiction for young ladies to believe that they can reach the ideal state as the endorser in the photos. There are still some limitations of high income participants in this research.

Table of contents

摘要 I
Abstract II
Table of contents III
LIST OF TABLES IV
1. Introduction 1
2. Literature Review 2
2.1. Brand Equity 2
2.2. Brand Loyalty 4
2.3. Aesthetics 5
3. Methodology 8
4. Result 11
5. Conclusion and discussion 23
References 24

List of tables and figures
Figure 1 ………………………………………………………………………………………...11
Table 1 ………………………………………………………………………………………..11
Table 2 ………………………………………………………………………………………..12
Table 3 ………………………………………………………………………………………..12
Table 4 ………………………………………………………………………………………..12
Table 5 ………………………………………………………………………………………..13
Table 6 ………………………………………………………………………………………..14
Table 7 ………………………………………………………………………………………..15
Table 8 ………………………………………………………………………………………..16
Table 9 ………………………………………………………………………………………..17
Table 10 ………………………………………………………………………………………..18
Table 11 ………………………………………………………………………………………..19
Table 12 ………………………………………………………………………………………..20
Table 13 ………………………………………………………………………………………..21
Table 14 ………………………………………………………………………………………..22
Table 15 ………………………………………………………………………………………..23

Aaker, D (1991), Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name, Free Press, New York, NY.
Aaker, D (1996), Building Strong Brands, Free Press, New York, NY, p. 150.
Anderson. John D (2006). Qualitative and Quantitative research. Imperial COE, 2006. Superintendent of Schools
Alex Simonson, Bernd H. Schmitt (1997). Marketing Aesthetics: The Strategic Management of Brands, Identity, and Image. New York : Free Press.
Assael, I-I., 1992. Consumer Behavior and Markcling Action. 4th ed.. (PWS-Kent Publishing Company; Boston).
Broniarczyk, Susan – Alba, Joseph (1994) The Importance of the Brand in Brand Extension. Journal of Marketing Research 1994:5, 214-228.
Chegini, Mehrdad Goudarzvand (2010). ”Customer loyalty and value key dimensions interaction in organization”, China-USA Business Review, Vol. 9, Iss. 8, pp. 8-14.
Cunningham, Ross M. (1956). Brand Loyalty – what, where, how much?. Harward Business Review, Vol. 34, pp. 116–128.
Cropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C. and Cropley, A. J. (2011), Measuring Creativity for Innovation Management, J. Technol. Manag. Innov. Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 13-30.
Farley, John U. (1964). ”Why Does Brand Loyalty Vary Over Products?”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 1, Iss. 4, pp. 9–14.
Feldwick, P. (1996). What is brand equity anyway and how do you measure it. Journal of the Marketing Research Society. 38: 85-104.
Groesz, L.M., Levine, M.P., Murnen, S.K., 2002. The effect of experimental presentation of thin media images on body satisfaction: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Eating Disorders 31, 1–16.
Hancock, B (1998). An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Nottingham, UK: Trent Focus Group, Division of General Practice, University of Nottingham.
Jones, D., (1995). Sexual selection, physical attractiveness, and facial neoteny. Current Anthropology 36, 723–748.
Kant, I. (2002). Critique of the power of judgment. Trans.. In P. Guyer, & E. Matthews (Eds.) (2nd ed). USA, New York: Cambridge University Press
Kapferer J.N. (1992) Strategic Brand Management. New York and London: Kogan Page.
Keller, K.L.(1993), Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57, pp. 1-22.
Kreuzbauer, R., & Malter, A. J. (2005). Embodied cognition and new product design: changing product form to influence brand categorization. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22, 165-176.
Lassar, W., Mittal B. , and Sharma A. (1995) Measuring Customer-Based Brand Equity. Journal of Consumer Marketing 12(4): 11-19.
Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95 (4), 489-508.
Matveev Alexei V (2002). The Advantages of Employing Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Intercultural Research: Practical Implications from the Study of the Perceptions of Intercultural Communication Competence by American and Russian Managers. Issue 1 / Edited by I.N. Rozina, Rostov-on-Don: Institute of Management, Business and Law Publishing, 2002. - 168 p. P. 59-67
Nicholls, C. (2011) The Advantages of using Qualitative Research Methods. Alexander Technique College.
Oliver R.L. (1999). “Whence Customer Loyalty?”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 63, Special Issue, pp. 33-44.
Osborne, H. (1979). Some theories of aesthetic judgment. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 38(2), 135−144.
Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (pp. 169-186). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Perrett, D.I., May, K.A., Yoshikawa, S., (1994). Facial shape and judgments of female attractiveness. Nature 368, 239–242.
Rafael Ramírez, Jerome Ravetz (2011) Feral futures -Zen and aesthetics. Special Issue: Community Engagement for Sustainable Urban Futures. Volume 43, Issue 4, May 2011, Pages 478–487
Reichheld, Frederick F. (2003). ”The One Number You Need to Grow”, Harward Business Review, Vol. 81, Iss. 12, pp. 46–55.
S.Geldart, (2009). That woman looks pretty, but is she attractive? Female perceptions of facial beauty and the impact of cultural labels. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée/European Review of Applied Psychology, Volume 60, Issue 2, April 2010, Pages 79-87
Solomon, D. K., Poreda, R. J., Schiff, S. L. & Cherry, J. A. (1992) Tritium and helium-3 as groundwater age tracers in the Borden aquifer. Wat. Resour. Res. 28,741-755.
Srivastava, R.K. and Shocker, A.D. (1991), Brand equity: a perspective on its meaning and measurement, working paper, Marketing Science Institute, Boston, MA, pp. 91-124.
Tractinsky, N., Katz, A. S., & Ikar, D. (2000). What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers, 13(2), 127-145.
Tuominen, Pekka (1999) Managing Brand Equity. The Finish Journal of Business Economics 1999:1, 65-100.
W. Hirstein & M. Campbell (2009), Aesthetics and the Experience of Beauty. In: William P. Banks, (Editor), Encyclopedia of Consciousness. volume 1, pp. 1-7. Oxford: Elsevier.
Washburn, J.H. and Plank R.E. (2002). Measuring brand equity: an evaluation of a consumer-based brand equity scale. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 10(1): 46-62.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 涉入程度、顧客滿意度與忠誠度關係之研究─以網路商店類型及顧客關係結合類型分析
2. 顧客滿意度、品牌忠誠度對再購意願之影響─以汽車銷售業為例
3. 品牌權益、顧客滿意與消費者購買行為之關係-以加油站為例
4. 顧客滿意,品牌權益與顧客終身價值關係之研究-以服務過程為服務業分類之實證
5. 運用結構方程模式探討咖啡連鎖店服務品質、感受價值、品牌權益、顧客滿意度、顧客忠誠度關係之研究-以台北市咖啡連鎖店為例
6. 台中市健康體適能俱樂部會員參與動機參與行為顧客滿意度及品牌忠誠度關係之研究
7. 臺北市羽球拍消費者品牌形象對顧客忠誠度影響之研究-線性結構方程模式之驗證
8. 運用結構方程模式探討品牌權益、服務品質、顧客滿意度、關係品質與顧客忠誠度之關係-以桃園縣加油站為例
9. 顧客滿意、品牌權益與顧客終身價值關係之研究-以KTV為例
10. 財富管理顧客忠誠度之探討-以中國國際商業銀行財富管理部門為例
11. 運用線性結構模式探討共同基金投資績效、服務品質、顧客滿意度、品牌權益對顧客忠誠度之影響
12. 消費者之產品品質認知對顧客滿意度及品牌忠誠度之影響─以台北市隱形眼鏡藥水市場為例
13. 顧客自發行為影響模式之探討—以台灣銀行業財富管理部門為例
14. 運用線性結構關係模式探討共同基金涉入程度、服務品質、投資績效、顧客滿意度、品牌權益、知覺風險對顧客忠誠度之影響—以台灣投資信託產業貴賓級客戶為例
15. 影響加油站顧客忠誠度因素之探討-以台北地區加油站為例
 
無相關期刊