臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

教學方法在有效學習中扮演了極為重要的角色。此研究旨在探討合作教學法之拼圖法第四代對大學生英語學習態度與學習成就之影響。本研究對象為台灣北部大學非英語主修的EFL學習者為例，由兩個班級共77位大學生組成。此研究分為控制組和實驗組。研究工具分別為合作教學法之拼圖法第四代回饋問卷以及英文成就測驗。資料收集和分析同時採用量化與質化。研究結果指出，合作教學法之拼圖法第四代對學生英文學習成就無顯著的影響。透過合作教學法之拼圖法第四代回饋問卷結果顯示，學生對於此學習方法抱持較不一致的觀點。學生也指出合作教學法之拼圖法第四代成功應用在英文課堂學習的重要的因素。

Teaching method plays a crucial role for an effective learning (Buyukkaragoz, 1997). This study focuses on the cooperative learning method of Jigsaw IV in English class to investigate EFL (English as a Foreign Language) college students’ English learning attitudes and English achievement. The participants are all non-English majored students from a university in the northern Taiwan. The samples are comprised of 77 students separated into two classes. There are a control and an experimental group in the study. The instruments include the feedback questionnaires of the cooperative learning method Jigsaw IV and the English achievement tests. Both quantitative and qualitative methods were employed to collect and analyze data. The results showed that the Jigsaw IV technique contributed to the English learning achievement of the university-level students. Furthermore, the feedback questionnaires indicated that Taiwanese students had inconsistent opinions on Jigsaw IV method. Ultimately, students highlighted the important factors that made the Jigsaw IV method successful in their English learning.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

摘要
Abstract
Acknowledgments
Table of Contents
List of Appendix
List of Tables
1.Introduction
1.1 General Background Information
1.2 Purpose of the Study
1.3 Research Question
1.4 Significant of the Research
2.Literature Review
2.1 Definition of the Cooperative Learning
2.1.1 Theoretical Background of the Cooperative Learning
2.1.2 Empirical Studies on the Cooperative Learning
2.2 Introduction of Cooperative Learning Method: Jigsaw
2.2.1 Theoretical Background of Jigsaw IV
2.2.2 Pedagogical background of Jigsaw IV
3. Method
3.1 Research Design
3.2 Participants
3.3 Instruments
3.4 Pedagogical Design for the Control Group and the Experiment Group
3.5 Procedures of the Treatment
3.6 Data Collection
3.7 Data Analysis
4. Results and Discussion
4.1 The Analysis of the Mock Exam of GEPT
4.2 The Analysis of the Midterm Exam and the Final Exam
4.3 Analysis of the Feedback Questionnaires on English Learning Attitudes toward Jigsaw IV Method
4.4 Results and Discussion of Open-ended Questions
5. Conclusion
5.1 Review of Research finding
5.2 Limitations of the Study and Recommendations for Future Research
References

LIST OF APPENDIX
Appendix A: The comparison of the different Jigsaw methods
Appendix B: (1) The feedback questionnaires on English learning attitudes toward Jigsaw IV cooperative learning method (Chinese version)
(2)The feedback questionnaires on English learning attitudes toward Jigsaw IV cooperative learning method (English version)
Appendix C: Lesson Plan
Appendix D: Mock Exam of GEPT
Appendix E: Quizzes of Expert Sheets
Appendix F: Individual Test Sheets
Appendix G: Midterm Exam Sheet
Appendix H: Final Exam Sheet
Appendix I: Team Assignment Sheet (S Type)

LIST OF TABLES
Table 2.1: Role assignment in cooperative learning method
Table 3.1: Gender distribution of the participants
Table 3.2: Age distribution of the participants
Table 3.3: Grade distribution of the participants
Table 3.4: English learning period distribution of the participants
Table 3.5: The class syllabus
Table 4.1: The mean scores of the mock exam of GEPT prior to the intervention
Table 4.2: The independent sample T-test of the mock exam of GEPT
Table 4.3: The mean scores of the midterm exam for the two groups
Table 4.4: The independent sample T-test of the midterm exam mean scores for the two groups
Table 4.5: The mean scores of the final exam for the two groups
Table 4.6: The independent sample T-test of the final exam for the two groups
Table 4.7: The percentage analysis and the average of means of the feedback questionnaires
Table 4.8: (1) Do you like the cooperative learning method Jigsaw IV this semester? Why or why not? Please specify your reasons
Table 4.9: (2) What did you learn in the cooperative learning method Jigsaw IV? What was the most helpful to you? Please give specific illustration (at least three points)
Table 4.10: (3) In the cooperative learning method Jigsaw IV, what were the advantages and disadvantages? (Please give two illustrations for each)
Table 4.11: (4) In the cooperative learning method Jigsaw IV, did you think that your learning attitude changed? Why or why not?
Table 4.12: (5) Did you have any suggestions or opinions for the cooperative learning method Jigsaw IV? Please write down your valuable opinions

Anderson, N.J. (2008). Active Skills for Reading: Book 3, 2nd ed. Boston: Heinle Cengage.
Aronson, E., &; Patnoe, S. (Eds). (1997). The jigsaw classroom: building cooperation in the classroom. Addison-Wesly Education Publisher.
Aronson, E., Stephan, C., Sikes, J., Blaney, N., &; Snapp, M. (1978). The Jigsaw Classroom. Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
Babbie, E. (1990). Survey Research Methods (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Buyukkaragoz S (1997). Program Development in Education. Konya: Öz E_itim Yayınları.
Chen, M. L. (2004). A study of the effects of cooperative learning strategies on student achievement in English as a foreign language in a Taiwan college. Dissertation Abstracts International , 175. (UNI No. 3120699)
Coelho, E. (1992). Jigsaw: Integrating language and content. In C. Kessler (Ed.). Cooperative language learning (pp. 129-152). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. California: Sage.
Das, J. P. (1995). Some thoughts on two aspects of Vygotsky’s work. Educational Psychologist, 30(2), 993-997.
Deutsch, M. (1949). An experimental study on the effects of cooperation and competition upon group process. Human Relations, 2, 199-231.
Dewey, J. (1940). Education Today. New York: Greenwood Press.
DeVries, D., &; Edwards, K. (1973). Learning games and student teams: their effects on classroom process. American Educational Research Journal, 10, 307-318
Doymus K (2007). The effect of a cooperative learning strategy in the teaching of phase and one-component phase diagrams. J. Chem. Educ., 84(11): 1857-1860.
Eck, R. V. (2006). Digital Game-Based Learning: It’s Not Just the Digital Natives Who Are Restless… EDUCAUSE Review, 41(2), 1-16.
Fidan N (1993). Okulda ö_renme ve ö_retme, [Learning and Teaching in Classroom Setting] Ankara: Alkım Yayınevi.
Ghaith, G., &; El-Malak, M. A. (2004). Effect of Jigsaw II on Literal and Higher Order EFL Reading Comprehension. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10(2), 105-115.
Gillies, R. M. (2007). Cooperative learning: integrating theory and practice. United States of America: Sage Publications.
Gillies, R. M., &; Ashman, A. F. (Eds). (2003). Cooperative learning: the social and intellectual outcomes of learning in groups. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Gömleksi, M. N. (2007). Effectiveness of cooperative learning (jigsaw II) method in teaching english as a foreign language to engineering students (case of firat university, turkey). European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(5), 613-625.
Hedeen T (2003). The Reverse Jigsaw: A process of cooperative learning and discussion. Teach. Sociol., 31(3): 325-332.
Holliday, D.C. (2000). The development of jigsaw in a secondary social studies classroom. Paper presented at the 2000 Midwest Educational Research Association (MWERA) Annual Conference in Chicago, IL.
Holliday, D.C. (2002). Jigsaw IV: Using Student/Teacher Concerns To Improve Jigsaw III. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&;_&;ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED465687&;ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&;accno=ED465687
Hunter, M. (1984). Knowing, Teaching and Supervising. In P.L. Hanford (ED). Using What We Know To Teach. Alexandria, VA. Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development, 169-192.
Jacobs, G. M., Power, M. A., &; Loh Wan Inn (2002). The teacher’s sourcebook for cooperative learning: Practical techniques, basic principles, and frequently asked questions. USA: Corwin Press.
Johnson, D. W., &; Johnson, R. (1975). Learning Together and Alone. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Johnson, D. W., &; Johnson, R. (1981). Effects of cooperative and individualistic learning experiences on interethnic interaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 454-459.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., &; Holubec, E. J. (1993). Circles of learning (4th ed.). Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., &; Holubec, E. J. (1994). The new circles of learning: Cooperation in the classroom and school. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R., &; Maruyama, G. (1983). Interdependence and interpersonal attraction among heterogeneous and homogeneous individuals: a theoretical formulation and a meta-analysis of the research. Review of Educational Research, 53, 5-54.
Johnson, D. W., &; Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Boston: Allyn &; Baon.
Johnson, D. W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R., Nelson, D., &; Skon, L. (1981). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 47-62.
Lai, Y. C. (2010). The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language. 13(4), 1-3. http://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume13/ej52/ej52r2/
Law, Y. K. (2008). Effects of cooperative learning on second graders' learning from text. Educational Psychology, Vol. 28 Issue 5, 567-582,
Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving Social Conflicts: Selected Papers on Group Dynamics. New York: Harper &; Brothers.
Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., &; White, R. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behaviour in experimentally created social climates. The Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 271-299.
Lightbown, P. M., &; Spada, N. (2006). How Languages are Learned. Third edition. Oxford University Press.
Maden, S. (2010). The effect of Jigsaw IV on the achievement of course of
language teaching methods and techniques. Educational Research and Review Vol. 5(12), 770-776. http://www.academicjournals.org/ERR
Massey, S. L. (2003). The Effects of Cooperative Learning Versus Traditional Classroom Instruction on Cognitive Achieve, Critical Thinking, and Attitudes toward Learning in Teams in a Physician Assistant Program. Dissertation, Andrews University.
Richards, J. C., &; Rodgers, T. S. (Eds.). (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rohrbeck, C. A., Ginsburg-Block, M. D., Fantuzzo, J. W., &; Miller, T. R. (2003). Peer-assisted learning interventions with elementary school students: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 240-257.
Sharan, S. (1980). Cooperative learning in small groups: recent methods and effects on achievement, attitudes, and ethnic relations. Review of Educational Research, 50, 241-271.
Sharan, S., &; Sharan, Y. (1976). Small-Group Teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Sharan, Y., &; Sharan, S. (1992). Expanding cooperative learning through group investigation. NewYork: Teachers College Press.
Slavin, R. (1977). Classroom reward structure: an analytical and practical review. Review of Educational Research, 47, 633-650.
Slavin, R. E. (1986). Using student team learning. Baltimore. MA: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Research on Elementary and Middle School.
Slavin, R. (1989). Cooperative learning and student achievement. In R.E. Slavin (ed.). School and Classroom Organization. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Slavin RE, Sharan S (1990). Comprehensive cooperative learning methods: Embedding cooperative learning in the curriculum and school, Cooperative Learning: Theory and Research. New York: Preston Pres.
Slavin, R. E. (1994). Using student team learning (4th ed.). Baltimore: Jones Hopkins University, Center for Research on Elementary and Middle Schools.
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (second ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Slavin, R. E., Hurley, E. A., &; Chamberlain, A. (2003). Cooperative learning and achievement: Research and theory. In N.J. Smelser &; P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social&; Behavioral Sciences. Oxford: Pergamon.
Slavin, R. E. (2006). Educational psychology: theory and practice (8th ed.). USA: Johns Hopkins University.
Stahl R (Ed). (1994). Cooperative learning in social studies: A handbook for teachers. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
Stevens, R. J., &; Slavin, R. E. (1995). The effects of Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) on academically handicapped and non- handicapped students’ achievement, attitudes, and metacognition in reading and writing. Elementary School Journal, 95(3), 241-262.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Process, ed. and trans. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner and E. Souberman, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Yin-kum Law. (2008). Effects of cooperative learning on second graders' learning from text. Educational Psychology, 28(5), 567-582.