跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.9.172) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/02/10 11:44
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:王雅卉
研究生(外文):Ya-Hui Wang
論文名稱:資訊揭露評鑑結果變動對企業經營績效之影響
論文名稱(外文):The Impact of Changes of Information Transparency and Disclosure Ranking Results on Firm Performance
指導教授:李婉真李婉真引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:健行科技大學
系所名稱:財務金融所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2013
畢業學年度:101
語文別:中文
論文頁數:54
中文關鍵詞:資訊揭露評鑑訊號發射理論經營績效
外文關鍵詞:the Information Disclosure and Transparency Ranking SystemSignaling TheoryFirm Performance
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:194
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
自1997年亞洲金融風暴發生,彰顯出投資大眾對於公司資訊不透明所隱含投資風險的疑慮,全球的投資人也開始意識到企業資訊透明度與公司治理的重要性。我國為了落實公司治理並鼓勵公司自願性資訊揭露,以提高企業資訊透明度,證券交易所及證券櫃檯買賣中心委託證券暨期貨市場發展基金會設置「資訊揭露評鑑系統」,此系統於2003年進行第一次辦理,係以全體上市櫃公司為評鑑對象。
本論文以台灣上市櫃公司的「資訊揭露評鑑系統」評鑑等級結果為研究基礎,研究期間為2007年至2010年(第五屆至第八屆),分析方式是把當屆評鑑等級與前一屆評鑑等級結果進行比較,來檢視評鑑等級進步或退步的公司在營運績效表現上是否不同。回顧過去文獻,有關企業資訊揭露與公司經營績效的研究,都以單年度的評鑑等級水準進行探討,本文則著重公司評鑑等級的變動,是否與公司未來經營績效的良窳具有相關性。本論文初步實證結果顯示,資訊揭露評鑑結果為進步或退步公司與當年度整體企業平均績效指標呈現不同結果,一般而言,退步公司的未來績效表現較差,支持資訊揭露評鑑結果與公司經營績效有關的論點。但進一步以迴歸分析檢驗,結果顯示無論在資訊揭露評鑑退步或進步公司,評鑑等級變動對於企業經營績效衡量指標,都未達預期的顯著性。但退步公司評鑑等級變動與企業經營績效呈現負相關的情形稍多於與進步公司經營績效呈現正相關的情形。整體而言,本文實證結果未能支持資訊揭露評鑑等級進步(退步)公司,傳遞企業未來經營績效變好(變差)訊息的假說。

Since the 1997 Asian financial tsunami occurred, revealing investors being worried about investing risks implied by information non-transparency, so that the worldwide investors began to note the importance of corporate information transparency and corporate governance. In order to encourage companies to implement voluntary information disclosure, Taiwan Securities and Futures Institute (SFI) began to implement the Information Disclosure and Transparency Ranking System in 2003 to reduce the information asymmetry in capital market. There are many studies in the Information Disclosure and Transparency Ranking System in Taiwan. However, most of them focused on the ranking level of information disclosure and the relationship to stock prices, and few of them focused on relationship between the change of appraisal ranking and transparency of voluntary information disclosure and the corporate performance. This research intended to explore the impact of change of ranking result on corporate performance.
The study period is from the year 2007 to 2010 (fifth to eighth appraisal) , all listed companies are included. The proxies of operating performance include EPS, ROA, ROE, Operating ROA, Sales growth rate, and Net profit margin. The preliminary empirical results show that there are differences of performance indicators among upgrade, downgrade and all companies. General speaking, performance of downgrade firms are worse than that of average. However, the regression analyses do not provide significant evidences on the relationship between change of ranking result and firm performance.

摘  要………………………………………………i
Abstract………………………………………………ii
誌  謝………………………………………………iii
目  錄………………………………………………iv
表目錄…………………………………………………vi
圖目錄…………………………………………………vii
第一章 緒論…………………………………………1
1.1 研究背景與動機…………………………………1
1.2 研究目的與貢獻…………………………………3
1.3 研究架構與流程…………………………………4
第二章 文獻探討……………………………………6
2.1 代理理論…………………………………………6
2.2 訊號發射理論……………………………………9
2.3 公司治理…………………………………………11
2.4 資訊揭露…………………………………………16
2.5 資訊揭露評鑑系統………………………………20
2.6 資訊揭露與公司經營績效………………………22
第三章 研究方法……………………………………25
3.1 資料來源與樣本選取……………………………25
3.2 研究期間…………………………………………26
3.3 經營績效衡量變數………………………………27
3.4 控制變數衡量……………………………………31
3.5 研究假說…………………………………………33
3.6 實證模型…………………………………………33
第四章 實證結果……………………………………35
4.1 研究期間受評公司與樣本公司績效變數………35
4.2 相關係數分析……………………………………36
4.3 迴歸分析-退步公司……………………………38
4.4 迴歸分析-進步公司……………………………41
4.5 迴歸分析-穩健測試……………………………44
第五章 結論與建議……………………………………47
5.1 研究結論…………………………………………47
5.2 研究建議…………………………………………48
參考文獻…………………………………………………49
簡  歷…………………………………………………54

中文文獻
(1)王大維,「公司治理相關要素與公司績效關聯性之研究-以台灣上巿公司為例」,淡江大學,碩士論文,民國九十二年。
(2)伍忠賢,公司治理的第一本書,商周文化,台北市,民國九十二年。
(3)何里仁,「公司治理之資訊透明度與績效評核關聯性之研究」,逢甲大學,未出版之碩士論文,民國九十二年。
(4)李亭誼,「董事身分特性與董監經理人相關資訊揭露程度關係之研究」,國立政治大學,未出版之碩士論文,民國九十二年。
(5)李幃宗,「資訊透明度、公司治理對公司經營績效之探討」,長庚大學企管研究所,碩士論文,民國九十七年。
(6)宋明&;#23791;,「公司治理、資訊揭露評鑑與公司股價之研究」,高雄應用科技大學,碩士論文,民國九十七年。
(7)林尚志,「我國公司治理評等指標建立之研究」,國立政治大學,碩士論文,民國九十三年。
(8)林瑞琴,「公司經營績效、公司治理與資訊透明度之關聯性」,輔仁大學,碩士論文,民國九十六年。
(9)林岳賢,「公司治理與資訊揭露透明度之關聯性探討-以台灣上市電子業為例」,淡江大學,未出版之碩士論文,民國九十五年。
(10)周瑤純,「董事會特性與資訊揭露水準之關係」,中原大學會計學系,碩士論文,民國九十六年。
(11)柯承恩,「我國公司監理體系之問題與改進建議(上)」,會計研究月刊,第一百七十三期,75 ~ 81頁,民國九十三年四月。
(12)陳依蘋,「透明度與企業價值」,會計研究月刊,第二百期,48 ~ 54頁,民國九十一年。
(13)陳美娟,「年報自願性揭露水準與公司特徵之關聯性研究」,國立政治大學,未出版碩士論文,民國八十六年。
(14)陳瑞斌、許崇源,「資訊揭露水準對於權益資金成本之影響」,東吳經濟商學學報,第六十一期,67 ~ 108頁,民國九十六年。
(15)葉銀華、李存修、柯承恩,公司治理與評等系統,商智文化,台北市,民國九十一年。
(16)葉銀華,「透明度要推行成功最重要的還是股東行動(實踐)主義」,會計研究月刊,第二百期,62 ~ 63頁,民國九十一年。
(17)崔震萱,「公司資訊揭露與公司績效」,國立交通大學,碩士論文,民國九十八年。
(18)張志裕,「董事會特性、資訊揭露與經營績效之關聯性研究」,中原大學,未出版之碩士論文,民國九十四年。
(19)張振山、包幸玉,「我國資訊公開制度之探討」,證券暨期貨月刊,第二十二卷第四期,15 ~ 24頁,民國九十三年。
(20)張麗真,「公司治理與資訊透明化之探討」,內部稽核,第四十八期,4 ~ 9頁,民國九十三年。
(21)黃品凱,「投信持股影響因素之研究」,台中健康暨管理學院,未出版之碩士論文,民國九十三年。
(22)黃寶潭,「董事會結構、所有權結構與公司資訊揭露水準」,明志技術學院,未出版之碩士論文,民國九十三年。
(23)黃馨嬅,「公司治理品質、經營策略對經營績效之影響-以通過中華公司治理協會公司治理評鑑之上市櫃公司為例」,國立臺北大學,碩士論文,民國九十九年。
(24)楊俊中,「股權結構與經營績效相關性之研究」,國立台灣大學會計學研究所,未出版之碩士論文,民國八十七年。
(25)蔡幸珊,「公司治理綜合之指標與公司績效之關聯性研究」,銘傳大學,未出版之碩士論文,民國九十四年。
(26)鄧宏旭,「公司治理、經營績效對資訊揭露影響之研究」,國立政治大學,未出版之碩士論文,民國九十六年。
(27)廖益興,「董監事獨立性、企業結構特徵與盈餘管理之關聯性研究」,台北大學,未出版之博士論文,民國九十三年。
(28)鄭芬梅,「台灣上市(櫃)公司資訊評鑑結果與企業價值之相關性研究」,東吳大學,碩士論文,民國九十九年。
(29)賴俊宇,「上櫃電子業經營績效分析,資料包絡分析法之應用」,銘傳大學未出版之碩士論文,民國八十九年。
(30)薛明玲,「資訊透明度與企業競爭力」,會計研究月刊,第二百期,14 ~ 15頁,民國九十一年。
(31)謝錦堂,「董事會功能理論模型之驗證:台灣上市公司董監事的觀點」,管理學報,第二十六卷第二期,127 ~ 144頁,民國九十七年。
英文文獻
(32)Alkhafaji, A. F., “Effective Boards of Directors:An Overview”, Industrial Management and Data Systems, 32, pp. 18-26, 1990.
(33)Agrawal, Anup, and Charles, R. Knoeber, “Firm performance and mechanisms to control problems between managers and shareholders”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31, pp. 377-397, 1996.
(34)Akerlof, G., “The Market for Lemons: Quality Uncertainty and Market Mechanism”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 85(3), pp. 488-500, 1970.
(35)Barnea, A., Haugen, R. Q., and Senbet, L.W., Agency Problems and Financial Contracting, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1985.
(36)Berle, A., and Means, G. C., The Modern Corporation and Private Property, MacMillan, 1932.
(37)Bushee, B., “The Influence of Institutional Investors on Myopic R &; D Investment Behavior”, The Accounting Review, 73(3), pp. 305-333, 1998.
(38)Brounen, D., Cools, J. R., and Schweitzer, M., “Information Transparency Pays: Evidence from European Property Shares”, Real Estate Finance, 18, pp. 11-39, 2001.
(39)Botosan, C. A., and Plumlee, M. A., Disclosure Level and Expected Cost of Equity Capital: An Examination of Analysts’ Rankings of Corporate Disclosure, Working Paper, 2000.
(40)Cadbury, A., “What are the trends in corporate governance? How will they impact your company?”, Long Range Planning Journal, 32(1), pp. 12-19, 1999.
(41)Chow, C. W., and Wong-Boren, A., “Voluntary Financial Disclosure by Mexican Corporations”, Accounting Review, 62, pp. 533-541, 1987.
(42)Claessens, S., Djankov, S., and Lang, L. H. P., “The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporation”, Journal of Finance Economics, 58, pp. 81-112, 2000.
(43)Cooke, T. E., “An assessment of voluntary disclosure in the annual reports of Japanese corporations”, The lnternational Journal 01 Accounting, 26(3), pp. 174-189, 1991.
(44)Daily, C. M., and Dalton, D. R., “Board of Directors Leadership and Structure: Control and Performance Implications”, Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 17(3), pp. 65-81, 1993.
(45)Davis, E. and Kay, J., European Mergers and Merger Policy, Oxford University Press, New York, 1993.
(46)Debreceny, R., and Rahman, A., “Firm-specific determinants of continuous corporate disclosures”, The International Journal of Accounting, 40(3), pp. 249-278, 2005.
(47)Diamond, D. and Verrecchia, R., “Disclosure, Liquidity, and the Cost of Capital”, Journal of Finance, 46, pp. 1325-1359, 1991.
(48)Durnev, Art and E. Han Kim, “Measuring Organizational Performance in the Absence of Objective Measures: The Case of the Privately-Held Firm and Conglomerate Business Unit”, Strategic Management Journal, 5, pp. 265-273, 2002.
(49)Dye, R., “Earnings management in an overlapping generation model”, Journal of Accounting Research, 26(2), pp. 195-235, 1988.
(50)EI-Gazzar, S. M., “Pre disclosure information and institutional ownership: A cross sectional examination of market revaluations during earnings announcement Periods”, The Accounting Review, 73(1), pp. 119-129, 1998.
(51)Elliott, R. K., and Jacobson, P. D., “Costs and Benefits of business information disclosure”, Accounting Horizons, 8, pp. 80-96, 1994.
(52)Eng, L. L., and Y. T. Mark, “Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22, pp. 325-345, 2003.
(53)Fama, E., and Jensen, M. C., “Agency Problems and Residual Claim”, Journal of Law and Economics, 26, pp. 327-349, 1983.
(54)Fama, E. F., Fisher, L., Jensen, M.C., and Roll, R., “The Adjustment of Stock Prices to New Information”, International Economic Review, pp. 1-21, 1969.
(55)Fan, J. P., and Wong, T. J., “Corporate ownership structure and the in formativeness of accounting eamings in East Asia”, Journal 01 Accounting and Economics, 33(3), pp. 401-425, 2002.
(56)Fama, E. F., and French, K. R., “The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns”, Journal of Finance, 47, pp. 427-465, 1992.
(57)Frost, C. A., Gordon, E. A., and Pownall, G., Disclosure, and emerging market companies'' access to capital in global equity markets, Financial Reporting Quality, 2006.
(58)Forker, J. J., “Corporate govemance and disclosure quality”, Accounting and Business Research, 22, pp. 111-124, 1992.
(59)Glosten, L., and P. Milgrom. Bid, “ask and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders”, Journal of Financial Economics, 14, pp. 71-100, 1985.
(60)Goodwin, J., and J. L. Seow, “The Influence of Corporate Governance Mechanisms on the Quality of Financial Reporting and Auditing:Perceptions of Auditors and Directors in Singapore”, Accounting and Finance, 42, pp. 195-224, 2002.
(61)Haniffa, R. M., and T. E. Cooke Culture, “Corporate Governance and Disclosure in Malaysian Corporations”, ABACUS, 38, pp. 317-349, 2002.
(62)Healy, P. M., and Palepu, K. G., “The Effect of Firms’ Financial Disclosure Strategies on Stock Prices”, Accounting Horizons, 7(1), pp. 1-11, 1993.
(63)Healy, P. M., Hutton, A. P., and Palepu, K. G., “Stock Performance and Intermediation Changes Surrounding Sustained Increases in Disclosure”, Contemporary Accounting Research, 16(3), pp. 485-520, 1999.
(64)Healy, P. M., and Palepu, K. G., “Information Asymmetry, Corporate Disclosure, and the Capital Markets: A Review of the Empirical Disclosure Literature”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31, pp. 405-440, 2001,
(65)H. Young Baek, Darlene R. Johnson, Joung W. Kim, “Managerial Ownership, Corporate Governance, and Voluntary Disclosure”, Journal of Business &; Economic Studies, 15(2), pp. 44-61, 2009.
(66)Jensen, M. C., and Meckling, W. H., “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, 3, pp. 305-360, 1976.
(67)Kee H. Chung, John Elder, and Jang-Chul Kim, “Corporate Governance and Liquidity”, Journal of financial and quantitative analysis, 45(2), pp. 265-291, 2010.
(68)Klein, A., “Audit Committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management”, Journal 01 Accounting and Economics, 33(3), pp. 375-400, 2002.
(69)Lang, M. H., and Lundholm, R. J., “Corporate Disclosure Policy and Analyst Behavior”, Accounting Review, 71, pp. 467-492, 1996.
(70)Leuz, C., and R. E. Verrecchia, “The economic consequences of increased disclosure”, Journal of Accounting Research, 38, pp. 91-124, 2000.
(71)Lowenstein, L., Financial Transparency and Corporate Governance, Columbia Law Review, 1996.
(72)Millestein, I. M., and P. W. MacAvoy, “The Active Board of Directors and Performance of the Large Publicly Traded Corporation”, Columbia Law Journal, 98, pp. 1283-1321, 1998.
(73)Myers, S. C., “Determinants of corporate borrowing” Journal of Financial Economics, 5, pp. 147-175, 1977.
(74)Prowse, S., Corporate Governance: Emerging Issues and Lessons from East Asia, Responding to the Global Financial Crisis- World Bank mimeo, 1998.
(75)Raffoumier, B., “The determinants of voluntary financial disclosure by Swiss listed companies”, The European Accounting Review, 4(2), pp. 261-280, 1995.
(76)Ravid, S. A., and Saring, O. H., “Financial Signaling by Committing to Cash Outflows”, Journal of Financial &; Quantitative Analysis, 26(2), pp. 165-181, 1991.
(77)Singhvi, S., and H. B. Desai, “An empirical analysis of the quality of corporate financial disclosure”, Accounting Review, 46, pp. 621-632, 1971.
(78)Richardson, V. J., “Information asymmetry and earnings management: Some evidence”, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 15(4) pp. 325-347, 2000.
(79)Ross, S., “Disclosure Regulation in Financial Market: Implications of Modern Finance Theory and Signaling Theory”, Key Issues in Financial Regulation, pp. 177-201, 1979.
(80)Schipper, K., “Commentary on earnings management”, Accounting Horizons, 3(4), pp. 91-102, 1989.
(81)Skinner, D., “Why Firms Voluntarily Disclose Bad News”, Journal of Accounting Research, 32, pp. 38-61, 1994.
(82)Spence, M., “Job Market Signaling”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), pp. 355-379, 1973.
(83)Stulz, R. M., “Globalization of equity markets and the cost of capita1”, Journal 01 Applied C, 12(3), pp. 8-25, 1999.
(84)Trueman, B., and S. Titman, “An explanation for accounting income smoothing”, Journal of Accounting Research, 26, pp. 127-139, 1988.
(85)Welker, M., “Disclosure Policy, Information Asymmetry and Liquidity in Equity Markets”, Contemporary Accounting Research, 11, pp. 801-827, 1995.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 9、許仁舉,數宗共有土地合併分割之探討,土地事務月刊,第380期,第4頁,2003年2月1日。
2. 5、巫惠玲,「共有物分割爭議處理之探討」,現代地政,第237期,第28-33頁,2001年3月。
3. 4、吳明軒,「試論不動分割之訴」,月旦法學雜誌,第81期,第77-91頁,2002年2月。
4. 3、李宏志,農業發展條例第16條第2項1「分割後之宗數,不得超過共有人人數」之辯正,土地問題研究季刊,NO.40 (特刊),2011年11月。
5. (31)謝錦堂,「董事會功能理論模型之驗證:台灣上市公司董監事的觀點」,管理學報,第二十六卷第二期,127 ~ 144頁,民國九十七年。
6. (20)張麗真,「公司治理與資訊透明化之探討」,內部稽核,第四十八期,4 ~ 9頁,民國九十三年。
7. (19)張振山、包幸玉,「我國資訊公開制度之探討」,證券暨期貨月刊,第二十二卷第四期,15 ~ 24頁,民國九十三年。
8. (14)陳瑞斌、許崇源,「資訊揭露水準對於權益資金成本之影響」,東吳經濟商學學報,第六十一期,67 ~ 108頁,民國九十六年。
9. (12)陳依蘋,「透明度與企業價值」,會計研究月刊,第二百期,48 ~ 54頁,民國九十一年。
10. (11)柯承恩,「我國公司監理體系之問題與改進建議(上)」,會計研究月刊,第一百七十三期,75 ~ 81頁,民國九十三年四月。
11. 11、黃明芳,「談共有物分割判決判決主文之瑕疵」,現代地政,第48-50頁,1999年2月。
12. 12、黃明芳,「談共有物分割判決後,登記錯誤之更正」,現代地政,第34-37頁,1999年4月。
13. 13、陳明燦,共有物分割相關法律問題之探析,法令月刊,第五十八卷,第十一期,第17-35頁。
14. 16、鄭冠宇,「民法物權編關於「共有」部分之修正簡評」,月旦法學雜誌,第168期,2009年5月。
15. 19、溫豐文,「土地法第34條之1第1項的適用問題」,現代地政人與地,第63-66頁。