臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

教材在教學過程中扮演非常重要的角色，而教材的品質對於學習的成效，扮演關鍵性的角色。隨著雲端服務的興起、網路環境的進步，選擇雲端數位教材作為輔助教材的使用者亦快速增加中。由於雲端數位教材不同於傳統的數位教材，選用者在選擇上會有所困難，且雲端數位教材屬於新的研究領域，過去相關資料不多。因此本研究以高中數學為例，建構一個適合高中數學的雲端數位教材評估指標。本研究以修正式德菲法建構評估指標，並以國內外數位教材評鑑量表為基礎，推導出基本評估指標之五個構面：「教材內容」、「引導及支援」、「教學設計」、「教學媒體」及「相容模式」，再加上學習相關理論、雲端相關文獻及高中數學教材課程綱要，以補之不足，最後再由專家提供意見並進行修正指標。資料經分析後，本研究提出6個構面，共50雲端數位教材之評估指標，以供學術與實務上之參考。

Learning materials play a very important role in the teaching process. Therefore, the quality of learning materials for the effectiveness of learning has a great influence. With the rise of cloud services and advances in network environment, users who select the cloud learning materials as teaching aids are also rapidly increasing. As the cloud learning materials are different from traditional digital materials, the user will have difficulty making choices. Cloud learning materials belong to new areas of research, so over the past relevant data of cloud learning materials was few. Therefore, the study aims to construct evaluation indicators for senior high school mathematics materials. Using modified Delphi method, and based on digital materials evaluation scales, the study constructs five dimensions of evaluation indicators, including “Content,” “Navigation & Support,” “Instructional Design,” “Instructional Media,” “Compatibility Standards.” The study also uses study theories, cloud computing related literatures and the high school mathematics textbooks syllabus as supplements. At last the study corrects the evaluation indicators by expert advices. As the data are analyzed, the study proposes six dimensions of 50 cloud learning materials evaluation indicators for academic and practical reference.

目錄
摘 要 i
ABSTRACT ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 vi
圖目錄 vii
一、緒 論 2
1.1研究動機、目的 2
1.2論文架構 5
二、文獻探討 6
2.1數位教材品質評估指標 7
2.2學習相關理論 9
2.3雲端運算相關文獻 11
2.4高中數學課程教材規範 16
三、研究方法 22
3.1修正式德菲法 23
3.2研究變數 24
3.3專家學者群體 29
3.4資料分析方法與工具 30
四、研究結果 32
4.1第一回合修正式德菲法調查問卷分析 32
4.2第二回合修正式德菲法調查問卷分析 36
4.3雲端數位教材評估指標 40
五、結論及建議 50
5.1研究貢獻 50
5.2管理意涵 52
5.3研究限制與建議 53
參考文獻 55
附錄 58
附錄一：德菲法調查專家學者名單 58
附錄二：第一次德菲法調查問卷 59
附錄三：第二次德菲法調查問卷 65

[1]教育部, 2009, “高中課程綱要(99)-必修數學”, 2012年8 月1 9日, 擷取自：http://mathcenter.ck.tp.edu.tw/MCenter/Center/CourseOutline.aspx
[2]資策會FIND，2012，“2011全球上網行為大揭密”， 資策會FIND／經濟部工業局「電信平台整合資通訊應用推動計畫」，2012年8 月1 9日，擷取自：http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx?page=trend&id=1534
[3]數位教材品質服務中心, 2013, "數位教材認證規範", 2012年8月19日, 擷取自：http://www.elq.org.tw/teaching002.php
[4]ASTD, 2010, “ASTD Certification Institute E-Learning Courseware Certification Program”, 1640 King Street, Retrieved April 6 2013, from http://astd.org/content/education/certificateprograms/ecc/, 2010/3
[5]Castelletti et al., 2007, “Developments in Integrated Environmental Assessment”, Integrated and Participatory Water Resources Management: Practice, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 69-104.
[6]Couper M. R., 1984, “The Delphi technique: Characteristics and Sequence Model”, Advances in nursing science, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp.72-77.
[7]Dawson, M.D. & Brucker, P. S., 2001, “The Utility of the Delphi Method in MFT Research”, The American Journal of Family Therapy, Vol.29, No.2, pp.125-140.
[8]Delbecq A. L., Van de Ven A. H. & Gustafson D. H ,1975, “ Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Normal Group and Delphi Processes”, Foresman and Company Scott.
[9]Doody, D. G., et al., 2009, “Evaluation of the Q-Method as a Method of Public Participation in the Selection of Sustainable Development Indicators”, Ecological Indicators, Vol. 9, No. 6, pp. 1129-1137.
[10]E-learning Competency Centre, 2002, “Directory of E­learning providers ”, in Singapore 2002
[11]Fahety V., 1979, “Continuing Social Work Education: results of a Delphi Survey”, Journal of Education for Social Work, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp.12-19.
[12]Gartner, 2008, “Gartner Says Cloud Computing Will Be As Influential As E-business”, Retrieved Sep 23,2012 from http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=707508
[13]Gartner, 2009, “Gartner Identifies the Top 10 Strategic Technologies for 2010”, Retrieved Sep 23,2012 from http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/1210613
[14]Gartner, 2010, “Gartner Identifies the Top 10 Strategic Technologies for 2011”, Retrieved Sep 23,2012 from http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/1454221
[15]Gartner, 2011, “Gartner Identifies the Top 10 Strategic Technologies for 2012”, Retrieved Sep 23,2012 from http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1826214
[16]Gartner, 2012, “Media tablet”, Retrieved Sep 23,2012 from http://www.gartner.com/it-glossary/media-tablet/
[17]Green B., Jones M., Hughes D. & Williams A., 1999, “Applying the Delphi technique in a study of GPs’ information requirements”, Health and Social Care in the Community, Vol.7, No.3, pp.198-205.
[18]Harris, P., 2001, “Go in Mobile”, Retrieved October 25, 2008, from http://www.astd.org/LC/2001/0701_harris.htm.
[19]Holden M. C. & Wedman J. F., 1993, “Future issues of computer-mediated communication: The results of a delphi study”, Educational technology research and development, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp.5-24.
[20]Kern, T., Kreijger, J., & Willcocks, L., 2002, Exploring ASP as sourcing strategy: theoretical perspectives, propositions for practice. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol.11, No. 2, pp.153-177.
[21]Kristiansen, T., 2001, M-Learning. Experiences from the Use of WAP as a Supplement in Learning, Fornebu Knowation, Oslo.
[22]Lan YF, Sie YS, 2010, Using RSS to support mobile learning based on media richness theory. Computers & Education, Vol.55, No. 2, pp. 723-732.
[23]Linstone H.A. & Turoff M, 1975, The Delphi method: Techniques and applications, Addison­Wesley Publishing, USA.
[24]Milrad, M. & Sharples, M., 2007, “How Should Learning Activities Using Mobile Technologies be Designed to Support Innovative Educational Practices?”, IADIS International Conference Mobile Learning 2007, Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 28-30.
[25]Murphy, K. R. & Cleveland, J. N., 1995, Understanding Performance Appraisal Social, Organizational, and Goal-Based Perspectives, Sage, London.
[26]Murry J. W. & Hammons J. O., 1995, “Delphi: A versatile methodology for conducting qualitative research”, The Review of Higher Education, Vol.18, No.4, pp.423-436.
[27]NIST,2011,“NIST Cloud Computing Program”, Retrieved Feb 10,2013 from http://www.nist.gov/itl/cloud/index.cfm
[28]Okoli C. & Pawlowski S. D., 2004, “The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications”, Information & Management, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp.15-29.
[29]Pitt, L., 2011, “Business Value From Tablets.”, SIM Advanced Practices Council (APC), October 2011.
[30]Software Information Industry Association, 2001, “Software as a Service : Strategic 
Backgrounder”, Retrived Feb 10,2013 from http://www.siia.net/estore/ssb-01.pdf
[31]Sudman S., Bradburn N. M. & Schwarz N., 1996, Thinking About Answers: The application of cognitive processes to survey methodology, Jossey Bass.
[32]Trifonova, A., & Ronchetti, M., 2003, Where is mobile learning going?. In World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, Vol. 2003, No. 1, pp. 1794-1801
[33]Von Glasersfeld, E., 1989, Constructivism in education. In T. Husen & N. Postle- hwaite (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education. Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 162-163.
[34]Walsh, K. R., 2003, “Analyzing the Application ASP Concept: Technologies, Economies, and Strategies,” Communications of the Acm, Vol. 46, pp.103-107.
[35]Wang, 2007, “Performing a Course Material Enhancement Process With Asynchronous Interactive Online System”, Computers & Education, Vol. 48, No. 4, pp. 567-581..