跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.213.63.130) 您好!臺灣時間:2023/02/01 02:04
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:朱振逢
研究生(外文):CHU CHEN FONG
論文名稱:建構3D列印系統評選模式
論文名稱(外文):Constructing Selection Model for 3D Printing System
指導教授:張俊陽張俊陽引用關係
指導教授(外文):ZHANG JUN YANG
口試委員:張俊陽張添香黃照貴
口試委員(外文):ZHANG JUN YANGZHANG TIAN XIANGHUANG ZHAO GUI
口試日期:2014-07-11
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立高雄應用科技大學
系所名稱:資訊管理系碩士在職專班
學門:電算機學門
學類:電算機一般學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2014
畢業學年度:102
語文別:中文
論文頁數:80
中文關鍵詞:3D列印科技接受模型修正式德菲法修正後資訊系統成功模式評選模式模糊綜合評判
外文關鍵詞:3D PrintingTechnology Acceptance ModelModified Delphi MethodAmended Information System Success ModelSelection ModelFuzzy Synthetic Evaluation
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:567
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:17
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
由於過去鮮少3D列印系統評選模式的文獻,且目前實務界多以經驗模式或單一資訊系統角度來評選3D列印系統,此等評估方式往往無法完整考慮到3D列印的複雜特性,且評估指標的權重並非完全相等。
因此本研究提出一套整合文獻與專家意見的四階段評選模式,首先,第一階段利用DeLone資訊系統成功模式作為基礎發展雛型指標,第二階段結合3D列印的特性及科技接受模型推導出評選基礎構面,第三階段則運用修正式德菲法請專家進行構面及指標的修正與精簡,第四階段利用模糊綜合評判來決定評估指標的權重。最後,本研究結果提出五大構面:系統品質、資訊品質、服務品質、感知易用性及感知有用性,共49項評估指標及權重,且提供一則個案範例以說明指標與權重的用法。經由上述,本研究期望能給予企業評選3D列印系統時作為參考依據。


As historical literature were rarely themed in selection model of a 3D Printing System, and empirical model or a single information system has been the most selected perspective in practical field to evaluate the 3D Printing System at present, where such methods often failed to have an entire assessment in the complicated nature of 3D Print, plus that the evaluation index weights have not been completely equal.
Therefore, this study proposed a four-phased selection model integrating literature and expert opinions; firstly, Phase I used success of DeLone information system as the base to develop prototype index; secondly, the deduced dimension of evaluation foundation was through a combination of the features of 3D Print and Technology Acceptance Model; thirdly, the Modified Delphi Method was utilized in the modification and simplification of dimension and index by experts; fourthly, a fuzzy consolidated selection mode was used to determine the evaluation index weights. Finally, the findings proposed five dimensions: System quality, information quality, service quality, Perceived ease-of-use and Perceived usefulness, with a total of 49 evaluation indexes and weights, along with provision of a case sample to illustrate the use of indexes and weights. Combined as above, this study anticipates being for references of a company’s process in the evaluation of a 3D Printing System.

目錄
摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
誌謝 III
目錄 IV
表目錄 VI
圖目錄 VII
一、緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究動機與目的 2
1.3 論文架構 3
二、文獻探討 5
2.1 修正式德菲法 5
2.2 DELONE & MCLEAN修正後資訊系統成功模式 7
2.3 3D列印系統 9
2.3.1 3D列印之定義 9
2.3.2 3D列印之架構 9
2.3.3 3D列印之特性 10
2.4 科技接受模型 14
2.5 模糊綜合評判 14
三、研究方法 17
3.1 第一階段:文獻回顧及雛型指標設計 17
3.2 第二階段:雛型指標修正與分析 19
3.3 第三階段:雛型指標精簡 20
3.4 第四階段:評估指標權重分析 21
四、研究結果 22
4.1 第一階段:文獻回顧及雛型指標設計之結果 22
4.2 第二階段:雛型指標修正與分析之結果 28
4.3 第三階段:雛型指標精簡之結果 35
4.4 第四階段:評估指標權重分析 36
4.5 個案範例 52
五、結論與建議 57
5.1 研究貢獻 57
5.1.1 建構一套系統化的評選模式發展程序 57
5.1.2 擴充DeLone & McLean修正後資訊系統成功模式的使用範圍 57
5.1.3 實務貢獻 58
5.2 管理意涵 58
5.2.1 系統品質 58
5.2.2 資訊品質 58
5.2.3 服務品質 59
5.2.4 感知易用性 59
5.2.5 感知有用性 59
5.3 研究限制 60
5.4 未來研究建議 60
參考文獻 61
附錄一 修正式德菲法專家名單 65
附錄二 第一次德菲法調查問卷 66
附錄三 第二次德菲法調查問卷 72
附錄四 權重調查問卷 77

參考文獻
一、中文文獻:
1.3D System, (2013)。3D列印機購買指南。台北:實威國際。
2.BotFeeder, (2014)。3D列印材料。檢索日期:2014年7月1日,取自
http://www.botfeeder.com.tw/print_material.htm.
3.霍德與梅爾芭, (2014)。印出新世界:3D列印將如何改變我們的未來。台北:馥林文化。
4.詹姆斯, (2014)。3D列印無限可能:從打造自己的3D印表機到輸出個性化3D物件。台北:博碩文化。
5.中國機械工程學會, (2013)。3D列印.列印未來.從虛擬到實現:3D列印大時代全民化正式啟動。台北:佳魁文化。
6.吳懷宇, (2014)。原來世界不是平的:3D 列印+數位成像技術「凹凸」整個地球。台北:上奇時代。
7.郭少豪與呂振, (2014)。3D列印新浪潮:啟迪3D列印的未來。台北:佳魁文化。
8.資策會, (2013)。低階3D列印機快速成長 資訊服務商機浮現。檢索日期:
2014年7月1日,取自
http://www.mic.iii.org.tw/aisp/pressroom/press01_pop.asp?sno=345&cred=2013/10/24&type1=2.

二、英文文獻:
1.Chen, L. Y. & Wang, T. C., (2009), “ Optimizing Partners’ Choice in IS/IT Outsourcing Projects: The Strategic Decision of Fuzzy VIKOR”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 120, No. 1, pp. 233-242.
2.Chen, M. K., & Wang, S. C., (2010), “The Use of a Hybrid Fuzzy-Delphi-AHP Approach to Develop Global Business Intelligence for Information Service Firms”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 37, No. 11, pp. 7394-7407.
3.Davis, F. D., (1989), “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 319–340.
4.Delbecq, A. L., Van, D. V., & Gustafson D. H., (1975), “ Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes”, Scott, Foresman and Company.
5.DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R., (1992), “Information System Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable”, Information System Research, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 60-95.
6.DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R., (2003), “The DeLone & McLean Model of Information System Success: A Ten-Year Update”, Journal of Management Information System, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 9-30.
7.Gartner, (2013), “Gartner Identifies the Top 10 Strategic Technologies for 2014”, Gartner Symposium/ITxpo, Orlando , Florida, USA, Retrieved July 1, 2014, from http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2603623.
8. Gartner, (2013), “Gartner Says Early Adopters of 3D Printing Technology Could Gain an Innovation Advantage Over Rivals”, Gartner Symposium/ITxpo, Stamford , Connecticut, USA, Retrieved July 1, 2014, from
http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2388415.
9. Gartner, (2013), “Gartner Says Early Adopters of 3D Printing Technology Could Gain an Innovation Advantage Over Rivals”, Gartner Symposium/ITxpo, Stamford , Connecticut, USA, Retrieved July 1, 2014, from
http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2388415.
10.Gartner, (2013), “Gartner Says Worldwide Shipments of 3D Printers to Grow 49 Percent in 2013”, Gartner Symposium/ITxpo, Stamford , Connecticut, USA, Retrieved July 1, 2014, from http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2600115.
11.Gartner, (2013), “Gartner Says Worldwide Shipments of 3D Printers to Grow 49 Percent in 2013”, Gartner Symposium/ITxpo, Stamford , Connecticut, USA, Retrieved July 1, 2014, from http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2600115.
12.Gorla, N., Somers, T. M., & Wong, B., (2010), “Organizational Impact of System Quality, Information Quality, and Service Quality”, The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 207-228.
13.Green, B., Jones, M., Hughes, D., & Williams, A., (1999), “Applying the Delphi Technique in a Study of GPs' Information Requirements”, Health & Social Care in the Community, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 198-205.
14.Holden, M. C., & Wedman, J. F., (1993), “Future Issues of Computer-Mediated Communication: The Results of a Delphi Study”, Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 5-24.
15.IDC, (2013), “Market Growth Projections Indicate That 3D Printing Is Heading Toward Mainstream Adoption”, IDC, USA, Retrieved July 1, 2014, from http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS24524113.
16.Jiang, J. J., Klein, G., & Carr, C. L., (2002), “Measuring Information Systems Service Quality: SERVQUAL from the Other Side”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 145-166.
17.Klobas, J. E., (1995), “Beyond information quality: Fitness for purpose and 382 electronic information resource use”, Journal of Information Science, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp.95-114.
18.Khayun, V., & Ractham, P., (2011), “Measuring e-Excise Tax Success Factors: Applying the DeLone & McLean Information Systems Success Model”, 44th Hawaii International Conference, Hawaii, USA.
19.Liang, Z., Yang, K., Sun, Y., Yuan, J., & Zhang, H., (2006), “Decision Support for Choice Optimal Power Generation Projects: Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Model Based on the Electricity Market”, Energy Policy, Vol. 34, No. 17, pp. 3359-3364.
20.Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M., (1975), “The Delphi Method Techniques and Applications”, MA: Boston, USA , Addison-Wesley.
21.Mitchell, V. W., (1991), “The Delphi Technique: An Exposition and Application”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 333-358.
22.Mathieson, K., (1991), “ Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp.173-191.
23.Mathieson, K., & Chin, W. W., (2001), “Extending the Technology Acceptance Model: The Influence of Perceived User Resources”, The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp.86-112.
24.Nelson, R. R., Todd, P. A., & Wixom, B. H., (2005), “Antecedents of Information and System Quality: An Empirical Examination Within the Context of Data Warehousing”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 199-235.
25.Okoli, C., & Pawlowski, S. D., (2004), “The Delphi Method as a Research Tool: An Example, Design Considerations and Applications”, Information & Management, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 15-29.
26.Pitt, L. F., Watson, R. T., & Kavan, C. B., (1995), “Service Quality: A Measure of Information Systems Effectiveness”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 173-188.
27.Roger, E. M., (1983), “Diffusion of Innovation(3rd Edition)”, New York:Free Press.
28.Roger, E. M., (1995), “Diffusion of Innovation(4rd Edition)”, New York:Free Press.
29.Sedera, D., & Gable, G., (2004), “A Factor and Structural Equation Analysis of the Enterprise Systems Success Measurement Model”, 2004 25th International Conference on Information Systems(ICIS), Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 449-464.
30.Shing, G. L., Koh, C., & Nathan, R. J., (2012), “Service Quality Dimensions and Tourist Satisfaction towards Melaka Hotels”, International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering (IJEME), Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 26-32.
31.Skulmoski, G. J., Hartman, F. T., & Krahn, J., (2007), “The Delphi Method for Graduate Research”, Journal of Information Technology Education, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 1-21.
32.Tornatzky, L. G., & Klein, K. J., (1982), “Innovation Characteristics and Innovation Adoption Implementation: A Meta-Analysis of Findings”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 28-43.
33.Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A., (1995), “Decomposition and Cross Effects in the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Study of Consumer Adoption Intentions”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 12, pp. 137-155.
34.Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A., (1995), “Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Text of Competing Models”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 144-176.
35.Venkatesh, V., (1995), “Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model”, Information System Research, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 342-365.
36.Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P. A., (2005), “A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 85-102.
37.Xu, Y., Chan, A. P. C., & Yeung, J. F. Y., (2010), “Developing a Risk Asseddment Model for PPP Projects in China-A Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation Approach”, Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 19, No. 7, pp. 929-943.
38.Zhang, Z. J., (2010), “Feeling the Sense of Community in Social Networking Usage”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 57, No. 2, pp. 225-239.
39.Zimmermann, H. J., (1996), “Fuzzy Logic on the Frontiers of Decision Analysis and Expert Systems”, Biennial Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, Berkeley, CA.
40.Zongxian, Z., Yang, W., Xiaofei, X., & Ming, Z., (2012), “Risk Assessment of Concentrating Solar Power Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation”, Systems Engineering Procedia, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 99-106.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊