臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

新古典現實主義作為新興的巨型理論，應指導其他中小型理論，改善當前現實主義學派在安全研究的困境。因此，筆者嘗試探討新古典現實主義的哲學基礎，以及當前安全研究的發展與問題，希冀能發展出新的研究模式與分析架構。總體而言，本文主要目的有三。首先，從目前諸多學者對新古典現實主義的研究成果出發，結合古典現實主義的國家理論，與新現實主義的體系理論，試圖設計適切的跨層次分析模式。其次，討論目前現實主義學派受到的批判，以及其在安全研究上的挑戰與回應，藉此定義出主要的研究問題，並進行解決。最後，以聯盟理論、經濟安全與族群衝突為例，嘗試運用新古典現實主義的分析模式，結合目前紛雜的模式與政策，並說明未來可能的研究與實證方向。

Neoclassical Realism as a rising grand theory should instruct other models, and improve the realist school’s difficult situation in security studies. Therefore, Writer tries to investigate the philosophy ground of Neoclassical Realism, the development of security studies, and its problem. Hope this thesis can expand a newly research model and an analysis structure. Overall, there are three main purposes in the thesis. First, to begin with the research achievements of Neoclassical realists, combine with state theory of Classical realism, and systemic theory of Neorealism. Writer intends to design a proper cross-level analysis model. Second, writer will discuss the critique to Neorealist school, also to talk about the challenging and response of Neorealist school in security studies. In order to define the main research agendas, then resolving it. Finally, take alliance theory, economic security, and ethnic conflict for example, writer tries to apply the analysis model of Neoclassical realism, then combing the complicate issues and policies nowadays, in order to explain the possible research aspect and case studies in the future.

第一章 緒論.....................1
第一節 研究動機與目的.............1
第二節 研究途徑與方法.............6
第三節 研究問題與假設............10
第四節 研究架構.................11
第五節 研究範圍與研究限制.........12
第六節 文獻回顧.................14
第二章 新古典現實主義與安全研究....21
第一節 新古典現實主義的哲學基礎....21
第二節 新古典現實主義的變項關係....31
第三節 安全研究的困境與轉機.......38
第三章 多極體系下的聯盟與制衡......45
第一節 當前的研究取向............45
第二節 理論的重新定位............50
第三節 應用案例的範疇............55
第四章 單極體系中的經濟與安全......59
第一節 經濟安全的學術發展.........59
第二節 新古典現實主義與經濟治術....65
第三節 應用的範疇與限制...........71
第五章 國內安全困境下的族群衝突.....74
第一節 國際關係與族群衝突研究.......74
第二節 新古典現實主義的分析模式.....79
第三節 應用途徑與限制.............87
第六章 結論.....................90
第一節 研究發現..................90
第二節 未來展望..................93
參考書目 .........................95

參考書目
一、專書與專書論文
Allison, Graham T. Zelikow, Philip (1999), Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis (2nd ed.), New York: Longman,.
Brawley, Mark R. (2009), “Neoclassical Realism and Strategic Calculation: Explaining Divergent British, French, and Soviet Strategies toward Germany between the World Wars (1919-1939),” in Steven E. Lobell, Norrin M. Ripsman and Jeffrey W. Taliaferro, eds., Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.75-98.
Buzan, Barry (1991), People, State and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in Post~Cold War Era, Boulder CO: Lynne Rienner,.
Garnett, John (1987), “Strategic Studies and its Assumption,” in John Baylis eds., Contemporary Strategy: Theories and Concepts, New York: Holmes & Meier, Ch. 1.
Gilpin, Robert (1981), War and Change in International Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gilpin, Robert & Gilpin, Jean M. (2001), “The Study of International Political Economy,” Global Political Economy : Understanding the International Economic Order, United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, pp. 77-102.
Hobson, John M. (2000), “Weberian historical sociology,” The State and International Relations Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 174-214.
Kang, David C. (2008), China Rising-Peace, Power, and Order, New York: Columbia University Press.
Lobell, Steven E., Ripsman, Norrin M. and Taliaferro, Jeffrey W. (2009), Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lobell, Steven E. (2009), “Threat Assessment, the State, and Foreign Policy: a Neoclassical Realist Model,” Steven E. Lobell, Norrin M. Ripsman and Jeffrey W. Taliaferro, eds., Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , pp.42-74.
Michael Mastanduno (2003), “The Strategy of Economic Engagement: Theory and Practice,” in Edward Deering Mansfield & Brian M. Pollins eds., Economic Interdependence and International Conflict: New Perspectives on an Enduring Debate, USA: University of Michigan Press , pp. 175-185.
Morgenthau, Hans J. (2006), Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Rosecrance, Richard, Stein, Arthur A. (1993), The Domestic Base of Grand Strategy, New York: Cornell University Press, Chapter 1, pp. 3-22.
Snyder, Jack (1979), Myth of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition, New York: Cornell University Press.
Sterling-Folker, Jenniffer (2009), “Neoclassical Realism and Identity: Peril despite Profit across the Taiwan Strait,” in Steven E. Lobell, Norrin M. Ripsman and Jeffrey W. Taliaferro, eds., Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 99-138.
Victoria Tin-bot Hui (2005), War and State Formation in Ancient China and Early Modern Europe, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kenneth N. Waltz (2001), Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis, New York: Columbia University Press.
Waltz, Kenneth N. (1979), Theory of International Politics, New York: Addison-Wesley.
二、期刊論文
Angstrom, Jan & Duyvesteyn, Isabelle (2001), “Evaluating realist explanations of internal conflict: The case of Liberia,” Security Studies, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 186-218.
Baldwin, David A. and Pape, Robert A. (1998), “Evaluating Economic Sanctions”, International Security, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 189-198.
Baldwin, David A. (1999-2000), “The Sanctions Debate and the Logic of Choice”, International Security, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 80-107.
Betts, Richard K. (1997), “Should Strategic Studies Survive,” World Politics, Vol. 50, No. 1, , pp. 7-33.
Blanchard, Jean-Marc F.; Mansfield, Edward D.; Ripsman, Norrin M. (1999–2000), “The political economy of national security: Economic statecraft, interdependence, and international conflict”, Security Studies, Vol. 9, No. 1&2, , pp. 1-14.
Blanchard, Jean‐Marc F. & Ripsman, Norrin M. (1999-2000), “Asking the right question: When do economic sanctions work best,” Security Studies, Vol. 9, No. 1-2, pp. 219-253.
Brooks, Stephen G. & Wohlforth, William C. (2005), “Hard Times for Soft Balancing,” International Security, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 72-108.
Brooks, Risa A. (2010), “Sanctions and Regime Type: What Works, and When,” Security Studies, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 1-50.
Cable, Vincent (1995), “What is International Economic Security,” International Affairs, Vol. 71, No. 2, pp.306-324.
Cederman, Lars-Erik Wimmer (2010), Andreas and Min, Brian, “Why Do Ethnic Groups Rebel? New Data and Analysis,” World Politics, Vol. 62, No. 1, pp. 87-119.
Cha, Victor D. (2000), “Abandonment, Entrapmentm and Neoclassical Realism in Asia: The United States, Japan, and Korea,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 44, No. 2, p. 261-291.
Chan, Steve (2006), “The Politics of Economic Exchange: Carrots and Sticks in Taiwan-China-U.S. Relations,” Issues & Studies, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 1-22.
Christensen, Thomas J. & Snyder, Jack (1990), “Chain Gangs and Passed Bucks: Predicting Alliance Patterns in Multipolarity,” International Organization, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 137-168.
Copeland, Dale C. (1996), “Economic Interdependence and War: A Theory of Trade Expectations”, International Security, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 5-41.
Drezner, Daniel W. (1999), “The trouble with carrots: Transaction costs, conflict expectations, and economic inducements,” Security Studies, Vol. 9, No. 1-2, pp. 188-218.
Drezner, Daniel W. (2003), “The Hidden Hand of Economic Coercion”, International Organization, Vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 643-659.
Fearon, James D. (1995), “Rationalist Explanations for War,” International Organization, Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 379-414.
Fearon, James D. and Laitin, David D. (2003), “Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 97, No. 1, pp. 75-90.
Foot, Rosemary (2006), “Chinese Strategies in a US-hegemonic Global Order: Accommodating and Hedging,” International Affairs, Vol. 82, No. 1, pp. 77-94.
Gagnon, V.P., Jr. (1996), “Ethnic Nationalism and International Conflict: the Case of Serbia,” International Security, Vol. 19, No. 3 (1994-1995) pp. 130-166.
Gilpin, Robert, “No One Love a Political Realist,” Security Studies, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 3-26.
Glenn, John (2009), “Realism versus Strategic Culture: Competition and Collaboration,” International Studies Review, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 523-524.
Gray, Colin S. (1999), “Strategic Culture as Context: The First Generation of Theory Strikes Back,” Review of International Studies, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 49-69.
Grieco, Joseph M. (1988), “Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism,” International Organization, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 485-507.
Gourevitch, Peter (1978), “The Second Image Reversed: The International Sources of Domestic Politics,” International Organization, Vol. 32, No. 4, , pp. 881-911.
He, Kai (2012), “Underminig Adversaries: Unipolarity, Threat Perception, and Negative Balancing Strategies after the Cold War,” Security Studies, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 154-191.
Homolar, Alexandra (2010), “The Political Economy of National Security,” Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 410-423.
Huntington, Samuel P. (1993), “Why International Primacy Matters”, International Security, Vol.17, No. 4, , pp. 68-83.
Hyon Joo Yoo (2012), “Domestic Hurdles for System-driven Behavior: Neoclassical Realism and Missile Defense Policies in Japan and South Korea,” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 325-339.
Jervis, Robert (1988), “War and Misperception,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 675-700.
Kahler, Miles & Kastner, Scott L. (2006), “Strategic Uses of Economic Interdependence: Engagement Policies on the Korean Peninsula and Across the Taiwan Strait,” Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 43, No. 5, pp. 523-541.
Kalyvas, Stathis N. (2001), “ ‘New’ and ‘Old’ Civil Wars: A Valid Distinction? ” World Politics, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 99-118.
Kang, David C. (2003), “Getting Asia Wrong: The Need for New Analytical Frameworks,” International Security, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 57-85.
Kastner, Scott L. (2006), “Ambiguity, Economic Interdependence, and the US Strategic Dilemma in the Taiwan Strait,” Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 15, No. 49, pp. 651-669.
Kaufmann, Chaim (2006), “Rational Choice and Progress in the Study of Ethnic Conflict: A Review Essay,” Security Studies, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 178-207.
Kaufman, Stuart J. (1996), “An ‘International’ Theory of Inter-Ethnic War,” Review of International Studies, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 149-171.
Kaufman, Stuart J. (1996), “Spiraling to Ethnic War: Elites, Masses, and Moscow in Moldova's Civil War,” International Security, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 108-138.
Kitchen, Nicholas (2010), “System Pressures and Domestic Ideas: A Neoclassical Realist Model of Grand Strategy Formation,” Review of International Studies, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp.117-143.
Krause, Keith & Williams, Michael C. (1996), “Broadening the Agenda of Security Studies: Politics and Methods,” Mershon International Studies Review, Vol. 40, No. 2, p. 229-254.
Kuik Cheng Chwee (2008), “The Essential of Hedging: Malaysia and Singapore’s Response to a Rising China,” Contemporary Southeast Asia, Vol. 30, No. 2, p. 159-185.
Lake, David A. & Rothchild, Donald (1996), “Containing Fear: The Origins and Management of Ethnic Conflict,” International Security, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 41-75.
Layne, Christopher (1997), “From Preponderance to Offshore Balancing: America’s Future Grand Strategy,” International security, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 86-124.
Legro, Jeffery and Moravcsik, Andrew (1999), “Is Anybody Still a Realist?” International Security, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 15-55.
Lenway, Stefanie Ann (1988), “Between War and Commerce: Economic Sanctions as a Tool of Statecraft”, International Organization, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 397-426.
Levy, Jack S. (2008), “Preventive War and Democratic Politics,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 1-24.
Lobell, Steven E. (2007), “The Second Face of Security: Britain’s ‘Smart’ Appeasement Policy towards Japan and Germany,” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 73-98.
Long, Andrew G. and Leeds, Brett Ashley (2006), “Trading for Security: Military Alliances and Economic Agreements”, Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 433-351.
Mahoney, James, ”After KKV: The New Methodology of Qualitative Research,” World Politics, Vol. 62, No. 1 (2010), pp. 120-147.
Mastanduno, Michael (1998), “Economics and Security in Statecraft and Scholarship”, International Organization, Vol. 52, No. 4, , pp. 825-854.
Mastanduno, Michael (1999), “Economic Statecraft, Interdependence, and National Security: Agenda for Research,” Security Studies, Vol. 9, No. 1-2, pp. 288-316.
Miller, Eric A. & Toritsyn, Arkady (2005), “Bringing the Leader Back In: Internal Threats and Alignment Theory in the Commonwealth of Independent States,” Security Studies, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 325-363.
Narziny, Kevin (2003), “The Political Economy of Alignment: Great Britain’s Commitment to Europe, 1905-39,” International Security, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 184-219.
Omar Shahabudin McDoom (2012), “The Psychology of Threat in Intergroup Conoict: Emotions, Rationality, and Opportunity in the Rwandan Genocide,” International Security, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 119–155.
Papayoanou, Paul A. & Kastner, Scott L. (1999), “Sleeping With the (potential) Enemy: Assessing the U.S. Policy of Engagement with China,” Security Studies, Vol. 9, No. 1-2, pp. 157-187.
Pape, Robert (2005), “Soft Balancing Against the United States,” International Security, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 7-45.
Paul, T. V. (2005), “Soft Balancing in the Age of U.S. Primacy,” International Security, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 46-71.
Posen, Barry (1993), “The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict,” Survival, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 27-47.
Rathbun, Brian (2008), “A Rose by Any Other Name: Neoclassical Realism as the Logical and Necessary Extension of Structure Realism,” Security Studies, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 294~321.
Roe, Paul (1999), “The Intrastate Security Dilemma: Ethnic Conflict as a Tragedy,” Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 183-202.
Rose, Gideon (1998), “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy,” World Politics, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 144~172.
Rose, William (2007), “The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict: Some New Hypotheses,” Security Studies, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 1-51.
Rosecrance, Richard (1981), “Reward, Punishment, and Interdependence”, The Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 31-46.
Roth, Ariel Ilan (2006), “A Bold Move Forward for Neoclassical Realism,” International Studies Review, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 486-488.
Sambanis, Nicholas (2004), “What Is Civil War? Conceptual and Empirical Complexities of an Operational Definition,” The Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 48, No. 6, pp. 814-858.
Schweller, Randall L. (1994), “Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In,” International Security, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 72-107.
Schweller, Randall L. (2004), “Unanswered Threats: A Neoclassical Realist Theory of Underbalancing,” International Security, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp.159-201.
Schweller, Randall L., Wohlforth, William C. (2000), “Power Test: Evaluating Realism in Response to the End of the Cold War,” Security Studies, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 60-107.
Snyder, Glenn H. (1990), “Alliance Theory: A Neorealist First Cut,” Journal of International Affairs,” Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 104-106.
Snyder, Glenn H. (1991), “Alliances, Balance, and Stability,” International Organization, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 121-142.
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer (1997), “Realist Environment, Liberal Process, and Domestic-Level Variables,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 1~25.
Stein, Arthur A. (1982), “Coordination and Collaboration: Regimes in an Anarchic World,” International Organization, Vol. 36, No. 2, , pp. 299-324.
Taliaferro, Jeffrey W. (2004), “Power Politics and the Balance of Risk: Hypotheses on Great Power Intervention in the Periphery,” Political Psychology, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 177-211.
Taliaferro, Jeffrey W. (2006), “State Building for Future War: Neoclassical Realism and the Extractive State,” Security Studies, Vol. 15, No.3, pp. 464-495.
Tang, Shiping (2009), “The Security Dilemma: A Conceptual Analysis,” Security Studies, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 587-623.
Tang, Shiping (2009), “Taking Stock of Neoclassical Realism,” International Studies Review, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 799-803.
Tang, Shiping (2011), “The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict: Toward a Dynamic and Integrative Theory of Ethnic Conflict,” Review of International Studies, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 511-536.
Tessman, Brock F. (2012), “System Structure and State Strategy: Adding Hedging to the Menu,” Security Studies, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 192-231.
Walt, Steven M. (1985), “Alliance Formation and the Balance of World Power,” International Security, Vol. 9, No.4, pp.3~43.
Waltz, Kenneth N. (1993), “The Emerging Structure of International Politics”, International Security, Vol. 18, No. 2, , pp. 44-79.
Wendt, Alexander (1992), “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics,” International Organization, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 391-425.
Wendt, Alexander (1995), “Constructing International Politics,” International Security, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 71-81.
Williams, Michael C. (2004), “Why Ideas Matter in International Relations: Hans Morgenthau, Classical Realism, and the Moral Construction of Power Politics,” International Organization, Vol. 58, No. 4, pp. 633-665.
Wohlforth, William C. (1999), “The Stability of a Unipolar World,” International security, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 5-41.
Wucherpfennig, Julian, Metternich, Nils W., Cederman, Lars-Erik, and Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede (2011), “Ethnicity, the State, and the Duration of Civil War,” World Politics, Vol. 64, No. 1, pp. 79-115.
Zakaria, Fareed (1992), “Realism and Domestic Politics: A Review Essay,” International Security, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 177-198.