跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.85) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/14 11:20
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:林莉娜
研究生(外文):Mansjur, RinaNovita
論文名稱:Understanding Individual’s Charitable Giving Behavior: Moderating Effects of Social Norm and Social Justice
論文名稱(外文):Understanding Individual’s Charitable Giving Behavior: Moderating Effects of Social Norm and Social Justice
指導教授:林豪傑林豪傑引用關係
指導教授(外文):Hao Chieh Lin
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立成功大學
系所名稱:國際經營管理研究所碩士班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2013
畢業學年度:101
語文別:英文
論文頁數:112
外文關鍵詞:Charitable giving behaviorDemonstrable utilityFamilial utilityEmotional utilitySocial normSocial justice.
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:161
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
Individual charitable giving behavior takes an important role in our society. Despite the fact that the number of non-profit charitable organizations keeps increasing, the number of individual charitable giving is decreasing. This study thus applies the social exchange and the social impact theories to analyze the determinants of individual charitable giving behavior by exploring their perceived benefits; demonstrable utility, familial utility, emotional utility, together with their perceived social factors; social norm and social justice, which work as moderating variables between the perceived benefits and individuals’ charitable giving behavior, in the form of money donation or time donation (volunteering).
Statistical analyses based on a sample collected from 519 respondents in several countries reveal that demonstrable and emotional utilities are positively related with money donation while familial and emotional utilities are positively related with volunteering. Moreover, the two moderators of social norm and social justice show negative moderating effects on the relationships between familial and emotional utilities and money donation, as well as the relationship between familial utility and volunteering. The study contributes to the charitable giving literature by exploring the psychological and social factors as determinants of giving behaviors within the broad social contexts.

ABSTRACT I
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS II
TABLE OF CONTENTS III
LIST OF TABLES VII
LIST OF FIGURES IX
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Research Background and Motivation. 1
1.2 Research Objectives and Contributions. 7
1.3 Research Scope. 11
1.4 Research Procedures. 11
1.5 Research Structures. 13
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 14
2.1 Theoretical Background. 14
2.1.1 Social Exchange Theory. 14
2.1.2 Social Impact Theory. 16
2.2 Definition of Independent Variables. 18
2.2.1 Egoistic Motivation. 18
2.2.2 Altruistic Motivation. 20
2.3 Definition of Dependent Variable: Charitable Giving Behavior. 21
2.4 Definition of Moderating Variables. 22
2.4.1 Social Norm. 22
2.4.2 Social Justice. 25
2.5 Development of Research Hypotheses. 29
2.5.1 The Relationship between Demonstrable Utility and Charitable Giving Behavior. 29
2.5.2 The Relationship between Familial Utility and Charitable Giving Behavior. 30
2.5.3 The Relationship between Emotional Utility and Charitable Giving Behavior. 30
2.5.4 The Relationship between Social Norm and Charitable Giving Behavior. 31
2.5.5 The Relationship between Social Justice and Charitable Giving Behavior. 31
2.5.6 Social Norm as a Moderator. 32
2.5.7 Social Justice as a Moderator. 33
CHAPTER THREE RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY 35
3.1 Conceptual Model. 35
3.2 Definitions of Variables. 36
3.3 Summary of Hypotheses. 36
3.4 Construct Measurement. 37
3.4.1 Charitable Giving Behavior. 37
3.4.2 Demonstrable Utility. 39
3.4.3 Familial Utility. 39
3.4.4 Emotional Utility. 40
3.4.5 Social Norm. 41
3.4.6 Social Justice. 41
3.5 Sampling Plan and Data Collection. 42
3.6 Control Variables. 42
3.6.1 Age. 42
3.6.2 Gender. 43
3.6.3 Income. 44
3.6.4 Religious Affiliation. 44
3.6.5 Marital Status. 45
3.6.6 Number of Household. 45
3.6.7 Education. 45
3.6.8 Employment Status. 46
3.6.9 Nationality. 46
3.7 Method of Analysis. 46
3.7.1 Descriptive Statistic. 47
3.7.2 Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). 47
3.7.3 Reliability Test. 47
3.7.4 Pearson’s Correlation. 47
3.7.5 Hierarchical Regression Analysis. 48
3.7.6 Common Method Variance. 48
CHAPTER FOUR RESEARCH RESULT 49
4.1 Descriptive Analysis. 49
4.1.1 Sample and Data Collection Procedures. 49
4.1.2 Characteristics of Respondents. 50
4.2 Confirmatory Factor Analysis. 52
4.3 Reliability and Validity Test Analysis. 54
4.4 Pearson Correlation Analysis. 56
4.5 Hierarchical Multiple Regression Analysis. 58
4.5.1 Charitable Giving Behavior – Giving Money. 58
4.5.2 Charitable Giving Behavior – Giving Time. 71
4.6 Common Method Variance. 80
CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION 81
5.1 Discussion and Conclusion. 81
5.1.1 Theoretical Implications. 81
5.1.2 Managerial Implications. 92
5.2 Research Limitations. 94
5.3 Suggestion for Future Research. 95
REFERENCES 97
APPENDICES 107
Appendix 1: Questionnaires (English) 107
Appendix 2: Questionnaires (Indonesian) 110
Appendix 3: Goodness of Fit For the Measurement Model 112

Aggarwal, P. (2004). The effects of brand relationship norms on consumer attitudes and behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 87-101.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Amato, P. R. (1985). An investigation of planned helping behaviour. Journal of Research in Psychology, 19(2), 232-252.
Amos, O. (1982). Empirical analysis of motives underlying contributions to charity. Economic Journal, 10(4), 45-52.
Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. Economic Journal, 100(401), 464-477.
Aquino, K., & Douglas, S. (2003). Identity threat and antisocial behavior in organizations: The moderating effects of individual differences, aggressive modeling, and hierarchical status. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90(1), 195-208.
Ariely, D., Bracha, A., & Meier, S. (2009). Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. American Economic Review, 99(1), 544-555.
Austin, J. T., & Vancouever, J. B. (1996). Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content. Psychological Bulletin, 120(3), 338-375.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1), 1173-1182.
Batson, C. D., Fultz, J., & Schoenrade, P. A. (1987). Distress and empathy: Two qualitatively distinct vicarious emotions with different motivational consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(1), 19-39.
Batson, C. D., Oleson, K. C., Weeks, J. L., Healy, S. P., Reeves, P. J., Jennings, P., et al. (1989). Religious prosocial motivation: Is it altruistic or egoistic? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 873-884.
Batson, D. C. (1987). Prosocial motivation: Is it ever truly altruistic? In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press.
Becker, G. (1974). A theory of social interactions. Journal of Political Economy, 82(6), 1063-1093.
Begue, L. (2002). Beliefs in justice and faith in people: Just world, religiosity and interpersonal trust. Personality and Individual Differences, 32(3), 375-382.
Begue, L., & Muller, D. (2006). Belief in a just world as moderator of hostile attributional bias. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45(1), 117-126.
Bekkers, R. (2010). Who gives what and when? A scenario study of intentions to give time and money. Social Science Research, 39(3), 369-381.
Bekkers, R., & Wiepking, P. (2006). To give or not to give, thats the question: How methodology is destiny in dutch data. Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(3), 533-540.
Bendapudi, N., Singh, S. N., & Bendapudi, V. (1996). Enhancing helping behavior: An integrative framework for promotion planning. Journal of Marketing, 60(3), 33-49.
Bentley, R., Weber, A., & Hall-Russell, C. (1999). Religion, youth, and philanthropy: An annotated resource guide. Indianapolis: The Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University.
Berkowitz, A. D., & Trumansburg, N. Y. (2002). The social norms approach to preventing school and college age substance abuse: A handbook for educators, counselors, clinicians. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bernheim, B. D. (1994). A theory of conformity. Journal of Political Economy, 102(5), 841-877.
Blake, J., & Davis, K. (1964). Norms, values and sanctions. In R. E. L. Faris (Ed.), Handbook of modern sociology (pp. 456-484). Chicago: Rand McNally.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
Bloom, P. N., & Novelli, W. D. (1981). Problems and challenges in social marketing. Journal of Marketing, 45(2), 79-88.
Borsari, B., & Carey, K. B. (2003). Descriptive and injunctive norms in college drinking: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 64(3), 331-341.
Braus, P. (1994). Will baby boomers give generously. American Demographics, 16(7), 48-57.
Brown, E., & Ferris, J. (2002). Social capital in Los Angeles: Findings from the social capital community benchmark survey. Los Angeles: Center on Philantrophy and Public Policy.
Burnett, J. J. (1981). Psychographic and demographic characteristics of blood donors. Journal of Consumer Research, 8(1), 62-66.
Callan, M. J., Kay, A. C., Davidenko, N., & Ellard, J. H. (2009). The effects of justice motivation on memory for self- and other-relevant events. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 614-623.
Callero, P. L., Howard, J. A., & Piliavin, J. A. (1987). Helping behavior as role behavior: Disclosing social structure and history in the analysis of prosocial action. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(3), 247-256.
Capek, M. E. S. (2001). Women and philantrophy: Old streotypes, new challenges. San Fransisco, California: Women's Funding Network.
Cialdini, R., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015–1026.
Cialdini, R., & Trost, M. (1998). Social norms, conformity, and compliance. The Handbook of Social Psychology, 2(4), 151-192.
Cialdini, R. B., Arps, K., Fultz, F., & Beaman, A. (1987). Empathy based helping: Is it selfishly or selflessly motivated? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(4), 749-758.
Coles, R., & Brenner, J. (1969). American youth in social struggle: The Appalachian volunteers. American Journal Of Orthopsychiatry, 38(1), 31-46.
Conway, J., M., & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business Pyschology, 25(1), 325-334.
Cornwall, M. (1989). The determinants of religious behavior: A theoretical model and empirical test. Social Forces, 68(2), 572–592.
Croson, R., Handy, F., & Shang, J. (2009). Keeping up with the Joneses: The relationship of perceived descriptive social norms, social information, and charitable giving. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 19(4), 467-489.
Cunningham, M. R., Steinberg, J., & Greu, R. (1980). Wanting to and having to help: Separate motivations for positive mood and guilt-induced helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 181-192.
Dalbert, C. (1998). Belief in a just world, well-being and coping with an unjust fate. In L. Montada & M. Lerner (Eds.), Responses to victimizations and belief in the just world (pp. 87-105). New York: Plenum.
Dalbert, C. (1999). The world is more just for me than generally: About the personal belief in a just world scale's validity. Social Justice Research, 12(2), 79-98.
Dalbert, C., Montada, L., & Schmitt, M. (1987). Glaube an eine gerechte welt als motiv: Validierungskorrelate zweier skalen [Belief in a just world as motive: Validity correlates of two scales]. Psychologische Beitraege, 29(4), 596-615.
Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(1), 113-126.
Davis, M. H., Hull, J. G., Young, R. D., & Warren, G. G. (1987). Emotional reactions to dramatic film stimuli: The influence of cognitive and emotional empathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 126-133.
Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
Deutsch, F., & Lamberti, D. (1986). Does social aprroval increase helping? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12(2), 149-157.
Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2000). Introducing LISREL: A guide for the uninitiated. London: SAGE Publication.
Dovidio, J. F. (1984). Helping behavior and altruism: An empirical and conceptual overview. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 17, pp. 362-427). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Dunn, E. W., Aknin, L. B., & Norton, M. I. (2008). Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science, 319(5870), 1687-1688.
Edlund, J. E., Sagarin, B. J., & Johnson, B. S. (2007). Reciprocity and the belief in a just world. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(3), 589-596.
Einolf, C. J. (2008). Empathic concern and prosocial behaviors: A test of experimental results using survey data. Social Science Research, 37(4), 1267-1279.
Einolf, C. J. (2010). Does extensivity form part of the altruistic personality? An empirical test of Oliner and Oliner’s theory. Social Science Research, 39(1), 142-151.
Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2(1), 335-362.
Erkut, S., Jaquette, D. S., & Staub, E. (1981). Moral judgment-situation interaction as a basis for predicting prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(1), 1-15.
Farrington, J., & Farrington, C. (2005). Rural accessibility, social inclusion and social justice towards conceptualisation. Journal of Transport Geography, 13(1), 1-12.
Fehr, E., & Gachter, S. (2000). Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 159-181.
Furnham, A. (1995). The just world, charitable giving, and attitudes toward disability. Personality and Individual Differences, 19(4), 577-583.
Furnham, A. (2003). Belief in a just world: Research progress over the past decade. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(5), 795-817.
Gaube, T. (2006). Altruism and charitable giving in a fully replicated economy. Journal of Public Economics, 90(8-9), 1649-1667.
Gebauer, J. E., Riketta, M., Broemer, P., & Maio, G. R. (2008). Pleasure and pressure based prosocial motivation: Divergent relations to subjective well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(2), 399-420.
Gneezy, U., Meier, S., & Rey-Biel, P. (2011). When and why incentives (don't) work to modify behavior. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(4), 191-209.
Gollwitzer, M., Rothmund, T., Pfeiffer, A., & Ensenbach, C. (2009). Why and when justice sensitivity leads to pro- and antisocial behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(6), 999-1005.
Gremler, D. D., & Gwinner, K. P. (2000). Customer-employee rapport in service relationships. Journal of Service Research, 3(1), 82-104.
Gundlach, G. T., Achrol, R. S., & Mentzer, J. T. (1995). The structure of commitment in exchange. Journal of Marketing, 59(1), 78-92.
Hafer, C. (2000). Investment in long-term goals and commitment to just means drive the need to believe in a just world. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(9), 1059-1073.
Hagger, M., & Chatzisarantis, N. (2008). Self-determination theory and the psychology of exercise. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1(1), 79-103.
Hair, J. F. (1995). Multivariate data analysis with reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Halls.
Hair, J. R., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Havens, J. J., O'Herlihy, M. A., & Schervish, P. G. (2006). Charitable giving: How much, by whom, to what, and how. New Haven, CT: Yale Press.
Healy, K. (2006). Embedded altruism: Blood collection regimes and the european union's donor population. American Journal of Sociology, 105(6), 1633-1657.
Helms, S. E., & Thornton, J. P. (2012). The influence of religiosity on charitable behavior: A COPPS investigation. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 41(4), 373-383.
Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Special identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London: Routledge.
Homans, G. (1958). Social behavior as exchange behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597-606.
Homans, G. C. (1974). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Jackson, E. F., Bachmeier, M. D., Wood, J. R., & Craft, E. A. (1995). Volunteering and charitable giving: Do religious and associational ties promote helping behavior? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 24(1), 59-78.
Johnson, Diane, Erez, A., Kiker, D. S., & Motowidlo, S. J. (2002). Liking and attributions of motives as mediators of the relationship between individuals' reputation, helpful behaviors, and raters reward decision. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 87(4), 808-815.
Jones, A., & Posnett, J. (1991). Charitable giving by UK households: Evidence from the family expenditure survey. Applied Economics, 23(2), 343-351.
Jones, E. E., Jones, R. G., & Gergen, K. J. (1963). Some conditions affecting the evaluation of a conformist. Journal of Personality, 31(2), 270-288.
Judge, T. A., Erez, A., & Bono, J. E. (1998). The power of being positive: The relation between positive self-concept and job performance. Human Performance, 11(2-3), 167–187.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.
Kang, C., Handy, F., Hustinx, L., Cnaan, R., Brudney, J. L., Haski-Leventhal, D., et al. (2011). What gives? Cross-national differences in students’ giving behavior. The Social Science Journal, 48(2), 283-294.
Kim, J. S., Kaye, J., & Wright, L. K. (2001). Moderating and mediating effects in causal model. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 22(1), 63-75.
Kolstad, I. (2007). The evolution of social norms: With managerial implications. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 36(1), 58-72.
Konow, J. (2010). Mixed feelings: Theories of and evidence on giving. Journal of Public Economics, 94(3-4), 279-297.
Kotler, P. (1979). Strategies for introducing marketing into non-profit organizations. Journal of Marketing, 43(1), 37-44.
Latane, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36(4), 343-356.
Latane, B. (1996). Dynamic social impact: The creation of culture by communication. Journal of Communication, 46(4), 13-25.
Lee, L., Piliavin, J. A., & Call, V. R. A. (1999). Giving time, blood, and money: Differences and similarities. Social Psychology Quarterly, 62(3), 276-290.
Lerner, M. (1998). The two forms of belief in the just world: Some thoughts on why and how people care about injustice. In L. Montada & M. Lerner (Eds.), Responses to victimizations and belief in the just world (pp. 247-270). New York: Plenum.
Lerner, M. J., & Miller, D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85(5), 1030-1051.
Lin-Healy, F., & Small, D. A. (2012). Cheapened altruism: Discounting personally affected prosocial actors. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(2), 269-274.
Lipkus, I. (1991). The construction and preliminary validation of a global belief in a just world scale and the exploratory analysis of the multidimensional belief in a just world scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(11), 1171-1178.
Lipscomb, T. J., Larrieu, J. A., & Mcallister, H. A. (1985). A developmental inquiry into the effects of multiple models on childrens' generosity. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 31(4), 335-344.
List, J. A. (2011). The market for charitable giving. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(2), 157-180.
Locke, E. A. (1997). The motivation to work: What we know. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrick (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 375-412). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Inc.
Ma, E., & Qu, H. (2011). Social exchanges as motivators of hotel employees’ organizational citizenship behavior: The proposition and application of a new three-dimensional framework. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(3), 680-688.
Mackintosh, K. H. (1998). Bargaining policies and social exchange: Review of a neglected concept. Journal of Socio-Economics, 27(5), 565-585.
Maes, J., Tarnai, C., & Schuster, J. (2012). About is and ought in research on belief in a just world: The janus-faced just-world motivation. Germany: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Maner, J. K., & Gailliot, M. T. (2007). Altruism and egoism: Prosocial motivations for helping depend on relationship context. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(2), 347-358.
Manucia, G. K., Baumann, D. J., & Cialdini, R. B. (1984). Mood influences on helping: Direct effects or side effects? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(2), 357-364.
Martin, M. W. (1994). Virtuous giving: Philanthropy, voluntary service, and caring. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row.
Mesch, D. J., Rooney, P. M., Chin, W., & Steinberg, K. (2002). Race and gender differences in philantrophy: Indiana as a test case. Philantropic Fundraising, 2002(37), 65-77.
Midlarsky, E., & Hannah, M. E. (1989). The generous elderly: Naturalistic studies of donations across the life span. Psychology and Ageing, 4(3), 346-351.
Miller, D. T. (1977). Altruism and threat to a belief in a just world. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13(2), 113-124.
Miller, D. T. (1999). The norm of self interest. American Psychologist, 54(12), 1053-1060.
Mitchell, H. E., & Byrne, D. (1973). The defendant's dilemma: Effects of jurors' attitudes and authoritarianism on judicial decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25(1), 123-129.
Morgan, J. N., Dye, R., & Hybels, J. H. (1979). Results from two national surveys of philanthropic activity. Michegan: University of Michegan Press.
Morrissey, C. A., & Collett, J. L. (2007). Science of generosity. Indiana: University of Notre Dame.
Nettle, D. (1999). Using social impact theory to simulate language change. Lingua, 108(2-3), 95-117.
Nicholls, J. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91(3), 328-346.
Nichols, J. (1992). Targeting older America. Fund Raising Management, 23(3), 38-41.
Nowak, A., Szamrej, J., & Latane, B. (1990). From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. Psychological Review, 97(3), 362-376.
Oppenheimer, L. (2005). Justice and the belief in a just world: A developmental perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(8), 1793-1803.
Ouellette, J. A., & Wood, W. (1998). Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 124(1), 54-74.
Pedersen, E. R., Labrie, J. W., & Lac, A. (2008). Assessment of perceived and actual alcohol norms in varying contexts: Exploring social impact theory among college students. Addictive Behaviors, 33(4), 552-564.
Pessemier, E. A., Beamon, A. C., & Hanssen, D. M. (1977). Willingness to supply human body parts: Some empirical result. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(3), 131-140.
Piferi, R. L. (2006). Giving to others during national tragedy: The effects of altruistic and egoistic motivations on long-term giving. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(1), 171-184.
Pinder, C. C. (1998). Work motivation in organizational behavior. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Ranganathan, S. K., & Henley, W. H. (2008). Determinants of charitable donation intentions: A structural equation model. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 13(1), 1-11.
Rimal, R. N., & Real, K. (2003). Understanding the influence of perceived norms on behaviors. Communication Theory, 13(2), 184-203.
Robinson, S. L., & Leary-Kelly, A. (1998). Monkey see, monkey do: The influence of work groups on the antisocial behavior of employees. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 658-672.
Rosenblueth, A., Wiener, N., & Bigelow, J. (1943). Behavior, purpose, and teleology. Philosophy of Science, 10(1), 18-24.
Rothschild, M. L. (1979). Marketing communication in nonbusiness situations or why it is so hard to sell brotherhood like soap. Journal of Marketing, 43(2), 11-20.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self determination theory and the faciliation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
Sargeant, A. (1999). Charitable giving: Towards a model of donor behaviour. Journal of Marketing Management, 15(4), 215-238.
Sargeant, A., Ford, J. B., & West, D. C. (2006). Perceptual determinants of nonprofit giving behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59(2), 155-165.
Schervish, P. G. (1997). Inclination, obligation, and association: What we know and what we need to learn about donor motivation. San Francisco: Joseey-Bass.
Schervish, P. G. (2008). Why the wealthy give: Factor which mobilize philantrophy among high net-worth individuals. New York: Routledge.
Schervish, P. G., & Havens, J. J. (1997). Social participation and charitable giving: A multivariate analysis. Voluntas 8(3), 235-260.
Schervish, P. G., & Ostrander, S. A. (1990). Giving and getting: Philanthropy as a social relation. In Critical issues in american philanthropy stregthening theory and practice (pp. 67-98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 221-279). New York: Academic Press.
Shaw, B., & Post, F. R. (1993). A moral basis for corporate philantrophy. Journal of Business Ethic, 12(10), 745-751.
Small, D. A., & Simonsohn, U. (2008). Friends of victims: Personal experience and prosocial behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 532-542.
Snipes, R. L., & Oswald, S. L. (2010). Charitable giving to not-for-profit organizations: Factors affecting donations to non-profit organizations. Innovative Marketing, 6(1), 73-80.
Stavrova, O., Fetchenhauer, D., & Schlösser, T. (2012). Why are religious people happy? The effect of the social norm of religiosity across countries. Social Science Research, 42(1), 90-105.
Stevens, J. P. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social science applications (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Stroebe, W., & Frey, B. S. (1982). Self interest and collective action: The economics and psychology of public goods. British Journal of Social Psychology, 21(2), 121-137.
Teo, T. S. H., Lim, V. K. G., & Lai, R. Y. C. (1999). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage. Omega: International Journal of Management Science, 27(1), 25-37.
Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1994). Influence of experience on personal computer utilization: Testing a conceptual model. Journal of Management Information System, 11(1), 167-187.
Turner, C., & Oakes, P. J. (1986). The significance of the social identity concept for social psychology with reference to individualism, interactionalism and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25(3), 237-249.
Unger, L. S., & Thumuluri, L. K. (1997). Trait empathy and continuous helping: The case of voluntarism. Journal of Social Behavior, 12(3), 785-800.
Verhaert, G. A., & Van den Poel, D. (2011). Empathy as added value in predicting donation behavior. Journal of Business Research, 64(12), 1288-1295.
Watson, C., & Clark, L. (1984). Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychological Bulletin, 96(3), 465-490.
Webb, D., & Khoo, V. (2010). Exploring Singaporean giving behaviour to different charitable causes. Journal of Reserach for Consumers, 2010(18), 1-5.
Wegener, D., & Petty, R. (1994). Mood management across affective states: The hedonic contingency hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(6), 1034-1049.
Wright, B. (1983). Physical disability: A psychosocial approach. New York: Harper & Row.
Yavas, U., Riecken, G., & Parameswaran, R. (1981). Personality, organisation-specific attitudes, and socioeconomic correlates of charity giving behaviour. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 9(1), 52-65.
Zeithaml, V., Berry, L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996). The behavioral consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 31-46.

連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top