臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

經濟發展帶給我們豐腴的生活，而良好的環境可以帶給人民舒適的生活。本文首先利用過去國家經驗，討論政府環境支出與經濟成長的關係，然後利用內生成長模型，建構私部門、政府部門的理論模型，且環境支出為政府支出的一部分，探討政府環境支出比例對經濟成長的影響。接者使用數值模擬的方式，討論各種不同參數對經濟成長的影響，結果發現一開始政府環境支出與經濟成長有正向關係，隨著支出比例不斷增高，會使政府環境支出與經濟成長呈負相關。模擬結果也發現，經濟成長會與時間偏好率、風險趨避係數呈負相關，與稅率為非線性的關係。對於延續生命的願付價格，模擬結果顯示願付價格與時間偏好率、風險趨避係數呈現負相關，與年齡為正相關。

Economic development leads the population to have a wealthy life; well established environment is associated with sustainable economic growth. This research first looks at the stylized facts of country experiences to find the relationship between environmental expenditure and economic growth. There is no exact relationship between these two variables. Based on endogenous growth model, this research further provides analytical framework to investigate our concerns. Theoretical analysis and numerical simulation find that an increase in the ratio of environmental expenditure of output is associated with faster economic growth. However, as this ratio rises continually, the economic growth becomes slower. Furthermore, the economic growth rates decreases with the time preference rate and the coefficient of risk aversion. The relationship between economic growth and income tax is non-linear. The population is willing to pay more to enjoy good environment and longer life with smaller time preference rates, coefficients of risk aversion, and longer life expectancy at birth.

第一章 緒論 1
第一節 前言 1
第二節 研究動機與目的 6
第三節 本文架構 7
第二章 文獻回顧 8
第一節 環境支出為建設性支出之文獻 8
第二節 經濟成長理論文獻 13
第三節 經濟成長對環境是破壞或正面影響 13
第三章 理論模型 15
第一節 代表性家戶單位 15
第二節 一般均衡解 18
第三節 政府支出分配對經濟成長的影響 21
第四節 環境對消費的影響 22
第五節 環境支出為消費性支出 24
第四章 數值刻劃 26
第一節 財富與環境支出的關聯 26
第二節 數值模擬 29
第五章 結論與政策意涵 43
參考文獻 45
附錄 48

一.中文文獻
1.王銘正(2001)，《技術進步、環境品質與經濟成長》， 經濟論文叢刊，第二十九卷第二期，105-116頁。
2.李育明、葉欣誠、朱雲鵬(2006)，《經濟成長與永續發展模型：系統動態與一般均衡方法之應用》，桃園：國立中央大學臺灣經濟發展研究中心。
3.阮俊英、孫鈺峯(2013)，《環保支出、通貨膨脹和經濟成長之間的關聯》，經濟研究，第四十一卷第一期，1-30頁。
4.陳智華、蕭文宗、謝智源(2003) ，《內生化勞動休閒決策下污染與經濟成長的關係》， 經濟研究，第三十九卷第二期，147-172頁。
5.陳智華、謝智源(2008) 《汙染管制與經濟成長：一個不完全競爭的總體模型》，經濟論文叢刊，第三十六卷第三期，357-392頁。




二.英文文獻
1.Agénor, P. R.,(2008). Health and infrastructure in a model of endogenous growth. Macroeconomics, Vol.30(4), pp. 1407-1422.
2.Arrow, K., Bolin, B., Costanza, R., Dasgupta, P., Folke, C., Holling, C. S., Jansson,B.O., Levin,S., Maler, K. G., Perrings,C., and Dimentel, D. (1995). Economic growth,carrying capacity,and the environment. Science , Vol.268(5210) , pp.520-521.
3.Barro, R.J., and Sahasakul, C. (1984). Measuring the average marginal tax rate from the individual income tax. ,Journal of Business, Vol. 56, No. 4, pp. 419-452.

4.Barro,R.J. ,(1990),Government spending in a simple-model of endogenous growth. Political Economy, Vol.98, pp.103-125.
5.Bovenberg, A.L., and Smulders, S.,(1995) Environmental quality and pollution-augmenting technological change in a two-sector endogenous growth model. Public Economics ,Vol.57(3), pp.369-391.
6.Bovenberg, A. L., and Smulders, S. A.,(1996).Transitional impacts of environmental policy in an endogenous growth model. International Economic Review ,Vol.37,pp.861-893.
7.Byrne, M. M. ,(1997) Is growth a dirty word ? Pollution ,abatement and endogenous growth. Development Economics ,Vol.54(2),pp. 261-284.
8.Chen, B. L., (2006) Economic growth with an optimal public spending composition. Oxford Economic Papers, Vol.58(1),pp.123-136
9.Forster,B.A.(1973),Optimal capital accumulation in a polluted environment. Southern Economic Journal , Vol.39, pp.544-547.
10.Hall, R. E., and Jones, C. I. (2007). The value of life and the rise in health spending. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.122(1), 39-72.
11.Jones, L. E., Manuelli, R. E., and Rossi, P. E. (1993). Optimal taxation in models of endogenous growth. Journal of Political economy, Vol.101(3), pp.485-517.
12.Managi, S., and Kaneko, S. (2009).Chinese economic development and the environment. Edward Elgar Publishing
13.Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D., and Weil, D. N. (1992). A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 107(2), pp. 407-437.
14.Martínez-Alier, J., Pascual, U., Vivien, F. D., and Zaccai, E. (2010). Sustainable de-growth: Mapping the context, criticisms and future prospects of an emergent paradigm. Ecological Economics, Vol.69(9), pp.1741-1747.
15.Rosen,S.(1994). The quantity and quality of life: A conceptual framework.Valuing Health for Policy: An Economic Approach, Ed. by George Tolley, Donald Kenkel, and Robert Fabian, University of Chicago Press, Chicago
16.Smulders, S., and Gradus, R. (1996). Pollution abatement and long-term growth.European Journal of Political Economy, Vol.12(3),pp. 505-532.
17.Van den Bergh, J. C. (2011). Environment versus growth—A criticism of “degrowth and a plea for “a-growth.Ecological Economics, Vol.70(5), pp.881-890.
18.Van Der Ploeg, F., and Withagen, C. (1991) Pollution control and the Ramsey problem. Environmental and Resource Economics , Vol.1(2), pp. 215-236.