臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究目的在探討調控適配對運動表現的影響，調控焦點理論(Regulatory Focus Theory； Higgins, 1997)認為不論是個體或是環境線索當中都有兩種不同的焦點導向分別為「促進焦點」(promotion focus)與「預防焦點」(prevention focus)，過去的實證研究驗證當個人與環境焦點傾向一致時（調控適配），會有最適效果出現，過去許多研究也都驗證了此一假設。然而，在運動情境中卻少有研究者應用此一理論來探究其對運動表現的影響。有鑑於此，本研究招募五十一名大學生作為受試者進行簡單的投擲測驗，目的在檢驗當個體與情境的調控焦點適配時是否會產生最適效果。本研究先測量個體的調控焦點之後，接著在透過實驗設計對調控焦點進行操弄，實驗結果支持了本研究提出的假設：個人調控焦點的相對強度對投擲表現的影響，受到實驗操弄的調整。更清楚地說，結果顯示在促進焦點的操弄下，高相對強度對運動表現的影響被增強；同樣地，在預防焦點的操弄下，低相對強度對運動表現的影響也被增強。整體而言，本研究結果支持了調控焦點適配對運動表現具有影響效果。

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of regulatory fit on sport performance. According to Regulatory Focus Theory, it was proposed that both individual and environment have different orientations, namely promotion focus and prevention focus. Furthermore, when the focuses are congruent between person and environment, it would have optimal effect on individual’s performance. However, researchers rare applied regulatory focus theory in sport which resulted in a obviously gap in the literature. In the present study, the author recruited 51 participants to perform a simple throwing task in order to examine Regulatory Focus Theory. First, participants completed questionnaire to assess individual’s regulatory focus and then manipulating regulatory focus. It has been assumed that the effect of individuals’ chronic orientation on throwing performance was moderated by experimental manipulation. Results indicated that the relationship between high relative regulatory focus and throwing performance was enhanced under promotion condition. On the other hand, the relationship between low relative regulatory focus and throwing performance was enhanced under prevention condition. Overall, the results of this study support the effect of regulatory focus fit on sport performance.

第一章 緒論
第一節 調控焦點理論 1
第二節 調控焦點的操作方式 3
第三節 理論對於運動表現之影響 6
第四節 研究問題與目的 8
第五節 研究假設 9
第二章 研究方法
第一節 研究對象 10
第二節 研究工具 10
第三節 資料分析 12
第三章 研究結果
第一節 描述性統計與相關分析 13
第二節 主要研究發現 14
第四章 結論
第一節 研究結果討論 16
第二節 實務應用 17
第三節 研究限制 18
第四節 結論 18
參考文獻 19
附錄 21
表目錄
表3-1 各變項相關矩陣 13
表3-2 階層迴歸摘要表 14
圖目錄
圖3-1 情境操弄對相對強度的調節效果圖 15

楊淑雯（2010）。極大化傾向對後悔之影響：以調控焦點作為調節變項。國立臺灣大學理學院心理研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
顏志龍（2009）。死亡威脅下訊息參照架構對說服之影響：調控焦點的調節效果。中華心理學刊，51，2，235-250。
Aaker, J. L., &; Lee, A. Y. (2006). Understanding regulatory fit. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 15-19.
Aiken, L.S.,West, S. G., &; Krull, J. L. (1996). Experimental personality designs: Analyzing categorical by continuous variable interactions. Journal of Personality, 64(1).
Avnet, T., &; Higgins, E. T. (2006). How regulatory fit affects value in consumer choices and opinions. Journal of Markrting Research,43, 1-10.
Hamstra, M. R. W., Yperen, N. W. V., Wisse, B., &; Sassenberg, K. (2011). Transformational-transactional leadership styles and followers' regulatory focus fit reduces followers’ turnover intentions. Journal of Personnel Psychology,10(4), 182-186. doi: 10.1027/1866-5888/a000043.10.1027/a000001
Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300.
Higgins, E. T. (2005). Value from regulatory fit. Current Directions in Psychological Science,14(4), 209-213. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00366.x
Higgins, E. T., Cesario, J., Hagiwara, N., Spiegel, S., &; Pittman, T. (2010). Increasing or decreasing interest in activities: The role of regulatory fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(4), 559-572. doi: 10.1037/a0018833
Kutzner, F. L. W., Förderer, S., &; Plessner, H. (2012). Regulatory fit
20
improves putting in top golfers. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology. doi: 10.1037/a0030733
Latimer, A. E., Rivers, S. E., Rench, T. A., Katulak, N. A., Hicks, A., Hodorowski, J. K., …, Salovey, P. (2008). A field experiment testing the utility of regulatory fit messages for promoting physical activity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(3), 826-832. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.07.013
Lockwood, P., Jordan, C. H., &; Kunda, Z. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 854-864. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.83.4.854
McKay-Nesbitt, J., Bhatnagar, N., &; Smith, M. C. (in press). Regulatory fit effects of gender and marketing message content. Journal of Business Research. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.02.004
Plessner, H., Unkelbach, C., Memmert, D., Baltes, A., &; Kolb, A. (2009). Regulatory fit as a determinant of sport performance: How to succeed in a soccer penalty-shooting. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10(1), 108-115. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2008.02.001
Wang, J., &; Lee, A. Y. (2006). The role of regulatory focus in preference construction. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 28-38.
Worthy, D. A., Maddox, W. T., &; Markman, A. B. (2007). Regulatory fit effects in a choice task. Psychonomic Bulletin &; Review, 14(6), 1125-1132.
Yen, C. L., Chao, S. H., &; Lin, C. Y. (2011). Field testing of regulatory focus theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(6), 1565-1581.