臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

全球金融危機從2007年起開始快速傳播到世界各地，並影響到主要經濟體的銀行績效。許多國家的政府採用了各種干預政策，以恢復其本身金融體系。透過銀行績效的動態變化來檢驗政府干預前/後成長趨勢的差異。本研究採用分段潛伏趨勢模型。本研究使用的資料數據來自Bloomberg系統，收集五個亞洲主要經濟體包含日本、南韓、香港、新加坡和台灣地區的銀行。從2007年第四季到2010年第二季，共11期季資料來反映六個財務指標的償債能力、信用風險和獲利能力。全球金融危機下亞洲五個經濟體政府干預前/後的行為，銀行績效的變化趨勢已進行比較分析。我們的實證結果證明，平均而言，銀行績效在償債能力、信用風險和獲利能力方面在政府干預後的獲得改善。再者，政府干預行為對銀行績效的表現取決於所評估的財務指標、經濟體與銀行是否具國際化而有所影響。南韓和香港兩經濟體在政府干預後具有較強的銀行績效。南韓和香港所採用的有效性政策已被證明與討論。

The global financial crisis that started from 2007 onwards spread around the world and impacted the performance of banks in major economies. Many governments have used a variety of intervention policies to recover their financial systems. By examining the dynamic changes in bank performance before and after government intervention, this study demonstrates the use of the piecewise latent trajectory model. We used the data collected from Bloomberg for banks of five major Asian economies, Japan, South Korea, Hong Kong, Singapore and Taiwan, over the eleven-quarter period from the 4th quarter of 2007 to the 2nd quarter of 2010 on six financial performance indicators reflecting solvency, credit risk and profitability. The change patterns of bank performance before/after government intervention during the global financial crisis have been compared among the five economies. Our empirical results indicate that, on average, the bank performance in terms of solvency, credit risk, and profitability improves after government intervention. Moreover, the influence of government intervention on bank performance depends on the evaluative financial indicator, the economy, and whether banks are internationalized. South Korea and Hong Kong have been identified to be the economies with stronger bank performance after government intervention. Policies demonstrated useful in South Korea and Hong Kong have been summarized and discussed.

第一章 緒論 ........................................................................................................... 1
1.1 研究背景 ................................................................................................... 1
1.2 研究動機 ................................................................................................... 4
1.3 研究問題與目的 ....................................................................................... 4
1.4 研究流程 ................................................................................................... 6
1.5 研究範圍 ................................................................................................... 7
1.6 論文結構 ................................................................................................... 7
第二章 文獻回顧與研究假設 ............................................................................... 8
2.1 銀行財務績效指標 ................................................................................... 8
2.2 政府干預的效果 ....................................................................................... 9
第三章 研究方法 ................................................................................................. 14
3.1 資料來源 ................................................................................................. 14
3.2 財務指標 ................................................................................................. 15
3.3 分段潛伏趨勢模型 ................................................................................. 17
第四章 結果與討論 ............................................................................................ 27
4.1 政府干預前/後銀行績效成長趨勢之比較 ......................................... 27
4.2 各經濟體銀行績效成長趨勢之比較 ................................................... 38
4.3 政策意涵 ................................................................................................. 42
第五章 結論與建議 ............................................................................................. 48
5.1 結論 ......................................................................................................... 48
5.2 對投資者與政策決策者之建議 ............................................................. 49
5.3 研究限制與後續研究建議 ..................................................................... 49
參考文獻 …................................................................................................................... 50
附錄：SAS分析程式 …................................................................................................ 55

[1]Ackermann, J., 2008. The subprime crisis and its consequences. Journal of Financial Stability, 4, 329□337.
[2]Arena, M., 2008. Bank failures and bank fundamentals: A comparative analysis of Latin America and East Asia during the nineties using bank-level data. Journal of Banking and Finance, 32, 299□310.
[3]Arshadi, N., Lawrence, E. C., 1987. An empirical investigation of new bank performance. Journal of Banking and Finance, 11, 33–48.
[4]Barrell, R., Davis, E.P., Karim, D., Liadze, I., 2010. Bank regulation, property prices and early warning systems for banking crises in OECD economies. Journal of Banking and Finance, 34, 2255□2264.
[5]Berger, A. N., G. R. G. Clarke, R. Cull, L. Klapper, G. F. Udell., 2005. Corporate governance and bank performance: A joint analysis of the static, selection, and dynamic effects of domestic, foreign, and state ownership. Journal of Banking and Finance, 29, 2179–2221.
[6]Bhattacharyya, A., Lovell, C.A.K., Sahay, P., 1997. The impact of liberalization on the production efficiency of India commercial banks. European Journal of Operational Research, 98, 332□345.
[7]Bollen, K.A., Curran, P.J., 2006. Latent Curve Models: A Structural Equation Perspective. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
[8]Calomiris, C.W., Mason, J.R., 2001. Causes of U.S. Bank Distress during the Depression. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, May, 530□554.
[9]Central Bank of the R.O.C., 2009. Financial Stability Report (Issue No. 3). Central Bank of the R.O.C., May.
[10]Chan, D., 1998. The conceptualization and analysis of change over time: An integrative approach incorporating longitudinal mean and covariance structures analysis (LMACS) and multiple indicator latent growth modeling (MLGM). Organizational Research Methods, 1, 421-483.
[11]Chen, H.Y., Lee, C.F., Tai, T., Wang, K., 2011. Fiscal and monetary policies in reaction to the financial tsunami by the Taiwanese government. Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies, 14, 153□169.
[12]Cukierman, A., 2011. Reflections on the crisis and on its lessons for regulatory reform and for central bank policies. Journal of Financial Stability, 7, 26□37.
[13]Curran, p. J., 2003. Have multilevel models been structural equation models all along? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 38, 529-569.
[14]Curran, P. J., Baucer, D. J., 2007. Building path diagrams for multilevel models. Psychological methods. 12, 283-297.
[15]Diamond, D., Rajan, R., 2011. Fear of fire sales, illiquidity seeking, and credit freezes. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126, 557□591.
[16]Duncan, S. C., Duncan, T. E., Hops, H., 1996. Analysis of longitudinal data within accelerated longitudinal design. Psychological Methods, 1, 236-248.
[17]Flora, D.B., 2008. Specifying piecewise latent trajectory models for longitudinal data, Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 513□533.
[18]Goodhart, C.A.E., 2008. The regulatory response to the financial crisis. Journal of Financial Stability, 4, 351□358.
[19]Hildebrand, P.M., 2008. The sub-prime crisis: A central banker's perspective. Journal of Financial Stability, 4, 313□320.
[20]Hoshi, T., Kashyap, A.K., 2010. Will the U.S. bank recapitalization succeed? Eight lessons from Japan. Journal of Financial Economies, 97, 398□417.

[21]Hsiao, H.C., Chang, H., Cianci, A.M., Huang, L.H., 2010. First financial restructuring and operating efficiency: Evidence from Taiwanese commercial banks. Journal of Banking and Finance, 34, 1461□1471.
[22]Iannotta, G., G. Nocera, A. Sironi., 2007. Ownership structure, risk and performance in the European banking industry. Journal of Banking and Finance, 31, 2127-2149.
[23]Kawai, M., 2010. Reform of the international financial architecture: An Asian perspective. The Singapore Economic Review, 55, 207□242.
[24]Kim, B.H., Kim, S., 2012a. Transmission of the global financial crisis to Korea. Journal of Policy Modeling, doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2012.01.005.
[25]Kim, I.J., Rhee, Y., 2009. Global financial crisis and the Korean economy. Seoul Journal of Economics, 22, 145□179.
[26]Kim, J., Kim, Y.C., 2012b. Financial crisis and a transmission mechanism of external shocks: The signaling role of the Korean Monetary Stabilization Bond. Journal of Financial Stability, doi: 10.1016/j.jfs.2012.06.002.
[27]Krimminger, M.H., 2008. The resolution of cross-border banks: Issues for deposit insurers and proposals for cooperation. Journal of Financial Stability, 4, 376□390.
[28]Lee, C.P., 2009. Notable features of 2008 financial crisis and directions of adjustment by the Korean economy. Seoul Journal of Economics, 22, 181□215.
[29]Lee, K., Lee, C.H., 2008. The miracle to crisis and the mirage of the postcrisis reform in Korea: Assessment after ten years. Journal of Asian Economies, 19, 452□437.
[30]Li, F., Duncan, T.E., Duncan, S.C., Hops, H., 2001. Piecewise growth mixture modeling of adolescent alcohol use data. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 175□204.
[31]Littell, R.C., Milliken, G.A., Stroup, W.W., Wolfinger, R.D., Schabenberger, O., 2006. SAS for Mixed Models, second ed. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
[32]McDowell, D., 2012. The US as ‘Sovereign International Last-Resort Lender’: The Fed’s currency swap programme during the great panic of 2007–09. New Political Economy, 17, 157□178.
[33]Meyer, D. W., Markiewicz, M. K., 1997. Developing a balanced scorecard at Wachovia corporation. Bank Accounting and Finance, 11, 13–19.
[34]Mishkin, F.S., 1999. Lessons from the Asian crisis. Journal of International Money and Finance, 18, 709□723.
[35]Ongena, S., Smith, D.C., Michalsen, D., 2003. Firms and their distressed banks: Lessons from the Norwegian banking crisis. Journal of Financial Economies, 67, 81□112.
[36]Park, J.H., Lee, S., 2009. Global financial crisis: Background, prospects, and its impacts on Korea. Seoul Journal of Economics, 22, 77□94.
[37]Pasquariello, P., 2007. Informative trading or just noise? An analysis of central bank interventions. Journal of Financial Markets, 10, 107□143.
[38]Praet, P., Nguyen, G.., 2008. Overview of recent policy initiatives in response to the crisis. Journal of Financial Stability, 4, 368□375.
[39]Raddatz, C., 2006. Liquidity needs and vulnerability to financial underdevelopment. Journal of Financial Economies, 80, 677□722.
[40]Raveh, A., 2000. The Greek banking system: Reanalysis of performance. European Journal of Operational Research, 120, 525□534.
[41]Rotheli, T.F., 2010. Causes of the financial crisis: Risk misperception, policy mistakes, and banks’ bounded rationality. Journal of Socio-Economics, 39, 119□126.
[42]Sabi, M., 1996. Comparative analysis of foreign and domestic bank operations in Hungary. Journal of Comparative Economies, 22, 179□188.
[43]SAS Institute Inc., 2010. SAS/STAT User’s Guide (SAS 9.2). SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
[44]Simpson, W. G., T. Kohers., 2002. The Link between corporate social and financial performance: Evidence from the banking industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 35, 97-109.

[45]Sohn, W., 2010. Market response to bank relationships: Evidence from South Korea bank reform. Journal of Banking and Finance, 34, 2042□2055.
[46]Stojanovic, D., Vaughan, M.D., Yeager, T.J., 2008. Do federal home loan bank membership and advances increase bank risk-taking? Journal of Banking and Finance, 32, 680□698.
[47]Sturm, J.E., Williams, B., 2004. Foreign bank entry, deregulation and bank efficiency: Lessons from the Australian experience. Journal of Banking and Finance, 28, 1775□1799.
[48]Zhang, Y., Tong, S. T., 2009. Hong Kong’s Economy in the Financial Crisis. EAI Background Brief No. 448. National University of Singapore, Singapore.
[49]Zopounidis, C., 1998. Operational Tools in the Management of Financial Risk. Kluwer Academic Publishers Groups, New York.