(18.206.187.91) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/05/19 01:26
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:劉建利
研究生(外文):Chien-Li Liu
論文名稱:創業教育之核心能力與模式建構之研究
論文名稱(外文):A Study of Model Construction and Core Competencies of Entrepreneurship Education
指導教授:謝如梅謝如梅引用關係
指導教授(外文):Ru-Mei Hsieh
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立屏東科技大學
系所名稱:科技管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2013
畢業學年度:101
語文別:中文
中文關鍵詞:創業教育核心能力創業機會創業知識與能力創業精神
外文關鍵詞:Entrepreneurial EducationCore CompetencyEntrepreneurial OpportunityEntrepreneurial Knowledge and AbilityEntrepreneurship
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:349
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
以往創業教育相關研究中,都將重點放在整理各大專院校創業課程、學程的規劃與內容,歸納整體課程雛型架構,從課程比較分析得知課程屬性、特色及發展,雖課程的開設確實對實施創業教育甚為重要,但課程開設的前提是有須先瞭解台灣創業教育之核心能力究竟為何,再針對此核心能力,開設符合相關的核心課程。因此,本研究以探討創業教育之核心能力與模式建構為出發點,透過Colin and Jack (2004)之論點基礎,以三個構面:創業知識與能力、創業機會、創業精神作為創業教育之核心能力的初步架構,進一步聚焦探討台灣創業教育是否具有該核心的能力,調整其合適之完整架構模組。
本研究於過去的相關研究文獻中建立創業教育之核心能力初步架構,先以研究方法一(次級資料分析法),蒐集國內各代表大專院校與技專院校學程所開設課程模組與規劃、學校發展特色,與初步研究架構作驗證,並找出其有待釐清的缺口;接著再以研究方法二(內容分析法),經蒐集相關資料結果與分析,找出關鍵字眼,統計出現頻率次數,再擷取原句作者之看法與建議,進一步彙整做分析,最後與原架構相對照,重新修正架構,提出結論與建議供後續研究參考。

The previous education-related Entrepreneurship research would focus on preparation for planning and content of entrepreneurial courses, program by universities and colleges. And then its summarizing the framework across the curriculum. Besides, its knew that properties, characteristics, and development by comparing with courses analysis. It is important to offer the curriculum for the entrepreneurial education, but the premise that must understand what core competencies of entrepreneurship education is in Taiwan. At last, relational courses are offered according to the core competencies. Therefore, this study to explore Core Competencies of Entrepreneurial Education and model Construction as a starting point and follows Colin and Jack (2004) view. For the three aspects, entrepreneurial knowledge and ability, opportunity, and spirit become original model of entrepreneurial education. And focus on entrepreneurial education in Taiwan further if has the core competencies. However, adjusting suitable for a model.
There were two parts in this study. Study I used secondary analysis method to collect the representative for universities and technological colleges which offer courses module, planning, and schools develop characteristics. After its check with the original model and find out the need to be clarify from the gaps. Study II used content analysis. We collect relational data which find out key sentences and compute occurrence frequency. And then we retrieve meaning of original sentences, and analyze after summary. The results of study are compared with the original framework, and are revised the framework. At last we can get a new framework about core competencies of entrepreneurship education. According to the findings, I present its conclusions and suggestions for follow-up research.

摘要.............................I
Abstract.......................II
謝誌........................... IV
目錄............................ V
圖目錄........................VIII
表目錄........... ...............IX
第一章 緒論.............. 1
第一節 研究背景與動機....... 1
第二節 研究問題與目的....... 4
一、研究問題................ 4
二、研究目的................. 5
第三節 研究範圍.............. 6
第四節 研究流程.............. 7
第二章 文獻探討.............. 9
第一節 創業與創業教育......... 9
一、創業的源起與定義........... 9
二、創業教育的重要性與意涵...... 12
第二節 創業教育核心能力....... 14
一、創業能力................. 15
二、創業機會................. 17
三、創業精神.............. ........19
第三節 整合性研究架構............. 21
第三章 創業教育發展現況........... 26
第一節 台灣創業學程之概況.......... 26
第二節 整理分析.................. 27
第三節 小結..................... 33
第四章 研究方法.................. 35
第一節 內容分析法................ 35
第二節 研究過程.................. 39
一、內容分析之步驟................. 40
二、資料蒐集...................... 41
第五章 研究結果與分析..............45
第一節 資料來源與分類..............45
第二節 樣本概況.................. 47
第三節 內容分析結果............... 48
第四節 小結......................70
第五節 修正架構.................. 76
第六章 結論與建議................ 78
第一節 研究結論.................. 78
第二節 研究貢獻與意涵............. 80
第三節 實務貢獻與意涵............. 81
第四節 研究限制與未來研究方向....... 83
參考文獻......................... 84
中文部分......................... 84
英文部分......................... 86
附錄1 國內創業學程................ 92
附錄2 內容分析-創業管理期刊文獻清單.. 104
附錄3 TED演講內容逐字稿............ 105
作者簡介......................... 111

中文部分
1.經濟部中小企業處 (2012)。2012年中小企業白皮書。台北市:經濟部,檢索日
期:2012年10月。取自:http://incubator.moeasmea.gov.tw/
2.周春美 (2005)。創業教育及提昇商管群學生就業競爭力的有效策略。明道學術
論壇,1(1),15-30。
3.王宗坤 (2009)。大學創業精神經營之研究。國立台南大學教育經營與管理研究
所博士論文,未出版,台南市。
4.陳中慧 (2007)。高等技職校院教師專業發展能力內涵之研究-以中部一所國立
科技大學為例。國立雲林科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,雲
林縣。
5.崔慈悌(2013,1月3日)。馬英九:培育人才 動作一定要快。工商時報。搜尋
日期: 2013年1月5日。取自:http://tw.news.yahoo.com/
6.本報訊(2013,1月7日)。培育人才 學校與企業都有責任。台灣立報。搜尋日
期: 2013年1月10日。取自:http://tw.news.yahoo.com
7.劉常勇、謝如梅 (2006)。創業管理研究之回顧與展望:理論與模式探討。創業
管理研究,1(1),1-43。
8.羅宗敏、王俊人、許雄傑 (2007)。創業者人格特質對創業績效影響之研究:關
係網絡之中介效果。創業管理研究,2(4),57-88。
9.劉文龍 (2001)。創業管理教育課程設計之探索性研究。中山大學企研所碩士論
文,未出版,高雄市。
10.駱守儉(2012,1月18日)。創業精神:創業教育的核心。光明日報。
搜尋日期: 2013年1月11日。
取自:http://news.hexun.com.tw/2012-01-18/137367081.html
11.陳瑜芬、賴銘娟 (2007)。台灣創業課程現況之探究。創業管理研究,2(3),
1-25。
12.羅宗敏、王俊人、許雄傑 (2007)。創業者人格特質對創業績效影響之研究:
關係網絡之中介效果。創業管理研究,2(4),57-88。
13.吳思華 (2002)。從製造台灣到知識台灣。載於金誠 (Kim, W. Chan)等
著,應小端譯,創新,台北:天下遠見。
14.母國光 (2001)。創業教育觀點匯集。求是雜誌,18。取自:
http://www.qstheory.cn/
15.劉常勇 (2004)。創業管理的十二堂課。台北:天下文化。
16.大前研一 (2006)。創新者的思考。台北市:商周。
17.陳建源 (2008)。台灣大專院校創業教育與創業資源對於學生創業影響之研
究。逢甲大學科技管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台中市。
18.侯嘉政 (2008)。企業動態能力與創業管理之研究。創業管理研究,3(2),1-
28。
19.田芳華 (2000)。「學術調查研究資料庫資料使用手冊」,中央研究院調查研
究工作室,台北。
20.謝如梅 (2010)。創業認知觀點下的機會辨識過程-以創業警覺能力為中介變
項。國立中山大學企業管理研究所博士論文,未出版,高雄市。
21.楊孝榮 (1985)。內容分析,社會及行為科學研究法,第二十五章。東華社會
科學叢書,台北。
22.師曉莉 (2012)。淺談參與式教學法在創業教學中的運用。出國與就業:就業
教育,(6),53。

英文部分
1.Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., &; Ray, S. (2003). A Theory of
entrepreneurial opportunity identification and
development. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1): 105-
123.
2.Birley, S., &; Muzyka, D. F. (2000). Mastering
entrepreneurship: Pearson Education.
3.Bowen, D. D., &; Hisrich, R. D. (1986). The female entrepreneur: A careerdevelopment perspective, Academy of Management Review, 11(2),397-399.
4.Barringer, B. R., &; Bluedorn, A. C. (1999). The
relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and
strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5):
421-444.
5.Birkinshaw, J. (2000). Entrepreneurship in the global
firm. London: Sage Publications.
6.Brown, T. E., Davidsson, P., &; Wiklund, J. (2001). An
operationalization of Stevenson's conceptualization of
entrepreneurship as opportunity-based firm behavior.
Strategic Management Journal, 22(1), 953-968.
7.Berelson, B. (1952). Content Analysis in Communication
Research, New York Free Press.
8.Babbie, E. (1997). The Practice of Social Research. Cole
Publishing Company.
9.Budd, R. W., Thorp R. K., &; Donohew L. (1967). Content
Analysis of Communication, New York: The Macmillan Co.
10.Bowers, J.W. (1970). Content Analysis, in P. Emment and
W. Brooks (eds),Methods of Research in Communication,
Boston: Hougton Miffinco Press.
11.Colin, J., &; Jack, E. (2004). A Contemporary Approach to
Entrepreneurship Education. Education &; Training, 46(1),
416-423.
12.Cooper, A. ( 2003). Entrepreneurship: The Past, the
Present, the Future. In Acs Z.J. (eds.), Handbook of
Entrepreneurship Research, Kluwer Academic Publishers ,
21-36.
13.Collins, L., Hannon, P. D., &; Smith, A. (2004). Enacting
Entrepreneurial Intent: The Gaps Between Student Needs
and Higher Education Capability. Education &; Training,
46, 454-63.
14.Chandler, G. N., &; Hanks, S. H. (1994). Market
Attractiveness, Resource-Based Capabilities, Venture
Strategies, and Venture Performance. Journal of Business
Venturing, 9 (4), 331-349.
15.Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship :
Practice and Principles, New York: Harper and Row.
16.Dollingers, M. J. (2003), Entrepreneurship: Strategies
and Resources, Prentice Hall, (3ed.).
17.David. A. K., (2004). Point of View Entrepreneurship
Education: Can Business School Meet the Challenge.
Education &; Training, 46, 510-519.
18.Dollingers, M. J. (2003). Entrepreneurship: Strategies
and Resources (3ed.). Prentice Hall.
19.Flexman, N. A., &; Scanlan, T. J. (1982). Running Your Own
Business: How to Evaluate and Develop Your
Entrepreneurial Skills. Argus Communications.
19.Fisher, S. L., Graham, M. E., &; Compeau, M. (2008).
Starting from scratch, understanding the learning
outcomes of undergraduate entrepreneurship education.
Harrison R. T., &; Leitch C. M. (eds.), Entrepreneurial
learning, conceptual frameworks and applications. Oxon,
Great Britain: Routledge.
20.Gartner, W. B. (1985). A Conceptual Framework for
Describing the Phenomenon of New Venture Creation.
Academy of Management Review, 10 (4), 696-707.
21.Gottleib, E., &; Ross, J. A. (1997). Made not born: HBS
Courses and Entrepreneurial Management. Harvard Business
School Bulletin, 73, 41-45.
22.Griffiths, J. M., &; King, D.W. (1985). New Directions in
Library and Information Science Education, Greewood
Press, Westport, CT.
23.Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: The
contributing processes and the literatures. Organization
Science, 2(1), 88-115.
24.Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The
role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across
organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly,
44, 82-111.
25.Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content Analysis for the Social
Sciences Humanities Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley
Publishing Company Inc.
26.Ibrahin, A. B., &; Saufani, K. (2002). Entrepreneurship
Education and Training in Canada: A Critical Assessment.
Education &; Training, 44, 421-430.
27.Jones, C., &; English, J. (2004). A contemporary approach
to entrepreneurship education. Education+ Training,
46(8/9), 416-423.
28.Knight, G. A., &; Cavusgil, S. T. (2004), Innovation,
organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm.
Journal of International Business Studies, 35(4), 334-
351.
29.Kourilsky, M. L. (1995). Entrepreneurship education:
Opportunity in search of curriculum. Educational
Resources Information Center, ERIC: ED389347.
30.Kirzner, I. (1973) Competition and Entrepreneurship.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.Khilstrom, R., &; Laffont, J. (1979). A General
Equilibrium Entrepreneurship Theory of Firm Formation
Based on Risk Aversion. Journal of Political Economic,
87, 719-748
32.Kiecolt, K. J. &; Nathan E. (1988). Secondary Analysis of
Survey Data. California: Sage。
33.Low, M., &; MacMillan, I. C. (1988). Entrepreneurship:
Past Research and Future Challenges. Journal of
Management, 14: 139-161.
34.Luo, Y. (2000). Dynamic capabilities in international
expansion, Journal of World Business, 35(4), 355-378.
35.Lumpkin, G.T., &; Gregory, G. D. (1996). Clarifying the
Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to
Performance. Academy of Management Review, 21 (1), 135-
72.
36.Light, R. J.,& Pillemer, D. B. (1984). The Science of
Reviewing Research. Mass: Harvard University Press.
37.Martinez, A. C., Levie J., Kelly D., Sæmundsson R. J., &; 38.Schøtt T. (2012). A global perspective on education and
training. Thomas, H., &; Kelley, D. (eds.),
Entrepreneurship education in Asia, pp.41-95.
39.Miller, D. (1983). The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms. Management Science, 29, 770-791.
40.Rae, D. (2003). Opportunity centred learning: An
innovation inenterprise education? Education &; Training,
45(8/9): 542-549.
41.Ronsdant, R. (1984). The Corridor Principle, Journal of
Business Venturing, 3(1), 31-40,
42.Reynolds, P. D., Hay, M., &; Camp, S. M. (1999). Global
Entrepreneurship Monitor: 1999- Executive Report. Babson
College, London Business Seholl and the Kauffman Center
for Entrepreneurial Leadership.
43.Raposo, M., &; Do Paço, A. (2011). Entrepreneurship
education: Relationship between education and
entrepreneurial activity. Psicothema, 23(3), 453-457.
44.Ray, D. (1990). Liberal arts for entrepreneurs.
Entrepreneurship Theory &; Practice, 15(2): 79-93.
45.Shepherd, D. A., Douglas, E. J., &; Shanley, M. (2000).
New venture survival: Ignorance, external shocks, and
risk reduction strategies. Journal of Business Venturing,
15(5), 393-410.
46.Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic
Development, Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
47.Shame, W. (1974) . Venture Management: The Business of
the Inventor, Entrepreneur, Venture Capitalist, and
established Company, New York: The Free Press.
48.Siropolis, N. C. (1989). Small business management : A
guide to entrepreneurship (7th ed.). Boston: Houghton
Miffin, 27.
49.Shane, S., &; Venkataraman, S. (2000). The Promise of
Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research. Academy of
Management Review, 25(1), 217-226.
50.Sánchez, José C. (2011). University training for
entrepreneurial competencies: Its impact on intention of
venture creation. International Entrepreneurship and
Management Journal, 7(2), 239-254.
51.Sexton, D. L., &; Vesper K. H., (eds.) (1982).
Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship, Englewood, Cliffs,
N.J., Prentice Hall, 39-57.
52.Shepherd, J., Stein, K. &; Milne, R. (2000). Eye movement
desensitization and reprocessing in the treatment of
post-traumatic stress disorder: a review of an emerging
therapy. Psychological Medicine, 30, 863–871.
53.Solomon, G., Duffy, S., &; Tarabishy, A. (2002). The state
of entrepreneurship education in the United States: A
nationwide survey and analysis. International Journal of
EntrepreneurshipEducation, 1(1), 65-86.
54.Shane, S. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship,
the individual-opportunity nexus. Cheltenham, UK: Edward
Elgar.
55.Sarasvathy, S .D., Dew, N., Velamuri, S. R., &;
Venkataraman, S. (2003). Three Views of Entrepreneurial
Opportunity. Acs, Z. J., &; Audretsch, D. B. (eds.),
Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research, 141-160.
56.Shepherd, D., &; DeTienne, D. (2005). Prior knowledge,
potential financial reward, and opportunity
identification. Entrepreneurship Theory &; Practice,
29(1): 91-112.
57.Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of
entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4): 448-469.
58.Stevenson, H. H., Grousbeck, H. I.; Roberts, M. J. &;
Bhide, A. (2000). New Business Ventures and The
Entrepreneur (5th ed). Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
59.Stewart, D.W. (1984). Secondary Research: Information
Sources and Methods. Beverly Hills: Sage.
60.Timmons, J.A. (1999). New Venture Creation (5th ed).
Singapore: McGraw-Hill, 37-40.
61.Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of
entrepreneurship research: An editor’s Perspective. Katz,
J., &; Brockhaus, R. (eds.). Advances In entrepreneurship,
Firm emergence, and Growth, 3, 119-238. Greenwich, CT:
JAI.

連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top