跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(3.236.23.193) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/07/26 07:52
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:陳雪玲
研究生(外文):HSUEH LING CHEN
論文名稱:薪酬委員會是否能提升薪酬績效敏感度?
論文名稱(外文):Can Compensation Committee Increase Pay-Performance Sensitivity?
指導教授:林維珩林維珩引用關係
指導教授(外文):Wei Heng Lin
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺北商業技術學院
系所名稱:會計財稅研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:會計學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2013
畢業學年度:101
語文別:中文
論文頁數:37
中文關鍵詞:薪酬委員會薪酬績效敏感度公司治理
外文關鍵詞:compensation committeepay-performance sensitivitycorporate governance
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:319
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:27
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
我國於2010年11月24日訂立「證券交易法」第十四條之六條文,條文明確規定上市櫃與興櫃公司必須設置薪酬委員會,故本研究針對在法令的規範下,探討我國薪酬委員會之設置是否能提升薪酬績效敏感度,並提供董事會有關於我國設置薪酬委員會之規範及目前設置薪酬委員會的運作情形。本研究以上市櫃公司資料為研究對象,研究期間為2007年、2010年及2011年,共計三年。本研究結果發現,有設置薪酬委員會之公司相較於無設置薪酬委員會之公司未能顯著提升薪酬績效敏感度。研究結果亦發現,有設置薪酬委員會之公司相較於無設置薪酬委員會之公司,董事會有效性與薪酬績效敏感度呈反向關係。本研究結果可提供董事會審慎評估高階主管之薪酬與公司績效之關聯以及董事會結構之有效性,以做為強化公司治理之參考依據。
Section 14-6 of Securities Exchange Act is amended in November 24, 2010 to stipulate that corporations shall set up compensation committees. This research explores whether the mandatory compensation committee can increase pay-performance sensitivity and to provide the Board the specification establishment of compensation committee and operation model of compensation committee. The subject of this research is publicly listed companies from 2007, 2010 and 2011. The empirical results show that pay-performance sensitivity of the companies with compensation committees does not significantly differ from companies without compensation committees. In addition, the effectiveness of board is negative and significantly associated with association of pay-performance sensitivity and existence of compensation committees.
誌 謝 i
中文摘要 iii
英文摘要 iv
目錄 v
表目錄 vii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 研究問題 2
第三節 論文架構 3
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 國外設置薪酬委員會與薪酬績效敏感度 5
第二節 我國法令規範設置薪酬委員會之發展 7
第三節 董事會與薪酬績效敏感度 9
第三章 研究設計 12
第一節 研究假說 12
第二節 變數定義 14
第三節 實證模型 18
第四節 樣本選取 19
第四章 實證結果分析 20
第一節 研究期間及樣本資料來源 20
第二節 實證結果 21
第五章 結論與建議 32
第一節 研究結論 32
第二節 研究限制與未來研究方向 33
參考文獻 34

林淑惠與胡星陽,2003,「上市公司高階經理人之酬勞結構」,經濟論文,第31卷第2期:171-206。
洪玉舜與王泰昌,2005,高階主管薪酬與績效衡量指標關聯性影響因素之研究,2005會計理論與實務研討會,國立台灣大學會計系。,
張瑞當、林國欽、沈文華與侯佩秀,2007,高階經理人薪酬績效敏感度對自願性資訊發佈之影響,會計與公司治理,第4卷第1期(6月):57-84。
楊朝旭、吳幸蓁,2003,總經理薪酬績效敏感性、績效門檻與盈餘管理關聯性之研究,會計評論,第36期:55-87。
蔡柳卿,2006,依會計盈餘時效性設計高階主管薪酬契約:董事會所扮演的角色,會計評論,第44期:61-94。
Anderson, R. and J. Bizjak. 2003. An empirical examination of the role of the CEO and the compensation committee in structuring executive pay. Journal of Banking and Finance 27 (7):1323-1348.
Bayer, C. and C. Burhop. 2008. A corporate governance reform as a natural experiment for incentive contracts. Schmalenbach Business Review 60 (October):378-399.
Bender, R. and B. Porter. 2003. Setting executive directors' remuneration in listed companies. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research 1 (2):27-47.
Bushman, R., Q. Chen, E. Engel, and A. Smith. 2004. Financial accounting information, organizational complexity and corporate governance systems Journal of Accounting and Economics 37(7):167-201.
Cahan, S., F. Chua and R. Nyamori. 2005. Board structure and executive compensation in the public sector: New Zealand evidence. Financial Accountability & Management 21:437-465.
Chang, H., H. L. Choy, and K. M. Wan. 2008. Effect of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on CEOs' stock ownership and pay-performance sensitivity. Working Paper.
Chhaochharia, V. and Y. Grinstein. 2007. Corporate governance and firm value: the impact of the 2002 governance rule. The Journal of Finance 62 (4) (August):1789-1826.
Chung, H. J. 2009. Board independence and CEO incentives. Working Paper.
Conyon, M. J. 1997. Corporate governance and executive competition. International Journal of Industrial Organization 15 (4):493-510.
Conyon, M. J. and S. Peck. 1998. Board control, remuneration committees, and top management compensation. Academy of Management Journal 41 (2):146-157.
Conyon, M. J. and L. He. 2008. Executive compensation and CEO equity incentives in China's listed firms. Working Paper.
Core, J. E., R. W. Holthausen, and D. F. Larcker. 1999. Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics 51 (3):371-406.
David, P., R. Kochhar, and E. Levitas. 1998. The effect of institutional investors on the level and mix of CEO compensation. Academy of Management Journal 41 (2):200-208.
Fama, E. and M. Jensen. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law & Economics 26:301-325.
Ferri, F. and D. A. Maber. 2008. Say on pay vote and CEO compensation: evidence from the UK . AAA Management Accounting Section (MAS) Meeting Paper.
Frinkelstein, S. and D. C. Hambrick. 1989. Chief executive compensation: a study of the intersection of markets and political process. Strategic Management Journal 10:121-134.
Fu, C.J. 2001. Executive compensation, ownership, and firm performance. Sun Yat-sen Management Review (September):95-116.
John, T. A. and K. John.1993.Top-management compensation and capital structure. Journal of Finance48 (7):949-974.
Lipton, M. and J. W. Lorsch. 1992. A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. Business Lawyer 48:59-77.
Milliron, J. 2000. Board of director incentive alignment and the design of executive compensation contracts. 1999 AAA Meeting Paper.
Ortiz-Molina, H. 2007. Executive compensation and capital structure: the effects of convertible debt and straight debt on CEO pay. Journal of Accounting & Economics 43 (1):69-93.
Ozkan, N. 2009. CEO compensation and firm performance: an empirical investigation of UK panel data. Working Paper.
Schultz, E., G. Y. Tian, and G. J. Twite. 2012. Corporate Governance and the CEO Pay-Performance Link: Australian Evidence. Working Paper.
Singh, H. and F. Harianto. 1989. Management-board relationships, takeover risk, and the adoption of golden parachutes. The Academy of Management Journal 32:7-24.
Smith, G. and P. L. Swan. 2008. Too good to be true: do concentrated institutional investors really reduce executive compensation whilst raising incentives? Working Paper.
Stuart, O. and R. Watson. 2004. Remuneration committees and CEO pay in the UK privatized water industry. Socio-Economic Review 2:33-63.
Sun, J. and S. Cahan. 2009. The effect of compensation committee quality on the association between CEO cash compensation and accounting performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review 17 (2):193-207.
Ungson, G. R. and R. M. Steers. 1984. Motivation and politics in executive compensation. Academy of Management Review 9 (April):313-323.

連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top