臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

此論文之主要目的是檢視學習意圖對於學生動機歷程的影響，研究重點為學生的自律能力(self-regulatory capacity)。本研究預期建立一能測量學生學習意圖的量表，學習意圖可分成目標意圖和行動意圖兩大類，並依此量表研究學生學習意圖在英語學習中和自律能力的關係。
本研究初步先行建立學習意圖量表之題庫，並邀請一百一十六位高二學生參與預試。主成分分析和信度分析顯示學習意圖共可分為六個面向。在主要研究的問卷中，包含了修正過的英語學習意圖量表和英語學習自律能力量表，研究對象為四百一十二位高一及高二的學生。
研究結果顯示修正後學習意圖量表具有相當的穩定性，多元迴歸分析法印證了學習意圖可正向地預測學生英語學習自律能力，尤以行動意圖為甚。其中互動取向是本研究的新發現，印證了和外國人的互動的機會可對學生自我學習調整有顯著的影響。
本研究期望能幫助英語教師釐清目標的建立和關鍵情境(situational cues)的重要性，並且利用機會幫助學生主控其學習表現，最終能達成精熟的目的。

Researchers have long been interested in what motivates learners to transform thoughts into actions. The intention to learn tends to prevail over other competing motivational variables (Achtziger &; Gollwitzer, 2008). Dörnyei and Ottó (1998) were among the first L2 researchers who placed intentions as critical variables in the motivational activities in the Process Model of L2 Motivation. The model offered detailed description of L2 motivational process, but an explanation on the decisive factor to act still remained unsatisfactory. Consequently, the current research intends to borrow Gollwitzer’s (1999) implementation intentions because the construct is believed to complement goal intentions in that it specifies in advance when, where, and how one’s intentions are guided through the process. Furthermore, following the process model, Self-Regulatory Capacity (SRC) stands out for its facilitative nature to help learners adapt and sustain in pursuit of the goal. The current study is designed to distinguish goal intentions and implementation intentions and to measure L2 learning intentions and the effect on the motivational process based on a standard psychometric procedure.
Items for measuring goal intentions and implementation intentions in English learning were first developed, and 116 second-year high school students participated in the pilot study. Principal Component Analysis was adopted to explore the underlying traits of the two learning intentions. The result of the pilot study showed that two components for goal intentions and four components for implementation intentions were properly extracted. The questionnaire in the formal study included the revised intentional scales and the Self-Regulatory Capacity in Language Learning Scale constructed by Liu (2008). A total of 412 first-year and second-year high school students were recruited in the formal study. Multiple regression and correlation analysis were operated to investigate the predictability of L2 intentions in self-regulatory capacity and the relationships among the variables.
The findings suggest that while goal intentions and implementation intentions show an interaction effect with self-regulation, the decisive factor of implementation intentions commands an individual’s self-regulatory capacity. Interactive orientation, the new dimension extracted to highlight the interaction with people from the target language community, holds predictive power over one’s SRC. In addition, implementation intentions can function when based upon goal intentions, which confirmed the result of the previous studies.
With the development of the intentional scales and the findings of the multiple regression analysis, it is hoped that EFL teachers can have a clearer view on how to aid the learners to empower their learning performance with goal setting furnished with situational cues.

Chinese Abstract ............................................................................................................i
English Abstract ...........................................................................................................iii
Acknowledgement......................................................... ................................................v
Table of Contents ........................................................................................................vii
List of Tables ................................................................................................................ix
List of Figures ...............................................................................................................x

CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION
Background 1
Purpose of the Present Study 3
Significance of the Study 4
Definition of Terms 5
Goal Intentions 5
Implementation Intentions 5
Self-Regulatory Capacity 6
Organization of the Thesis 6

CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW
Theory of Intentions 9
Goal Intentions 9
Goal Intentions in L2 research 11
Implementation Intentions 15
Implementation Intentions in L2 research 18
Self-Regulatory Capacities 20
Zimmerman’s Social Cognitive Model of Self-Regulation 21
Winne &; Hadwin’s Four-stage Model of Self-Regulated Learning 22
Pintrich’s General Framework of Self-Regulated learning 24
Self-Regulation in L2 Research 26

CHAPTER THREE METHOD
Participants 30
The Pilot Study 30
The Formal Study 31
Instruments 31
Scale of Goal Intentions in Language Learning 32
Scale of Implementation Intentions in Language Learning 32
Scale of Self-Regulatory Capacity in Language Learning 33
Procedures 34
Item Analysis 31
Data Analysis 34

CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS
The Reliability Test of the Intentional Constructs 44
Correlation Analysis 47
The Effects of Intentions on Self-Regulatory Capacity 48

CHAPTER FIVE DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
Summary of Major Findings 52
Discussion 53
The Modification of Scale Items 53
The Conceptualization of Interactive Orientation 55
The Effects of Intentions on Self-regulatory Capacities 56
The Interplay between Goal Intentions and Implementation Intentions 58
Pedagogical Implications 59
Limitations of the Study 60
Suggestions for Future Research 61

REFERENCES ............................................................................................................64
APPENDICES .............................................................................................................75
Appendix A The Item Pool of Goal Intentions (in Chinese)………........................75
Appendix B The Item Pool of Goal Intentions (in English)……….........................76
Appendix C Item Pool of Implementation Intentions (in Chinese)……………......77
Appendix D Item Pool of Implementation Intentions (in English)..........................78
Appendix E Items of Goal Intentions for the Pilot Study in Chinese......................79
Appendix F Items of Goal Intentions for the Pilot Study in English.......................80
Appendix G Items of Implementation Intentions for the Pilot Study in Chinese....82
Appendix H Items of Implementation Intentions for the Pilot Study in English.....83
Appendix I Items of Goal Intentions for the Formal Study in Chinese..................85
Appendix J Items of Goal Intentions for the Formal Study in English...................86
Appendix K Items of Implementation Intentions for the Formal Study in Chinese…
..............................................................................................................87
Appendix L Items of Implementation Intentions for the Formal Study in English…
..............................................................................................................88
Appendix M Items of Self-regulatory Capacity in Chinese.....................................90
Appendix N Items of Self-regulatory Capacity in English......................................91

Achtziger, A., &; Gollwitzer, P. M. (2008). Motivation and volition in the course of action. In J. Heckhausen &; H. Heckhausen (Eds.), Motivation and action (pp. 272-295). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univer. Press.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50,179-211.
Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 665-683.
Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, personality, and behavior (2nd. Ed.). Milton-Keynes, England: Open University Press / McGraw- Hill.
Ajzen, I., &; Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
Armitage, C.J., &; Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471-499.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 1982, 37, 122-147.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Brandstӓtter, V., &; Lengfelder, A., &; Gollwitzer, P. M. (2001). Implementation intentions and efficient action initiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 946-960.
Butler, D. L., &; Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245 -281.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cohen, A-L., &; Gollwitzer, P. M. (2008). The cost of remembering to remember: Cognitive load and implementation intentions influence ongoing task performance. In M. Kliegel, M. McDaniel &; G. Einstein (Eds.) Prospective memory: Cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives (pp. 367-390). Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., &; Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 3rd Ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Conner, M., &; Armitage, C. J. (1998). Extending the theory of planned behavior: A review and avenues for further research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1429-1464.
Corno, L. (1993). The best-laid plans: Modern conceptions of volition and educational research. Educational Researcher, 22, 14-22.
Corno, L., &; Kanfer, R. (1993). The role of volition in learning and performance. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of Research in Education (Vol. 21, pp. 301-341). Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock Publishers.
Cullhane, S. F. (2003). Sojourner acculturation attitudes: Suggestions for learner motivation in second language acquisition (SLA). Research Bulletin (Kagoshima University) 55, 1-13.
Cullhane, S. F. (2004). An intercultural interaction model: Acculturation attitudes in second language acquisition. E-FLT Journal, 1, 50-61.
Cullhane, S. F., &; Umeda, C. (2004). Authentic second language interaction in an instructional Setting: Assessing an inter-class exchange programme. Regional Language Centre Journal, 35, 281-298.
Dai, M.-H. (2012). Constructing an L2 motivational model of planned learning behavior. Unpublished Master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.
Dai, M.-H., &; Tseng, W.-T. (2011). Measuring intention in language learning: A confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Reports, 108, 766-778.
Dörnyei, Z. (2001a). Teaching and researching motivation. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education Ltd.
Dörnyei, Z. (2001b). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Dörnyei, Z., &; Ottó, I. (1998). Motivation in action: A process model of L2 motivation. Working papers in Applied Linguistics (Thames Valley University, London), 4, 43-69.
Dörnyei, Z., &; Clément, R. (2001). Motivational characteristics of learning different target languages: Results of a nationwide survey. Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics Conference, Vancouver, Canada.
Gardner, R. C. (1985). The social psychology and language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.
Gardner, R. C. (2000). Correlation, causation, motivation, and second language acquisition. Canadian Psychology, 41(1), 10-24.
Gardner, R. C. (2001). Integrative motivation and second language acquisition. In Z. Dörnyei, &; R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language learning. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
Gardner, R. C. &; Lambert, W. E. (1959). Motivational variables in second language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 13, 266–272.
Gardner, R. C., Masgoret, A. M., Tennant, J., &; Mihic, L. (2004). Integrative motivation: changes during a year-long intermediate-level language course. Language Learning, 54, 1-34.
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1993). Goal achievement: The role of intentions. In W. Stroebe &; M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 141-185). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1996). The volitional benefits of planning. In P. M. Gollwitzer &; J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The social psychology and language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation (pp. 287-312). New York: Guilford.
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation Intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493-503.
Gollwitzer, P. M. &; Bargh, J. A. (Eds.). (1996). The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior. New York: Guilford Press.
Gollwitzer, P. M., &; Brandstӓtter, V. (1997). Implementation intentions and effective goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73,186-199.
Gollwitzer, P. M. &; Sheeran P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 249-268.
Gollwitzer, P. M., &; Fujita, K., &; Oettingen, G. (2004). Planning and the implementation of goals. In R. F. Bameister &; K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications. New York: Guilford.
Gollwitzer, P. M., Bayer, U., &; McCulloch, K. (2005). The control of the unwanted. In R. Hassin, J. Uleman, &; J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The new unconscious (pp. 485-515). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Guilloteaux, M. J., &; Dörnyei, Z. (2008). Motivation language learners: A classroom-oriented investigation of the effects of motivational strategies on student motivation. TESOL Quarterly, 42, 55-77.
Hatcher, L. (2013). Advanced statistics in research: Reading, understanding, and writing up data analysis results. Shadow Finch Media LLC.
Heckhausen, H. (1991). Motivation and action. New York: Springer.
Heckhausen, H., &; Kuhl, J. (1985). From wishes to action: The dead ends and short cuts on the long way to action. In M. Frese &; J. Sabini (Eds.), Goal-directed behavior: The concept of action in psychology (pp. 134-159). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Heckhausen, J. &; Heckhausen, H. (2008). Motivation and action. New York, NJ: Cambridge University Press.
Hernández, T. A. (2006). Integrative motivation as a predictor of success in the intermediate foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 39, 605-617.
Hernández, T. A. (2010). The relationship among motivation, interaction, and the development of second language oral proficiency in a study-abroad context. The Modern Language Journal, 94, 600-617.
Hofer, B., Yu, S., &; Pintrich, P. R. (1998). Teaching college students to be self-regulated learners. In D. H. Schunk &; B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 57–85). New York: Guilford.
Isabelli-García, C. (2006). Study abroad social networks, motivations and attitudes: Implications for second language acquisition. In M. DuFon &; E. Churchill (Eds.), Language learners in study abroad contexts (pp. 231-258). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Kuhl, J. (1984). Volitional aspects of achievement motivation and learned helplessness: Toward a comprehensive theory of action control. In B. A. Maher (Ed.), Progress in experimental personality research (Vol. 13, pp. 99-171). New-York: Academic Press.
Kuhl, J. (1987). Action control: The rnaintenance ofrnotivational states. In F. Halish, &; J. Kuhl (Eds.), Motivation, intention, and volition (pp.279-291). NY: Springer-Verlag.
Kuhl, J. (2008). Individual differences in self-regulation. In J. Heckhausen &; H. Heckhausen (Eds.), Motivation and action (pp. 296-322). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kuhl, J., &; Kraska, K. (1989). Self-regulation and rnetamotivation: rnechanisrns, developrnent, and assessrnent. In R. Kanfer, P. L. Ackerrnan, &; R. Cudeck (Eds.), Abilities, Motivation, and Methodology: The Minnesota Symposium on lndividual Differences (pp.343-374). Hillsdale: Erlbaurn.
Kuhl, J., &; Goschke, T. (1994). A theory of action control: Mental subsystems, modes of control, and volitional conflict-resolution strategies. In J. Kuhl and J. Beckmann (Eds.), Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation (pp. 93-126). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe &; Huber.
Lengfelder, A., &; Gollwitzer, P. M. (2001). Reflective and reflexive action control in patients with frontal lobe lesions. Neuropsychology, 15, 80-100.
Lewin, K. (1926). Vorsatz, wille und bedürfnis. Psgchologische Forschuns, 7, 330-385.
Liao, P. (2012). The handbook of research paper writing. Jong Wen Books Co., Ltd.
Lin, C.-W. (2003). A study of self regulation academic learning strategies of the senior (vocational) high school students. Chinese Annual Report of Guidance and Counseling, 13, 1-44.
Liu, H. T. (2008). Scale development and causal-effect studies of self-regulation in English language learning. Unpublished Master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.
Locke, E. A., &; Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting &; task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentic-Hall.
Masgoret, A. M., &; Gardner, R.C. (2003). Attitudes, motivation, and second language learning: a meta-analysis of studies conducted by Gardner and associates. Language Learning, 53, 123-163.
Odenthal, F. W. G., &; Gollwitzer, P. M. (2010). Self-efficacy moderate implementation intention effects. Self and Identity, 9, 177-194.
Oettingen, G., Servincer, G. M., &; Gollwitzer, P. M. (2008). Goal pursuit in the context of culture. In R. Sorentino, &; S. Yamagugi (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and motivation across cultures (pp. 191-211). San Diego, CA; London: Academic.
Orbell, S., &; Sheeran, P. (1998). Inclined abstainers: A problem for predicting health-related behavior. British Journal of Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 151-165.
Orbell, S., Hodgkins, S. and Sheeran, P. (1997). Implementation intentions and the theory of planned behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(9), 945–954.
Paris, S. G., &; Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36, 89-101.
Parks-Stamm, E. J., Gollwitzer, P. M., &; Oettingen, G. (2007). Action control by implementation intentions: Effective cue detection and efficient response initiation. Social Cognition, 25, 248-266.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In P. Pintrich, M. Boekaerts, &; M. Seidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 667-686.
Pintrich, P. R., &; Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in Education: Theory, research, and applications. NJ: Pearson Education.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., &; McKeachie, W. J.(1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) (Tech. Rep. No. 91-B-004). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, School of Education.
Pressley, M., &; Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Puustinen, M., &; Pulkkinen, L. (2001). Models of self-regulated learning: a review. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45, 269-187.
Rheinberg, F., Vollmeyer, R., &; Rollett, W. (2000). Motivation and action in self-regulated learning. In P. Pintrich, M. Boekaerts, &; M. Seidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 503-529). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Rubin, J., Chamot, A. U, Harris, V., &; Anderson, N. J. (2007). Intervening in the use of strategies. In A. D. Cohen &; E. Macaro (Eds.), Language learner strategies: 30 years of research and practice (pp. 141-160). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schmidt, R., &; Watanabe, Y. (2001). Motivation, strategy use, and pedagogical preferences in foreign language learning. In Z. Dörnyei &; R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (pp. 313-359). Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching Center.
Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-regulation through goal setting. ERIC/ CASS Digest ED462671.
Schunk, D. H., &; Zimmerman B. J. (Eds.) (1998) Self-regulated Learning: From teaching to Self-regulated Practice. New York: Guilford Press.
Schunk, D. H., &; Zimmerman B. J. (Eds.) (2008). Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory research, and applications. New York: Taylor &; Francis Group.
Sheeran, P. (2002). Intention-behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. In W. Hewstone, &; M. Stroebe (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 12, pp.1-36). Chichester, England: Wiley.
Sheeran, P., Webb, T. L., &; Gollwitzer, P. M. (2005). The interplay between goal intentions and implementation intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 87-98.
Shih, M. M. (2007). A study on Curriculum Integration in ELT Using Video-conferencing. Paper presented at the English Teachers’ Swap, Taipei, Taiwan.
Steffens, K. (2006). Self-regulated learning in technology enhanced learning environments: Lessons of a european peer review. European Journal of Education, 41, (3/4), 353-379.
Stevens, J. P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sutton, S. (1998). Predicting and explaining intentions and behavior: How well are we doing? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1317–1338.
Swales, J. M., &; Feak, C. B. (2004). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. The University of Michigan Press.
Tacq, J. (1997). Multivariate analysis techniques in social science research: From problem to analysis. SAGE Publications LTD.
Tseng, W.-T., &; Schmitt, N. (2008). Toward a model of motivated vocabulary learning: A structural equation modeling approach. Language Learning, 58, 357-400.
Tseng, W.-T., Dörnyei, Z., &; Schmitt, N. (2006). A new approach to assessing strategic learning: The case of self-regulation in vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 27, 78-102.
Turner, J. C. (1995). The influence of classroom contexts on young children's motivation for literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 410-441.
Webb, T. L., &; Sheeran, P. (2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 249-268.
Webb, T. L., &; Sheeran, P. (2008). Mechanisms of implementation intention effects: The role of goal intentions, self-efficacy, and accessibility of plan components. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 373–395.
Weiner, B. (1994). Integrating social and personal theories of achievement striving. Review of Educational Research, 64, 557-573.
Weinstein, C. E., Palmer, D. R., &; Schulte, A. C. (1987). Learning and Study Strategies Inventory. Clearwater, FL: H &; H Publishing.
Winne, P. H. (1995). Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 30(4), 173-187.
Winne, P. H. (1997). Experimenting to bootstrap self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 397-410.
Winne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. Zimmerman &; D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 153-189). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Winne, P. H., &; Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, &; A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277-304). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Winne, P. H., &; Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaers, P. R. Pintrich, &; M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531-599). San Diego: Academic Press.
Wlodkowski, R. J. (1999). Enhancing adult motivation to learn (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329-339.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary instructional models. In D. H. Schunk &; B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 1-19). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman &; D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp.1-37). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zimmerman, B. J., &; Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Developing a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614-628.
Zimmerman, B.J., &; Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Perceptions of efficacy and strategy use in the self-regulation of learning. In D.H. Schunk &; J. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom: Causes and consequences (pp. 185–207). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.