臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究目的在探討國小學童身體自我概念、勝任感與體育課參與動機之關係。參與者為臺北市五所國小高年級學生共500名，其中男生257名，女生243名，平均年齡11.01±0.69歲。研究工具包括兒童身體自我概念量表、勝任感量表、自我決定型態動機量表。資料分析以描述性統計、積差相關、獨立樣本 t 考驗和多元迴歸分析進行。研究發現男童的柔軟度、耐力、彈性及肌力較能有效預測勝任感，女童的柔軟度、耐力、彈性和外表較能有效預測勝任感；男童的柔軟度、耐力較能有效預測自我決定指標，女童的耐力較能有效預測自我決定指標；無論是男童或女童的勝任感皆能部分中介身體自我概念對自我決定指標的解釋力。根據研究結果，本研究在實務應用上，可提供體育教師在進行體育課程設計時，應考量性別差異對知覺身體自我概念會產生不同的認知。另外，以可增進柔軟度、耐力以及彈性的課程內容較能提升學生的勝任感，其中，尤以耐力項目相對重要。

關鍵詞：心理需求、自我決定理論

The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship among physical self-concept, perceived competence and participation motivation of physical education in elementary school students. Participants were 500 5th and 6th grade students studying in 5 elementary schools in Taipei City including 257 boys and 243 girls with average age 11.01 ± 0.69 years.
The measures consisted of Children's Physical Self-Concept Inventory, Competence Inventory, and Self-determinated Motivation Inventory. Descriptive statistics, Zero-Order correlation, independent-sample t-test and multiple regression analysis were carried out in the present study.
The results showed that Flexibility, endurance, resilience and forces can effectively predict perceived competence in boys. Flexibility, endurance, resilience and appearance can effectively predict perceived competence in girls. Flexibility and endurance can effectively predict self-determination index (SDI) in boys, however, endurance only can effectively predict SDI in girls. Perception of Competence expressed partial effect between physical self-concept and SDI in both genders.
Based on the findings of this study, during curriculum design the physical education teachers should consider gender differences will result in different cognitive in physical self-concept. More, curriculum to enhance flexibility, endurance, and resilience can enhance students' perceived competence, among them endurance is relatively important.


Key words：psychological needs, self-determination theory

第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 問題背景 1
第二節 研究目的 4
第三節 研究問題 5
第四節 研究假設 5
第五節 名詞操作型定義 5
第貳章 文獻探討 8
第一節 身體自我概念的定義及相關理論 8
第二節自我決定理論及動機歷程之相關研究 15
第參章 研究方法 25
第一節 研究架構 25
第二節 研究參與者 26
第三節 研究工具 26
第四節 實施程序 28
第五節 資料分析 28
第肆章 研究結果 29
第一節 基本描述統計、t考驗與簡單相關分析結果 29
第二節 身體自我概念對勝任感之預測情形 32
第三節 身體自我概念對自我決定指標之預測情形 34
第四節 勝任感對自我決定指標之預測情形 37
第五節 勝任感對於身體自我概念和自我決定指標之間的中介效果 39
第伍章 討論 42
第一節 國小男童在不同變項間之預測情形及中介效果 42
第二節 國小女童在不同變項間之預測情形及中介效果 44
第三節 綜合討論 45
第陸章 結論與建議 47
第一節 結論 47
第二節 建議 48

一、中文文獻
李炯煌、季力康(2006)。目標取向和能力知覺對運動動機之預測。大專體育學刊，8，65-76。
莊鵬輝(1996)。兒童身體自我概念與體適能及其建構相關研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立體育學院，桃園縣。
葉素汝、張家銘(2008)。大學生的身體形象、運動參與和自尊之研究。運動休閒餐旅研究，3(3)，105 -120。
趙曉美(2001)。自我概念多層面階層結構之驗證暨增進自我概念課程之實驗效果(未出版博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
蔡銘仁(2006)。國中生體育課參與動機及其身體活動的探討-應用自我決定理論（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
劉義群(2004)。不同性質體育課程學生知覺動機氣候、自覺能力、參與體育課動機與滿意度之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立體育大學，桃園縣。
蘇美如（2009）。國小體育教師支持和學生體育課參與動機歷程之關係研究-自我決定理論之檢驗（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。
二、英文文獻
Blanchard, C., & Vallerand, R. J. (1996b). Perceptions of competence, autonomy, and relatedness as psychological mediators of the social factors-contextual motivation relationship. Unpublished manuscript, Universite Quebee a Montreal, Canada.
Cox, A., & Williams, L., & Smith, A. L. (2007). Motivation in physical education and physical activity behavior outside of school. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 2,154-155.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determinattion in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivation approach to self: Intergration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation. Vol. 38. Perspectives on motivation (pp. 237-288). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ’’what’’ and ‘’why’’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
Edmunds, J., & Ntoumanis, N., & Duda, J. L. (2006). A Test of Self-Determination Theory in the Exercise Domain. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 2240-2265.
Fox. K. R., & Corbin, C. B. (1989). The physical self-perception profile: Development and preliminary validation. Journal of Sport Psychology, 10, 139-150.
Harter, S. (1978). Effectance motivation reconsidered: Toward a developmental model. Human Develpoment,21, 34-64.
Ntoumanis, N., & Standage, M. (2009). Morality in Sport: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective. Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 9, 235-243.
Ommundsen, Y., & Kvalø, S. E. (2007). Autonomy-mastery, supportive or performance focused? Different teacher behaviours and pupils’ outcomes in physical education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 51, 385-413.
Roberts, G. C., Kleiber, D. A., & Duda, J. L. (1981). An analysis of motivation in children’s sport: The role of perceived competence in participation. Journal of Sport Psychology , 3, 206-216.
Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J, J., & Stanton, G, C.(1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretation. Review of Educational Researsh, 46, 407-441.
Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 29, 271-360. New York: Academic Press.
Vallerand, R. J. (2001). A hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport and exercise. In G. C. Roberts (Ed.), Advences in Motivation in Sport and Exercise. (pp. 263-319). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.