跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(2600:1f28:365:80b0:f3de:de2a:940c:ec8b) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/04 07:52
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:蔡思婷
研究生(外文):Si-Ting Tsai
論文名稱:探討共創繪本提升國小學童認字、造句能力與英語學習態度的成效
論文名稱(外文):The Effects of Co-writing Picture Books on 6th Graders’ Word Recognition, Sentence Making Abilities and English Learning Attitude
指導教授:陳錦芬陳錦芬引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chin-Fen Chen
口試委員:陳淑惠胡潔芳
口試委員(外文):Shu-Hui ChenChieh-Fang Hu
口試日期:2013-11-19
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺北教育大學
系所名稱:兒童英語教育學系碩士班
學門:教育學門
學類:普通科目教育學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2013
畢業學年度:102
語文別:英文
論文頁數:116
中文關鍵詞:共創繪本造句能力認字能力英語學習態度
外文關鍵詞:co-writing of picture bookssentence making abilityword recognitionEnglish learning attitude
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:9
  • 點閱點閱:501
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:33
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
 本研究目的在於探討國小六年級學童藉由共創繪本在認字,造句能力和英語學習態度之效益。研究對象是四十八位就讀台北市國小六年級生,以三本教育當局出版的師生共創系列英語繪本為媒材。二十四位實驗組學生接受共創繪本教學並且分享故事繪本;而另二十四位控制組學生則在一般閱讀故事教學後寫學習單做字彙和句型練習。研究工具包括認字和造句能力的前、後測和英語學習態度的問卷來檢視兩組學生在接受實驗教學後其認字和造句能力的進步情形,及兩組進步之差異。
  十二週實驗教學後,實驗組在認字能力和造句能力方面皆有顯著進步,但控制組則皆無顯著進步。在兩組後測比較上,在造句方面,實驗組和控制組有顯著差異,然而在認字能力方面兩組後測則無顯著差異。再者,實驗組的英語學習態度在接受共創繪本教學後,其興趣,自信,和行為表現都有顯著改變。對於共創繪本教學的回饋也持正向態度。最後,根據研究結果提出相關建議,供英語教學與未來研究之參考。

This study aimed to investigate the effects of the co-writing of picture books on 6th graders’ word recognition, sentence-making ability and English learning attitude through picture book co-writing instruction. Forty-eight research subjects from an elementary school in Taipei City participated in this study and assigned to the experimental group and the control group respectively. Three English locally-created picture books were used as the teaching materials. The experimental group was required to co-writing picture books and shares their story books, while the control wrote worksheets and did vocabulary exercises and sentence pattern drills after reading each picture book. Data required for the study were collected through pre-and posttest of word recognition and sentence abilities and English learning attitude questionnaire.
The study results show that after 12-week experimental instruction, the experimental group improved their sentence-making ability and word recognition ability more significantly than the control group did. Compared with their posttest, the experimental group makes significantly difference from control group on sentence-making ability. However, the experimental group’ word recognition was not significantly different from that of the control group. Furthermore, data collected from the questionnaire indicated that the subjects’ English learning attitude of the experimental group was very positive in terms of their interest, confidence and behavior as well as feedback of co-writing instruction. Based on the findings, some suggestions were offered for the reference of similar English instruction and future studies.


CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1
Background and Motivation 1
Purposes of the Study 6
Research Questions 6
Significance of the Study 7
Definitions of Terms 7

CHATER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 11
Cultivation of Four Language Skills 11
Listening skills 11
Reading skills 12
Speaking skills 12
Writing skills 12
Key Elements of Writing 13
Vocabulary 14
The importance of vocabulary. 14
Word recognition. 15
Vocabulary and writing correlations. 15
Learning and teaching strategies of vocabulary. 16
Sentence patterns 19
Sentence making and writing. 19
Teaching strategies of sentence making. 20
Picture Books 22
Features of picture books 22
Locally-created picture books. 23
Picture books and language learning. 24
Swain’s output hypothesis. 25
Creating picture books. 27
Cooperative learning. 27
Social-Constructivist theories. 28
Zone of proximal development. 28
Promotion of achievement 29
Support less performing students. 29
The quality of written texts. 30
Procedure of co-writing. 30
Previous Studies on the Effects of Picture Books with Writing 32
Summary 33

CHPTER THREE METHODOLOGY 35
Framework of the Study 35
Research design 35
Research structure 36
Independent variables. 37
Controlled variables. 37
Dependent variables. 38
Procedure and Duration 40
Procedure 40
Duration 41
Setting and Participants 41
Setting 41
Participants 42
Students. 42
Between-group comparison in the pretests of word recognition. 44
Between-group comparison in the pretests of sentence-making. 45
Experimental Instruction 47
Teaching materials 47
Teaching procedures and timetable 49
Picture book instruction (For both EG and CG) 50
Guided reading. 50
Vocabulary activities. 51
Sentence patterns activities. 51
Co-writing of picture books. 51
Worksheet activity. 52
Instruments 54
The background questionnaire 54
Pretest and posttest of word recognition test 55
Pretest and posttest of sentence-making ability 56
Pilot test 59
The follow-up questionnaire 59
Data Analysis 62
Quantitative approaches 62
CHPATER FOUR RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS 65
The Improvement of Both Groups 65
Both groups’ progress in word recognition and sentence-making abilities 66
The control group. 66
The experimental group. 68
Comparison of Both Groups’ Progress 70
Comparison of both groups’ word recognition in the posttest 71
Comparison of both groups’ sentence-making in the posttest 72
Findings From Students’ Response Questionnaire 75
Changes of English learning confidence & interests 75
Change of English leaning behavior 77
Feedback toward co-writing instruction 79

CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS 83
Conclusions 83
Suggestions for Pedagogical Implications 85
Encourage teachers to replace worksheet with picture book co-writing 86
Picture books can be used for vocabulary teaching. 86
Discussions before and during co-writing of story books are needed. . 87
Peer’s feedback is emphasized and encouraged. 88
Suggestions for Future Studies 88
Limitations 89

REFERENCES 91
APPENDIXES 99
Appendix A: Parents Consensus Form (Chinese Version) 99
Appendix B: Students Background Survey ( Chinese Version) 100
Appendix C: Pretest / Posttest of word recognition 102
Appendix D : Pretest/posttest of sentence-making 105
Appendix E: Work worksheet (for control group) 107
Appendix F: Difficulty and Discrimination of the Word recognition Pilot Test 113
Appendix G: Follow-up Questionnaire 115



Anglin, J. M., Miller, G. A., & Wakefield, P. C. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58(10), 1-186.

Applebee, A. (1984). Writing and reasoning. Review of Educational Research, 54(41), 577-586.

Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal, 54, 153–60.

Bailey, G. D., & Dyck, N. (1990). The administrator and cooperative learning: Roles and responsibilities in instructional leadership. Clearing House, 64(1), 39-43.

Barcroft, J. (2004). Effects of sentence writing in second language lexical acquisition. Second Language Research, 20(4), 303-334.

Beck, I. L., McCaslin, E. S., & McKeown, M. G. (1985). The rationale and design of a program to teach vocabulary to fourth-grade students. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center.

Biemiller, A., & Boote, C. (2006). An effective method for building meaning vocabulary in primary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 44-62.

Blachowicz, C., &; Fisher, P. J. (1996). Teaching vocabulary in all classrooms (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Person Education.

Bolling, A. L. (1993) Writing articulation and assessment. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED367995)

Bromley, K. D. (1996). Webbing with literature: Creating story maps with children’s book (2nd ed.). New York: Scholastic

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd Ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.

Brown, H. D. & Abeywickrama, P. (2010). Language assessment: principles and classroom practices. New York: Longman

Chen, C. F , Dai, W. Y., &; Liu, M. E. (2002). 台北市國民中小學英語教學銜接問題探討。Taipei Educational Bureau.

Chen, L. S. (2002). The effectiveness of cooperative learning in an EFL vocational senior high school classroom. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi, ROC.

Chimombo, M. (1986). Evaluating compositions with large classes.ELT Journal, 40(1), 21, 24-25.

Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (1994). Ways with words: Chinese students learning of English vocabulary. In W. Y. Dai (Ed.), The Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 15-28). Taipei: English Teachers’ Association.

Daiute, C., & Dalton, B. (1992). Collaboration between children learning to write: Can novices be masters? (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED354522)

Dale, H. (1997). Co-authoring in the classroom: Creating an environment for effective collaboration. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED402625)

Diller, K. C. (1971). Generative grammar, structural linguistics, and language teaching. Rowley, MA: Newbuy House.

Doff, A. (1988). Teach English: A training course for teachers. New York: Cambridge.

Duin, A. H., & Graves, M. F. (1987).The effects of intensive vocabulary instruction on expository writing. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 311-330.

Ediger, M. (1999). Reading and vocabulary development. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 26(1), 7-15.

Ellis, G., & Brewster, J. (1991). The storytelling handbook for primary teachers. London: Penguin.

Feyten, C. (1991). The power of listening ability: An overlooked dimension in language acquisition. Modern Language Journal 75 (2), 173-180.

Freedman, S. W. (1992). Outside-in and inside-out: Peer response groups in two ninth-grade classes. Research in the Teaching of English, 26, 71-106.

Furr, M. (2003). Literature circles for the EFL classroom. Proceedings of the 2003 TESOL Arabia Conference. TESOL Arabia: Dubai, UAE, 2004

Gagne, E. D. (1985). The cognitive psychology of school learning. Boston: Little, Brwon, and Company.

Graham, S, & Harris, K. R. (2005). Writing better: Effective strategies for teaching students with learning difficulties. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

Harmer, J. (1991). The practice of English language teaching. London: Longman

Harmer, J. (1998). How to teach English. New York: Longman.

Harmon, J. M. (1998). Vocabulary teaching and learning in a seventh-grade literature-based classroom. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. 41(7), 518-529.

Heaton, J. B. (1988). Writing English language tests. Harlow: Longman.

Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hyland, F. (2003). Focusing on form: Student engagement with teacher feedback. System, 31, 217-230.

Imel, S. (1989). Employers’ expectations of vocational education. (ERIC Document Production Service No. ED 318912).

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R, T. (1994). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (p.52, 54, 56, 87, 113). Massachusetts: Needham Heights.

Jones, I. (2002). Social relationships, peer collaboration and children’s oral language. Educational Psychology, 22(1), 63-73.

Justice, L. M. (2001). Storybook reading and early literacy: Using storybooks to encourage children’s early literacy skills. Children and Families, 15, 64-67.

Kagan, S. (1995). We can talk: Cooperative learning in the elementary ESL classroom. Eric Clearinghouse on Language and Linguistics, ED382035.

Kathleen E. C. & Guthrie, J. T. (2005). Motivational and cognitive contributions to students’ amount of reading. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 116-131.

Katz, D., & Stotland, E. (1959). A preliminary statement to a theory of attitude structure and change. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (Vol.3, pp. 423-475). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Kerka, S. (1990). Job related basic skills. (ERIC Document Production Service No. ED 318912).

Krashen, S. (1985).The input hypothesis. London: Longman.

Krashen, S. (1989). Language acquisition and language education. Great Britain: Prentice Hall.

Krashen, S., & Terrell, T. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. New York: Pergamon.

Kroll, B. (1990). Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom. Cambridge: The University of Cambridge.

Laflamme, J. G. (1997). The effect of the multiple exposure vocabulary method and the target reading/writing strategy on test scores. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 40(5), 372-381.

Landes, S. (1985). Picture books as literature, children’s literature association. TESOL Quarterly, 10(2), 52-55.

Langer, J. A. (1986). Children reading and writing: Structures and strategies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.

Latham G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. American Psychologist, 57(9)

Liang, T. L. (2002). Implementing cooperative learning in EFL teaching process and effects. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Manning, M. (1999). Helping words grow. Teaching PreK-8, 29(4), 103-105.

McCarthy, M. (1990). Vocabulary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ministry of Education (2008). Nine-year integrated curriculum guidelines for the English course. Retrieved Jul 1, 2012, from Taiwan Elementary and Secondary Educator

Nation, I. S. P. (2008). Teaching vocabulary-strategies and techniques. Heinle ELT.

Nation, P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

National Writing Project, & Nagin, C. (2006). Because writing matters.(revised and updated ed.). San Fransciso: Jossey-Bass.

Nixon, J. G., & Topping, K. J. (2001). Emergent writing: The impact of structured peer interaction. Educational Psychology, 21(1), 41-58

Nordlund, C. Y. (1996). A strategy for teaching the picture book in the elementary art classroom. Dissertation Abstracts International, 35(01). (PQDD,No.AAT1381687).

Norton, D. E. (1995). Through the eyes of a child: An introduction to children's literature. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Oxford, R. L., & Scarcella, R. C. (1994). Second language vocabulary learning among adults: State of the art in vocabulary instruction. System, 22, 231-243.

Paul, D. (2003). Teaching English to children in Asia. HK: Longman Asia ELT.

Peng, J. C. (2009). Peer assessment of oral presentation in an EFL context. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.

Perfetti, C.A. (1985). Reading ability. NY: Oxford University Press.

Pincas, A. (1982b). Writing in English 1. In Badger, R. & White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal, 54(2), 153-154

Pogrow, S. (1990). A Socratic approach to using computers with at-risk students. Educational Leadership, 47(5), 61-66.

Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Reimer, C. N. (2001). Strategies for teaching writing to primary students using the writing process. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED459471)

Richards, J. C. (1976). The role of vocabulary teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 10(1), 77-89.

Schindler, K. (2002). Writing for the addressee. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED474072)

Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Segers, E., Takke, L., & Verhoeven, L. (2004). Teacher-mediated versus computer-mediated storybook reading to children in native and multicultural kindergarten classrooms. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15(2), 215-226.

Slattery, M, & Willis, J. (2001). English for primary teachers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Sorensen M. R., & Lehman, B. A. (Eds.) (1995). Teaching with children’s books: Paths to literature-based instruction. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English

Speck, B. W. (2002). Facilitating students’ collaborative writing. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED466716)

Stroller, F. L., & Grabe, W. (1993). Implications for L2 vocabulary acquisition and instruction from L1 vocabulary research. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes, & J. Coady (Eds.), Second language reading vocabulary learning (pp. 24-45). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden(Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp.235-253). Boston, Massachusetts: Heinle & Heinle.

Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.) Handbook on research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471-484). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 371-391.

Swanson, L. A., Fey, M. E., Mills, C. E., &; Hood, L. S. (2005). Use of narrative-based language intervention with children who have specific language impairment. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 131-141.

Tompkins, G. E. (1994). Teaching writing: Balancing process and product (2nd ed.)Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Macmillan.

Tsai, Y. M. (2004). A case study of applying children’s English reading instruction strategy in English remedial instruction. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taipei University of Education, Taipei, Taiwan.

VanPatten, B. (2003). From input to output: A teacher's guide to second language acquisition. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Williams, J. (2005). Teaching writing in second and foreign language classrooms. Taipei: McGraw-Hill Education, International Editions.

Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. New York: Macmillan.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊