跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.200.82.149) 您好!臺灣時間:2023/06/11 03:28
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:陳佳琳
研究生(外文):Jia-Lin Chen
論文名稱:探討自助旅遊者國外旅遊景觀之體驗價值
論文名稱(外文):Exploring Experiential Value of Foreign Landscape for Free Independent Traveler
指導教授:陳惠美陳惠美引用關係
指導教授(外文):Hui-Mei Chen
口試委員:何昶鴛鄭佳昆
口試委員(外文):Chaang-Iuan HoChia-Kuen Cheng
口試日期:2013-06-21
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:園藝暨景觀學系
學門:農業科學學門
學類:園藝學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2013
畢業學年度:101
語文別:中文
論文頁數:112
中文關鍵詞:自助旅遊者景觀特性體驗價值方法目的鏈
外文關鍵詞:Free Independent travelerLandscape attributesExperiential valueMeans-end theory
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:17
  • 點閱點閱:770
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
旅遊業在大眾旅遊後期面臨許多問題,像是僵化的行程、景點同質性高、人造產物過多等因素,造成人們為了追求新奇體驗特地到遠處旅遊,最後卻獲得千篇一律的體驗。如今,隨著消費者的情感和體驗需求在旅遊的重要性提升,自主性高、彈性的自助旅遊將成為未來的旅遊趨勢。在臺灣,自助旅遊不但是國人偏好的出國旅遊形式,也是自我拓展視野和價值觀的一種方法。自助旅遊者偏好自主規劃、彈性的旅遊形式,追求新奇、深入體驗不同文化、探索不同於一般觀光客會前往的地點。有別於大眾旅遊,他們對於旅遊地景觀及內心價值這兩部分有更多且更深層的需求。

現今的旅遊體驗是旅遊者凝視不同日常生活的景致帶來愉快體驗的過程。景觀是由土地表面可見的物理特性和人類活動所組成。自助旅遊者在過程中主動追求對他們而言有獨特意義的景觀,並依據自我的價值去解讀景觀特色。本篇研究目的為探討自助旅遊體驗中吸引自助旅遊者的國外旅遊景觀特性、獲得的價值,以及國外旅遊景觀特性與自助旅遊者追求價值之關連。透過方法目的鏈瞭解旅遊景觀如何滿足自助旅遊者內心價值。方法目的鏈是探索人們購買產品時背後的心理需求,將心理過程分成三個層級:屬性、結果和價值。在背包客棧自助旅行論壇網站徵求受訪者,透過MSN及SKYPE等即時通訊軟體與自助旅遊者進行階梯式訪談探索人們內心價值。

研究指出,自助旅遊者主要追求有四種價值:自我成長、美好生活、自我實現及國家認同。受訪者認為在自助旅遊體驗中吸引他們的景觀屬性有四種類型:生活景觀(人物、日常生活、習俗信仰)、自然景觀(地形地質、水景、動植物、氣象)、文化景觀(文物、建築物、遺址)和都市景觀(都市夜景、建築物、娛樂);從屬性引發的結果有五個項目:正向情緒、反向思考、壓力調適、學習體驗,和支持關係。生活景觀是自助旅遊者最常提及的旅遊景觀吸引力。在體驗價值部分,自助旅遊者追求美好生活和自我成長之價值。

階層價值圖中,自我成長價值鏈結有一條主要連結「自我成長」價值路徑是從「人物」」屬性開始,連結到「反向思考」的結果。「美好生活」價值路徑有兩條主要聯結,第一及第二是從「每日生活」、「人物」屬性開始,連結到「反向思考」的結果。「自我實現」價值路徑有兩條主要連結,分別從「氣象」、「都市夜景」屬性開始,連結到「正向情緒」的結果。「國家認同」價值連結有兩條主要路徑,分別是從「每日生活」、「人物」屬性開始,連結到「反向思考」結果。


The stage of mass tourism at the end, the tourism industry has confronted some questions with the rigid itinerary, homogeneous attractions, and artificial products. The man for the novelty experience leaves his home to travel, but get the monotonous experiences. In future, the tour will be toward new tourism forms with autonomy, flexible in order to meet the consumer demand for the emotions and experiences. Independent travel is an important developing outbound tourism market in Taiwan. It is not only a preferred form of outbound tourism, but also a method to develop self-vision and values. The characteristics of the free independent travelers or tourists (FIT) are planned journey, in favor of a more individualistic and fluid approach to travel. They tend to seek novelty, enjoy experiencing with different culture, off the beaten track explorers. Different from the mass tourism, they have more and deeper needs with value and the landscape of the destination.
Contemporary travel experience is to seek pleasant experience by gazing different views of everyday life. Landscape comprises the visible features and human activities of an area of land. Combining both their physical origins and the cultural overlay of human presence, Independent travelers take the initiative to pursue in the process for them a unique landscape, and to interpret it according to their value. Objective of this study is to understand what foreign landscape will attract independent traveler, experiential values, as well as the relationship between landscape and independent travelers’ experiential values.
The Means-end chain is to explore the way people purchase products behind the psychological needs. In this study, the Means-end chain theory was used to clarify the relationship between independent travelers’ experiential values, feeling consequences, and perceived attributes of foreign landscapes. The respondents with independent travel experience were enrolled from representative websites “backpackers” in Taiwan. Online in-depth interviews through the MSN Messenger and Skype were conducted, and a technique of laddering interview was adopted to collect data.
The results showed that the independent travelers emphasized four experiential values of the foreign landscape comprising self actualization, self improvement, good life, and national identity. Pursuing these values, the respondents regarded lifescapes (people, daily life, and festivals), natural landscape (mountain, lake, wildlife, and meteorology), cultural landscape (relics, monuments, and ancient sites), urban landscape (urban night scenes, modern architectures and entertainments) and as important attributes of foreign landscapes during their independent travel. These attributes were the crucial source of feeling consequences including positive emotion, stress coping, learning, reflection and supportive relationship, which then lead to the realization of the aspired values. Lifescapes are the most frequently mentioned in landscape attributes. Good life and self improvement are the major experiential values of the Independent travel.
Besides, the self improvement of hierarchical value map comprises one chain. One starts from appreciating attributes of the people of the lifescapes which leads to gain consequence of reflection and finally links to value of self improvement;
The good life of hierarchical value map comprises two chains. It starts from appreciating the people or daily life of the lifescapes which leads to gain consequence of reflection and further links to good life.

The self actualization of hierarchical value map comprises two chains. It starts from appreciating the meteorology of the natural landscape or the urban night scenes of the urban landscape which leads to gain consequence of positive emotion and further links to self actualization.
The national identity of hierarchical value map comprises two chains. It starts from appreciating the people or daily life of the lifescapes which leads to gain consequence of reflection and further links to national identity.


目錄
口試委員會審定書 Ⅱ
謝誌 III
中文摘要 IV
英文摘要 VI
第一章 緒論 1
第二章 文獻回顧 4
第一節 自助旅遊之意涵 4
一、 自助旅遊源起 4
二、 自助旅遊特性 5
第二節 自助旅遊體驗價值與效益 7
一、 價值 7
二、 體驗價值 7
三、 自助旅遊體驗效益 8
第三節 旅遊景觀體驗 11
一、 旅遊景觀概念 11
二、 自助旅遊者之旅遊景觀特性 12
三、 自助旅遊者體驗價值與旅遊景觀之關連 14
第三章 研究方法 16
第一節 方法目的鏈理論 16
一. 方法目的鏈 16
第二節 研究對象 17
第三節 訪談方式 19
一. 階梯方法論 19
二. 訪談流程 19
第四節 資料分析 21
一. 內容分析法 21
二. 效度分析 22
三. 蘊含矩陣鏈結圖 22
第四章 研究結果與討論 23
第一節 個人特性分析 23
一. 受訪者社經背景 23
二. 旅遊國家 25
第二節 類目分析 26
一. 景觀屬性說明 28
二. 結果說明 33
三. 價值說明 38
第三節 景觀階層價值分析 41
一. 自我成長階層價值路徑 44
二. 美好生活階層價值路徑 52
三. 自我實現階層價值路徑 63
四. 國家認同階層價值路徑 65
五. 景觀類型階層路徑 67
第五章 結論與建議 74
第一節 自助旅遊體驗之景觀吸引力 74
第二節 自助旅遊者之體驗價值 76
第三節 旅遊景觀價值階層圖 77
第四節 建議 80
一. 旅遊地意象營造 80
二. 研究限制 81
參考文獻 83
附錄一 類目語幹表 91
景觀類目語幹表 91
結果類目語幹表 97
價值類目語幹表 104
附錄二 基本資料問卷 108
附錄三 訪談大綱 111



參考文獻
1.中華民國交通部觀光局(2011)。2011年國人旅遊狀況之調查,下載日期:2013/04/01,取自:http://admin.taiwan.net.tw/statistics/market.aspx?no=133
2.王石番(1991)。傳播內容分析法-理論與實證。台北市:幼獅文化專業公司。
3.王俊翔(2008)。自助旅行者的涉入程度對自助旅行知覺價值、重遊意願的影響。未出版之碩士論文,國立中央大學企業管理研究所,桃園。
4.白光潤、李仙德(2007)。後現代旅遊探析。旅遊科學,21(3),32-36。
5.江宜樺(1997)。自由民主體制下的國家認同。臺灣社會研究季刊,25,83-121。
6.但強、朱珠(2005)。旅遊景觀內涵探析。重慶科技學院學報,2005(4),64-66。
7.吳竹湞(2005)。高齡者古蹟旅遊體驗之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學社會教育學系,台北。
8.李佳蓉(2005)。女性獨自從事自助旅行之動機與體驗。未出版之碩士論文,國立東華大學觀光暨遊憩管理研究所,花蓮。
9.李淑宏(2000)。因為旅行,所以存在-旅行世紀的台灣新世代。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣大學新聞研究所,台北。
10.初昌樂(2009)。女性海外自助旅遊者生活型態、涉入程度與主觀幸福感之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學運動與休閒管理研究所碩士學位論文,台北。
11.周佳如(2011)。海外自由行旅遊動機、滿意度與忠誠度之研究-以日本地區為例。未出版之碩士論文,國立高雄應用科技大學觀光與餐旅管理系,高雄。
12.林碧月(2010)。海外度假打工體驗的內涵與價值。未出版之碩士論文,朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理系,台中。
13.波仕特線上市調網(2009)。Pollster波仕特線上市調:出國旅遊。半自助旅遊最受歡迎,下載日期:2011/12/25,取自:http://www.pollster.com.tw/Aboutlook/lookview_item.aspx?ms_sn=264
14.張文奎(1990)。人文地理學概論。中國大陸:東北師範大學出版社。
15.張芬芬(2010)。質性資料分析的五步驟:在抽象階梯上爬升。初等教育學刊,35,87-120。
16.張淑美譯。Miller, J. P.著(2007)。生命教育-推動學校的靈性課程。台北:學富文化。
17.盛蕾(2003)。背包旅遊及其特徵。社會科學家,102,88-89。
18.許瑞嫚(2010)。女性背包客在旅行經驗中展現的自我成長: 女性主義觀點探究。休閒暨觀光產業研究,5(1),1-12。
19.陳水源(1988)。遊客遊憩需求與遊憩體驗之研討。戶外遊憩研究,1(3),25-51。
20.陳忻岱(2008)。在旅行轉彎處看見:女性背包客旅行與部落格書寫之主體建構。未出版之碩士論文,國立東華大學族群關係及文化研究所,花蓮。
21.陳勁甫、古素瑩(2006)。海外自助旅行者動機、知覺價值與市場區隔之研究。中華管理評論國際學報,9(4),1-22。
22.陳萍萍(2010)。基於〝體驗〞視角的旅遊景觀主題化規劃設計研究。浙江學刊,2010(4),163-168。
23.陳雅玲、賀先蕙(2007)。放大你的格局。人一輩子要有一次壯遊,商業週刊,下載日期:2012/3/09,取自:http://www.businessweekly.com.tw/article.php?id=24957
24.傅淑梅(2010)。台灣女性海外自助旅行經歷之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學運動與休閒管理研究所,台北。
25.曾煥玫(2000)。女性自助旅行者的旅遊經驗研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣大學森林學研究所,台北。
26.黃世孟(1995)。基地規劃導論。台北:中華民國建築學會。
27.黃家珊、梁炳琨(2010)。觀光凝視與影像再現-台灣背包客在京都的影像再現之探討。鄉村旅遊研究,4(1),59-80。
28.楊樺譯。Wheeler, T. & Wheeler, M.著(2007)。當我們旅行:Lonely Planet的故事。台北市:聯經。
29.葉浩譯。Urry, J.著(2007)。觀光客的凝視。台北:書林。
30.劉蕊(2009)。體驗經濟視角下的民族旅遊開發。長春師範學院學報,28(4),65-68。
31.蔡麗伶譯。Mayo, E. J. & Jarvis, L. P.著(1990)。旅遊心理學。台北市:揚智文化。
32.鄧寧(2010)。背包裡的世界-背包客的多元生命圖像。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣大學新聞研究所,台北。
33.謝金玲(2011)。海外自助旅行者人格特質、安康生活型態與學習旅遊關係之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立高雄應用科技大學觀光與餐旅管理研究所,高雄。
34.嚴秀茹、李有仁、蕭丞傑、李國書(2006). 顧客關係利益之階層探析: 方法目的鏈之應用。管理評論, 25(1), 95-119。
35.Adler, J. (1989). Origins of sightseeing. Annals of Tourism Research, 16(1), 7-29.
36.Alves, T. (2007). Art, light and landscape new agendas for urban development. European Planning Studies, 15(9), 1247-1260.
37.Binder, J. (2004). The whole point of backpacking: Anthropological perspectives on the characteristics of backpacking. In G. Richards & J. Wilson (Eds.), The global nomad: Backpacker travel in theory and practice (pp. 92-108). Bristol: Channel View Publications.
38.Brenner, L., & Fricke, J. (2007). The evolution of backpacker destinations: The case of Zipolite, Mexico. International Journal Tourism Research, 9(3), 217-230.
39.Brown, F. (1998). So why do people travel?. In F. Brown (Ed.), Tourism reassessed: Blight or blessing (pp. 100-110) Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
40.Burton, R. (1995). Travel Geography. London: Pitman Publishing Limited.
41.Cohen, E. (1972). Toward a sociology of international tourism. Social Research, 39(1), 164-182.
42.Cohen, S. A. (2011). Lifestyle travelers backpacking as a way of life. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(4), 1535-1555.
43.Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310-357.
44.Daniel, T. C. (2001). Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54(1), 267-281.
45.Daudelin, M. W. (1997). Learning from experience through reflection. Organizational Dynamics, 24(3), 36-48.
46.Dejeant-Pons, M. (2006). The European landscape convention. Landscape Research, 31(4), 363-384.
47.Department of Immigration & Citizenship. (2012). Working holiday and work and holiday visa report, Retrieved April 1, 2013, Retrieved from http://www.immi.gov.au/media/statistics/visitor.htm
48.Dethloff, C., Reynolds, T. J., & Westberg, S. J. (2010). Advancements in laddering. In J. C. Olson & T. J Reynolds (Eds.), Understanding consumer decision making: The means-end approach to marketing and advertising strategy (pp. 91-118). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
49.Dubow, J. (2009). Landscape. In R. Kitchin & N. Thrift (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (pp. 124-131). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
50.Elsrud, T. (2001). Risk creation in traveling backpacker adventure narration Annals of Tourism Research, 28(3), 597-617.
51.Fredrickson, B., & Cohn, M. A. (2010). Positive emotions. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 777-796). New York: Guilford Press.
52.Gottlieb, B. H. (1985). Social support and the study of personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2(3), 351-375.
53.Gutman, J. (1982). A means-end chain model based on consumer categorization processes. Journal of Marketing, 46(2), 60-72.
54.Hampton, M. P. (1998). Backpacker tourism and economic development. Annals of Tourism Research, 25(3), 639-660.
55.Holbrook, M. B. (1994). The nature of customer value: An axiology of services in the consumption experience. In R.T. Rust & R. L. Oliver (Eds.), Service quality: New directions in theory and practice (pp. 21-72). California: Sage Publications.
56.Hyde, K. F., & Lawson, R. (2003). The nature of independent travel. Journal of Travel Research, 42(13), 13-23.
57.Jewell, B., & Crotts, J. C. (2002). Adding psychological value to heritage tourism experiences. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 11(4), 13-28.
58.Kals, E., Schumacher, D., & Montada, L. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31(2), 178-202.
59.Kelly, C. (2009). Heritage. In R. Kitchin & N. Thrift (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (pp. 91-97). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
60.King, L. A., & Scollon, C. N. (1998). What makes a life good?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 156-165.
61.Klenosky, D. B., Gengler, C. E., & Mulvey, M. S. (1993). Understanding the factors influencing ski destination choice: A means-end analytic approach. Journal of Leisure Research, 25(4), 362-379.
62.Leclerc, G., Lefrancois, R., Dube, M., Hebert, R., & Gaulin, P. (1998). The self-actualization concept: a content validation. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 13(1), 69-84.
63.Li, Y. (2000). Geographical consciousness and tourism experience. Annals of Tourism Research, 27(4), 863-883.
64.Loker-Murphy, L., & Pearce, P. (1995). Young budget travelers: Backpackers in Australia. Annals of Tourism Research, 22(4), 819-843.
65.Lothian, A. (1999). Landscape and the philosophy of aesthetics: Is landscape quality inherent in the landscape or in the eye of the beholder?. Landscape and Urban Planning, 44(4), 177-198.
66.MacCannell, D. (1999). The tourist: A new theory of the leisure class. Berkeley: University of California Press.
67.MacCannell, D. (2011). The ethics of sightseeing. Berkeley: University of California Press.
68.Maciocco, G. (2008). Urban landscape perspectives. In G. Maciocco (Ed.), Urban Landscape Perspectives (pp. 1-25). Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
69.Mannell , R. C., & Stynes, D. J. (1991). A Retrospective:The Benefits of Leisure. In B. L.Driver, P. J. Brown, & G. L. Peterson (Eds.), .Benefits of Leisure (pp. 461-473). Pennsylvania: Venture Publishing.
70.Mansfeld, Y. (1992). From motivation to actual travel. Annals of Tourism Research, 19(3), 399-419.
71.Maoz, D. (2007). Backpackers’ motivations the role of culture and nationality. Annals of Tourism Research, 34(1), 122-140.
72.Mathwick, C., Malhotra, N., & Rigdon, E. (2001). Experiential value: conceptualization, measurement and application in the catalog and Internet shopping environment. Journal of Retailing, 77(1), 39-56.
73.McKercher, B. (2002). Towards a classification of cultural tourists. International Journal of Tourism Research, 4(1), 29-38.
74.Mohsin, A., & Ryan, C. (2003). Backpackers in the northern territory of Australia- motives, behaviours and satisfactions. International Journal Tourism Ressearch, 5(2), 113-131.
75.Morin, K. M. (2009). Landscape perception. In R. Kitchin & N. Thrift (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (pp. 140-145.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
76.Muller, T. E. (1991). Using personal values to define segments in an international tourism market. International Marketing Review, 8(1), 57-70.
77.Muzaini, H. (2006). Backpacking southeast Asia strategies of “looking local”. Annals of Tourism Research, 33(1), 144-161.
78.Nash, R., Thyne, M., & Davies, S. (2006). An investigation into customer satisfaction levels in the budget accommodation sector in Scotland: A case study of backpacker tourists and the Scottish Youth Hostels Association. Tourism Management, 27(3), 525–532.
79.Noy, C. (2004). This trip really change me backpacker’s narratives of self-change. Annals of Tourism Research, 31(1), 78-102.
80.O’Reilly, C. C. (2006). From drifter to gap year tourist mainstreaming backpacker travel. Annals of Tourism Research, 33(4), 998-1017.
81.Olson, J. C., & Reynolds, T. J. (2010). The means-end approach to understanding consumer decision making. In J. C. Olson & T. J Reynolds (Eds.), Understanding consumer decision making: The means-end approach to marketing and advertising strategy (pp. 3-23). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
82.Parasuraman, S., & Hansen, D. (1987). Coping with work stressors in nursing effects of adaptive versus maladaptive strategies. Work and Occupations, 14(1), 88-105.
83.Pearce, P. L., & Foster, F. (2007). A “university of travel” backpacker learning. Tourism Management, 28(5), 1285-1298.
84.Pieters, R., Baumgartner, H., & Allen, D. (1995). A means-end chain approach to consumer goal structures. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12(3), 227-244.
85.Pine, B. J. II., & Gilmore, J. H. (1998). Welcome to the experience economy. Harvard Business Review, 76, 97-105.
86.Piner, K. E. (1983). Individual differences associated with value selection. In L. R. Kahle (Eds.), Social values and social change: Adaptation to life in America (pp. 261-273). Connecticut: Praeger Publishers.
87.Reichel, A., Fuchs, G., & Uriely, N. (2009). Israeli Backpackers the role of destination choice. Annals of Tourism Research, 36(2), 222-246.
88.Reynolds, T. J., & Gutman, J. (1988). Laddering theory, method analysis and interpretation. Journal of Advertising Research, 28(1), 11-31.
89.Riley, P. J. (1988). Road culture of international long-term budget travelers. Annals of Tourism Research, 15(3), 313-328.
90.Roggenbuck, J. W., Loom, R. J., & Dagostino, J. (1990). The learning benefit of leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 22(2), 112-124.
91.Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values and value systems. In M. Rokeach (Ed.), The nature of human values (pp. 3-25). New York: Free press.
92.Ross, G. F. (1993). Tourist motivation among backpacker visitor to the wet tropics of northern Australia. Journal of travel& Tourism Marketing, 1(3), 43-60.
93.Russell, J. A., & Pratt, G. (1980). A description of the affective quality attributed to environments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 311-322.
94.Schmitt, B. (1999). Experiential marketing: A new framework for design and communications. Design Management Journal, 10(2), 10-16.
95.Schouten, F. F. J. (1995). Heritage as historical reality. In D.T. Herbert (Eds.), Heritage, tourism and society (pp. 21-31). Los Altos: Mansell Publishing.
96.Sedikides, C. (1999). A multiplicity of motives: The case of self-improvement. Psychological Inquiry, 10(1), 64-65.
97.Sorensen, A. (2003). Backpacker ethnography. Annals of Tourism Research, 30(4), 847-867.
98.Sorenson, D., & Henchion, M. (2011). Understanding consumers’ cognitive structures with regard to high pressure processing: A means-end chain application to the chilled ready meals category. Food Quality and Preference, 22(3), 271-280.
99.Terkenli, T. S. (2004). Tourism and Landscape. In A. A. Lew, C. M. Hall, & A. M. Williams (Eds.), A companion to tourism (pp. 339-348). Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing
100.Ueda, H., Nakajima, T., Takayama, N., Petrova, E., Matsushima, H., Furuya, K., & Aoki, Y. (2012). Landscape image sketches of forests in Japan and Russia. Forest Policy and Economics, 19, 20-30.
101.Ulrich, R. S. (1979). Visual landscapes and psychological well‐being. Landscape Research, 4(1), 17-23.
102.Ulrich, R. S. (1981). Natural versus urban scenes some psychophysiological effects. Environment and Behavior, 13(5), 523-556.
103.United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (1972). Convention concerning the protection of the world cultural and natural heritage, Retrieved, April 3, 2013, Retrieved from http://whc.unesco.org/en/conventiontext.
104.Uriely, N., Yonay, Y., & Simchai, D. (2002). Backpacking experiences a type and form analysis. Annals of Tourism Research, 29(2), 520–538.
105.Welk, P. (2004). The beaten track: anti-tourism as an element of backpacker identity construction. In G. Richards & J. Wilson (Eds.), The global nomad: Backpacker travel in theory and practice (pp. 77-91). Bristol: Channel View Publications.
106.Young, M. (1999). The social construction of tourist places. Australian Geographer, 30(3), 373-389.
107.Yuan, Y. H., & Wu, C. K. (2008). Relationships among experiential marketing, experiential value, and customer satisfaction. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 32(3), 387-410.
108.Zube, E. H., Sell, J. L., & Taylor, J. G. (1982). Landscape perception: research, application and theory. Landscape Planning, 9(1), 1-33.


QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top