跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.200.82.149) 您好!臺灣時間:2023/06/11 03:35
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:李冠穎
研究生(外文):Kuan-Ying Li
論文名稱:台灣高中職學生打工行為對於學業成就之影響-工具變數法之應用
論文名稱(外文):Part-time Work Experiences and Academic Performances of Taiwanese Senior Secondary School Students-Evidence from Instrumental Variable Method
指導教授:黃芳玫黃芳玫引用關係
指導教授(外文):Fung-Mey Huang
口試委員:李浩仲陶宏麟
口試委員(外文):Hao-Chung LiHung-Ling Tao
口試日期:2013-07-26
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:農業經濟學研究所
學門:農業科學學門
學類:農業經濟及推廣學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2013
畢業學年度:101
語文別:中文
論文頁數:62
中文關鍵詞:在學打工人力資本內生性工具變數法學業成就
外文關鍵詞:part-time jobhuman capitalendogeneityinstrumental variable methodacademic performance
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:850
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本文欲探討台灣高中職(五專)學生於高中時期的打工行為,對於其大學入學考試成績的影響。打工行為是人力資本累積的途徑之一,長期而言,人力資本的累積對於未來的薪資平均而言存在正向的報酬;然而,在台灣的升學制度下,多數高中職(五專)學生必須面臨各種形式的大學入學考試以當作分發大學校系的標準,因此,在時間稟賦的限制下,在投入打工時間的同時,也必須犧牲相對應的學習課業時間,由此觀點可知,在學打工行為雖然能夠累積人力資本,卻也需付出一定程度的學業機會成本。
然而,在學時期打工決策的選擇存在內生性問題,這是因為個人的能力存在異質性,導致誤差項與解釋變數相關,因此,若不考慮其內生性,估計出來的係數將不具有一致性進而產生偏誤。本文利用中央研究院社會學研究所的年度計劃──「青少年成長歷程研究」為資料來源,並嘗試利用兩階段工具變數法修正其內生性問題,以獲得理論上的一致性估計量。
研究結果顯示,於第一階段的估計中,不論是採用受訪者的學校型態(IV1)、受訪者居住地的職業學校家數(IV2)、受訪者家中子女數目(IV3)、受訪者有無可支配的零用錢(IV4)當作工具變數,除了IV4對於內生變數(打工決策)不具有解釋力外,其餘皆具有顯著的解釋力;於第二階段的估計中,與不考慮內生性的OLS法互相比較得知,不考慮內生性的OLS模型低估了打工決策對於學業成就的負面影響,意即在考慮內生性下的工具變數法模型,其打工決策對於學業成就存在更嚴重的負面影響。
最後,本文透過第一階段弱工具變數檢定的F值、過度認定限制檢定的P值以及第二階段的調正後判定係數(Adj R-squared)當作篩選標準,在各種不同工具變數的組合下,獲得最佳的工具變數組合IV1+IV2。


The objective of this study is to investigate the effects of Taiwanese high school students’ part-time job on their performance of the college entrance examination. Taking a part-time job is one of the best ways for students to accumulate human capital and it is beneficial for their future salary in the long run. However, current Taiwanese education system puts massive pressure on high school students, who have to invest most of their time in study in order to gain admission to an ideal college. Time, accordingly, is the most valuable asset for high school students but working part-time significantly reduces their study time. As a result, a loss of study time becomes the student’s major opportunity cost of working a part-time job.
Nevertheless, unobserved individual ability heterogeneity could lead to endogeneity, and by neglecting the endogeneity, the inconsistency of the estimated coefficient would result in bias. This research is based on the Annual Taiwan Youth Project, conducted by the Institute of Social Sciences of the Academia Sinica. Moreover, a two-stage instrumental variable approach was implemented to correct the endogeneity and obtain a consistent estimator, theoretically.
The result of first stage indicates that, except whether survey participant has disposable income (IV4), the following instrumental variables - school type of survey participants (IV1), number of vocational schools on survey participant’s location (IV2) and number of siblings of survey participants (IV3) - have significant influence on endogeneity. The second stage suggests that the negative effect of doing part-time jobs on academic performance is underestimated by the OLS model, without considering endogeneity. In other words, doing part-time job causes a larger significant negative effect on academic performance when we use an instrumental variable model, considering endogeneity.
Last but not least, by using a weak instrument test, an over-identification test and adjusted R-squared as filters, the best instrumental variable combination, IV1+IV2, was acquired.


目錄
摘要 i
Abstract ii
目錄 iv
表目錄 v
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究方法與架構 4
第二章 文獻回顧 5
第三章 資料與基本統計量 18
第一節 資料來源 18
第二節 資料處理 21
第三節 基本統計量 33
第四章 實證模型與實證結果 42
第一節 實證模型 42
第二節 工具變數的選取及工具變數有效性檢定 44
第三節 變數定義及基本敘述統計 47
第四節 實證結果 49
第五章 結論與建議 60
參考文獻 62



行政院勞委會,2006。『九十五年度大學生打工狀況調查』。台北,行政院勞委會。
周華玉,2009。「影響青少年在學打工之因素──以追蹤資料為例」,碩士論文,國立台灣大學農業經濟系。
陳心儂,2011。「大學時期工讀經驗對畢業成績及初期薪資之影響」,碩士論文,東吳大學經濟學系。
D’Amico (1984). "Does employment during high school impair academic progress? "Sociology of Education,57:152-164.
Hotz, Joseph V., Lixin Colin Xu, Marta Tienda, and Avner Ahituv (2002)." Are There Returns to the Wages of Young Men from Working While in School." Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(2): 221-236.
Lee, Chanyoung, and Peter F. Orazem (2010). "High School Employment, School Performance, and College Entry." Economics of Education Review, 29(1): 29-39.
Light, Audrey (1999). "High School Employment, High School Curriculum, and Post-School Wages." Economics of Education Review, 18(3): 291-309.
Light, Audrey (2001). "In-School Work Experience and the Returns to Schooling." Journal of Labor Economics, 19(1): 65-93.
Lillydahl, Jane H. (1990). "Academic Achievement and Part-Time Employment of High School Students." Journal of Economic Education, 21(3): 307-316.
Oettinger, Gerald S. (1999). "Does High School Employment Affect High School Academic Performance?" Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 53(1): 136-151.
Ruhm, Christopher (1997)." Is High School Employment Consumption or Investment?" Journal of Labor Economics, 15(4)735-776.
Stinebrickner, Ralph, and Todd R. Stinebrickner (2003). "Working during School and Academic Performance." Journal of Labor Economics, 21(2): 473-491.
Tyler, John H. (2003)." Using State Child Labor Laws to Identify the Effect of School-Year Work on High School Achievement." Journal of Labor Economics, 21(2): 381-408.


QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top