臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

為因應漁業資源日益減少，魚類復育放流在全世界被廣為採用，但放流成效常因事前評估工作不足、施作不當使效果不佳，而缺乏中間育成培養放流物種野外生存能力亦為可能敗因之一，在生物成長、繁衍、遷移或避敵等重要行為都仰賴能量投注，覓食行為重要性無庸置疑，對群體生活的物種更加重要，對魚類而言，群聚行為已被廣泛研究，但較偏重同一群體內個體的比較，來自不同群體的個體間影響研究較少，然若不詳加釐清各群聚之間在覓食行為上之食物認知能力或種間競爭力等變數，放流施作恐不易成功，再則，放流通常會造成施作區域種間族群比例短時間內急遽失衡，在此前提下，究竟是原生群體受外來群體影響較鉅抑或完全相反，情況仍待諸多研究驗證，因此，本研究運用隔板試驗台灣鏟頷魚野生、放流再捕及養殖三族群間單一族群、兩兩族群三比三混合群聚以及五比一混合群聚中第一尾通過隔板、第一尾攝食、兩尾攝食、三尾攝食共四項時間點輔以表現行為來探討各群聚組合在覓食藻類及飼料上的差異，結果顯示，單一族群在覓食各自長期攝食的食物上皆快速，又當群聚成員越單純，整體覓食的表現越佳，而當其中有一名成員被不同群的個體取代時，群體覓食表現明顯受其影響，而當群聚內兩群個體數量數相當時，覓食表現較多樣分歧，綜合上述結果顯示台灣鏟頷魚群聚覓食行為受不同群個體顯著的影響。

The fisheries resources depleted in recent decades, fish stocking were widely adopted to enhance the resources in many countries. The release effects were usually poor due to its assessments not enough, wrong operation or low survival and foraging ability of fishes, especially for those group-living animals which often got social information to elevate individual fitness. The shoaling behavior is important for information transfer, anti-predator responses and foraging ability for individuals among shoal but a few studies between shoals. The purpose of the study is to compare the foraging behaviors among three groups, i.e., the wild, the hatchery, and the mark-released Taiwan shoveljaw carp (Varicorhinus barbatulus). Three shoals for six individuals from same group, six shoals for five-one from two groups and three shoals for three-three from two groups were selected, respectively. There were four time recorded, i.e., the time for the first individual swim through opaque partition, the first individual begin to feed algae or artificial diets, two individuals together feed, and three individuals or above together feed, besides which groups were also identified. The results are as follows. The four recorded time for the six individuals from same group were shorter for all shoals, in other words, those groups have the strongest explored behavior and have faster foraging ability for their habitual foods. The foraging patterns were influenced among the five-one from two groups and were divergent for three-three from two groups. In summary, the foraging behaviors of shoals were influenced by the individuals from different groups obviously.

謝辭............................................................................................................i
中文摘要...................................................................................................ii
Abstract.....................................................................................................iii
壹、前言.....................................................................................................1
漁業資源復育與放流現況.............................................................1
放流與野生族群競爭關係.............................................................3
魚類覓食行為.................................................................................4
動物群聚效應.................................................................................5
研究目的.........................................................................................6
貳、材料與方法.........................................................................................8
實驗魚種、來源與飼養環境條件....................................................8
實驗方法.........................................................................................9
行為判讀及比較方法...................................................................10
參、結果...................................................................................................11
單一類型群聚對於藻類與人工飼料覓食行為比較..................11
五比一混合類型群聚覓食行為比較..........................................11
三比三混合類型群聚覓食行為比較..........................................13
肆、討論...................................................................................................15
單一群聚覓食實驗......................................................................15
五比一混合群聚..........................................................................16
三比三混合群聚..........................................................................18
未來放流操作建議......................................................................20
伍、結論...................................................................................................21
陸、參考文獻...........................................................................................22
表.............................................................................................................28
圖.............................................................................................................35
照片.........................................................................................................57

李英周、郭一羽、吳俊宗、朱達仁，2012。石門水庫集水區移地復育在地民眾參與生態監測及成效評估100-101年正式報告書。
呂榮琦、李英周、潘明雄，2008。魚苗放流中間育成之內涵與實施，臺灣漁業永續發展協會會訊，6，8-10。
呂榮琦，2009。探討降低黑鯛魚苗運輸緊迫及增加放流存活率之研究。臺灣大學漁業科學研究所，碩士論文。
沈世傑，1993。台灣魚類誌。國立台灣大學動物學系。臺北。
郭慶老，2002。台灣海洋物種之標誌放流試驗。台灣海洋學刊，40(1)，13-20。
能勢幸雄，石井丈夫，清水誠，1988。第六章標識放流法。東京大學出版社。 135-152。
張惟哲。2006。大量魚苗標識與放流之研究。臺灣大學漁業科學研究所，碩士論文。
鄭豐洲、張永明、曾萬年，1996。花身雞魚的耳石成長與生活履歷關係之研究。 台灣水產學會刊，23(2)，79-94。
盧宗楷，2009。紅樹林鱂魚(Kryptolebiasmarmoratus)之勝者效應與睪固酮、皮質醇之關係研究。國立臺灣師範大學。碩士論文。
Babaluk, J.A., Campbell, J.S. (1987). Preliminary results of tetracycline labeling for validating annual growth increments in opercula of walleyes. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage., 7, 138-141.
Bams, R. A. (1967). Differences in Performance of Naturally and Artificially Propagated Sockeye Salmon Migrant Fry as Measured with Swimming and Predation Tests. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 24(5), 1117.
Berejikian, B. A. (1995). The effects of hatchery and wild ancestry and experience on the relative ability of steelhead trout fry (Oncorhynchus mykiss) to avoid a benthic predator. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 52(11), 2476-2482.
Berejikian, B. A., Tezak, E. P., Schroder, S. L., Flagg, T. A., and Knudsen, C. M. (1999). Competitive differences between newly emerged offspring of captive-reared and wild coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 128(5), 832-839.
Birch, L. C. (1957). The Meanings of Competition. American Naturalist, 91(856), 5-18.
Breuning, S. E., Ferguson, D. G., and Poling, A. D. (1981). 2nd-Order Schedule Effects with Goldfish - a Comparison of Brief-Stimulus, Chained, and Tandem Schedules. Psychological Record, 31(3), 437-445.
Brown, C., and Laland, K. N. (2003). Social learning in fishes: a review. Fish and Fisheries, 4(3), 280-288.
Brown. C., (2011). Fish Cognition and Behavior (K. L. Culum Brown, Jens Krause Ed.).
Bryant, M.D., Dolloff, C.A., Porter, P.E., Wright, B.E. (1990). Freeze branding with CO2: an effective and easy-to-use field method to mark fish. Am. Fish. Soc., Symp. 7, 30–35.
Chang, W.C., Lee, Y.C., Shih, C.H. (2008). The determination of mass marking methods with high marks retention rate for hatchery-reared fry. J. Fish. Soc. Taiwan, 35(2), 185-194.
Coleman, F. C., and Travis, J. (1998). Proceedings of the First William R. and Lenore Mote International Symposium in Fisheries Ecology, November 20-23, 1996, Sarasota, Florida, USA - Marine stock enhancement: A new perspective - Preface. Bulletin of Marine Science, 62(2), 303-303.
Couzin, I. D., Krause, J., James, R., Ruxton, G. D., and Franks, N. R. (2002). Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 218(1), 1-11.
Craig, W.R. (1987). Flocks, Herds, and Schools: A Distributed Behavioral Model. Computer Graphics, 21.
Croney, C. C., and Newberry, R. C. (2007). Group size and cognitive processes. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 103(3-4), 215-228.
Day, R. L., MacDonald, T., Brown, C., Laland, K. N., and Reader, S. M. (2001). Interactions between shoal size and conformity in guppy social foraging. Animal Behaviour, 62, 917-925.
Day, R. L., MacDonald, T., Brown, C., Laland, K. N., and Reader, S. M. (2002). Interactions between shoal size and conformity in guppy social foraging. (vol 62, pg 917, 2001). Animal Behaviour, 63, 193-193.
Elliott, J. M. (1975). Weight of Food and Time Required to Satiate Brown Trout, Salmo-Trutta L. Freshwater Biology, 5(1), 51-64.
Ersbak, K., and Haase, B.L. 1983. Nutritional deprivation after stocking as a possible mechanism leading to mortality in streamstocked brook trout. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 3: 142–151.
Fleming, I. A., and Gross, M. R. (1994). Breeding Competition in a Pacific Salmon (Coho, Oncorhynchus-Kisutch) - Measures of Natural and Sexual Selection. Evolution, 48(3), 637-657.
Furuta, S. (1996). Predation on juvenile japenese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) by diurnal piscivorous fish: field observations and laboratory experiments. In: Survival Strategies in Early Life Stages of Marine Resources.(eds Yoshirō Watanabe, Yō Yamashita and Yoshioki Ōzeki). A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 285-294.
Galef, B. J., Jr. (1988). Imitation in animals: History, definition, and interpretation of data from the psychological laboratory. In T. R. Zentall & B. G. Galef, Jr. (Eds.), Social learning: Psychological and biological perspectives (pp. 3-28). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gross, M. R. (1998). One species with two biologies: Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in the wild and in aquaculture. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 55, 131-144.
Healey, M. C., and Reinhardt, U. (1995). Predator Avoidance in Naive and Experienced Juvenile Chinook and Coho Salmon. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 52(3), 614-622.
Hughes, R. N., and Blight, C. M. (2000). Two intertidal fish species use visual association learning to track the status of food patches in a radial maze. Animal Behaviour, 59, 613-621.
Ide, L. M., Urbinati, E. C., and Hoffmann, A. (2003). The role of olfaction in the behavioural and physiological responses to conspecific skin extract in Brycon cephalus. Journal of Fish Biology, 63(2), 332-343.
Jenkins, T. M. (1971). Role of Social Behavior in Dispersal of Introduced Rainbow Trout (Salmo-Gairdneri). Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 28(7), 1019.
Kevin, Roger. (2011). Learning of Foraging Skills by Fish (K. L. Culum Brown, Jens Krause Ed. 2 ed.): Wiley-Blackwell.
Krause. (1993). The Influence of Hunger on Shoal Size Choice by 3-Spined Sticklebacks, Gasterosteus-Aculeatus. Journal of Fish Biology, 43(5), 775-780.
Krause. (2002). Living in Groups. Press, New York, Oxford Univ. , 6-40.
Lachlan, R. F., Crooks, L., and Laland, K. N. (1998). Who follows whom? Shoaling preferences and social learning of foraging information in guppies. Animal Behaviour, 56, 181-190.
Lima, Steven L. (1995). Back to the basics of anti-predatory vigilance: the group-size effect. Animal Behaviour, 49(1), 11-20.
Lord, R. F. (1934). Hatchery trout as foragers and game fish. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc., 64, 339-345.
Mackney, P. A., and Hughes, R. N. (1995). Foraging behaviour and memory window in sticklebacks. Behaviour, 132, 1241-1253.
Maynard, D. J., McDowell, G. C., Tezak, E. P., and Flagg, T. A. (1996). Effect of diets supplemented with live food on the foraging behavior of cultured fall chinook salmon. Progressive Fish-Culturist, 58(3), 187-191.
McFarlane, G.A., Wydowski, R.S. and Prince, E.D. (1990). External tags and marks, historical review of the development of external tags and marks. American Fisheries Society Symposium, Symp.7, 9-29.
Mcneil, W. J. (1991). Expansion of Cultured Pacific Salmon into Marine Ecosystems. Aquaculture, 98(1-3), 173-183.
McRobert, S. P., and Bradner, J. (1998). The influence of body coloration on shoaling preferences in fish. Animal Behaviour, 56, 611-615.
Mesa, M. G. (1991). Variation in Feeding, Aggression, and Position Choice between Hatchery and Wild Cutthroat Trout in an Artificial Stream. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 120(6), 723-727.
Metcalfe, N. B., and Thorpe, J. E. (1992). Early Predictors of Life-History Events - the Link between 1st Feeding Date, Dominance and Seaward Migration in Atlantic Salmon, Salmo-Salar L. Journal of Fish Biology, 41, 93-99.
Milinski, M. (1993). Predation risk and feeding behaviour. London: Chapman & Hall.
Morgan, M. J. (1988). The Influence of Hunger, Shoal Size and Predator Presence on Foraging in Bluntnose Minnows. Animal Behaviour, 36, 1317-1322.
Morrell, L. J., Croft, D. P., Dyer, J. R. G., Chapman, B. B., Kelley, J. L., Laland, K. N., and Krause, J. (2008). Association patterns and foraging behaviour in natural and artificial guppy shoals. Animal Behaviour, 76, 855-864.
Moyle, P. B. (1969). Comparative Behavior of Young Brook Trout of Domestic and Wild Origin. Progressive Fish-Culturist, 31(1), 51.
Nielson, B. R. (1990). Twelve-Year Overview of Fluorescent Grit Marking of Cutthroat Trout in Bear Lake, Utah-Idaho. . American Fisheries Symposium, 7, 42-46.
Olla, B. L., and Davis, M. W. (1989). The Role of Learning and Stress in Predator Avoidance of Hatchery-Reared Coho Salmon (Oncorhynchus-Kisutch) Juveniles. Aquaculture, 76(3-4), 209-214.
Olla, B. L., Davis, M. W., and Ryer, C. H. (1998). Understanding how the hatchery environment represses or promotes the development of behavioral survival skills. Bulletin of Marine Science, 62(2), 531-550.
Parrish, Pitcher and. (1993). The behaviour of teleost fishes. London.: Chapman and Hall.
Peuhkuri, N. (1997). Size-assortative shoaling in fish: The effect of oddity on foraging behaviour. Animal Behaviour, 54, 271-278.
Pickering, A. D., and Pottinger, T. G. (1989). Stress Responses and Disease Resistance in Salmonid Fish - Effects of Chronic Elevation of Plasma-Cortisol. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry, 7(1-6), 253-258.
Pickering, A. D., Pottinger, T. G., and Christie, P. (1982). Recovery of the Brown Trout, Salmo-Trutta-L, from Acute Handling Stress - a Time-Course Study. Journal of Fish Biology, 20(2), 229-244.
Pitcher. (1979). Sensory Information and the Organization of Behavior in a Shoaling Cyprinid Fish. Animal Behaviour, 27(Feb), 126-149.
Pitcher. (1983). Heuristic Definitions of Fish Shoaling Behavior. Animal Behaviour, 31(May), 611-613.
Pitcher. (1987). Foraging Rules for Group Feeders - Area Copying Depends Upon Food Density in Shoaling Goldfish. Ethology, 76(2), 161-167.
Pitcher, Magurran, Winfield. (1982). Fish in Larger Shoals Find Food Faster. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 10(2), 149-151.
Priyadarshana, T., Asaeda, T., and Manatunge, J. (2006). Hunger-induced foraging behavior of two cyprinid fish: Pseudorasbora parva and Rasbora daniconius. Hydrobiologia, 568, 341-352.
Richkus, W.A. (1978). A quantitative study of inter tide-pool movement of the woolly sculpin Clinocottus analis. Marine Biology (Berlin), 49, 277-284.
Robert Boyd, Peter J. Richerson. (1985). Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rosenau, M. L., and Mcphail, J. D. (1987). Inherited Differences in Agonistic Behavior between 2 Populations of Coho Salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 116(4), 646-654.
Ryer, C. H., and Olla, B. L. (1992). Social Mechanisms Facilitating Exploitation of Spatially-Variable Ephemeral Food Patches in a Pelagic Marine Fish. Animal Behaviour, 44(1), 69-74.
Ryer, C. H., and Olla, B. L. (1995). Influences of Food Distribution on Fish Foraging Behavior. Animal Behaviour, 49(2), 411-418.
Schmidt, J. (1923). The breeding place of the eel. Trans. Roy. Soc. (London), (B)(211), 179-208.
Sheenaja. (2012). Population Difference in foraging behaviour of Nandus nandus (Hum-Buch). Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Sciences, 1(6), 28-30.
Shen, S. F., Vehrencamp, S. L., Johnstone, R. A., Chen, H. C., Chan, S. F., Liao, W. Y., Yuan, H. W. (2012). Unfavourable environment limits social conflict in Yuhina brunneiceps. Nature Communications, 3.
Sosiak, A. J., Randall, R. G., and Mckenzie, J. A. (1979). Feeding by hatchery-reared and wild Atlantic Salmon (Salmo Salar) Parr in Streams. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 36(11), 1408-1412.
Steward, C.R., and Bjornn, T.C. (1990). Supplementation of salmon and steelhead stocks with hatchery fish: a synthesis of published literature. Tech. Rep.
Stone, L. (1872). Trout culture. Proc. Ain. Fish Culturists'' Assoc., 1, 46-56.
Svasand, T., Kristiansen, T. S., Pedersen, T., Salvanes, A. G. V., Engelsen, R., Naevdal, G., and Nodtvedt, M. (2000). The enhancement of cod stocks. Fish and Fisheries, 1(2), 173-205.
Swain, D. P., Riddell, B. E., and Murray, C. B. (1991). Morphological Differences between Hatchery and Wild Populations of Coho Salmon (Oncorhynchus-Kisutch) - Environmental Versus Genetic-Origin. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 48(9), 1783-1791.
Tomiyama, T., Ebe, K., Kawata, G., and Fujii, T. (2009). Post-release predation on hatchery-reared Japanese flounder Paralichthys olivaceus in the coast of Fukushima, Japan. Journal of Fish Biology, 75(10), 2629-2641.
Walsh, M. G., Bjorgo, K. A., and Isely, J. J. (2000). Effects of implantation method and temperature on mortality and loss of simulated transmitters in hybrid striped bass. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 129(2), 539-544.
Ward, A. J. W., Krause, J., and Sumpter, D. J. T. (2012). Quorum decision-making in foraging fish shoals. Plos One, 7(3): e32411.
Ward, A. J. W., Sumpter, D. J. T., Couzin, L. D., Hart, P. J. B., and Krause, J. (2008). Quorum decision-making facilitates information transfer in fish shoals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(19), 6948-6953.
Woods, C. M. C., and James, P. J. (2003). Evaluation of visible implant fluorescent elastomer (VIE) as a tagging technique for spiny lobsters (Jasus edwardsii). Marine and Freshwater Research, 54(7), 853-858.
Zahavi, A. (1983). Citation classic - the importance of certain assemblages of birds as information-centers for food-finding. Current Contents/Agriculture Biology & Environmental Sciences(15), 26-26.