臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

目的：比較鏡像療法合併電刺激、鏡像療法合併安慰劑刺激及鏡像療法對慢性中風患者感覺動作功能、日常生活功能和動作控制的療效。
設計：隨機分派，前測後測比較，安慰劑控制組試驗
環境：10家醫院
受試者：44位慢性中風門診個案，動作損傷程度位於中度至重度。
介入：每週五天，每天1.5小時，為期四週的療程。
成效評量：主要評估工具包含傅格-梅爾動作評估量表（Fugl-Meyer Assessment）、沃夫動作功能測驗（Wolf Motor Function Test）、功能獨力量表之動作項目（motor items of Functional Independence Measure）、運動學分析；次要評估工具為修訂版諾丁漢感覺動作評估量表（revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment）、十公尺步行測驗（10-Meter Walking Test）。採用疲勞視覺類比量表（Visual Analogue Fatigue Scale）來監測各種療法的副作用。
結果：四周治療後，所有組別在傅格-梅爾動作評估量表總分和修訂版諾丁漢感覺動作評估量表總分均有顯著進步。鏡像療法合併電刺激組在沃夫動作功能測驗的表現時間（performance time）和十公尺步行測驗的步長（stride）有顯著的組內差異。鏡像療法合併電刺激組和鏡像療法合併安慰劑刺激組在功能獨力量表之動作項目的轉位（transfer）和移行（locomotion）顯著優於鏡像療法組。感覺復原方面，修訂版諾丁漢感覺動作評估量表的溫度覺和辨位覺有高度效果值，但樣本數較小（N = 23）。運動學方面，鏡像療法合併電刺激組在尖峰速度和達終端尖峰速度所占時間百分比有較佳的療效。鏡像療法合併安慰劑刺激組在沃夫動作功能測驗的表現時間、十公尺步行測驗的步長及功能獨力量表之動作項目的轉位和移行有優於鏡像治療的趨勢。
結論：鏡像療法合併全手型感覺電刺激是可行的，並且在改善慢性中風患者的動作功能、動作控制和日常生活功能有較佳的療效。未來需要收入更大的樣本數來探討鏡像療法合併電刺激在感覺復原的療效。在符合倫理的狀況下，臨床上可使用安慰劑治療來誘發安慰劑效應。

Objective: To compare the effects of mirror therapy combined with mesh-glove stimulation (MGS), mirror therapy with placebo stimulation (MTP), and mirror therapy (MT) on sensorimotor functions, daily functions and motor control for patients with chronic stoke.
Design: A randomized, pretest-posttest, placebo-controlled trial
Settings: Ten hospitals
Participants: Outpatients with chronic stroke (N = 44) with sever to moderate motor impairment.
Interventions: The MGS group received mirror therapy program combined with mesh-glove stimulation. The MTP group received mirror therapy program combined with placebo stimulation. The MT group received mirror therapy program. The intensity for both groups was 1.5 hours/day, 5 days/week, for 4 weeks.
Main measures: Primary outcomes were Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), motor items of Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and kinematic analysis. Secondary outcomes were revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment (rNSA), 10-Meter Walking Test (10MWT). Visual Analogue Fatigue Scale (VAFS) was used to detect adverse effects of each treatment.
Results: After four week treatment, all groups significant improved on overall FMA scores and overall rNSA scores. MGS showed better outcome on WMFT Time and 10MWT. MGS and MTP had significant improvement on transfer and locomotion subscale of FIM than MT. In rNSA, temperature sense and localization sense had large effect size, however, the sample size (N = 23) was small. In kinematic analysis, MGS tend to improved more on PV and PPV. There is a trend that MTP improved more than MT on WMFT Time, 10MWT, and transfer and locomotion subscale of FIM.
Conclusions: Mesh-glove stimulation is feasible to combine with mirror therapy. The application of MGS after stroke might result in beneficial effects on motor functions, motor control, and daily functions. A larger sample size is needed to explore the effects of MGS on improving sensory recovery. Ethical use of placebo treatments could be delivered in the clinic to stimulate placebo effects.

口試委員會審定書 I
誌謝 II
摘要 III
Abstract V
Table of Contents VII
List of Tables IX
List of Figures X
Chapter 1. Introduction 1
1.1 Backgroud 1
1.2 Study Purposes and Hypothesis 5
Chapter 2. Methods 6
2.1 Study Design 6
2.2 Participants 7
2.3 Interventions 8
2.3.1 Mirror Therapy with Mesh-glove stimulation 8
2.3.2 Mirror Therapy with Placebo stimulation 9
2.3.3 Mirror therapy 10
2.4 Outcome Measures 11
2.4.1 Primary Outcomes 11
2.4.2 Secondary Outcomes 13
2.4.3 Adverse effects 14
2.4.4 Kinematic Analysis 15
2.5 Data Analysis 18
Chapter 3. Results 19
3.1 Primary outcome measures 19
3.2 Secondary outcome measures 21
3.3 Adverse effects 21
Chapter 4. Discussion 22
4.1 Effects of improving motor functions and motor control 22
4.2 Effects of improving sensory recovery 26
4.3 Effects of improving daily functions 27
4.4 Adverse effects 28
4.4 Placebo effects 28
4.5 Study limitations and suggestions 29
Chapter 5. Conclusion 30
References 31

Altschuler, E. L., Wisdom, S. B., Stone, L., Foster, C., Galasko, D., Llewellyn, D. M., & Ramachandran, V. S. (1999). Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror. Lancet, 353(9169), 2035-2036.
Asanuma, H. (1981). Functional role of sensory inputs to the motor cortex. Prog Neurobiol, 16(3-4), 241-262.
Cacchio, A., De Blasis, E., De Blasis, V., Santilli, V., & Spacca, G. (2009). Mirror therapy in complex regional pain syndrome type 1 of the upper limb in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 23(8), 792-799. doi: 10.1177/1545968309335977
Cacchio, A., De Blasis, E., Necozione, S., di Orio, F., & Santilli, V. (2009). Mirror therapy for chronic complex regional pain syndrome type 1 and stroke. N Engl J Med, 361(6), 634-636. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc0902799
Celnik, P., Hummel, F., Harris-Love, M., Wolk, R., & Cohen, L. G. (2007). Somatosensory stimulation enhances the effects of training functional hand tasks in patients with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 88(11), 1369-1376. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.001
Conforto, A. B., Ferreiro, K. N., Tomasi, C., dos Santos, R. L., Moreira, V. L., Marie, S. K., . . . Cohen, L. G. (2010). Effects of somatosensory stimulation on motor function after subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 24(3), 263-272. doi: 10.1177/1545968309349946
Connell, L. A., & Tyson, S. F. (2012). Measures of sensation in neurological conditions: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil, 26(1), 68-80. doi: 10.1177/0269215511412982
Daly, J. J., Hogan, N., Perepezko, E. M., Krebs, H. I., Rogers, J. M., Goyal, K. S., . . . Ruff, R. L. (2005). Response to upper-limb robotics and functional neuromuscular stimulation following stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev, 42(6), 723-736.
Dimitrijevic, M. M. (1994). Mesh-glove. 1. A method for whole-hand electrical stimulation in upper motor neuron dysfunction. Scand J Rehabil Med, 26(4), 183-186.
Dimitrijevic, M. M., & Soroker, N. (1994). Mesh-glove. 2. Modulation of residual upper limb motor control after stroke with whole-hand electric stimulation. Scand J Rehabil Med, 26(4), 187-190.
Dimitrijevic, M. M., Stokic, D. S., Wawro, A. W., & Wun, C. C. (1996). Modification of motor control of wrist extension by mesh-glove electrical afferent stimulation in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 77(3), 252-258.
Dohle, C., Pullen, J., Nakaten, A., Kust, J., Rietz, C., & Karbe, H. (2009). Mirror therapy promotes recovery from severe hemiparesis: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 23(3), 209-217. doi: 10.1177/1545968308324786
Finniss, D. G., Kaptchuk, T. J., Miller, F., & Benedetti, F. (2010). Biological, clinical, and ethical advances of placebo effects. Lancet, 375(9715), 686-695. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61706-2
Fredericks, C. M. (1996). Basic sensory mechanisms and the somatosensory system. In Fredericks, C. M. & Saladin, L. K. (Ed.), Pathophysiology of the motor systems: principles and clinical presentations. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
Fugl-Meyer, A. R., Jaasko, L., Leyman, I., Olsson, S., & Steglind, S. (1975). The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med, 7(1), 13-31.
Funase, K., Tabira, T., Higashi, T., Liang, N., & Kasai, T. (2007). Increased corticospinal excitability during direct observation of self-movement and indirect observation with a mirror box. Neurosci Lett, 419(2), 108-112. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.04.025
Garry, M. I., Loftus, A., & Summers, J. J. (2005). Mirror, mirror on the wall: viewing a mirror reflection of unilateral hand movements facilitates ipsilateral M1 excitability. Exp Brain Res, 163(1), 118-122. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-2226-9
Golaszewski, S. M., Bergmann, J., Christova, M., Kunz, A. B., Kronbichler, M., Rafolt, D., . . . Nardone, R. (2012). Modulation of motor cortex excitability by different levels of whole-hand afferent electrical stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol, 123(1), 193-199. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.06.010
Golaszewski, S. M., Bergmann, J., Christova, M., Nardone, R., Kronbichler, M., Rafolt, D., . . . Beisteiner, R. (2010). Increased motor cortical excitability after whole-hand electrical stimulation: a TMS study. Clin Neurophysiol, 121(2), 248-254. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.09.024
Golaszewski, S. M., Kremser, C., Wagner, M., Felber, S., Aichner, F., & Dimitrijevic, M. M. (1999). Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the human motor cortex before and after whole-hand afferent electrical stimulation. Scand J Rehabil Med, 31(3), 165-173.
Golaszewski, S. M., Siedentopf, C. M., Koppelstaetter, F., Rhomberg, P., Guendisch, G. M., Schlager, A., . . . Mottaghy, F. M. (2004). Modulatory effects on human sensorimotor cortex by whole-hand afferent electrical stimulation. Neurology, 62(12), 2262-2269.
Haaland, K. Y., Prestopnik, J. L., Knight, R. T., & Lee, R. R. (2004). Hemispheric asymmetries for kinematic and positional aspects of reaching. Brain, 127(Pt 5), 1145-1158. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh133
Hendricks, H. T., van Limbeek, J., Geurts, A. C., & Zwarts, M. J. (2002). Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 83(11), 1629-1637.
Hsieh, Y. W., Wu, C. Y., Lin, K. C., Chang, Y. F., Chen, C. L., & Liu, J. S. (2009). Responsiveness and validity of three outcome measures of motor function after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke, 40(4), 1386-1391. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.108.530584
Hsueh, I. P., Lin, J. H., Jeng, J. S., & Hsieh, C. L. (2002). Comparison of the psychometric characteristics of the functional independence measure, 5 item Barthel index, and 10 item Barthel index in patients with stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 73(2), 188-190.
Hubbard, I. J., Parsons, M. W., Neilson, C., & Carey, L. M. (2009). Task-specific training: evidence for and translation to clinical practice. Occup Ther Int, 16(3-4), 175-189. doi: 10.1002/oti.275
Ikuno, K., Kawaguchi, S., Kitabeppu, S., Kitaura, M., Tokuhisa, K., Morimoto, S., . . . Shomoto, K. (2012). Effects of peripheral sensory nerve stimulation plus task-oriented training on upper extremity function in patients with subacute stroke: a pilot randomized crossover trial. Clin Rehabil. doi: 10.1177/0269215512441476
Keith, R. A., Granger, C. V., Hamilton, B. B., & Sherwin, F. S. (1987). The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabil, 1, 6-18.
Kitago, T., Liang, J., Huang, V. S., Hayes, S., Simon, P., Tenteromano, L., . . . Krakauer, J.W. (2013). Improvement after constraint-induced movement therapy: recovery of normal motor control or task-specific compensation? Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 27(2), 99-109. doi: 10.1177/1545968312452631
Klaiput, A., & Kitisomprayoonkul, W. (2009). Increased pinch strength in acute and subacute stroke patients after simultaneous median and ulnar sensory stimulation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 23(4), 351-356.
Koesler, I. B., Dafotakis, M., Ameli, M., Fink, G. R., & Nowak, D. A. (2009). Electrical somatosensory stimulation improves movement kinematics of the affected hand following stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 80(6), 614-619. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2008.161117
Kong, K. H., Chua, K. S., & Lee, J. (2011). Recovery of upper limb dexterity in patients more than 1 year after stroke: Frequency, clinical correlates and predictors. NeuroRehabilitation, 28(2), 105-111. doi: 10.3233/nre-2011-0639
Laufer, Y., & Elboim-Gabyzon, M. (2011). Does sensory transcutaneous electrical stimulation enhance motor recovery following a stroke? A systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 25(9), 799-809.
Lee, M. M., Cho, H. Y., & Song, C. H. (2012). The Mirror Therapy Program Enhances Upper-Limb Motor Recovery and Motor Function in Acute Stroke Patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31824fa86d
Levin, M. F., Michaelsen, S. M., Cirstea, C. M., & Roby-Brami, A. (2002). Use of the trunk for reaching targets placed within and beyond the reach in adult hemiparesis. Exp Brain Res, 143(2), 171-180. doi: 10.1007/s00221-001-0976-6
Liao, W. W., Wu, C. Y., Hsieh, Y. W., Lin, K. C., & Chang, W. Y. (2012). Effects of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation on daily function and real-world arm activity in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil, 26(2), 111-120. doi: 10.1177/0269215511416383
Lin, K. C., Hsieh, Y. W., Wu, C. Y., Chen, C. L., Jang, Y., & Liu, J. S. (2009). Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of the Wolf Motor Function Test in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 23(5), 429-434. doi: 10.1177/1545968308331144
Lincoln, N. B., Jackson, J. M., & Adams, S. A. (1998a). Reliability and Revision of Nottingham Sensory Assessment for Stroke Patients. . Physiotheray, 84(8), 358-365. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9406(05)61454-x
Lincoln, N. B., Jackson, J. M., & Adams, S. A. (1998b). Reliability and Revision of the Nottingham Sensory Assessment for Stroke Patients. Physiotherapy, 84(8), 358-365. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9406(05)61454-x
Maeda, A., Yuasa, T., Nakamura, K., Higuchi, S., & Motohashi, Y. (2000). Physical performance tests after stroke: reliability and validity. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 79(6), 519-525.
Meesen, R. L., Cuypers, K., Rothwell, J. C., Swinnen, S. P., & Levin, O. (2011). The effect of long-term TENS on persistent neuroplastic changes in the human cerebral cortex. Hum Brain Mapp, 32(6), 872-882. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21075
Mendoza, J. E., & Foundas, A. L. (2008). The somatosensory systems. In J. E. Mendoza & A. L. Foundas (Eds.), Clinical neuroanatomy: a neurobehavioral approach. New York: Springer.
Michielsen, M. E., Selles, R. W., van der Geest, J. N., Eckhardt, M., Yavuzer, G., Stam, H. J., . . . Bussmann, J. B. (2011). Motor recovery and cortical reorganization after mirror therapy in chronic stroke patients: a phase II randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 25(3), 223-233. doi: 10.1177/1545968310385127
Morris, D. M., Uswatte, G., Crago, J. E., Cook, E. W., 3rd, & Taub, E. (2001). The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 82(6), 750-755. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.23183
Nelson, W. L. (1983). Physical principles for economies of skilled movements. Biol Cybern, 46(2), 135-147.
Nojima, I., Mima, T., Koganemaru, S., Thabit, M. N., Fukuyama, H., & Kawamata, T. (2012). Human motor plasticity induced by mirror visual feedback. J Neurosci, 32(4), 1293-1300. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.5364-11.2012
Ottenbacher, K. J., Hsu, Y., Granger, C. V., & Fiedler, R. C. (1996). The reliability of the functional independence measure: a quantitative review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 77(12), 1226-1232.
Patel, A. T., Duncan, P. W., Lai, S. M., & Studenski, S. (2000). The relation between impairments and functional outcomes poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 81(10), 1357-1363. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2000.9397
Peurala, S. H., Pitkanen, K., Sivenius, J., & Tarkka, I. M. (2002). Cutaneous electrical stimulation may enhance sensorimotor recovery in chronic stroke. Clin Rehabil, 16(7), 709-716.
Platz, T., Pinkowski, C., van Wijck, F., Kim, I. H., di Bella, P., & Johnson, G. (2005). Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study. Clin Rehabil, 19(4), 404-411.
Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (2009). In L. G. Portney & M. P. Watkins (Eds.), Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice (3 ed., pp. 830-855). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Health.
Sullivan, J. E., & Hedman, L. D. (2008). Sensory dysfunction following stroke: incidence, significance, examination, and intervention. Top Stroke Rehabil, 15(3), 200-217. doi: 10.1310/tsr1503-200
Sullivan, J. E., Hurley, D., & Hedman, L. D. (2012). Afferent stimulation provided by glove electrode during task-specific arm exercise following stroke. Clin Rehabil. doi: 10.1177/0269215512442915
Sutbeyaz, S., Yavuzer, G., Sezer, N., & Koseoglu, B. F. (2007). Mirror therapy enhances lower-extremity motor recovery and motor functioning after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 88(5), 555-559. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.02.034
Thieme, H., Mehrholz, J., Pohl, M., Behrens, J., & Dohle, C. (2012). Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 3, CD008449. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008449.pub2
Tseng, B. Y., Gajewski, B. J., & Kluding, P. M. (2010). Reliability, responsiveness, and validity of the visual analog fatigue scale to measure exertion fatigue in people with chronic stroke: a preliminary study. Stroke Res Treat, 2010. doi: 10.4061/2010/412964
Tyson, S., & Connell, L. (2009). The psychometric properties and clinical utility of measures of walking and mobility in neurological conditions: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil, 23(11), 1018-1033. doi: 10.1177/0269215509339004
Ward, N. S., & Cohen, L. G. (2004). Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke. Arch Neurol, 61(12), 1844-1848. doi: 10.1001/archneur.61.12.1844
Welmer, A. K., von Arbin, M., Murray, V., Holmqvist, L. W., & Sommerfeld, D. K. (2007). Determinants of mobility and self-care in older people with stroke: importance of somatosensory and perceptual functions. Phys Ther, 87(12), 1633-1641. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20060349
Wolf, S. L., Catlin, P. A., Ellis, M., Archer, A. L., Morgan, B., & Piacentino, A. (2001). Assessing Wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke, 32(7), 1635-1639.
Wu, C. W., Seo, H. J., & Cohen, L. G. (2006). Influence of electric somatosensory stimulation on paretic-hand function in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 87(3), 351-357. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.11.019
Wu, C. Y., Chen, C. L., Tang, S. F., Lin, K. C., & Huang, Y. Y. (2007). Kinematic and clinical analyses of upper-extremity movements after constraint-induced movement therapy in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 88(8), 964-970. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.05.012
Wu, C. Y., Huang, P. C., Chen, Y. T., Lin, K. C., & Yang, H. W. (2013). Effects of mirror therapy on motor and sensory recovery in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 94(6), 1023-1030. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.02.007
Yavuzer, G., Oken, O., Atay, M. B., & Stam, H. J. (2007). Effect of sensory-amplitude electric stimulation on motor recovery and gait kinematics after stroke: a randomized controlled study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 88(6), 710-714. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.02.030
Yavuzer, G., Selles, R., Sezer, N., Sutbeyaz, S., Bussmann, J. B., Koseoglu, F., . . . Stam, H. J. (2008). Mirror therapy improves hand function in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 89(3), 393-398. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.162
Yun, G. J., Chun, M. H., Park, J. Y., & Kim, B. R. (2011). The synergic effects of mirror therapy and neuromuscular electrical stimulation for hand function in stroke patients. Ann Rehabil Med, 35(3), 316-321. doi: 10.5535/arm.2011.35.3.316
Zehr, E. P. (2005). Neural control of rhythmic human movement: the common core hypothesis. Exerc Sport Sci Rev, 33(1), 54-60.
Zehr, E. P., Klimstra, M., Dragert, K., Barzi, Y., Bowden, M. G., Javan, B., & Phadke, C. (2007). Enhancement of arm and leg locomotor coupling with augmented cutaneous feedback from the hand. J Neurophysiol, 98(3), 1810-1814. doi: 10.1152/jn.00562.2007
Zehr, E. P., & Loadman, P. M. (2012). Persistence of locomotor-related interlimb reflex networks during walking after stroke. Clin Neurophysiol, 123(4), 796-807. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.07.049