(3.238.240.197) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/04/12 01:55
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:王盈淇
研究生(外文):Wang Ying Chi
論文名稱:愛之深,責之切?初探籃球教練之負向領導
論文名稱(外文):Love Well, Whip Well? The Preliminary Study of Abusive Supervision in Basketball Coach
指導教授:王俊人王俊人引用關係方國榮方國榮引用關係
指導教授(外文):Jun-Ren WangKuo-Jung Fang
口試委員:羅彥棻蔡木霖李銘章王俊人方國榮
口試委員(外文):Ro Yen FenTsai Mur LinLee Ming ChangJun-Ren WangKuo-Jung Fang
口試日期:2014-06-30
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:實踐大學
系所名稱:企業管理學系碩士班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2014
畢業學年度:102
語文別:英文
論文頁數:52
中文關鍵詞:負向領導教練行為
外文關鍵詞:abusive supervisioncoaching behavior
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:160
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:7
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究的目的是使用不當督導組隊玩家調查籃球教練的影響。它是在教練領導體育領域的重要作用,也有很多研究,以探討如何教練和球員互動,各種行為模式的影響。
基於不當督導泰珀(2007)的定義,建議,“不當督導是一個多層次的現象,這可能變成體育領域。在本研究中,使用個人訪談10名球員誰曾/代表了高中或大學籃球隊找到了一些一致的泰珀(2000)測量刻度。我們預計,辱罵性的監管也將影響而導致不僅陰性,但正面影響團隊成員的規範承諾。
此外,當玩家認為自己是球隊重要的,他們可以從改造不當督導的壓力變成實現目標的挑戰。
關鍵詞:教練的行為,不當督導,歸屬地,主觀規範
The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of basketball coach using abusive supervision to team player. It is an important role in the field of sports of Coach leadership, there are many studies to explore how coaches and players interact and influence of various behaviors pattern.
Based on the definition of abusive supervision Tepper (2007) recommended that "abusive supervision is a multilevel phenomenon, which could turn into the field of sports. In this research, used personal interview with 10 players who has/ had represented for high school or university basketball team to find some consistent from the Tepper (2000) measuring scale. We expect that abusive supervision will also influence team member normative commitment which could lead not only negative but positive effects.
In addition, when the players consider themselves are important in the team, they could transform the pressure from abusive supervision into challenge of achieve goal.
Key words: coaching behavior、abusive supervision、attribution、subjective norms

Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Background
1.2 Research Purposes

Chapter 2 Literature of Review
2.1 Abusive Supervision
2.2 Constructs that Nonphysical Supervisor Hostility
2.3 Emergent Model of Abusive Supervision

Chapter 3 Methods
3.1 Maternally
3.2 Sample
3.3 Design

Chapter 4 Analysis
Chapter 5 Research Finding
Reference

Chinese Reference:
1.Cheng, Bor-Shiuan, Fan Jing-Li, Zhou Lai Fong (2006). “Paternalistic leadership: model and evidence”, Taipei: Prentice Hall.
2.Cheng, Bor-Shiuan, (1995). Organization under contract combined value of personal performance and Organization members, Chinese Journal of Psychology, 37, 235-244.
3.Farh Jing-Lih, Cheng Bor-Shiuan, (2000). “Paternalistic leadership Chinese organizations: a cultural perspective Analysis” Indigenous psychology, 13, 126-180
4.Hung Su- Li (1999). “Chinese people's interpersonal harmony and conflict: the construction of theoretical and empirical research”. National Taiwan University Psychology PhD thesis Institute.
5.Wu Hui-Qing, (2002): An Empirical Study of the behavior of players perceived coach leadership, team conflict, team cohesion and satisfaction relationships. Unpublished PhD thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.
6.Wu Wan-Yi, (2008),” Corporate research methods”, Huatai bookstores, Taipei.
7.Zheng Zhi fu (1996). Sports coach leadership behavior. Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University Bookstore.
8.Zheng Zhi-fu, Xiao Jia-Hui, Mou Zhong-Fu (1997). Researching and compiling sports leadership scales (Chinese version) of. Sports in Taiwan Normal University, 3, 120.
English Reference:
9.Adams, J. S. (1965). Ineguity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 2, pp.267-299). New York: Academic Press.
10.Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 8.
11.Amorose, A. J.,Horn, T. S.(2000).Intrinsic motivation: Relationships with collegiate athletes' gender scholarship status, and perceptions of their coaches' behavior.Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology,22(1),84.
12.Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L.-Y., & Debrah, Y. A. (2006). An empirical study on the process model of abusive supervision in China. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of International Association for Chinese Management Research (IACMR), Nanjing, China.
13.Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L.-Y., & Debrah, Y. A. (2007). Antecedents and Outcomes of Abusive Supervision: Test of a Trickle-Down Model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 191-201.
14.Ashforth, B. E.(1987). Organizations and the petty tyrant: An exploratory study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, New Orleans, LA.
15.Ashforth, B.E.(1994). Petty tyranny in organizations. Human Relations, 47: 755-778.
16.Ashforth, B. E. (1997). Petty tyranny in organizations: A preliminary examination of antecedents and consequences. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 14, 126-140.
17.Ashforth, B. E., & Lee, R. T. (1997). Burnout as a process: Commentary on Cordes, Dougherty and Blum. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 703-708.
18.Aquino, K. (2000) .Structural and individual determinants of workplace victimization:
19.The effects of hierarchical status and conflict management style. Journal of Management, 26:171-193.
20.Bono, J. E., & Judge, T. A.(2004). Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89 : 901-910.
21.Borman, W. C. and Motowidlo, S. J.(1993). Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance. Personnel selection in organizations. SanFrancisce,
22.Brouther, K. D.(2002). Institutional, Cultural and Transaction Cost Influences on Entry Mode Choice and Performance. Journal of International Business Studies.
23.Campbell, J.P.(1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organization psychology. In M.D.Dunnette, and L.M.Hough(Eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organization Psychology(2nded..). Palo Alto CA:Consulting Psychologists Press,1,687-732.
24.Cheyne, A. S.,Robert, F.,Hamet, D. S.(2000).Gender comparisons of preferred coaching behaviors in Australian sports.Journal of Sport Behavior,23(4),389-406.
25.Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R.(1992). The NEO PI / FFI manual supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
26.Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2006). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900.
27.Duffy, M. K., Ganster D. C. & Pagon M.(1998). Social undermining and social support in workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 331-351.
28.Duffy, M. K., Ganster, D., & Pagon, M (2002). Social undermining in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 331-351.
29.Eby. L. T. McManus, S. E., Simon, S. A., & Russell, J. E. A.(2000). The protégé’s perspective regarding negative mentoring experiences: The development of a taxonomy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57:1-21.
30.Eisenberger, R., Lynch, P., Aselage, J., & Rohdieck, S. (2004). Who takes the most revenge? Individual differences in negative reciprocity norm endorsement. Personilty & Socical Psychology Bulletin, 30(6), 787-799.
31.Ferris, G. R., Bhawuk, D. P. S., Fedor, D. F., & Judge, T. A. (1995). Organizational politics and citizenship: Attributions of intentionality and construct definition. In M. J. Martinko (Ed.), Attribution theory: An organizational perspective (pp. 231-252). Delray Beach, CA: St Lucie Press.
32.Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
33.Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161-178.
34.Graen, G.B. & Uhl-Bien, M.(1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247.
35.Green, S. G., & Mitchell, T. R. (1979). Attributional processes of leaders in leader-Member interactions. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 23(3), 429-458.
36.Greenberg. J.,(1996). The quest for justice on the job: Essays and experiments. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
37.Greenberg, J., and Baron, R. A., (2003). Behavior in organizations: Understanding and managing the human side of work. 8th ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice–Hall.
38.Hales, Colin and Gough, Orla (2003), Employee evaluations of company occupational pensions: HR implications, Personnel Review, 32(3): 319-331
39.Harris, K., Kacmar, K., and Zivnuska, S., 2007, “An Investigation of AbusiveSupervision as a Predictor of Performance and the Meaning of Work as a Moderator ofthe Relationship,” Leadership Quarterly, vol.18, no.3, pp.252-263.
40.Hoel, H., & Cooper, C.L.(2000). Destructive conflict and bullying at work.
41.Hoobler J.M.(2002). Abusive supervision in the Workplace: A restorative justice perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky. Unpublished report, Manchester School of Management, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, UK.
42.Laabs, J. J. (1996), Employee commitment, Personnel Journal, 75(8): 58-66
43.Lam, T. C.(1996).A comparison of the leadership behavior of winning and losing high school basketball coaches. Microform Publication: Int'l Inst for Sport & Human Performance.
44.Leck, J. D. (2003). Violence in the Canadian workplace. Journal of American Academy of Business, 7(2), 308-315.
45.Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 : 765 – 780.
46.Jung, D. I.,Avolio, B. J.(2000).Opening the black box: An experimental investigation of the mediating effects of trust and value congruence on transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Organizational Behaviour,21,949-946.
47.Keashly,L.,Trott,V.,& MacLean,L.M.(1994). Abusive behavior in the workplace: A preliminary investigation. Violence and Victims, 9: 341-357.
48.Kelloway, E. K., Sivanathan, N., Francis, L., & Barling, J., (2005). Poor leadership. In J. Barling, E. K. Kelloway & M.R. Frone(Eds.), Handbook of work stress, pp.89-112. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49.Mowday, R. T.; Porter, L. W.; Steers, R. M. (1982), Employee-organizational linkages, New York, Academic Press
50.Mak, Brenda L. and Sockel, Hy (2001), A confirmatory factor analysis of IS employee motivation and retention, Information and Management, 38(5): 265-276
51.Motowidlo, S. J., & Van Scotter, J. R.(1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79: 475-480.
52.Porter, L. W. and Smith, F. J. (1970), The Etiology of Organizational Commitment, Unpublished Paper, University of California, Irvine.
53.Powers, Edward L. (2000), Employee loyalty in the new millennium, Sam Advanced Management Journal, 65(3): 4-8
54.Ravlin, E. C., & Meglino, B. M. (1987). Effect of values on perception and decision making: A study of alternative work value measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 666-673.
55.Schat, A. C. H., Frone, M. R., & Kelloway, E. K.(2006). “Prevalence of workplace aggression in the U. S. workforce: Findings from a national study”. In E. K. Kelloway, J. Barling,& J. J. Hurrell (Eds.), Handbook of workplace violence: 47-89. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
56.Schat, A. C. H., Desmarais, S., & Kelloway, E. K.(2006). Exposure to workplace aggression from multiple sources: Validation of a measure and test of a model. Unpublished manuscript, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
57.Solomon, C. M. (1992), The loyalty factor, Personnel Journal, 71(9): 52-62
58.Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178-190.
59.Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., & Shaw, J. D.(2001). Personality moderators of the relationships between abusive supervision and subordinates’ resistance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 974-983.
60.Tepper, B.J., & Lockhart, D. (2005). Abused subordinates’ upward maintenance communication: A coping perspective. In E. Weatherly(Ed.), Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Southern Management Association, Charleston, SC. Clearwater, FL: Southern Management Association.
61.Tepper, B. J., Uhl-Bien, M., Kohut, G. F., Rogelberg, S. G., Lockhart, D. E., & Ensley, M. D. (2006). Subordinates, resistance and managers, evaluations of subordinates, performance. Journal of Management, 32, 185-209.
62.Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., Henle, C. A., & Lambert, L. S. (2006). Procedural injustice, victim precipitation, and abusive supervision. Personnel Psychology, 59, 101-123.
63.Tepper, B. J. (2007). Abusive Supervision in Work Organizations: Review, Synthesis, and Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 33(3), 261-289.
64.Tsui, A. S., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1989). Beyond simple demographic affects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journl, 402-423.
65.Turban, D. B., & Jones, A. P. (1988). Supervisor-subordinate similarity: Types, effect, and mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 228-234.
66.Weiss, H. M., 1978. Social learning of work values in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(6), 711-718.
67.Wester, K. R., & Weiss, M. R. (1991). The relationship between perceived coaching behavior and group cohesion in high school football teams. The Sport Psychology, 5, 41-54.
68.Zellars, K. L., Tepper, B. J., & Duffy, M. K. (2002). Abusive supervision and subordinates, organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 1068-1076.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔