臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究擬採用階層線性模式來探討政治不穩定與中學入學率之間的關係，並檢測經濟因素及文化因素的干擾效果；並以Marshall (2011)所整理之政治動亂主要事件指標 (MEPV)做為政治不穩定度的代理變數，以世界銀行 (Worldbank)所提供的中學入學率作為人力資本的代理變數，以人均國民所得做為經濟因素的代理變數，及以女男生入學比率和25歲以上不識字率人口數做為文化因素的代理變數。階層線性模式檢測的結果發現，在置入每人公共醫療支出、每人公共教育支出、失業率、貧窮比例做為控制變數的情況下，以人均國民所得、女男入學率及25歲以上不識字率人口數比例為干擾變數時，國家的政治不穩定指標對中學入學率的相關斜率會隨之不同，亦即政治不穩定度影響中學入學率的程度會隨著人均國民所得、女男入學率及25歲以上不識字率人口數比例的高低而變化。

This study explored the relationship between Secondary school enrollment and political instability, and tested the moderating effects of economic and cultural factors using hierarchical linear model. The major episodes of political violence (MEPV) from Marshall (2011) was used as a proxy variable for political instability; the secondary school enrollment rate from World Bank (Worldbank) was used as a proxy variable for human capital; GDP per capita and ratio of female to male secondary enrollment and Literacy rate is not over 25 years old population from World Bank were used as a proxy variable for economic factors and cultural factors, respectively.Health expenditure per capita amd Public expenditure on education per capita and Unemployment total and Poverty headcount ratio at national poverty line was put in the first-level regression as a control variable. The results from HLM showed that the slope between the MEPV indicators and secondary school enrollment rate is changing according to the values of GDP per capita, ratio of female to male secondary enrollment and illiteracy rate of over 25-year old population.

誌謝 I
中文摘要 II
Abstract III
目次 IV
第一章 緒論 6
1.1研究背景與動機 6
1.2研究目的 6
第二章 文獻探討 7
2.1 人力資本相關研究 7
2.2中學入學率之相關研究 8
2.3教育之相關研究 9
2.3.1父母之相關研究 9
2.3.2教育程度之相關研究 9
2.3.3家庭收入之相關研究 9
2.3.4性別之相關研究 10
2.4人力資本與經濟之相關研究 11
第三章 研究方法 16
3.1研究對象 17
3.2研究架構 21
3.3資料分析與統計方法 23
3.3.1.隨機效果的單因子變異數分析模式 23
3.3.2.隨機效果單因子共變數分析模式 24
3.3.3.隨機迴歸係數模式 24
3.3.4.完整模式 25
3.4 組平減與共線性問題 27
第四章 實證結果與分析 27
4.1、隨機效果的單因子變異數分析模式 28
4.2 隨機效果單因子共變數分析模式 30
4.3隨機迴歸係數模式 34
4.3.1 隨機迴歸係數模式之政治不穩定度(因素2) 34
4.3.2 隨機迴歸係數模式之結果 37
4.4完整模式 37
4.4.1控制變項為每人醫療支出費用(因素2) 38
4.4.2控制變項為失業率(因素2) 40
4.4.3控制變項為貧窮比例(因素2) 42
4.4.4 完整模式之結果 44
第五章 結論 46
5.1 結論 46
參考文獻 50
附錄 54

表目錄
表2.1 文獻探討彙整 13
表3.1.1 控制變數的最大值與最小值 18
表3.1.2 獨立變數的最大值與最小值 20
表3.1.3 干擾變數的最大值與最小值 21
表3.2.1 因素分析法 22
表4.1 隨機效果的單因子變異數分析模式 30
表4.2 隨機效果單因子共變數分析模式 34
表4.3 隨機迴歸係數模式之政治不穩定度(因素2) 36
表4.4.1 完整模式(控制變項為每人醫療支出,預測變項為大區域國內動亂指標) 40
表4.4.2 完整模式(控制變項為失業率,預測變項為大區域國內動亂指標) 42
表4.4.3 完整模式(控制變項為貧窮比例,預測變項為大區域國內動亂指標) 44
表5.1 完整模式之統整 47
表A-1 控制變項為每人醫療支出費用之樣本國家 54
表A-2 控制變項為每人公共教育支出費用之樣本國家 55
表A-3 控制變項為失業率之樣本國家 56
表A-4 控制變項為貧窮比例之樣本國家 57
表B-1 隨機迴歸係數模式之政治不穩定度(因素1) 59
表B-2 隨機迴歸係數模式之政治不穩定度(因素3) 60
表B-3 隨機迴歸係數模式之政治不穩定度(因素4) 61
表C-1 完整模式(控制變項為每人醫療支出,預測變項為鄰接國及大區域國際動亂指標) 62
表C-2 完整模式(控制變項為每人醫療支出,預測變項為鄰接國國內動亂指標) 63
表C-3 完整模式(控制變項為每人醫療支出,預測變項為國內種族動亂指標) 64
表D-1 完整模式(控制變項為失業率，預測變項為鄰接國及大區域國際動亂指標) 65
表D-2 完整模式(控制變項為失業率,預測變項為鄰接國國內動亂指標) 66
表D-3 完整模式(控制變項為失業率,預測變項為國內種族動亂指標) 67
表E-1 完整模式(控制變項為貧窮比例,預測變項為鄰接國及大區域國際動亂指標) 68
表E-2 完整模式(控制變項為貧窮比例,預測變項為鄰接國國內動亂指標) 69
表E-3 完整模式(控制變項為貧窮比例,預測變項為國內種族動亂指標) 70

圖目錄
圖3.2 研究架構圖 23

1.呂勝瑛，台灣的人力資本及其競爭力之分析，人文暨社會科學期刊，2(1) ，7-17，民95年。
2.邱皓政、溫福星，多層次模型分析導論，五南圖書出版公司，民96年。
3.邱惠玲、王玉珍、蔡惠華、馬辰明、鄭萬助，建立人力資本統計之研究，行政院主計處，民95年。
4.溫福星、邱皓政，多層次模型方法論：階層線性模式的關鍵議題與試解。台大管理論叢，19(12)，263-294，民98年。
5.溫福星、邱皓政，多層次模式方法論，αβγ實驗室，民100年。
6.Alba, A. and M. San Segundo, "The Returns to Education in Spain", Economics of Education Review 14 (2),155-166, 1995.
7.Alberto, A., Ozler, S., Roubini, N., & Swagel, P. , Political instability and economic growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 1(2), 189-211, 1992.
8.Barbara Petrongolo and Maria J. San-Segundo, Staying-on at school at sixteen: the impa of labor market conditions in spain., 21, 98-69, 1998.
9.Barro, R. J., Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Quarterly .Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407-443, 1991.
10.Barro and J. Lee., "Internat~onal Compansons of Educational Attainment, 1960-1985”, unpubllshed manuscnpt, Harvard Un~versity, 1992.
11.Barro, R. J., and Lee, J.W., International data on educational attainment updates and implications. (NBER Working papers 7911). Boston, Cambridge Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2000.
12.Becker, G. S., Murphy, K. M., & Tamura, R. Human capital, fertility, and economic growth.Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 323-350,1994.
13.Becker, G. S., Hman capital. New York: Columbia University Press, 1964.Cohen, D., Tests of the convergence h ypothesis: Some further results. Journal of Economic Growth, 1(3), 351–361, 1996.
14.Deary, I.J. and Taylor, M.D. and Hart, C.L. and Wilson, V. and Davey Smith, G. and Blane, D. and Starr, J.M. Intergenerational social mobility and mid-life status attainment: influences of childhood intelligence, childhood social factors, and education. Intelligence 33(5), 455-472, 2005.
15.Enders, C., &Tofighi, D., Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121-138, 2007.
16.Elsevier Ltd., Why Do Girls in Rural China Have Lower School Enrollment? World Development, 34(9),1639–1653, 2006.
17.Grossman, M., The correlation between health and smoking. In: Terleckyj, N.E. (Ed.), Household Production and Consumption. Columbia University Press for the NBER, 147–211, 1975.
18.Hart, C. L., Taylor, M. D., Davey Smith, G., Whalley, L. J., Starr, J. M., Hole, D. J., Wilson, V., & Deary, I. J. , Childhood IQ, social class, deprivation and their relationships with mortality and morbidity risk in later life: Prospective observational study linking the Scottish Mental Survey 1932 and the Midspan studies. Psychosomatic Medicine, 65, 877-883, 2003.
19.Hofmann, D. & Gavin, M., Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management, 24(5),623-641, 1998.
20.OECD , Education at a Glance. Paris,1986.
21.Jencks, C., Who gets ahead?: The determinants of economic success in America, New York, NY: Basic Books.1979.
22.Kahn, James A., and Jong-Soo Lim, “Skilled Labor-Augmenting Technical Progress in U.S. Manufacturing,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(4),1281–1308, 1998.
23.Klenow, Peter J., “Ideas versus Rival Human Capital: Industry Evidence on Growth Models,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 42(1),3–23, 1998.
24.Kreft, I., de Leeuw, J., & Aiken, J., The effect of different forms of centering in hierarchical linear models.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30(1), 1-22, 1995.
25.Londregan, J. B., &. Poole, K . T., Poverty, the coup trap, and the seizure of executive power. World Politics, 42(2), 151-183, 1990.
26.Mankiw, N. Gregory, David Romer, and David N. Weil , “A Contribution to the
27.Empirics of Economic Growth,” Quarterly Journal of Economics ,107(2), 407–437, 1992.
28.Mathiue, J. E.,& Taylor, S. R.,A Framework for testing meso-mediational relationships in Organizational Behavior.Journal of Organization Behavior,28,141-172, 2007.
29.Marshall, M., Center for Systemic Peace. Retrieved April 17, 2012, from http:// www.systemicpeace.org, 2011.
30.Marx, P., Perceived citizen insecurity in Honduras and the human capital investment decision. Tulane University Unergraduate Honor Thesis, 2011.
31.Nang Zawm Aye., Barriers to education in kun hing township shan state, M.A. (PUBLIC AFFAIRS),2011.
32.Robert M. Solow , A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth, The Quarterly Journal of Economics,70(1),65-94, 1956.
33.Rodrik, D., Institutions for high-quality growth: What they are and how to acquire them. (NBER Working Paper 7540). Boston, Cambridge Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2000.
34.San Segundo, M.(1997), "Decentralisation and Diversification in Spain", Higher Education Management ,9(3),89-100.
35.Schultz, Theodore W.,The Investment in Human Capital”, American . Economic Review, 5(1), 1-17, 1960.
36.See Micklewright, J., M. Pearson and S. Smith , "Unemployment and early school leaving", The Economic Journal ,100,163-169, 1990.
37.Van Ours, J.C. and Veenman, J., “The educational attainment of second-generation immigrants in The Netherlands”, Journal of Population Economics, 16,739-53, 2003.