臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

隨著時代的變遷，生產資源隨著使用而減少，企業越來越注重「知識」的開發與應用。在這個講求知識經濟的時代，知識可以視為一個核心資源，所以如何創造知識與應用知識是即為重要的。而知識的創造過程可以分為知識共創、知識移轉、知識分享三種活動，而知識的取得有很多種，其中與競爭者合作並且互相學習是一種有趣的現象。因此本研究藉著研究半導體產業當中相同領域的競爭著之間的知識活動，期望歸納出一種規律。並且採用質性方法，蒐集聯合新聞網上有關半導體2002年至2013年相關新聞，運用MAXQDA進行資料分析。最後發現水平競合以市場競合/技術合作為主要的競合型態，知識活動以知識共創活動為最多，其次為知識分享活動，再來是知識移轉活動；垂直競合則是以多重結盟競合為主要競合型態，知識活動以知識分享為最多，其次為知識共創活動與知識移轉活動。

As time changes, production resources reduce, so enterprises focus more and more on development and application of “knowledge.” In the era when knowledge economy is emphasized, knowledge can be regarded as a core resource, hence it is critical how to create and apply knowledge. The process of knowledge creation has three activities which are co-creation, transfer, and share of knowledge. Acquirement of knowledge can be achieved by many ways, of which cooperation with competitors and learn mutually is an interesting phenomenon. Therefore, this study attempts to induce a pattern by investigating the knowledge activities among competitors of the same field in semiconductor industry, and employs qualitative method to collect news about semiconductor on the news website of UDN during 2002 and 2013 and MAXQDA to analyze the data. Consequently, it is found market co-opetition/technical cooperation is the main co-opetition type in horizontal co-opetition. Of its knowledge activities, knowledge co-creation activity leads, followed by knowledge share activity and then knowledge transfer activity. In vertical co-opetition , multiple alliance co-opetition is the main co-opetition type. Of its knowledge activities, knowledge share activity dominates, followed by knowledge co-creation and then knowledge transfer activity.

摘要................................................................iv
ABSTRACT.....................................................v
致謝................................................................vi
目錄...............................................................vii
表目錄...........................................................viii
圖目錄.............................................................ix
第一章緒論.......................................................1
1.1研究背景與動機...........................................1
1.2研究目的......................................................2
第二章文獻.......................................................3
2.1知識.............................................................3
2.2競合關係....................................................11
第三章研究方法..............................................16
3.1研究方法....................................................16
3.2研究對象....................................................17
3.3資料分析工具.............................................18
第四章資料分析..............................................21
4.1水平競合....................................................22
4.2垂直競合....................................................31
第五章結論與建議..........................................36
5.1研究結論....................................................36
5.2實務上的建議.............................................38
5.3研究限制....................................................38
5.4後續研究建議.............................................39
參考文獻.........................................................40
附錄-新聞........................................................46

一、中文文獻
1.林本炫（2003），紮根理論研究法評介，收錄於齊力、林本炫主編-質性研究方法與資料分析
2.黃麒祐，IT知識管理導論，2003，文魁資訊
3.沈正宙(2008)，中小型企業經營社區寬頻網路之策略發展與商機，國立臺灣大學管理學院碩士在職專班商學組碩士論文
4.陳光郎(2008)，TFT LCD 面板主流設計與競合策略關係之研究，國立臺灣大學管理學院碩士在職專班國際企業管理組碩士論文
5.汪俊宏(2008)，台灣薄膜太陽能電池廠進入建築整合型應用業務之策略研究，國立臺灣大學管理學院碩士在職專班國際企業管理組碩士論文
6.譚漢儒(2008)，我國電子級化學品供應商競爭策略研究，國立臺灣大學管理學院碩士在職專班國際企業管理組碩士論文
7.張景松(2009)，IT 維修商之競合策略探討，國立臺灣大學管理學院碩士在職專班國際企業管理組碩士論文
8.杜佾凝(2008)，線上廣告服務商之競合---以Google、Microsoft、Yahoo!為例，國立臺灣大學管理學院商學研究所碩士論文
9.呂澄源(2008)，全球線上遊戲產業競合與興業策略分析，國立臺灣大學管理學院碩士在職專班國際企業管理組碩士論文
10.姜又元(2008)，紡織業廠商的價值網與合作行為分析─以福懋及宏遠的轉型發展為例，國立臺灣大學管理學院國際企業研究所碩士論文
11.吳義誠(2010)，後 PC 時代之挑戰與展望-以台灣資訊產業為例，國立臺灣大學管理學院碩士在職專班商學組碩士論文
12.林靖傑(2008)，會計師事務所及審計人員知識分享影響因素及其效果之研究，國立臺灣大學管理學院會計學研究所博士論文
13.張士峯(2010)，虛擬社群知識分享動機、激勵機制及影響因素探究，國立臺灣大學商學研究所博士論文
14.張雲卿(2007)，資訊科技投資、知識分享與資訊系統績效關聯之研究，淡江大學企業管理系碩士在職專班
15.宋文珍(2010)，使用者介面設計、跨部門互動與關係品質對知識分享的影響─以台灣電信業門市人員為例
16.彭國珍(2011)，新北市高中職教官組織信任與知識分享意願關係之研究，淡江大學公共行政學系公共政策碩士在職專班碩士論文
17.蕭秀娟(2008)，影響知識分享意願之因素探討，淡江大學會計學系碩士在職專班碩士論文
18.方小欣(2008)，組織承諾與知識分享關聯性探討-A公司為例，淡江大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文
19.吳泰德(2009)，組織文化、知識分享與創新能力之關連性研究─以台灣汽車產業為例，淡江大學管理科學研究所企業經營碩士在職專班碩士論文
20.呂理群(2008)，專業人員知識分享、核心能力及工作績效之關連性研究--以中小型會計師事務所為例，淡江大學會計學系碩士在職專班碩士論文
21.薛榮棠(2005)，事業網絡鑲嵌、知識管理與新產品開發績效關聯性之研究，國立台灣大學商學研究所博士論文
22.黃本聰(2005)，企業導入知識管理的考量因素與成功因素，國立台灣大學EMBA 商學研究所碩士論文
23.張保新(2006)，影響單一客戶代工合作關係之因素探討─豐泰公司之個案研究，國立中興大學高階經理人碩士在職專班碩士學位論文
24.游美惠(2000)。調查分析、文本分析與論述分析在社會研究的運用。調查研究，8，5-42。
25.黃廷合&吳思達 (2010)，知識管理理論與實務(第三版)P16
26.張奕華，許正妹，質性資料分析:MAXQDA軟體應用，初版，台北市，心理出版社，2010
27.簡俊成(2012)，跨組織學習與創新─競合觀點，組織與管理，(已接受發表)
二、英文文獻
1.Aadne, J. H., G. Krogh and J. Roos, 1996, “Representationism: The traditional approach to cooperative strategies,” in G. Krogh & J. Roos edits, Managing Knowledge-Perspectives on Cooperation and Competition, London: Sage Publications.
2.Song, J., Almeida, P., & Wu G. (2003). Learning-by-Hiring: When is Mobility More Likely to Facilitate Interfirm Knowledge Transfer. Management Science, 49(4), 351-365.
3.Lado, A. A. (1997), Nancy G. Boyd & Susan C. Hanlon. Competition, Cooperation, and the Search for Economic Rents: A Syncretic Model. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 110-141.
4.Doz, Y. L., & Hamel G. (1998), Alliance advantage. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
5.Gnyawali, D. R., & Park, B.-J. R. (2009). Co-Opetition and Technological Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Multilevel Conceptual Model. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(3), 308-330.
6.Gnyawali, D. R., & Park, B. J. (2011). Co-opetition between giants: Collaboration with competitors for technological innovation. Research Policy, 40(5), 650-663.
7.Gilbert, M. and M. Cordey-Hayes (1996). "Understanding the process of knowledge transfer to achieve successful technological innovation." Technovation 16(6): 301-312.
8.Winter, S. G. (1987). Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets. In David J. Teece (Ed.), The Competitve Challenge? Strategic for Industrial Innovation and Renewal, 159-184
9.Purser, R. E., W. A. Pasmore, et al. (1992). "The influence of deliberations on learning in new product development teams." Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 9(1): 1-28.
10.Szulanski,G.,(2000), “ The Process of Knowledge Transfer: A Diachronic Analysis of Stickness＂ Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, Vol. 1, No. 82:9-27.
11.Wiig, K. M. (1997), “Integrating Intellectual Capital and Knowledge Management＂ Long Range Planning ,30(3):399-405.
12.Davenport T. H. & Prusak L.(1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What Know, M. A. : Harvard Business School Press
13.Tsai, W., 2002, “Social structure of ‘coopetition’ within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing,” Organization Science: A journal of the Institute of Management Sciences, vol. 13, no. 2, pp.179-291.
14.Darr, E. D. and T. R. Kurtzberg, 2000, “An investigation of partner similarity dimensions on knowledge transfer,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 82, no. 1, pp.28-44.
15.Nonaka, I., R. Toyama, and N. Konno, 2000, “SECI, Ba and leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation,” Long Range Planning, vol. 33, pp.5-34.
16.Lado, A.A., Boyd, N. & Hanlon, S.C. (1997). “Competition, cooperation, and the search for economic rents: A syncretic model”. Academy of Management Review, 22(1): 110-141
17.Speaks. v.d. and Spijkervet, A., Knowledge Management: Dealing Intelligently with Knowledge, CIBIT, Utrecht, 1997
18.Verkasalo, M., & Lappalainen, P. A method of measuring the efficiency of the knowledge utilization process. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol.45, No.4, 1998, pp.414-423.
19.Klaus Krippendorff (2004). Content Analysis, an Introduction to Its Methodology, 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications – especially Chapter 11, pages 211-256
20.T. Winograd and F. Flores, Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation For Design. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation, 1985.
21.Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.
22.Major, E. and Cordey-Hayes, M. (2000), ``Knowledge translation: a new perspective on knowledge transfer and foresight’’, Foresight, Vol. 2 pp. 411-23
23.Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1996). Co-opetition, New York, NY: Doubleday
24.Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2000). Co-Opetitive Relationships in Business Networks: To Cooperate and Compete Simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(5), 411-26.
25.Dowling, M. J., Roering, W. D., Carlin, B. A., & Wiesneski, J. (1996). Multifaceted Relationships under Coopetition: Description and Theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 5(2), 155-167.
 
三、網路資源
1.聯合知識庫，http://udndata.com/
2.電子工程專輯，http://www.eettaiwan.com/
3.拓墣產業研究所，http://www.topology.com.tw/tri/
4.Digitimes資料庫，http://digitimes.com.tw/
5.CTIMES：電子產業社群平台，http://www.ctimes.com.tw/