臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

台灣在光復以後，經濟環境逐漸繁榮發達，許多早期的傳統企業也隨著經濟成長擴大規模，而大多都是早期以供應台灣內需市場為主的家族企業，家族企業是台灣經濟發展的根基所在，並導引著台灣的經濟走向(許士軍 & 陳光中, 1989)。但隨著企業本身規模的成長與外部市場環境的發展，企業本身也必須面臨更多的挑戰及決策，因此擁有專業知識、經驗的專業經理人所扮演的腳色也相當重要。
本研究旨在探討專業經理人與家族企業營運績效的關聯，並探究產品多角化及環境動盪性的影響。以台灣電子工業上市公司之124間家族企業為樣本，研究期間為2008年至2012年。本研究實證結果顯示：一、專業經理人對家族企業營運績效並沒有因為專業經理人參與程度的提升而產生正向影響之效果；二、專業經理人對家族企業在動盪環境中的營運績效，有因為專業經理人參與程度的提升而產生正向影響之效果；三、專業經理人對家族企業在產品多角化中的營運績效，並沒有因為專業經理人參與程度的提升而產生正向影響之效果。

This study aims to investigate the influence of professional managers on family business performance while considering the moderating effects of product diversification and environmental dynamism. In a panel data of 124 publicly listed family-owned firms in the electronics industry during the period 2008-2012, the results show that: (1) the involvement of professional managers in the family business has no significant effect on firm performance; (2) the involvement of professional managers contributes to improve the performance only when the family firms operate in the relative dynamic environment; (3) the professional managers do not have significant contributions to those family firms who have diversified product portfolios.

目錄
第一章 緒論 1
第一節　研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究流程 4
第四節 章節安排 5
第二章 文獻回顧與探討 6
第一節　家族企業 6
第二節　專業經理人與營運績效 8
第三節 權變觀點 11
第四節 專業經理人與環境動盪性之交互作用 12
第五節 專業經理人與企業多角化之相互作用 14
第三章 研究設計與研究方法 17
第一節　研究架構 17
第二節　研究假說 18
第三節　變數的衡量與操作性定義 18
第四節　資料收集 22
第四章 研究分析與結果 25
第一節　樣本產業分析 25
第二節　敘述性統計 26
第三節　相關係數分析 29
第四節　多元迴歸分析結果 32
第五章 結論與建議 35
第一節　結論 35
第二節　研究限制與建議 37
參考文獻 39

中文
1.許士軍、陳光中(1989)，台灣家族企業發展與家族結構關係。行政院國家科
學會專題研究報告，1-11頁。
2.許士軍（1997），家族主義、專業主義與創業⎯⎯以華人企業背景的探討。管
理評論，第16卷的1期， 1-9頁。
3.葉銀華 (1998)，家族控股集團與股票報酬共變性之實證研究。臺大管理
論叢，第9卷第1期，25-49頁。
4.葉銀華 (1999)，家族控股集團、核心企業與報酬互動之研究－台灣與香港
證券市場之比較。管理評論，第18卷第2期，59-86頁。
5.倪衍森、廖容岑 (2006)，家族企業負債代理成本及股利政策之研究－以台
灣上市公司為例。管理與系統，第13卷第1期，頁153-179。
6.倪寒芬(2006)，創業團隊與專業經理人價值契合歷程之研究-以台灣高科技
公司為例。台灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文。
7.范宏書、陳慶隆 (2007)，會計師異動、存在最終家族控制股東與財務報表
公佈時效性之探討。當代會計，第8卷第1期，1-34頁。
8.林萱霈(2009)，我國家族企業、公司治理與企業價值之關聯性研究。朝陽科技大學會計研究所碩士論文。
9.楊朝旭、蔡柳卿 (2003)，「總經理更換與相對績效評估」。人力資源管理學
報，第3卷第1期，63-80頁。
10.廖秀梅、李建然、吳祥華 (2006)，董事會結構特性與公司績效關係之研究
-兼論台灣家族企業因素的影響 。東吳經濟商學學報，第54卷第9期，117-160頁。
11.吳沛珊(1998)，家族企業中企業主對專業經理人的信任評估及行為導向-從
家族企業組織結構特徵的觀點探討。中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
12.林義又(2007)，信任關係及權力關係對家族企業主評估經理人績效之影響
研究。中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
13.侍台誠(1994)，董事會特性中家族因素與經營績效之實證研究-兼論法人董事
的影響。臺灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。
14.李卉馨(2011)，專業經理人職位的代理意涵：台灣個人電腦家族企業之實證
分析。中山大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文。
15.唐順明(2001)，環境不確定情況下策略聯盟管理對於績效影響之研究。中山
管理評論，第9卷第3期，335-372頁。
16.黃儀芳(2002)，「多角化行為對公司價值之影響」，國立中正大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。

英文
1.Anderson, R. C. & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding-Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301-1327.
2.Albert, K. J. (1981). Straight talk about small business. New York, McGraw-Hill.
3.Ansoff, H. I. (1965). Corporate Strategy: An Analytic Approach to Business Policy for Growth and Expansion. New York, McGraw-Hill.
4.Sharma, B. (2003). R&D strategy and Australian manufacturing industry: an empirical investigation of emphasis and effectiveness. Technovation, 23, 929-937.
5.Blyler, M. & Coff, R. W. (2003). Dynamic capabilities, social capital, and rent appropriation: Ties that split pies. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 677-686.
6.Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
7.Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 199-120.
8.Berry, C. H. (1975). Corporate Growth and Diversification. Princeton University Press. Princeton, N.J.
9.Burkart, M. & Shleifer, A. (2002). Family firms, Working paper 8776. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, USA.
10.Berry, C. H. (1971). Corporate Growth and Diversification. Journal of Law and Economics,14(2), 371-383.
11.Boyd, B. K. (1995). CEO duality and firm performance: A contingency model. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 301-312.
12.Booz, A. & Hamilton (1985). Diversification: A Survey of European Chief Executives. Booz, Allen and Hamilton, Inc., New York.
13.Buhner, R. (1987). Assessing International Diversification of West German Corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 8, 25-37.
14.Belkaoui, A. & Pavlik, E. (1992). The Effects of Ownership Structure and Diversification Strategy on Performance. Managerial and Decision Economics, 13, 343-352.
15.Berger, P. G. & Eli, O. (1995). Diversification's effect on firm value. Journal of Financial Economics, 37(1), 39-65.
16.Chrisman, J. J., Chua J. H., & Litz, R. A. (2004). Comparing the Agency Cost of Family and Non-Family Firms: Conceptual Issues and Exploratory Evidence. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 28(4), 335-354.
17.Chandler, A. D. (1977). The visible hand: The managerial revolution in American business. Cambridge, Belknap Press.
18.Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asia corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1), 81-112.
19.Dyer, W. (1989). Integrating Professional Management into a Family Owned Business. Family Business Review, 2, 221-235.
20.Dyer, W. (2006). Examining the Family Effect on firm performance. Family Business Review, 19(4), 253-273.
21.Dawson, A. (2011). Private equity investment decisions in family firms: The role of human resources and agency costs. Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 189-199.
22.Duncan, R. B. (1972). Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3), 313-327.
23.Dess, G. G. & Beard, D. W. (1984). Dimensions of organizational task　environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 52-73.
24.Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. NewYork, Free Press.
25.Filbeck, G. & Lee, S. (2000). Financial management techniques in family businesses. Family Business Review, 13(3), 201-216.
26.Flamholtz, E. G. & Randle, Y. (1986). Growing pains: How to make the transition froman entrepreneurship to a professionally managed firm. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
27.Francis, J. & Smith, A. (1995). Agency costs and innovation some empirical evidence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19, 383-409.
28.Gallo, M. A. & Vilaseca, A. (1998). A financial perspective on structure, conduct and performance in the family firm: an empirical study. Family Business Review, 11, 35-47.
29.Gallo, M. A., Tapies, J., & Cappuyns, K. (2004). Comparison of family and nonfamily business: Financial logic and personal preferences. Family Business Review, 17(4), 303-318.
30.Goffee, R. & Scase, R. (1985). Proprietorial Control in Family Firms: Some Functions of Quasi-Organic Management Systems. Journal of Management, 22,　53–68.
31.Gort, M. D. (1962). Diversification and Integration in AmericanIndustry. NewJersey, Princeton University Press.
32.Harris, M. & Raviv, A. (1991). The theory of capital structure. Journal of Finance, 46, 297-355.
33.Howorth, C., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2004). Buyouts, information asymmetry and the family management dyad. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(4), 509-534.
34.Hendrikse, G. W. J. & Oijen, A. A. C. J. (2002). Diversification and Corporate Governance. ERIM Report Series Research in Management, 1-10.
35.Hoskisson, R. E. & Hitt, M. A. (1988). Strategic Control Systems And Relative R&D Investment In La. Strategic Management Journal, 9(6), 605-621.
36.Hoskisson, R. E. & Hitt, M. A. (1990). The antecedents and performance outcomes of diversification: Review and critique of theoretical perspectives. Journal of Management, 16, 461-509.
37.Herrmann, P. (2002). The influence of CEO characteristics on the international diversification of manufacturing firms: An empirical study in the United States. International Journal of Management, 19(2), 279.
38.Jehn, K. A. (1997). A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 530-557.
39.Jaworski, B. J. & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 53-70.
40.Kochhar, R. & Hitt, M. A. (1995). Toward an Integrative Model of International Diversification. Journal of International Management, 1, 33-72,.
41.Koner, S. & Cohen, M. A. (2001). Does the market value environmental performance. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(2), 281,
42.Kogut, B. (1984). Normative Observations on the International Value-added Chain and Strategic Groups. Journal of International Business Studies, 15(2), 151-167.
43.Lam, K., Mok, H. M. K., Cheung, I., & Yam, H. C. (1994). Family Groupings on Performance of Portfolio Selection in the Hong Kong Stock Market. Journal of Banking& Finance, 18(4), 725-742.
44.La Porta, R., Lopezde S. F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate Ownership aroundthe World. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471-517.
45.Lee, P. K. C., Yeung, A. C. L., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2009). Supplier alliances andenvironmental uncertainty: an empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics, 120(1), 190-204.
46.Lin, Y. H., Hu, S. Y., & Chen, M. S. (2005). Managerial optimism and corporate investment: some empirical evidence from Taiwan. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 13, 523-546.
47.Maury, B. (2006). Family ownership and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Western European corporations. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12, 321-341.
48.March, J. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 2(1),71-87.
49.Meyer, M. W. & Zucker, L. (1989). Permanently Failing Organizations. Newbury Park, CA, Sage Publications.
50.Miles, R. E. & Snow, C. C. (1978). Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process. New York, McGraw-Hill
51.Milliken, F. J. (1987). Three types of perceived uncertainty about environment:　state, effect, and response uncertainty. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 133–143.
52.Mok, H. M. K., Lam, K., & Cheung, I. (1992). Family Control and Return Covariationin Hong Kong Common Stocks. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 19(2), 277-293
53.Morck, R. K., Stangeland, D. A., & Yeung, B. (2000). Inherited wealth, corporate control, and economic growth: the Canadian disease? (Chapter 11) In: Morck, R. K. (Ed), Concentrated Capital Ownership, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
54.Nooteboom, B., Van, H. W. P. M., Duijsters, G. M., Gilsing, V. A., & Van, D. O. A. (2007). Optimal Cognitive Distance and Absorptive Capacity. Research Policy, 36(7), 1016-1034.
55.Patton, A. & Baker, J. C. (1978). Why Won’t Directors Rock the Boat? Harvard Business Review, 10-18.
56.Perez, G. F. (2002). Inherited control and firm performance. Columbia University, Working Paper.
57.Pollack, R. A. (1985). A Transaction Cost Approach to Families and Households. Journal of Economic Literature, 23(2), 581–608.
58.Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy. New York, Free
59.Premkumar, G. (2003). A Meta-Analysis of Research on Information Technology Implementation in Small Business. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 13(2), 91-121.
60.Ronald, C. A. & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58, 1301-1329.
61.Ramanujam, V. & Varadarajan, P. (1989). Research on Corporate Diversification:A Hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 10(6), 523-551.
62.Reed, R. & Margaret, R. (1989). CEO Experience and Diversification StrategyFit. The Journal of Management Studies, 26(3), 251-270.
63.Schein, E. H. (1995). The role of the founder in creating organizational culture. Family Business Review, 8(3), 221‐238.
64.Sirmon, D. & Hitt, M. (2003). Managing resources: linking unique resources, management and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 27(4), 339‐358.
65.Sciascia, S. & Mazzola, P. (2008). Family involvement in ownership and management: Exploring nonlinear effects on performance. Family Business Review, 21(4), 331-345.
66.Simerly, R. L. & Li, M. (2000). Environmental dynamism, capital structure and　performance: A theoretical integration and an empirical test. Strategic　Management Journal, 21, 31-50.
67.Scherer, F. M. (1980). Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance.　Boston (MA), Houghton Mifflin.
68.Song J. H. (1982). Diversification Strategies and the Experience of Top　Executives of Large Firms:Summary. Strategic Management Journal , 3(4),　377-380.