( 您好!臺灣時間:2021/04/14 21:31
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  


論文名稱(外文):Establishment of Occupational Accident Prediction Model and Optimized Occupational Accident Elimination Solution Evaluation Model
外文關鍵詞:AHPRegression ModelOccupational Accident
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:248
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:13
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1

In recent decades, the construction industry has been followed by rising prices and the government''s public works and flourishing, while behind the development of the construction industry is labor-filled history. Looking at China Business Types of occupational disasters annually in recent years are more than thousand accidental deaths; while the occupational accidents associated with permanent disability events occur each year about 5,000 pieces. Described under the labor inspection report, China''s manufacturing industry, construction industry and the mining industry has been a casualty rate of thousands of people in Japan and Singapore 5-10 times. Not only labor itself was unfortunate accident disability or even death, their families, factories or companies, as well as social, occupational accidents must also pay a high cost of tangible and intangible. How to accurately and efficiently predict and construct programs to eliminate occupational accidents in order to reduce social losses for occupational hazard prevention research is the basic concept. Therefore, this paper aims to explore the construction industry occupational hazard prevention in practice to optimize assessment program, this study collected 2002-2011 Council of Labor Affairs of serious occupational accidents in the construction industry as a keyword, collect relevant material construction industry fatality accident has more than a thousand pieces of cases to explore the basis, according to occupational hazards case Content for case data analysis and classification, can be broken down into safety engineering methods, techniques missing, environmental loss, management factors, specifically told that automatically checks, safety and health education, health and safety training other eight for data analysis, followed by AHP, established occupational hazard type hierarchy structure model and type of occupational hazard model to analyze the relative weights continue to construct optimal occupational hazard Lingo program evaluation model, in order to reduce the construction industry the incidence of occupational hazard. Focus of the study except for the first and second stages construct predictive models and types of occupational hazards occupational hazard optimization program evaluation model, and the third phase for the case studies, which aim to verify the research model and further conclusions and future research directions although it is the case of the proposed research data analysis, research method should be extended to the general case studies, comparative reference for subsequent discretion.

中文摘要 I
誌 謝 V
Contents VII
Tables IX
Figures XI
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Motivation and Purpose 1
1.2 Scope and Assumptions of Study 9
1.3 Research Process 9
Chapter 2 Literature Review 11
2.1 Occupational Accidents 11
2.1.1 Basic Model of the Occurrence of an Occupational Accident and its Causes 15
2.1.2 Types and media of occupational accidents commonly seen at construction sites 25
2.1.3 Characteristics of Occupational Accidents and Discussion on Current Status 27
2.1.4 Investigation on Occupational Accidents in Construction Industry 35
2.1.5 Study of Occupational Accidents in Major Public Construction Projects 42
2.1.6 Public Safety in the Construction Industry 42
2.2 Analytic Hierarchy Process 45
2.2.1 Basic Assumptions of AHP 46
2.2.2 Hierarchy and Factors of AHP 47
2.2.3 Evaluation scale of AHP 47
2.2.4 Establishment of Paired Comparison Matrix 48
2.2.5 Calculation of Eigenvectors 49
2.2.6 Verification of Consistency 50
Chapter 3 Model Establishment and Derivation 52
3.1 Problem Description and Definition 52
3.2 Structure of Study 54
3.3 Optimized Occupational Accident Solution Evaluation Model 55
Chapter 4 Results and Analysis 58
4.1 Analysis on the Weights of Evaluation Criteria 58
4.2 Establishment and Analysis of Evaluation Model 59
4.3 Case Study in Model 60
Chapter 5 Conclusion and Suggestions 62
5.1 Conclusion 62
5.2 Suggestions and Prospects 63
References 64

[13]鄧振源、曾國雄,「層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(下) 」,中國統計學報,第二十七卷,第七期,1989,第1-19頁。
[15]C. H. Loch and S. Kavadias, "Dynamic portfolio selection of NPD programs using marginal returns," Management Science, Vol. 48, No. 10, 2002, pp. 1227-1241.
[16]E. K. R. E. Huizingh and H. C. J. Vrolijk, "Decision support for information systems management : Applying analytic hierarchy process," University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM, 1995.
[17]E. W. L. Cheng and H. Li, "Analytic hierarchy process: an approach to determine measures for business performance," Measuring Business Excellence, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2001, pp. 30-37.
[18]P. K. Dey and S. S. Gupta, "Feasibility Analysis of Cross-country Pipeline Projects: A Quantitative Approach," Project Management Journal, Vol. 32, No. 4, 2001, pp. 50-58.
[19]R. Eugene and P. K. Dey, "The role of environmental factors in industrial site selection activities: A case of limestone quarry expansion in Barbados," Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2005, pp.147-154.
[20]S. A. Mian and N.D. Christine, "Decision-making over the project life cycle: An analytical hierarchy approach," Project Management Journal, Vol. 30, No. 1, 1999, pp. 40-52.
[21]T. L. Saaty and L. G. Vargas, Prediction, projection, and forecasting : applications of the analytic hierarchy process in economics, finance, politics, games, and sports, Boston : Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991.
[22]T. L. Saaty, PageThe Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, New York:McGraw-Hill, 1980.

第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔