臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

資訊管理在過去三十年，歷經資訊科技的進步與資訊應用層次的提昇，學術研究則不斷地整理或驗證既有理論，並發展更高解釋或解決問題能力的新理論。歷年來沒有針對國外IS理論發表狀況調查，它的發展趨勢如何，為了瞭解學者研究IS理論方向的概況，本研究以量化指標去分析1993-2002年和2003-2012來IS理論變化趨勢，每個時期皆有相似(前10年)或相異(後10年)發展的理論，賽局理論是許多學者熱門研究的理論，科技接受模式理論和動態能力理論是近年來，學者趨向發展的新興理論。
本研究顯示在2008-2012時期，前10名理論發展量呈現大量增加，學者的研究能力與產出蓬勃發展。
從這20年來看，兩個時期理論發展有明顯的不同，可以觀察到兩個主要方向(趨勢A、B)之IS理論變化趨勢：趨勢A，IS理論發展的相似性很高，偏向組織管理和社會面；趨勢B，IS理論發展相異性有三個理論包括: 科技接受模式理論、動態能力理論、體制理論，亦擴及個人面，為近年來發展的理論。利用Gephi建立理論之間的關係，最有相關性為賽局理論和演化論、科技接受模式理論和計畫行為理論、體制理論和代理理論。
關鍵字:IS理論，發表數，引用數，趨勢分析

In the past three decades, information management has not only upgraded its technology but also promoted its application. Academic research on this field has been developing new theories with higher definitions or more problem-solving capabilities by constantly refreshing or verifying the existing theories. However, over the years, there has not been any research published on the development of foreign information system (IS) theory. In order to get general ideas about what the scholars have studied about the IS theory, this study adopts the quantitative indicators to analyze the trend IS theory in the periods of both 1993-2002 and 2003-2012, finding out that there are similarities (the former 10 years) and differences (the latter 10 years) on each period. Many scholars have been studying Game theory while Technology acceptance model and Dynamic capabilities are becoming more and more popular these years.
The results show that in the 2008-2012 period, the top 10 have a significant increase on theory developments and academic research was flourishing.
From the two 10-year terms, significant different theoretical developments can be observed and two main aspects (tendency A and B) of the IS theories can be noted. Tendency A with highly similar IS theory development focuses on organization management and societies; tendency B, the latest, with three different IS theory developments, Technology acceptance model, Dynamic capabilities, and Institutional theory, far extends its research to even the individuality. Use Gephi to establish the relationship between theories, the most relevant pairs are Game theory and Evolutionary theory, Technology acceptance model and Theory of planned behavior, and Institutional theory and Agency theory.

Keywords: IS theory, the number of published articles, citations, tendency analysis

書名頁………………………………………………………………………… i
論文口試委員審定書………………………………………………………… ii
授權書……………………………………………………………………… iii
中文摘要……………………………………………………………………… vii
英文摘要……………………………………………………………………… ix
誌謝…………………………………………………………………………… xi
目錄…………………………………………………………………………… xii
表目錄………………………………………………………………………… xiv
圖目錄……………………………………………………………………… xvi
第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………………… 1
第一節 背景…………………………………………………………… 1
第二節 動機…………………………………………………………… 1
第三節 研究目的……………………………………………………… 2
第二章 文獻探討…………………………………………………………… 3
第一節 資訊管理理論………………………………………………… 3
第二節 資訊管理研究發展的概況…………………………………… 4
第三章 研究方法…………………………………………………………… 8
第一節 研究流程……………………………………………………… 8
第二節 資料來源……………………………………………………… 9
第三節 資料搜尋步驟………………………………………………… 10
第四節 資料統計結果與說明………………………………………… 10
第四章 研究分析與結果…………………………………………………… 15
第一節 IS理論的趨勢發展…………………………………………… 15
第二節 主流理論消長……………………………………………… 24
第三節 IS理論研究之多元尺寸分析與比較……………………… 26
第四節 IS理論熱門分析…………………………………………… 29
第五節 IS理論關係…………………………………………………… 39
第五章 結論與研究貢獻及限制…………………………………………… 42
第一節 研究發現……………………………………………………… 42
第二節 研究貢獻……………………………………………………… 42
第三節 研究限制……………………………………………………… 43
第四節 討論…………………………………………………………… 43
參考文獻……………………………………………………………………… 45

1. 李明宗, 國內大學教師研究能量之表現, in 暨南大學經濟學系學位論文2011, 暨南國際大學. p. 1-55.
2. 唐震 and 謝宗憲, 以TSSCI為例探討學術共同著作現象. 企業管理學報, 2009(81): p. 43-83.
3. 梁定澎, 資訊管理理論. 2012.
4. 梁定澎 and 陳燈能, 資訊管理研究主題的趨勢分析. 資訊管理學報, 2005. 12(2): p. 1-24.
5. 陳禹辰, 簡志宏, and 陳彥良, 1999至2003年臺灣地區管理學門學術期刊發表成果分析. 管理與系統, 2005. 12(4): p. 99-127.
6. 傅雅秀, 從生命科學期刊論文作者數探討科學合作. Information Studies, 2002(17): p. 71-80.
7. 黃三益, et al., 臺灣資訊管理學術單位在學術期刊上的發表狀況之研究. 資訊管理學報, 2002. 9(1): p. 217-239.
8. 楊存一, 利用自適應共振理論網路探討 MIS 學術論文關鍵議題的發展趨勢. 雲林科技大學, 資訊管理研究所碩士論文, 2001.
9. Armitage, C.J. and M. Conner, Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta‐analytic review. British journal of social psychology, 2001. 40(4): p. 471-499.
10. Bruns, A., HOW LONG IS A TWEET? MAPPING DYNAMIC CONVERSATION NETWORKS ON TWITTER USING GAWK AND GEPHI. Information, Communication & Society, 2011. 15(9): p. 1323-1351.
11. Eisenhardt, K.M. and J.A. Martin, Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic management journal, 2000. 21(10-11): p. 1105-1121.
12. Farhoomand, A. and D.H. Drury, A historiographical examination of information systems. Communications of the AIS, 1999. 1(5es): p. 4.
13. Grant, R.M., Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic management journal, 1996. 17: p. 109-122.
14. Grant, R.M., Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization science, 1996. 7(4): p. 375-387.
15. Hall, C.S. and G. Lindzey, Theory of personality, 1957, New York: John Wiley.
16. Haykin, S., Cognitive radio: brain-empowered wireless communications. Selected Areas in Communications, IEEE Journal on, 2005. 23(2): p. 201-220.
17. Kruskal, J. and M. Wish, Multidimensional scaling. 1978. Beverly Hills, CA.
18. Lee, M.R. and T.T. Chen, Revealing research themes and trends in knowledge management: From 1995 to 2010. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2012. 28: p. 47-58.
19. Lee, Y., Z. Lee, and S. Gosain, The Evolving Intellectual Diversity of the IS Discipline: Evidence from the Referent Disciplines. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2004. 13(1): p. 33.
20. Mitchell, R.K., B.R. Agle, and D.J. Wood, Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of management review, 1997: p. 853-886.
21. Price, D.d.S., Little Science, Big Science. 1963.
22. Taylor, S. and P.A. Todd, Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information systems research, 1995. 6(2): p. 144-176.
23. Teece, D.J., G. Pisano, and A. Shuen, Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, 1997. 18(7): p. 509-533.
24. Venkatesh, V. and F.D. Davis, A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management science, 2000. 46(2): p. 186-204.
25. Venkatesh, V., et al., User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 2003: p. 425-478.
26. Whitley, E.A. and R.D. Galliers, An alternative perspective on citation classics: Evidence from the first 10 years of the European Conference on Information Systems. Information & Management, 2007. 44(5): p. 441-455.