跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.9.173) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/10 04:59
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:徐力
研究生(外文):Timothy McBush HIELE
論文名稱:什麼是服務創新:一個文獻綜述
論文名稱(外文):What is Service Innovation: A Comprehensive Literature Review
指導教授:彭奕農彭奕農引用關係
指導教授(外文):Yi-Nung Peng
口試委員:黃文曄林希偉林博文謝傑任
口試委員(外文):Wen-Yeh HuangShi-Woei LinBou-Wen LinJie-Ren Shie
口試日期:2012-07-23
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:元智大學
系所名稱:經營管理碩士班(企業管理)
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2012
畢業學年度:101
語文別:英文
論文頁數:85
中文關鍵詞:服務創新
外文關鍵詞:Service innovation
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:624
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
在21世紀中,服務創新的概念以日益重要。在許多文獻中回顧到服務準則在服務創新上有各式各樣的解釋,亦即從傳統的角度演變至新興的創新服務之想法。在演變的過程中,激發了產品與服務間觀點的不同之辯論。此研究主要探討服務創新的六個服務準則:行銷、科技創新管理、服務操作、公開服務創新、服務導向邏輯,以及服務科學。除此之外,此研究的目的為: (1)將服務創新以有條理且全面性的方向界定清楚定義 (2) 在六個服務準則中介定關係、共性,或/和服務創新的不同在服務準則中的定義上。本研究利用文獻提供一個有系統具深度且有系統一系列的根本服務準則,其中強調服務創新的概念。然而,此分析與發現是根據傳統的服務衡量標準:科技創新管理、服務操作為主要準則來界定服務創新。而在新興的服務準則:服務創新、服務導向邏輯,以及服務科學提供了服務創新概念上的貢獻,然而尚未實證服務創新的基本準則。
The concept of service innovation has becoming an important thought in this 21st century. The literature reviews on the service disciplines expose a variety of interpretations about the aspect of service innovation, transitioning from the traditional perspective to the new emerging perspective. This stimulates the debate solely based on the goods-versus-services viewpoints. The research is aiming to explore service innovation from six service disciplines: marketing, technology innovation management (TIM), service operations (SO), open service innovation (OSI), service-dominant logic (S-DL), and service science (SS). Furthermore, the aim of this research is: (i) to define service innovation in a coherent or comprehensively manner and, (ii) to determine the relationships, commonalities, and/or differences of service innovation among the six disciplines. The research introduces the literature review method to offer a systematic in depth coverage of the fundamental principles which underlie the concept of service innovation. However, the analysis and findings based on the evaluation of the measurement aspects proved that traditional disciplines: marketing, technology innovation management (TIM), service operations (SO) are the key disciplines to define service innovation. The new emerging service disciplines: open service innovation (OSI), service-dominant logic (S-DL), and service science (SS) are providing dynamic contributions towards the concept of service innovation but are yet to verify the fundamental premises with empirical evidence.
Inside Cover i
Chinese Abstract ii
English Abstract iii
Acknowledgement iv
Table of Contents v
List of Tables viii
List of Figures ix
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Introduction 1
1.2 Research Questions 2
Chapter 2 Literature Review 4
2.1 The Need to Study Service Innovation 4
2.2 Service Innovation 5
2.2.1 Interaction 5
2.2.2 Process 6
2.2.3 Participation 6
2.2.4 Experience 7
2.2.5 Performance 7
2.2.6 Co-creation/production 8
2.2.7 Ideas/knowledge creation 8
2.2.8 New solutions 9
2.3 The Service Disciplines 9
2.3.1 Marketing 10
2.3.2 Technology Innovation Management 12
2.3.3 Service Operations 13
2.3.4 Open Service Innovation 15
2.3.5 Service-Dominant Logic 16
2.3.6 Service Science 18
2.4 The Missing Gaps from the Literature Reviews 20
Chapter 3 Research Methodology 21
3.1 Literature Review Method 21
3.2 Research Framework 23
Chapter 4 Discussion and Synthesize Analysis 26
4.1 Analytical Overview of Studies on Service Innovation 26
4.2 Analysis on each Service Innovation Disciplines 26
4.2.1 Service Innovation on Marketing 27
4.2.2 Service Innovation on Technology Innovation Management 28
4.2.3 Service Innovation on Service Operations 29
4.2.4 Open Service Innovation 30
4.2.5 Service Innovation on Service-Dominant Logic 31
4.2.6 Service Innovation on Service Science 33
4.3 Synthesize Analysis on Service Disciplines 34
4.3.1 Traditional Service Disciplines 35
4.3.2 New Emerging Service Disciplines 35
4.3.3 The Commonalities and Differences among the Disciplines 36
4.4 The Obstacles on the Analysis of Service Disciplines 39
4.5 Linking Service Disciplines to Service Innovation Solutions 40
4.6 Evaluation of the Measurement Tools in each Service Discipline 45
4.7 Definition of Service Innovation 47
Chapter 5 Conclusion and Recommendations 48
5.1 The Fundamental Values of Service Innovation Research 48
5.2 Present Potential Research Contributions 49
5.3 The Managerial Implications 50
5.4 Research Limitations 51
5.5 Future Research Agenda: The Way Forward 51
References 54
Appendix 62
1. Alter, S. (2008). Service system innovation. Information Technology in the Service Economy: Challenges and Possibilities for The 21st Century. Eds. Barrett, M., Davidson, E., Middleton, C., & DeGross, JI: 267, 61-80.
2. Anxo, D. & Storrie, D. (2002). The job creation potential of the service sector in Europe. European Review of Labour and Research, 8(3), 377-391.
3. Baron, S., & Warnaby, G. (2011). Value Co-Creation from the Consumer Perspective. In: Demirkan H, Spohrer, JC and Krishna V eds. Service Systems Implementation Springer, 199-210.
4. Berry, L.L., Carbone, L.P., & Haeckel, S.H. (2002). Managing the total customer experience. MIT Sloan Management Review, 43(3), 85–89.
5. Berry, L.L., Wall, E.A., & Carbone, L.P. (2006). Service Clues and Customer Assessment of the Service Experience: Lessons from Marketing. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(2), 43-57.
6. Berry, L.L., Shankar, V., Parish, J.T., Cadwallader, S. & Dotz, T. (2006a). Creating New Markets Through Service Innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(2), 56-63.
7. Bessant, J., & Davies, A. (2007). Managing Service Innovation: Innovation in Services, UK Department of Trade and Industry, 9, 61-96.
8. Bitner, M.J., Ostrom, A.L., & Morgan, F.N. (2008). Service Blueprinting: A practical Technique for Service Innovation. California Management Review, 50 (3), 66-94.
9. Bitran, R.G. & Lojo, M. (1993). A Framework for Analyzing Service Operation. European Management Journal, 11(3), 271-282.
10. Bjork, J., & Magnusson, M. (2009). Where Do Good Innovation Ideas Come From? Exploring the Influence of Network Connectivity on Innovation Idea Quality. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(6), 662-670.
11. Bolton, R. & Shruti, S.I. (2009). Interactive Services: Framework, Synthesis, and Research Directions. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23 (1), 91-104.
12. Cai, H., Chung, J.Y., & Su, H. (2008). Relooking at services science and services innovation. Service Oriented Computing and Applications, 2(1), 1-14.
13. Chesbrough, H. (2003a). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
14. Chesbrough, H. (2003). The Era of Open Innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 35-41.
15. Chesbrough, H. (2005). Toward a science of service. Harvard Business Review, 83, 16-17.
16. Chesbrough, H. & Appleyard, M.M. (2007). Open innovation and strategy. California Management Review, 50 (1), 57–76.
17. Chesbrough, H. (2011). Open Services Innovation: Rethinking Your Business to Grow and Compete in a New Era, CA: Jossey-Bass.
18. Chesbrough, H. (2011). Bringing Open Innovation to Services. MIT Sloan Management Review, 52(2), 85-90.
19. Coombs, R. & Miles, R. (2000). Innovation, measurement and services: The new Problematique. In: Metcalfe, J.S., Miles, I. (Eds), Innovation systems in the service economy, Measurement and case study analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 85-103.
20. Cunningham, L.F., Young, C.E. & Gerlach, J. (2009). A comparison of consumer views of traditional services and self-service technologies. Journal of Services Marketing, 11-23.
21. Dahlander, L., & Gann, D.M. (2010). How open is innovation? Research Policy, 39(6), 699-709.
22. Drejer, I. (204). Identifying innovation in surveys of services: a Schumpeterian perspective. Research Policy, 33, 551-562.
23. Eiglier, P., & Langeard, E. (1987). Servuction le marketing des services. Paris, McGraw Hill.
24. Erik J, d. V. (2006). Innovation in services in networks of organizations and in the distribution of services. Research Policy, 35(7), 1037-1051.
25. Fulvio, C. (2008). Technological paradigms, regimes and trajectories: Manufacturing and service industries in a new taxonomy of sectoral patterns of innovation. Research Policy, 37(6-7), 978-994.
26. Gadrey, J., Gallouj F & Weinstein, O. (1995). New modes of innovation: How services benefit industry. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 6 (3), 4-16.
27. Gadrey, J., & Gallouj, F. (2002). Productivity, innovation and knowledge in services: New economic and socio-economic approaches. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
28. Gallouj, F., & Weinstein, O. (1997). Innovation in services. Research Policy, 26(4-5), 537-556.
29. Gallouj, F., & Windrum, P. (2009). Services and services innovation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 30(3), 141-148.
30. Gassmann, O. (2006). Opening up the innovation process: towards an agenda. R&D Management Journal, 36(3), 223-228.
31. Gassmann, O., & Enkel, E. (2006). Towards a Theory of Open Innovation: Three Core Process Archetypes. R&D Management Journal.
32. Gassmann, O., Enkel, E., & Chesbrough, H. (2010). The future of open innovation. R&D Management Journal, 40 (3), 213-221.
33. Gittell, J.H. (2002). Relationships Between Service Providers and Their Impact on Customers. Journal of Service Research, 4(4), 299-311.
34. Goldstein, S.M., Johnson, R., Duffy, J., & Rao, J. (2002). The service concept: the missing link in service design research? Journal of Operations Management, 20, 121-134.
35. Gronross, C. (1998). Marketing services: the case of a missing product. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 13(4-5), 322-338.
36. Grönroos, C. (2006). Adopting a service logic for marketing. Marketing Theory, 6(3), 317-333.
37. Gummesson, E., Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L (2010). Transitioning from service management to service-dominant logic: Observations and recommendations. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 2(1), 8-22.
38. Gutek, B.A., Groth, M., & Cherry, B. (2002). Achieving service success through relationships and enhanced encounters. Academy of Management Executive, 16(4), 132-144.
39. Hipp, C., & Grupp, H. (2005). Innovation in the service sector: The demand for service-specific innovation measurement concepts and typologies. Research Policy, 34(4), 517-535.
40. Howells, J. (2004). Innovation, Consumption and Services: Encapsulation and the Combinatorial Role of Services. The Service Industries Journal, 24(1), 19-36.
41. Hughes, A., & Wood, E. (2000). Rethinking Innovation Comparisons Between Manufacturing and Services: The Experience of the CBR SME Surveys in the UK. In: Metcalfe, J.S., Miles, I. (Eds), Innovation systems in the service economy, Measurement and case study analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 105-124.
42. IFM & IBM. (2007). Succeeding through Services Innovation: A discussion paper, University of Cambridge Institute for Manufacturing.
43. Ina, D. (2004). Identifying innovation in surveys of services: a Schumpeterian perspective. Research Policy, 33(3), 551-562.
44. Johnston, R. (1999). Service operations management: return to roots. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(2), 104-124.
45. Johnston, R. (2005). Service operations management: from the roots up. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(12), 1298-1308.
46. Katzan, H.Jr. (2008). Service Science: Concepts, Technology, Management, iUniverse.
47. Kim, H. (2009). Service Science for Service Innovation. Journal of Service Science, 1-7.
48. Kowalkowski, C. (2010). What does a service-dominant logic really mean for manufacturing firms? CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 3, 285-292.
49. Lewis, F.D (1979). Explaining the Shift of Labor from Agriculture to Industry in the United States: 1869 to 1899. The Journal of Economic History, 39(3), 681-698.
50. Lusch, R.F., Vargo, S.L. & O’Brien, M. (2007). Competing through service: Insights from service-dominant logic. Journal of Retailing, 83(1), 5-18.
51. Lusch, R.F., Vargo, S.L., & Wessels, G. (2008). Toward a conceptual foundation for service science: Contributions from service-dominant logic. IBM Systems Journal, 47(1), 5-14.
52. Maglio, P.P., & Spohrer, J. (2007). The emergence of service science: Toward systematic service innovations to accelerate co-creation of value. Production and Operations Management.
53. Maglio, P.P., & Spohrer. J. (2008). Fundamentals of service science. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 18-20.
54. Maglio, P.P., Vargo, S.L., Caswell, N., & Spohrer, J. (2009). The service system is the basic abstraction of service science. Information System and e-Business Management, 7, 395-406.
55. Malerba, F. & Orsenigo, L. (1995). Schumpeterian patterns of innovation. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 47-65.
56. Menor, L.J., Tatikonda, M.V., & Sampson, S.E. (2002). New service development: areas for exploitation and exploration. Journal of Operations Management, 20, 135-157.
57. Meuter, M.L., Ostrom, A. L., Roundtree, R.I., & Bitner, M.J. (2000). Self-Service technology: Understanding customer satisfaction with technology-based service encounters. Journal of Marketing, 64, 50-64.
58. Michel, S., Brown, S.W., & Gallan, A. S. (2008). An expanded and strategic view of discontinuous innovations: deploying a service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academic Marketing Science, 36, 54-66.
59. Michel, S., Brown, S.W., Gallan, A.S. (2008), Service logic innovations: How to Innovate Customers, Not Products. California Management Review, 50 (3), 49-65.
60. Nam, K., & Lee, N.H. (2010). Typology of Service Innovation from Service-Dominant Logic Perspective. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 16(13), 1761-1775.
61. Nesse, P. J. (2009). Open service innovation in telecom industry – case study of partnership models enabling 3’rd party development of novel mobile services, Telenor Research & Innovation, Service Innovation Group.
62. Nie, W., & Kellogg, D.L (1999). How Professors of Operations Management view Service Operations? Production and Operations Management Society, 8(3), 339-355.
63. Nijssen, E.J., Hillebrand, B., Vermeulen, P.A.M., Kemp, R.G.M. (2006). Exploring product and service innovation similarities and differences. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23, 241-251.
64. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2005). Promoting Innovation and Services, Paris.
65. Paton, R.A., & McLauhlin, S. (2008). Services innovation: Knowledge transfer and the supply chain. European Management Journal, 26, 77-83.
66. Preissl, B. (2000). Service innovation: What makes it different? Empirical evidence from Germany. In: Metcalfe, J.S., Miles, I. (Eds), Innovation systems in the Service Economy,” Measurement and Case Study Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 125-148.
67. Shostack, G.L. (1977). Breaking Free from Product Marketing, Journal of Marketing, 41, 73-80.
68. Sirilli, G., & Evangelista, R. (1998). Technological innovation in services and manufacturing: results from Italian surveys. Research Policy, 27, 881-899.
69. Spohrer, J., Anderson, L., Pass, N., & Ager, T. (2008). Service science and service-dominant logic. Otago Forum 2: Academic Papers, 3-18.
70. Sundbo, J., & Gallouj, F. (2000). Innovation as a Loosely Coupled System in Services. In: Metcalfe, J. S., Miles, I. (Eds), Innovation systems in the service economy, Measurement and case study analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 43-68.
71. Varey, R.J. (1995). Internal marketing: a review and some interdisciplinary research challenges. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 6(1), 40-63.
72. Vargo, S.L., & Lusch, R.F. (2004). The Four Service Marketing Myths: Remnants of a Goods-Based, Manufacturing model. Journal of Service Research, 6(4), 324-335.
73. Vargo, S.L., & Lusch, R.F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1-17.
74. Vargo, S.L., & Lusch, R.F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academic of Marketing Science, 36, 1-10.
75. Vargo, S.L., & Akaka, M.A. (2009). Service-Dominant Logic as a Foundation for Service Science: Clarifications. Service Science, 1(1), 32-41.
76. Voss, C., & Hsuan, J. (2011). Service Science: The Opportunity to Re-think What We Know About Service Design: The Service Science Systems. In H. Demirkan, J.C. Spohrer & V. Krishna (Eds): Springer US, 231-244.
77. Vries, E.J. (2006). Innovation in services in networks of organizations and in the distribution of services. Research Policy, 35(7), 1037-1051.
78. Zeithaml, V.A., Parasuraman, A., & Berry, L.L. (1985). Problems and Strategies in Services Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49, 33-46.
電子全文 電子全文(本篇電子全文限研究生所屬學校校內系統及IP範圍內開放)
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top