1.王瑞壎,「OECD組織PISA 評量對國小數學與科學教育之啟示」,科學教育研究與發展季刊,第二十七期,39-55頁,民國九十一年六月。2.張貴琳,「影響學生學科素養表現的社經地位因素探究-OECD與北歐地區PISA研究觀點」,中等教育,第六十二卷第一期,110 -121頁,民國一百年三月。
3.丁信中,「芬蘭中學生PISA科學成就優異表現及其相關因素之探討:2007歐洲科學教育學術參訪反思」,科學教育,第三一六期,2-19頁,民國九十八年三月。4.孔維新,傅祖壇,2008,「以學生為本位之大學商學院之表現評估-保證區域資料包絡分析法之應用」,經濟論文叢刊,第三十六卷第四期,483-514頁,民國九十七年十二月。5.台灣PISA國家研究中心,http://pisa.nutn.edu.tw/。
6.林佑俊,「國籍民用航空公司績效評估」,國立中央大學,碩士論文,民國九十五年。7.吳明芬,「台灣國際觀光旅館績效評估-Context-Dependent DEA之應用」,東吳大學,博士論文,民國九十八年。8.徐作聖,陳仁帥,「中正理工學院教育資源運用效率之研究」,高雄師大學報,第十九期,61-79頁,民國九十四年十二月。
9.許信儀,「消費者觀點之製藥廠商績效評估:情境依賴Context-Dependent DEA模式之方法與應用」,國立台北大學,碩士論文,民國九十九年。10.黃彥超,「影響學生學習表現之學校與系統因素探討:以PISA 2006年之結果為例」,學校行政,第六十三期,115 -130頁,民國九十八年九月。11.楊淑萍,林煥祥,「由家庭經濟資源及文化資源探討我國學生在PISA科學、數學素養的表現」,科學教育學刊,第十八卷第六期,547 -562頁,民國九十九年十二月。12.溫玲玉,李文清,「臺灣地區科技大學辦學相對效率之評估-DEA與超效率模式之應用」,彰化師大教育學報,第十三期,121-148頁,民國九十七年六月。13.盧永祥,傅祖壇,「產出品質、組織特性與臺灣高等技職院校之經營效率」,管理評論,第二十六卷第二期,1-21頁,民國九十六年四月。14.Aristovnik, A. “Measuring relative efficiency in health and education sector: the case of east European countries”, Actual Problems of Economics, 136(10), pp. 305-314, 2012.
15.Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E. “Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units”, European Journal of Operational Research, 3(4), pp. 339, 1979.
16.Cheng, H., Lu, Y. C., Chung, J. T. “Assurance region context-dependent DEA with an application to Taiwanese hotel industry”, International Journal of Operational Research, 8 (3), pp. 292-312, 2010.
17.Dominguez, M., Vieira, M.-J., Vidal, J. “The impact of the programme for international student assessment on academic journals, assessment in education: principles”, Policy and Practice, 19 (4), pp. 393-409, 2012.
18.Feniger, Y., Livneh, I., Yogev, A. “Globalization and the politics of international tests: The case of Israel”, Comparative Education, 48 (3), pp. 323-335, 2012.
19.Fried, H. O., C. A. K. Lovell, S. S. Schmidt, S. Yaisawarng. “Accounting for Environmental Effects and Statistical Noise in Data Envelopment Analysis”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 17, pp. 157-174, 2002.
20.Kong, W.-H., Fu, T.-T. “Assessing the performance of business colleges in Taiwan using data envelopment analysis and student based value-added performance indicators”, Omega, 40(5), pp. 541-549, 2012.
21.Lu, W. M., Hung, S. W. “Benchmarking the operating efficiency of global telecommunication firms”, International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 7 (4), pp. 737-750, 2008.
22.Mancebon, M.-J., Calero, J., Choi, A.,Ximenez-De-Embun, D.P. “The efficiency of public and publicly subsidized high schools in Spain: Evidence from PISA-2006”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 63 (11) , pp. 1516-1533, 2012.
23.OECD, The programme for international student assessment, from the World Wide Web: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/.
24.Seiford L. M., Zhu J. “Context-dependent data envelopment analysis - Measuring attractiveness and progress”, Omega, 31 (5) , pp. 397-408, 2003.
25.Shapira, M. “An exploration of differences in mathematics attainment among immigrant pupils in 18 OECD countries”, European Educational Research Journal, 11 (1), pp. 68-95, 2012.
26.Sungmook Lim, Hyerim Bae, Loo Hay Lee. “A study on the selection of benchmarking paths in DEA”, Expert Systems with Applications, 38(6), pp. 7665-7673, 2011.
27.Ulucan, A., Bariş Atici, K. “Efficiency evaluations with context-dependent and measure-specific data envelopment approaches: An application in a World Bank supported project”, Omega, 38 (1-2) , pp. 68-83, 2010.
28.Wei, C. K., Chen, L. C., Li, R. K., Tsai, C.H., and Huang, H.L. “A study of optimal weights of Data Envelopment Analysis – Development of a context-dependent DEA-R model”, Management Science, 39, pp. 4599-4608, 2012